Delhi Court January 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Anil Kumar vs.puneet Kaur@poonam & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-27-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: January 27, 2017 + MAC.APP. 36/2008 ANIL KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Mukesh Kaushik, Advocate Versus PUNEET KAUR @ POONAM & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Advocate for respondent No.3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % ORAL1 JUDGMENT Impugned Award of 29th September, 2007 grants compensation of `69,140/- with interest @9% p.a. to appellant due to grievous injuries suffered by him in a road accident on 16th May, 1998. Impugned Award directs owner of vehicle in question to pay the compensation and absolves respondent-insurer, as the driver of vehicle in question was found to be not possessing any driving license. In this appeal, a direction is sought to respondent-insurer to pay the awarded amount and to recover it from the owner of vehicle in question. Impugned Award denies loss of income of `54,000/- by observing that notionally there was no loss of income because appellant-injured had availed earned...
Icici Bank Ltd vs.jai Praksh Tyagi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-27-2017
$~A-48 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:27. 01.2017 + CM(M) 90/2017 and CM No.3007/2017 ICICI BANK LTD Through versus JAI PRAKSH TYAGI Through ........ Petitioner Mr.Puneet K.Bhalla, Ms. Chetna Bhalla, Advs ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(Oral) CM No.3007/2017 (Exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CM(M) 90/2017 1. An advance copy of the petition has been sent to the respondent but none is present on behalf of the respondent.2. By the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioner seeks to impugn the order dated 13.01.2017 of the trial court by which summons were issued in the suit and no orders were passed in the application filed by the petitioner for appointment of a receiver in taking the custody of the hypothecated vehicle.3. The petitioner has filed a suit for recovery of Rs.2,71,170.64/-. It is Page 1 of 5 stated that the respondent had approached the petit...
Vijay Mehta vs.association of Apartment Owners of New Delhi House ( Re ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-27-2017
$~A-60 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. h January, 2017 + C.R.P. 27/2015 & CM No.31088/2016 VIJAY MEHTA Through Mr.Peeyoosh Kalra, Mr.Sudhindra Babbar, ........ Petitioner Tripathi & Ms.Sona Advocates versus ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT OWNERS OF NEW DELHI HOUSE ( REGD ) Through Ms.Sunita Bhardwaj, Advocate ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) C.R.P. 27/2015 1. Present petition was filed seeking to impugn the judgment dated 19.8.2014 passed by the appellate court dismissing the appeal of the petitioners to the extent of maintenance of status quo regarding non- declaration of results of the governing body elections of New Delhi House Flat Owners Association (Regd.) (hereinafter referred to as NDHFOA).2. This court on 25.2.2016 disposed of the petition partly modifying the impugned order. The court noted that the impugned order has set aside the observations that NDHFOA is non-existent. It also noted the submission of t...
Aon Services India Private Limited vs.aon Hr Services India Private Li ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-25-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved On:14. 12.2016 Judgment Pronounced On:25. 01.2017 CO.PET.1025/2016 AON SERVICES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ..Petitioner/Transferor Company No.1 AND AON SPECIALIST SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED ..Petitioner/Transferor Company No.2 AND HEWITT HUMAN RESOURCE SERVICES LIMITED ..Petitioner/Transferor Company No.3 AND HEWITT OUTSOURCING SERVICES INDIA LIMITED ..Petitioner/Transferor Company No.4 AND AON CONSULTING PRIVATE LIMITED ..Petitioner/Transferee/Demerged Company AND AON HR SERVICES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ..Petitioner/Resulting Company CO.PET.1025/2016 Page 1 of 1 CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.1. The present petition has been filed jointly under Sections 391, 393 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) by Aon Services India Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as Transferor Company No.1), Aon Specialist Services Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as Transf...
Mendine Pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-25-2017
% + W.P.(C) 229/2017 MENDINE PHARMACEUTICALS PVT LTD UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS Versus : : ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS $~26 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:25. 01.2017 Mr. Gopal Jain, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Snehal Kakrania, Advocates. Mr. Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC for the respondent No.1. Mr. Amit Mahjan, CGSC with Mr. Rishikant Singh, Mr. Nitya Sharma and Ms. Gunjan Sharma, Advocates for respondent No.2. Mr. Joydeep Mazumdar with Mr. Debojyoti Bhattacharya and Mr. Parijat Sinha, Advocates for respondent No.3. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2501.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CM No.1047/2017 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CM No.1048/2017 (permission to file lengthy synopsis and list of dates) For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed. The lengthy synopsis is taken on record. W.P.(C) No.22...
Smt. Mary Francina vs.director of Education and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-25-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) Nos.788/2007 & 810/2007 * + % 1. W.P.(C) No.788/2007 SMT. MARY FRANCINA25h January, 2017 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. S.C. Rana, Advocate. Versus DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Satyakam, ASC for GNCTD.2. W.P.(C) No.810/2007 SMT. K.A.P. RANGAMMAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. S.C. Rana, Advocate. versus DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Satyakam, ASC for GNCTD. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. W.P.(C) Nos.7& 8Page 1 of 11 VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) W.P.(C) No.788/2007 1. By this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks the relief of being granted permanent appointment and/or regularization as an Assistant Teacher in the school run by the respondent no.2/Delhi Tamil Education Association Society.2. The case of the petitioner is that she has been working with the senior secondary sc...
Tapender Giri & Anr. Vs.bimla Devi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-25-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) 102/2017 & C.M. 3201/2017 & 3202/2017 Date of decision: January 25, 2017 TAPENDER GIRI & ANR. Through: Mr. Puneet Goel, Advocate ........ Petitioners Versus BIMLA DEVI AND ORS. Through: Nemo. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % ORAL1 JUDGMENT Vide impugned order of 17th December, 2016, petitioners application for summoning the concerned doctor from Safdarjung Hospital to prove the post mortem report of deceased and concerned official from Police Station Sarojini Nagar, New Delhi to prove the inquest proceedings and another application for appointment of a local commissioner to measure the correct distance between ganda nala to gole chakkar, police chowky, Sector-I, Noida stands dismissed while noting that summoned record stands destroyed and that the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal cannot appoint a Local Commissioner to collect evidence for a party. Challenge to the impugned order by learned counsel for petitione...
Kewal Singh vs.govt. Of n.c.t. Of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-25-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % KEWAL SINGH W.P.(C) No.8793/2015 25th January, 2017 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sourabh Ahuja, Advocate. versus GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Devesh Singh, Advocate for R-1. Mr. Puneet Mittal, Advocate for R-2 and 3. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. Appl. No.19510/2015 (for condonation of delay of 546 days in re- filing the petition) 1.... Petitioner was guilty of repeated misbehavior with the staff of the school including the Head Mistress of the Delhi Public School/respondent nos. 2 and 3. After holding a detailed inquiry in which the petitioner participated, petitioner was inflicted a penalty from removal from services. Appeal filed by the petitioner before the Delhi School Tribunal was unsuccessful because the Delhi School Tribunal (DST) by its judgment dated 7.2.2013 dismissed the appeal of the petitioner. The presen...
Harish Chander Bhola vs.ankit Bajaj
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-25-2017
$~A-35 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:25. 1.2017 RC.REV. 470/2016 & CM No.35673/2017 (stay) HARISH CHANDER BHOLA ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Jayant Advocate Mr.Shashwat Bhardwaj, Advocates Bhushan, Mr.M.S.Vinaik with Senior and % + ANKIT BAJAJ versus ..... Respondent Through Mr.Kirti Uppal, Senior Advocate with Mr.Manjit Singh Ahluwalia and Mr.Harsh Kumar, Advocates Mr.S.P.Mehta, Advocate for the Objector. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. The present Revision Petition is filed under section 25B (8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the DRC Act) seeking to impugn the eviction order passed by the Additional Rent Controller (hereinafter referred to as The ARC) dated 26.7.2016 by which the application for leave to defend filed by the petitioner/tenant was dismissed and an eviction order was passed.2. The respondent/landlord has filed the present Eviction Petition under section 14(1)(e) on grounds of...
Arvind Kumar vs.delhi Sikh Gurudwara Management Committee and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-25-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.13032/2006 % ARVIND KUMAR25h January, 2017 Through: None. ........ Petitioner versus DELHI SIKH GURUDWARA MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE AND ORS. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA Through: None. ........ RESPONDENTS To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner who is working as a Chowkidar with the Guru Harkishan Public School at its Hari Nagar branch, Delhi (represented by respondent nos.2 to4) impugns his transfer order dated 11.7.2006 transferring the petitioner to Guru Harkishan Public School at Loni Road, Delhi.2. The impugned order dated 11.7.2006 reads as under:-" GURU HARKRISHAN PUBLIC SCHOOL HARI NAGAR, NEW DELHI Ref. NO.300/P/GHPS.H.N. Dated:-11th July 06 OFFICE ORDER W.P.(C) No.13032/2006 Page 1 of 3 This is with reference to the letter no.5856/11-13, by the President/General Secy. of the D.S.G.M.C., dated 21st June...
- ‹ Prev
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- Next ›
- Last »