Delhi Court July 2016 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2016 Page 7 of about 67 results (0.021 seconds)New Delhi Municipal Council Vs. Jaswinder Rai
Court: Delhi
1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India impugns the order / judgment dated 26th May, 2011 [of the Additional District Judge-I (ADJ), Patiala House Courts, New Delhi acting as an Appellate Authority under Section 115 of the New Delhi Municipal Council Act, 1994 (NDMC Act)] in House Tax Appeals (HTAs) No.72A/2010 and 73/2010 to 79/2010 preferred by the respondent with respect to assessment by the petitioner New Delhi Municipal Council (NDMC) of Rateable Value for the year 2001-02 and for successive years in respect of Flat No.A-102, 6 Aurangzeb Road, New Delhi. 2. Though the petition came up first before this Court on 3rd September, 2012 but was repeatedly adjourned and notice thereof finally issued only on 19th December, 2014. A counter affidavit has been filed by the respondent and to which a rejoinder has been filed by the petitioner NDMC. The counsels were heard on 16th May, 2016 and 30th May, 2016 and order reserved. 3. The facts are not in dispute. The respo...
Tag this Judgment!Dr. V.K. Agrawal Vs. University of Delhi and Others
Court: Delhi
1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India impugns the order dated 18th August, 2014 of the respondent No.2 Vice-Chancellor of the respondent No.1 University of Delhi allowing the appeal filed by the respondent No.3 Mr. Sandeep Narula against the acceptance by the Election Officer, of the nomination of the petitioner for election to the Executive Council of the University, and consequently disqualifying the petitioner. 2. The petition came up first before this Court on 19th May, 2015 when notice thereof was issued. None appeared for the respondent No.3 despite service. Counter affidavit has been titled by the University and to which a rejoinder has been filed by the petitioner. The counsels were heard on 19th May, 2016 and judgment reserved. 3. It is the case of the petitioner: (a) that the petitioner and the respondent No.3 had filed nomination papers for the election to the Executive Council under Statute 5(1)(x) of the University; (b) that as per Statute 5(1) of...
Tag this Judgment!Surajit Nundy and Others Vs. Management of Mirambika Free Progress Sch ...
Court: Delhi
1. On 3rd July, 2015, after commencing hearing in W.P.(C) No.4535/2015 which alone was before this Court till then, the following order was passed:- 1. The nine petitioners are the parents of seven children out of the total of 149 studying in respondent no.2 The Mirambika Free Progress School at Sri Aurobindo Ashram, Sri Aurobindo Marg, New Delhi established by the respondent no.4 Sri Aurobindo Education Society. They have filed this petition seeking quashing of the decision of the respondent no.1 Management of the said school and the respondents no.2and4, of shifting of the said school from where it has existed for 25 years. Order, prohibiting the school from so shifting and prohibiting the use of the property where the school was earlier functioning for establishing a college, is also sought. 2. Notice of the petition was issued and vide order dated 6th May, 2015, ex parte so far as the respondents no.1,2and4 are concerned, inspection by the respondent no.3 Directorate of Education (...
Tag this Judgment!Madhvi Singh and Others Vs. Pavik Lifestyle Ltd.
Court: Delhi
1. This first appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) impugns the judgment and decree dated 27th May, 2015 of the Court of Additional District Judge (ADJ)-12, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi of dismissal of CS No.245/14/08, I.D. No.02401C0324222008 filed by the appellants/plaintiffs for ejectment of the respondent/defendant from the ground floor of property No.D-2, Maharani Bagh, New Delhi (after determination of tenancy, rent being in excess of Rs.3,500/- per month) and for recovery of arrears and future mesne profits. 2. The appeal came up first before this Court on 4th August, 2015 when notice thereof was issued and Trial Court record requisitioned. Though ordinarily first appeals are being heard after admission and in the category of regulars but finding the impugned judgment to be against the grain of the recent trend of judgments in such suits including of the same learned ADJ and finding the impugned judgment and decree to be causing palpabl...
Tag this Judgment!Guru Singh Sabha and Another Vs. South Delhi Municipal Corporation and ...
Court: Delhi
1. Both petitions concern a plot of land in the layout plan of the residential colony of Greater Kailash, Part-II (GK-II) on which the respondent no.1 South Delhi Municipal Corporation (SDMC) is going ahead with the development/construction of a Community Centre-cum-Club and residential accommodation for its employees. The petitioner in W.P.(C) No.4651/2014 is a Society of the residents of the colony of GK-II which has constructed and manages a Gurudwara adjacent to the said plot of land and has filed this petition objecting to the said development/construction by SDMC inter alia on the ground that the land aforesaid was ear-marked for the purpose of a school and cannot be used for the purpose of a Community Centre-cum-Club and residential accommodation for employees of the SDMC and offering to itself establish a school on the said plot of land. The petitioner in W.P. (C) no.5817/2014 is a Society, also consisting of residents of the colony of GK-II and also objects to the construction...
Tag this Judgment!Aero Club of India and Another Vs. Union of India and Others
Court: Delhi
1. W.P.(C) No.8183/2015 was filed i) impugning the directives dated 17th July, 2015 of the respondent no.2 Airport Authority of India (AAI) to its Northern, Western, Southern and North-Eastern Regional Executive Director a) that pending finalization/approval of Flying Club Policy by the competent authority, raise bills on Flying Clubs and Flying Training Institutes of Category-I as per decision contained in the letter dated 11th January, 2010, b) that all Flying Clubs under Category-I to clear all outstanding dues by 31st August, 2015, and, c) advising all Category-I Flying Clubs that upon non-clearing of dues by 31st August, 2015, their continued occupation from 31st August, 2015 will be treated as unauthorized and necessary action under the Airport Authority of India Act, 1994 (AAI Act) for eviction as unauthorized occupant will be initiated; ii) impugning the consequent demand dated 5th August, 2015 on the petitioner no.2 Delhi Flying Club Pvt. Ltd. (DFC) for Rs.8,30,31,076/- toward...
Tag this Judgment!Neha Aggarwal Vs. PNB Housing Finance Ltd. and Others
Court: Delhi
1. This first appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) impugns the judgment and decree dated 16th March, 2015 of the Court of the Additional District Judge (ADJ)-04 (NW), Rohini District Courts, Delhi of dismissal of CS No.261/14 filed by the appellant/plaintiff consequent to decision against the appellant/plaintiff on the preliminary issue framed in the suit. 2. Notice of the appeal was issued and trial court record requisitioned and though in response thereto the counsels for the respondent no.1 PNB Housing Finance Ltd. (PNBHFL) and respondent no.2 Allahabad Bank appeared but none appeared for the respondent no.3 The South Indian Bank Ltd. (SIBL) despite service. Notice issued to the respondents no.4 to 7 namely Shri Joginder Pal Gupta, Shri Tarun Gupta, Smt. Neelam Gupta and Shri Sita Ram was ordered to be served by publication but the appellant/plaintiff did not get the same effected and on the contrary on 26th April, 2016 the counsel for the appellant/pla...
Tag this Judgment!