Delhi Court February 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Turn browsing into brief-ready notes
Open any judgment and get a structured AI Brief in seconds - plus Semantic Search when you need to hunt by meaning, not keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
VLS Finance Ltd. and Others Vs. BMS it Institute Private Limited and O ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-01-2016
Pradeep Nandrajog, J. 1. We shall be referring to the parties as : (i) VLS, (ii) BMS, (iii) Gupta Group, (iv) Jain Group, (v) Navjeevan, (vi) NPMG, and (vii) Southend. 2. VLS is named VLS Finance Ltd. It was the petitioner in OMP (I) No.114/2015, filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The petition was filed after an award dated March 02, 2015 was pronounced in its favour by an Arbitral Tribunal, as per which the Gupta Group and the Jain Group were liable to pay to VLS a sum of Rs. 84,28,27,987/- (Rupees Eighty Four Crores Twenty Eight Lacs Twenty Seven Thousand Nine Hundred and Eighty Seven only) together with simple interest @ 15% on the sum of Rs. 24,92,00,000/- (Rupees Twenty Four Crores and Ninety Two Lacs only) from October 01, 2012 till date of payment. VLS was to transfer its shareholding in favour of the Gupta Group and the Jain Group in BMS. BMS is named BMS IT Institute Pvt. Ltd. It is a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956. The Gupta...
R.S. Yadav and Another Vs. Sumer Singh Salkan and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-01-2016
Mukta Gupta, J. 1. Following a matrimonial dispute between Sumer Singh Salkan and Reema Salkan, a complaint was made by Reema Salkan to the CAW Cell on March 06, 2003 which resulted in registration of FIR No. 127/2003 dated April 22, 2003 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC at PS Alipur, Delhi. 2. During the course of investigation in the said FIR, Look Out Circular (LOC) and Red Corner Notice (RCN) were issued against Sumer Singh Salkan resulting in the filing of a civil suit being CS(OS) No.2315/2011 for damages for `50 lakhs with interest pendent lite and future @ 12% per annum on account of defamation and malicious prosecution by Sumer Singh Salkan impleading Reema Salkan as defendant No.1, Assistant Director, Interpol, CBI as defendant No.2, Dr.R.K.Bansal, ACP Sub-Division Narela, as defendant No.3, Rupin Sharma, IPS, Head Quarters RandAW, as defendant No.4, R.S.Yadav, Additional Deputy Commissioner of Police, North West District, Delhi as defendant No.5, Ranjeet Narayan, Special Commi...
Ingram Micro India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner, Department of Trade and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-01-2016
Dr. S. Muralidhar, J. 1. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution by Ingram Micro India Pvt. Ltd. ( ˜IMIPL') which is registered as a dealer under the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 ( ˜DVAT Act') and also under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 ( ˜CST Act'). The registration certificate of the Petitioner permits it to deal with electronic goods within the state of Delhi and also undertake inter-state sales and purchases. 2. The challenge in the present petition is to an order dated 12th June 2015 issued by the Assistant Commissioner, Department of Trade and Taxes, Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi ( ˜GNCTD') (Respondent No. 2 herein) rejecting the request made by the Petitioner for issuance of C-Forms in relation to the inter-state purchases made by the Petitioner during the third and fourth quarter of Financial Year ( ˜FY') 2010-11. 3. Earlier by an order dated 28th May 2015 in Writ Petition (C) No. 5836 of 2015, Respon...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›