Delhi Court December 2016 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

AI Brief & Ask
Semantic AI Search
Devil's Bench

Try free for 7 days Semantic AI Search

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Dec 20 2016

Sunil Gupta vs.state and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-20-2016

* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on :20. 12.2016 Reserved on :25. 11.2016 TEST CASE472014 SUNIL GUPTA ..... PETITIONER Through: Mr. Vishnu Anand, Advocate Versus STATE AND ORS. .... DEFENDANTS Through: Mr. Dhanesh Relan, Advocate for R- 1/State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA1 ORDER This petition was filed under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 seeking grant of probate of registered Will dated 24.07.2010 of late Sh. D.R. Gupta son of late Sh. Balwant Rai, then resident of N-155, Panchshila Park, New Delhi-110 017, he having died on 18.03.2014.2. As per the averments set out in the petition, late Sh. D.R. Gupta (the testator of the Will) was a permanent resident of Delhi and during his lifetime had executed the Will dated 24.07.2010 (Ex. PW1/2) as his last testament and Will, in sound state of physical and mental health out of his own free will and volition in the presence of Test Case 47/2014 Page 1 of 9 witnesses Pradeep Aggarwal (PW-2), son of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 20 2016

Sunita vs.the State

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-20-2016

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + SUNITA RESERVED ON :28. h JULY, 2016 DECIDED ON :20. h DECEMBER, 2016 CRL.A.1367/2014 ..... Appellant Through : Mr.B.R.Kaushik, Advocate. versus THE STATE ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.The present appeal is allowed in terms of a detailed common judgment delivered today which is placed in the file of Crl.A.1746/2014 (S.P.GARG) JUDGE titled Naveen vs. The State . DECEMBER20 2016 / tr...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 20 2016

Harnand Bhardwaj vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-20-2016

% + THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:20. 12.2016 W.P.(C) 9101/2014 & CM50142015 BHIM SINGH versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANOTHER AND ...... Petitioner ...... RESPONDENTS ... Petitioner ....... RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner Respondents Petitioners Respondents Petitioner Respondents Page 1 of 29 + W.P.(C) 58/2015 & CM50082015 SUNIL KUMAR versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR + W.P.(C) 68/2015 & CM50182015 BHAGIRATH versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR SATISH BHARDWAJ & ANR + W.P.(C) 240/2015 & CM112702015 + W.P.(C) 241/2015 & CM112862015 HANUMANT SINGH GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR versus versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR W.P.(C) No.9101/2014 & Ors + W.P.(C) 242/2015 & CM112712015 SURAT SINGH versus ........ Petitioner GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ....... RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioners GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR Respondents + W.P.(C) 243/2015 & CM125312015 BHUPINDER & ORS versus + W.P.(C) 244/2015 & CM112742015 SULTAN SINGH versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI &...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 20 2016

Om Parkash vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-20-2016

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 20 2016

C L Bhola & Ors. Vs.cbi (Acb)

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-20-2016

$~31 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 2403/2016 & CRL.M.A.No.102DECIDED ON :20. h DECEMBER, 2016 C L BHOLA & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through : Mr.Dinesh Garg, Advocate. VERSUS CBI (ACB) ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG Through : Ms.Sonia Mathur, Standing Counsel with Mr.Sushil K.Dubey, Mr.Rakshit Thakur & Mr.Abhishek Chauhan, Advocates. S.P.GARG, J.(Oral) 1. Present petition has been preferred by the petitioners to challenge the legality and correctness of an order dated 02.07.2016 by which application under Section 311 Cr.P.C. moved on behalf of the respondent CBI was allowed to recall 29 witnesses for examination. The petition is contested by the respondent.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the file. Undisputedly, the petitioners are facing trial under Section 13 (2) read with Section 13(1)(e) of PC Act. Recording of the statements of the prosecution witnesses is underway. Out of 87 witnesses, 65 prosecuti...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 20 2016

Rajbir & 2 Ors vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-20-2016

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 20 2016

Ms. Ritu Taneja vs.ganga International School & Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-20-2016

* + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.11887/2016 20th December, 2016 MS. RITU TANEJA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ashok Aggarwal, Advocate. versus GANGA INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC with Mr. Deboshree Mukherjee, Advocate for respondent No.3. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition under Article 226 and Article 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioner impugns the order of the Delhi School Tribunal (DST) dismissing the appeal filed by the petitioner herein against the order/letter of the respondent no.1/school dated 28.6.2013 relieving the petitioner of her duties with the respondent no.1/school.2.... Petitioner filed an appeal before the DST pleading that she was appointed by the respondent no.1/school as PGT (Biology) on 3.2.2010 and she had continuously worked thereafter with the respondent no.1/school till W.P.(...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 20 2016

Priyanka Gautam vs.state Election Commission & Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-20-2016

$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 11929/2016 & CMs 47046-47/2016 1. PRIYANKA GAUTAM ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Kirti Uppal, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Sahiba Pautil and Mr. Priyanka Gautam, Advocates versus STATE ELECTION COMMISSION & ORS. Through : Mr. Sumeet Pushkarna, Advocate for R-1. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % The present petition has been listed subject to an office objection with ORDER2012.2016 regard to its maintainability, as the petitioner seeks to assail the judgment dated 3.12.2016 passed in a suit for declaration, mandatory and perpetual injunction instituted by the respondent No.3, against her and several others for declaring as void, the election of the petitioner/defendant No.3 for the Municipal Elections-2012, in respect of Ward No.215.2. It has been enquired from Mr. Uppal, learned Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioner as to how would a writ petition lie against a judgment passed by the learned trial co...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 20 2016