Delhi Court December 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Franchise India Holdings Ltd (Thr Directors) & Ors vs.m/s Balaji Ad-Pr ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-07-2016
$~29 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA162016 & CM9002016 FRANCHISE INDIA HOLDINGS LTD (THR DIRECTORS) & ORS ..... Appellants Through : Dr. Sarabjit Sharma, Advocate versus M/S BALAJI AD-PRINTS ..... Respondent Through : Mr. S.K. Grover with Ms. Akshima Sharma, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % ORDER0712.2016 CM454742016 (joint application u/O XXIV R3CPC) 1. The present compromise application has been filed by the parties stating inter alia that during the pendency of the present proceedings, they have arrived at an out of court settlement which has been reduced in writing and recorded in the Compromise Deed dated 27.11.2016, whereunder the appellants have agreed to pay a sum of Rs.14.00 lacs to the respondent in full and final settlement of all its claims, subject matter of the impugned judgment and decree. It has further been agreed by the parties that the said amount shall be paid in two instalments.2. Counsel for the appellants states that the first ins...
Sikander Singh vs.future General India Insurance Co Ltd. & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-07-2016
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: December 07, 2016 + MAC.APP. 802/2016 + MAC.APP. 803/2016 SIKANDER SINGH .... Appellant Through: Mr. Sudhir Batra & Mr.Rohit Khawana, Advocates versus FUTURE GENERAL INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajeev M. Roy, Advocate + MAC.APP. 861/2016 + MAC.APP.865/2016 BANKE LAL Through: Mr. Sudhir Batra & Mr.Rohit ..... Appellant Khawana, Advocates versus FUTURE GENERAL INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajeev M. Roy, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % ORAL JUDGMENT MAC.APP.802/2016 MAC.APP.803/2016 MAC.APP.861/2016 MAC.APP.865/2016 Page 1 of 8 C.M.37033/2016 in MAC.APP. 802/2016 C.M.370363/2016 in MAC.APP. 803/2016 C.M.38752/2016 in MAC.APP. 861/2016 C.M.38802/2016 in MAC.APP.865/2016 The delay in filing the accompanying appeal in the above captioned first and second appeal [MAC.APP. 802/2016 &MAC.APP. 803/2016]. is of 152 days. The delay in filing the above ...
Vishal Hira Merchant Pvt. Ltd. & Ors vs.hdfc Bank
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-07-2016
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:7. h December, 2016 % + W.P.(C). 603/2016 & CM No.2471/2016 VISHAL HIRA MERCHANT PVT. LTD. & ORS......... Petitioners Through: Through: Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Bindu Das, Adv. versus HDFC Bank Through: Mr. Kunal Tandon and Ms. ........ RESPONDENTS Snigdha Sharma, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT INDIRA BANERJEE, J.1. In this writ petition, the petitioners have challenged an order dated 6th October, 2015, passed by the learned Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal dismissing Appeal No.373/2015, filed by the petitioners, thereby affirming an order dated 6th August, 2015, passed by the learned Debt Recovery Tribunal, dismissing the counter claim filed by the petitioners against the claim of the respondent-Bank only on the ground that the same was barred by limitation.2. The respondent, HDFC Bank, (hereinafter referred to as HDFC Bank) instituted an original...
Aneeta Varma & Ors. Vs.pnb & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-07-2016
$~27. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 11543/2016 and CM APPL. 45446/2016 1. ANEETA VARMA & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Sandeep Thakur, Advocate versus PNB & ORS. Through: Mr. Hashmat Nabi, Advocate ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % The present petition is listed in Court subject to an office objection ORDER0712.2016 with regard to its maintainability.2. The petitioners herein seek a writ of mandamus against the respondents/Bank, restraining them from evicting them from a part of the premises No.16, Bhargava Lane, Civil Lines, Delhi.3. Counsel for the respondents/Bank, who appears on advance notice, relies on the provisions of Section 17(4-A) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (in short SARFAESI Act) to state that in view of the recent amendment to Section 17 by incorporation of Section 4-A, inserted by Act 44 of 2016 and given effect from 01.09.2016, the re...
Service and Justice for Sikh Society (Regd.) vs.lt. Governor of Delhi ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-07-2016
$~28 & 33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 11551/2016 & CM455012016 SERVICE AND JUSTICE FOR SIKH SOCIETY (REGD.) Through : Mr. Gurbaksh Singh with Ms. Sakshi Narang, Advocates ........ Petitioner versus LT. GOVERNOR OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Sanjay Ghose, ASC with Mr. Rhisabh Jetley, Advocate for GNCT of Delhi. Mr. Abinash K. Mishra, Advocate for R-4 + W.P.(C) 11591/2016 & CMs 45639-40/2016 AND KULWANT SINGH BAATH ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. A.P.S. Ahluwalia, Sr. Advocate with Mr. S.S. Ahluwalia and Mr. Jatin Teotia, Advocates versus LT. GOVERNOR OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Satyakam, ASC with Mr. Joginder Singh, EO, DGE for GNCT of Delhi. Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate Mr. Sumit K. Batra, Advocate Mr. Akhil Sibal, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % ORDER0712.2016 WP(C)11551/2016 & WP(C)11591/2016 Page 1 of 16 1. The present petitions have been filed by the petitioners praying inter alia, for issuing dire...
Girdhari Lal vs.gurbhachan Singh & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-07-2016
$~ 14 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: December 7, 2016 GIRDHARI LAL RSA3712016 Through: Mr.Manish Sharma, Advocate. ..... Appellant versus Through: None. GURBHACHAN SINGH & ORS CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI JUDGMENT (Oral) ........ RESPONDENTS CM No.45534/2016 1.2. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CM No.45533/2016 (delay) 1. For the reasons stated in the application 19 days delay in filing the appeal is condoned.2. The application stands disposed of. RSA No.371/2016 1. This Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been filed against the judgment dated August 01, 2016 of the learned First Appellate Court confirming the judgment dated March 23, 2012 of the RSA No.371/2016 Page 1 of 5 learned Trial Court.2. Learned counsel for the appellant/plaintiff has submitted that the Courts below could not have ignored the correctness of the layout plan of Virender Nagar, Delhi w...
Banke Lal vs.future General India Insurance Co Ltd & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-07-2016
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: December 07, 2016 + MAC.APP. 802/2016 + MAC.APP. 803/2016 SIKANDER SINGH .... Appellant Through: Mr. Sudhir Batra & Mr.Rohit Khawana, Advocates versus FUTURE GENERAL INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajeev M. Roy, Advocate + MAC.APP. 861/2016 + MAC.APP.865/2016 BANKE LAL Through: Mr. Sudhir Batra & Mr.Rohit ..... Appellant Khawana, Advocates versus FUTURE GENERAL INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajeev M. Roy, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % ORAL JUDGMENT MAC.APP.802/2016 MAC.APP.803/2016 MAC.APP.861/2016 MAC.APP.865/2016 Page 1 of 8 C.M.37033/2016 in MAC.APP. 802/2016 C.M.370363/2016 in MAC.APP. 803/2016 C.M.38752/2016 in MAC.APP. 861/2016 C.M.38802/2016 in MAC.APP.865/2016 The delay in filing the accompanying appeal in the above captioned first and second appeal [MAC.APP. 802/2016 &MAC.APP. 803/2016]. is of 152 days. The delay in filing the above ...
Reliance General Insurance Co Ltd vs.reena & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-07-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~ * % + MAC.APP. 678/2015 & CM No.17108/2015 Date of Decision:07. h December, 2016 27 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Shantha Devi Raman and Mr. Arbaaz Hussain, Advs. versus REENA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Adv. for R1 to R4. + MAC.APP. 945/2016 28 REENA & ORS versus Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Adv. ..... Appellants RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Shantha Devi Raman and Mr. Arbaaz Hussain, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) CM No.28863/2015 1.2. Issue notice. Learned counsel for the appellant accepts notice. The application is allowed and name of respondent No.4 is deleted from the array of parties. Amended memo of parties is taken on record. MAC.APP.945/2016 and MAC.APP.678/2015 1. The parties have challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal MAT. APP.Nos.678/2015 & 945/2016 Page 1 of 4 whereby compensation of Rs.19,98,642/...
Dhanraj Poswal vs.university of Delhi and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-07-2016
* + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.11585/2016 and C.M. Nos.45631/2016 (stay) & 45632/2016 (exemption) 7th December, 2016 DHANRAJ POSWAL Mr. Yogesh Rathee, Advocate. ........ Petitioner Through: versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI AND OTHERS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Shikhar Saha, Advocate with Mr. Santosh Kumar, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Apoorv Kurup, Advocate with Mr. Avanish Rathi, Advocate for respondent No.2. Mr. Amit Bansal, Advocate with Ms. Seema Dolo, Advocate and Ms. Surbhi Mehta, Advocate for respondent No.3. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This Court has tried its level best while reading this petition so as to at least understand as to what is the legal cause of action which is pleaded in this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of W.P. (C) No.11585/2016 Page 1 of 4 India for the reliefs as claimed in this writ petition. The reliefs claimed in th...
Man Mohan Sankhdher & Ors. Vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-07-2016
$~26 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI TEST.CAS. 74/2011 MAN MOHAN SANKHDHER & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr Aruneshwar Gupta and Mr Ayush Khanna, Advocates. STATE versus Through: ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % VIBHU BAKHRU, J ORDER0712.2016 The petitioners have filed the present petition under Section 217 of 1. the Indian Succession Act, 1925 seeking grant of Letters of Administration in respect of the property bearing No.89 Vaishali, Pitampura, Delhi -110034 (hereafter the Property) of Late Mr Madan Mohan Sankhdher (hereafter the Deceased).2. It has been averred in the petition that petitioners are class-II legal heirs of the Deceased.... Petitioner No.2 and 3 are brothers of the Deceased and petitioner nos.1, 4 and 5 are the legal heirs of Late Mr Lalit Mohan Sankhdher (brother of the Deceased). However, during the course of proceedings, petitioner No.3, Mr Brijendra Mohan Sankhdher expired and therefore, by an order dated 19.07.2012 the...
- ‹ Prev
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- Next ›
- Last »