Delhi Court December 2016 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2016 Page 4 of about 517 results (0.019 seconds)Smt Bala Rani & Ors vs.mr Israr Ali & Ors
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:23. d December, 2016 ..... Appellants Through: Mr. J.B. Ravi, Advocate $~ * % + MAC.APP. 647/2014 SMT BALA RANI & ORS versus MR ISRAR ALI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Shanta Devi Raman and Mr. Arbaaz Hussain, Advocates for respondent No.3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT1 The appellants have challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.11,20,920/- has been awarded to them. The appellants are seeking enhancement of compensation.2. The accident dated 07th July, 2012 resulted in the death of Aman Kumar. The deceased was aged 23 years at the time of accident and was survived by his parents and younger brother who filed the claim petition before the Claims Tribunal.3. The deceased was working as a Junior Non-Linear Editor with Independent News Service Pvt. Ltd. earning Rs.9,226/- per month. The Claims Tribunal took his income as Rs.8,426/- per month, added 50% towards future prospects...
Tag this Judgment!Ram Bahadur & Ors. Vs.government of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Judgment delivered on:22. 12.2016 $~7 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 12027/2016 RAM BAHADUR & ORS. ........ Petitioners versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners For the... RESPONDENTS Mr. Aditya Gaur and Mr Sunil Sagar Mr Sanjoy Ghose and Ms Pratishtha Vij, Advocates for GNCTD. Mr Apurb Lal and Ms Meenu Pandey, Advocates for R-3. Mr Parvinder Chauhan, Advocate for R- 2/DUSIB. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2212.2016 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CM No.47445/2016(delay in re-filing the writ petition) For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed. The delay in re-filing the Writ Petition is condoned. WP(C) 12027/2016 Page 1 of 4 W.P.(C) 12027/2016 & CM No.47444/2016(interim relief) 1. The petitioners, by the present petition, seek a direction to the respondents not to dispossess the petitioners or demolish their residences situated at Noor Nagar-...
Tag this Judgment!Mohd Shahzad vs.manju Luthra & Anr
Court: Delhi
$~9. * + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA10202016 MOHD SHAHZAD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Jayant Bhatt, Mr. Hamid Khan, Mr. Vipin Kumar and Ms. Shivani Sharma, Advocates with appellant in person. versus Through: None ........ RESPONDENTS MANJU LUTHRA & ANR CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % The appellant is aggrieved by the impugned judgment and decree ORDER2212.2016 dated 23.05.2016, whereunder the trial court has allowed an application filed by the respondents/plaintiffs under Order XII Rule 6 CPC and held that on the admissions made by the appellant/defendant in the written statement, the respondents/plaintiffs are entitled to a decree of possession in respect of the suit premises. For the remaining reliefs of damages/mesne profits towards the use and occupation of the suit premises, the suit is pending before the trial court.2. After addressing arguments for some time, learned counsel for the appellant states that he does not wish to press the appeal on merits....
Tag this Judgment!M/S b.r. Arora & Associates (P) Ltd. & Ors. Vs.airports Authority of I ...
Court: Delhi
$~20 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 11714/2016 Judgment delivered on:22. 12.2016 M/S B.R. ARORA & ASSOCIATES (P) LTD. & ORS........ Petitioners versus AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Ms. Anusuya Salwan with Mr. Vaibhav Dang and Mr. B.R. Arora, Advocates. For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Digivjay Rai, Advocate with Mr.V.R. Aray, JGM (Law) CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2212.2016 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CM No.46119/2016 (exemption) W.P.(C) 11714/2016 & CM No.46118/2016 (stay) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions.1. The petitioner impugns order dated 17.06.2016, communicated to the petitioner that the petitioner firm has been blacklisted for a period of 5 years w.e.f 01.07.2013 from participating in any tenders of Airport Authority of India in future and further informing the W.P.(C) No.11714/2016 Page 1 of 5 petitioner that henceforth the Airports Authority of...
Tag this Judgment!East Delhi Municipal Corporation vs.m/s Kapil Kumar Puri
Court: Delhi
$~3. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA10132016 and CM APPL. 47499-47501/2016 1. EAST DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Mini Pushkarna, Standing Counsel, EDMC with Ms. Namrata Mukim, Ms. Anushruti and Ms. Vasundhara Nayyar, Advocates versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Vinay Kumar, Advocate M/S KAPIL KUMAR PURI CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % Counsel for the appellant/EDMC states that the costs of Rs.1,500/- ORDER2212.2016 have been paid to the respondent, which fact is duly confirmed by learned counsel for the respondent.2. Counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant has paid the entire decretal amount to the respondent in the month of November, 2016 and as a result, the impugned judgment and decree stand satisfied.3. Counsel for the respondent had sought a pass over to enable him to obtain clear instructions from his clients about the receipt of payment but on pass over, he submits that he has not been able to get in touch with hi...
Tag this Judgment!South Delhi Municipal Corporation vs.v.d. Chawla
Court: Delhi
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment :22. 11.2016 + W.P.(C) 3632/2015 & C.M. No.6479/2015 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION........ Petitioner Through Ms.Madhu Tewatia, Advocate. versus V.D. CHAWLA ...... Respondent Through Mr.S.K.Jain, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.(oral) 1... Petitioner before this Court is the SDMC. It is aggrieved by the order dated 22.01.2014 passed by the Municipal Taxation Tribunal. By this common order 9 appeals had been decided. 2 Facts at the outset disclose that this dispute relates to the determination of the annual value under the Unit Area system of the property tax which was for the Assessment Years 2004-05 to 2012-13. The averments in the petition disclose that the petitioner had been issued a show cause notice dated 12.10.2012 under Sections 123-D of W.P.(C) 3632/2015 Page 1 of 8 the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 notifying the respondent to produce relevant evidence/documents to...
Tag this Judgment!Yash Kumari & Anr vs.state ( Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on : December 22nd, 2016 BAIL APPLN. 116/2015 YASH KUMARI & ANR ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Vikas Pahwa, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Neeraj Grover, Ms.Kinnori Ghosh, Mr.karan Khanuja and Mr.Zakir Hussain, Advs. versus STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through Mr.Ashish Dutta, APP with SI Pradeep Kumar, PS Preet Vihar. Mr.Keshav Mohan and Mr.Deepak Pathak, Advs. for the complainant. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI ORDER % P.S. TEJI, J.The present application under Section 438 of Code of Criminal 1. Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the Cr. P.C.), has been filed by the petitioner for seeking anticipatory bail in a case registered as FIR No.841/2014, under Sections 406/4of Indian Penal Code, at Police Station Preet Vihar.2. C.M. Sethi had made a written complaint to the police. As per FIR, the allegations leveled are that the complainant, Sh. In the Bail Appl. No.116/2015 Page 1 of 8 complaint, it was mentioned that ...
Tag this Judgment!East Delhi Municipal Coroporation vs.rekha Aggarwal
Court: Delhi
$~12 to 15, 17, 18 and 20 to 25. * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA10012016 and CM APPL. 47203/2016 (stay) RFA10022016 and CM APPL. 47208/2016 (stay) RFA10032016 and CM APPL. 47212/2016 (stay) RFA10042016 and CM APPL. 47215/2016 (stay) RFA10102016 and CM APPL. 47236/2016 (stay) RFA10112016 and CM APPL. 47240/2016 (stay) RFA9782016 and CM APPL. 46279/2016 (stay) RFA9802016 and CM APPL. 46323/2016 (stay) RFA9832016 and CM APPL. 46393/2016 (stay) RFA9842016 and CM APPL. 46399/2016 (stay) RFA9852016 and CM APPL. 46403/2016 (stay) RFA9862016 and CM APPL. 46407/2016 (stay) EAST DELHI MUNICIPAL COROPORATION ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Mini Pushkarna, Standing Counsel, EDMC with Ms. Namrata Mukim, Ms. Anushruti and Ms. Vasundhara Nayyar, Advocates versus REKHA AGGARWAL ASHWINI KUMAR AGGARWAL Through: Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate for Mr. Ritesh Khare, Advocate ..... Respondent ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % ORDER2212.2016 1. This order is in continuation of t...
Tag this Judgment!Itc Limited vs.food Corporation of India
Court: Delhi
$~17 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:22. 12.2016 % + W.P.(C) 7145/2015 ITC LIMITED versus FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA Advocates who appeared in this case: ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent For the... Petitioner :: For the Respondent : Mr Arvind Nigam, Senior Advocate with Mr L.K.Bhushan and Mr Raashi Beri, Advocates. Mr Rahul Srivastava, Advocate for FCI. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2212.2016 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner impugns order passed by the High Level Committee, communicated to the petitioner vide letters dated 18.11.2014 and 27.01.2015, whereby the security deposit of the petitioner has been forfeited.2. The respondent had floated a tender for sale of wheat at Food Supply Depot Mokama, Food Supply Depot Buxar and Food Supply Depot NRPA, inviting bids from empanelled bulk buyers to lift the WP(C) 7145/2015 Page 1 of 8 entire quantity of wheat from each of the three Centres.3. The petitioner participated in t...
Tag this Judgment!Jasmine Kaur Chandhok vs.jaspal Singh Chandhiok & Anr.
Court: Delhi
$~ * + % #23 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CONT.CAS(C) 52/2013 JASMINE KAUR CHANDHOK ........ Petitioner Through Ms. Aakriti Dawar with Ms. Ankita Gupta, Advocates versus JASPAL SINGH CHANDHIOK & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms. Manindra Acharya, Sr. Advocate and Amicus Curiae with Mr. Yashaswi S.K. Choksey, Advocate. Mr. B. Shankar K. Jha, Advocate for R-1. Mr. Rajesh Raina, Advocate for R-2. Date of Decision:22. d December, 2016 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present contempt petition has been filed alleging wilful disobedience of the order dated 29th September, 2011 passed by the Court of Civil Judge, Tis Hazari Courts in Suit No.64/2011. The relevant portion of the said order is reproduced hereinbelow:-"Matter received from the Mediation Cell as settled. It is submitted on behalf of the plaintiff that the matter has been CONT.CAS(C) 52/2013 Page 1 of 5 2. amicably settled with the defendants in the Mediation Cell vide order dated ...
Tag this Judgment!