Delhi Court December 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Delhi Transport Corporation & Anr. Vs.neetu Thakur & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2016
* (i) IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAC.APP. 898/2014 Date of decision: December 08, 2016 DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION & ANR. ... Appellants Through: Ms.Avnish Ahlawat & Ms.Latika Choudhary, Advocates. Versus SURENDER KUMAR & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Saurabh Kansal, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr.Priyadarshi Acharya, Advocate for respondent No.2/Insurer. (ii) + MAC.APP. 899/2014 DELHI TRANSPORT CORPOATION & ANR. ... Appellants Through: Ms.Avnish Ahlawat & Ms.Latika Choudhary, Advocates. Versus NEETU THAKUR & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Saurabh Kansal, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr.Priyadarshi Acharya, Advocate for respondent No.6/Insurer. SURENDER KUMAR (iii) + MAC.APP. 316/2015 & C.M.No.6112/2015 Versus ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Saurabh Kansal, Advocate MAC.APP.898/2014 MAC.APP.899/2014 MAC.APP.316/2015 Page 1 of 6 DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Avnish Ahlawat & Ms.Latika Choudhary, Advocates for respondent ...
Union of India & Ors. Vs.t.m.sampath
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2016
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:22. d September, 2016 Decided on:8. h December, 2016 + W.P.(C) 9278/2015 & C.M. Nos.26324/2015, 21305/2015 & 14568/2016 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ...... Petitioners Through: Mr. R.V.Sinha&Mr.R.N. Singh, Advs. versus ... Respondent Through: Respondent in person. T.M.SAMPATH % CORAM: HONBLE MR.JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is directed against the order / judgment dated 15.07.2015 passed by Central Administration Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi in OA No.1070/2015 titled T.M. Sampath v. Union of India & Ors..2. The respondent T.M. Sampath who was working as an Administrative Officer under National Water Development Agency (NWDA) filed the original application challenging the office memorandumNo.2/72/2011-Admn./Vol.IX/20021-23dated 30.12.2014 W.P.(C) 9278/2015 Pa ge 1 of 12 vide which the 97 days of duty period was tr...
Ayush Kumar vs.radhey Shyam & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2016
$~A- * % + Date of decision:8.12.2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RC.REV. 92/2016 AYUSH KUMAR RADHEY SHYAM & ORS Through Mr.Pradeep Kr.Saini,Advocate Through Mr.Neeraj Bhardwaj, Advocate ..... Respondent versus ........ Petitioner CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. This revision petition is filed under Section 25 (B) 8 of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the DRC Act) seeking to impugn the order dated 28.10.2015 dismissing the application filed by the petitioner seeking leave to defend and passing an eviction order against the petitioner.2. The facts pertaining to the present petition are virtually identical to another petition which was heard today, namely, RC Revision 54/2016 titled Ram Awadh Yadav vs. Radhey Shyam and Others. The contentions raised by the petitioner are also virtually identical to the above noted Revision Petition.3. By order passed today the said Revision Petition has been dismissed. The present pe...
Rajinder Kumar vs.the State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2016
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on : December 08, 2016 CRL.A. 964/2002 RAJINDER KUMAR Through: Mr. Yogesh Saini, Advocate ..... Appellant THE STATE versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ashish Datta, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with Sub- Inspector Shiv Charan, Police Station Anand Parbat, New Delhi CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI JUDGMENT P.S.TEJI, J.1. Aggrieved by the judgment of conviction dated 09.10.2002 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi convicting the appellant for the offence punishable under Section 308-II of I.P.C., and the order on sentence dated 17.10.2002 vide which the sentence has been passed to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of two years with fine of Rs.10,000/- and in default of payment of fine, to further undergo simple imprisonment for further four months, the Crl. A. No.964/2002 Page 1 of 23 present appeal has been preferred by the appellant.2. In brief, the facts of this case are that ...
Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs.parkash Chander and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:08. h December, 2016 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Adv. ..... Appellant $~29 * % + MAC.APP. 1106/2012 versus PARKASH CHANDER AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Adv. for R1(a) to R1(c). CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant has challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby the compensation of Rs.9,76,544/- has been awarded to Parkash Chander.2. The accident dated 30th November, 2006 resulted in the grievous injuries to Parkash Chander who filed the claim petition before the Claims Tribunal. The injured suffered fracture on both bones of left leg and he was admitted in Ayushman Hospital on 30th November, 2006 and discharged on 05th December, 2006. He was again hospitalised from 31st January, 2007 to 03rd February, 2007, 22nd August, 2007 to 28th August, 2007, 05th January, 2008 to 09th January, 2008, 29th April, 2008 to 03rd May, 2008, 28th July, 2008 ...
United India Insurance Co Ltd. Vs.samay Singh & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2016
$~10 & 11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAC.APP. 339/2011 Date of decision: December 08, 2016 MANOJ BHATIA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. N.L. Sahai, Advocate Versus RAFIQUE ALAM & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S.K. Ray, Advocate for respondent No.4 (i) UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD. Through: Mr. S.K. Ray, Advocate ..... Appellant (ii) + MAC.APP. 23/2012 SAMAY SINGH & ORS. Versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. B.K. Pandey, Advocate for respondents No.1a & 1b Mr. N.L.Sahai, Advocate for respondent No.4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT % ORAL C.M.No.229/2012 (u/S5of The Limitation Act r/w Sec. 151 CPC) In MAC.APP. 23/2012 Page 1 of 5 There is delay of 227 days in filing the accompanying appeal. As per order of 29th September, 2015, service is complete. Upon hearing, I find that the averments made in paragraphs No.3 & 4 of this application provide sufficient cause to condone the delay occasioned. The application is allowed and delay is condoned. The a...
Jagan Nath Lal vs.radhey Shyam & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2016
$~A- * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:8.12.2016 Through Mr.Pradeep Kr.Saini,Advocate ........ Petitioner RC.REV. 53/2016 JAGAN NATH LAL RADHEY SHYAM & ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH versus Through Mr.Neeraj Bhardwaj, Advocate ..... Respondent JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. This revision petition is filed under Section 25 (B) 8 of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the DRC Act) seeking to impugn the order dated 28.10.2015 dismissing the application filed by the petitioner seeking leave to defend and passing an eviction order against the petitioner.2. The facts pertaining to the present petition are virtually identical to another petition which was heard today, namely, RC Revision 54/2016 titled Ram Awadh Yadav vs. Radhey Shyam and Others. The contentions raised by the petitioner are also virtually identical to the above noted Revision Petition.3. By order passed today the said Revision Petition has been dismissed. The present...
Delhi Tourism & Transportation Development Corporation Ltd vs.chander ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-07-2016
$~2. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA9082016 and CM APPL. 43617/2016 DELHI TOURISM & TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. R.K.Dhawan, Advocate with Ms. Richa Dhawan and Mr. V.K.Teng, Advocates versus CHANDER PRAKASH GUPTA ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Bharti Badesra, Advocate with respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % This order is in continuation of the order dated 24.11.2016, on which ORDER0712.2016 1. date, it had been enquired from the counsel for the appellant if his clients are ready and willing to vacate the suit premises if granted some reasonable time.2. Today, Mr. Dhawan, learned counsel for the appellant states on instructions that the appellant is ready and willing to vacate the suit premises if granted time upto 30.09.2017.3. Counsel for the respondent, who appears on the basis of advance notice, states on instructions that extension sought by the appellant upto 30.09.2017, is too long and in any cas...
Kulwant Singh Baath vs.lt. Governor of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-07-2016
$~28 & 33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 11551/2016 & CM455012016 SERVICE AND JUSTICE FOR SIKH SOCIETY (REGD.) Through : Mr. Gurbaksh Singh with Ms. Sakshi Narang, Advocates ........ Petitioner versus LT. GOVERNOR OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Sanjay Ghose, ASC with Mr. Rhisabh Jetley, Advocate for GNCT of Delhi. Mr. Abinash K. Mishra, Advocate for R-4 + W.P.(C) 11591/2016 & CMs 45639-40/2016 AND KULWANT SINGH BAATH ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. A.P.S. Ahluwalia, Sr. Advocate with Mr. S.S. Ahluwalia and Mr. Jatin Teotia, Advocates versus LT. GOVERNOR OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Satyakam, ASC with Mr. Joginder Singh, EO, DGE for GNCT of Delhi. Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate Mr. Sumit K. Batra, Advocate Mr. Akhil Sibal, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % ORDER0712.2016 WP(C)11551/2016 & WP(C)11591/2016 Page 1 of 16 1. The present petitions have been filed by the petitioners praying inter alia, for issuing dire...
Reena & Ors vs.reliance General Insurance Co Ltd & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-07-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~ * % + MAC.APP. 678/2015 & CM No.17108/2015 Date of Decision:07. h December, 2016 27 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Shantha Devi Raman and Mr. Arbaaz Hussain, Advs. versus REENA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Adv. for R1 to R4. + MAC.APP. 945/2016 28 REENA & ORS versus Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Adv. ..... Appellants RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Shantha Devi Raman and Mr. Arbaaz Hussain, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) CM No.28863/2015 1.2. Issue notice. Learned counsel for the appellant accepts notice. The application is allowed and name of respondent No.4 is deleted from the array of parties. Amended memo of parties is taken on record. MAC.APP.945/2016 and MAC.APP.678/2015 1. The parties have challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal MAT. APP.Nos.678/2015 & 945/2016 Page 1 of 4 whereby compensation of Rs.19,98,642/...
- ‹ Prev
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- Next ›
- Last »