Delhi Court December 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Yashwinder Malik vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2016
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :19. h JULY, 2016 DECIDED ON :08. h DECEMBER, 2016 CRL.REV.P.472/2016 & CRL.M.A.Nos.10748-49/2016 YASHWINDER MALIK ........ Petitioner STATE Through : Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, Advocate with Mr.Jaideep Malik, Advocate. versus ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Amit Gupta, APP. Ms.Anindita Pujari, Advocate with Mr.Santosh Kumar, Advocate for the victim. + CRL.REV.P.183/2015 & CRL.M.A.No.4542/2015 AND + MANDEEP @ MAAN ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.Sumit Chaudhary, Advocate. versus ..... Respondent STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Through : Ms.Nandita Rao, ASC. Ms.Anindita Pujari, Advocate with Mr.Santosh Kumar, Advocate for the victim. CRL.REV.P.591/2015 & CRL.M.A.No.15110/2015 SHAHEEN @ SHIVANI ........ Petitioner Through : Ms.Anindita Pujari, Advocate with versus Mr.Santosh Kumar, Advocate. STATE OF HARYANA THROUGH GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Crl.Rev.P.472/2016 & connected matters. Page 1 of 20 Through : Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney...
Rajan Babuta & Ors vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 1563/2016 + RAJAN BABUTA & ORS Date of Decision: December 8th, 2016 ........ Petitioners STATE & ANR Through: Mr. Aseem Mehrotra, Advocate versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Arun Kumar Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State Mr. Anshum Jain, Advocate for respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.1. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioners, namely, Sh. Rajan Babuta, Sh. Jatin Bhasin, Sh. Shalender Singh, Sh. Maninder Singh and Sh. Atul Chaudhry for quashing of FIR No.322/2004 dated 09.07.2004, under Section 419/420/468/471 IPC registered at Police Station Darya Ganj on the basis of the settlement arrived at between the petitioners and respondent no.2 namely, Sh. Pawan Kumar Malhotra on 20.02.2016.2. respondent-State submitted that the respondent No.2 present in the Court has been identified to be the victim in the FIR in question by SI Lokesh. The factual matri...
Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.smt. Jagroshni & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2016
$~33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:08. h December, 2016 + MAC.APP. 928/2013 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Suman Bagga, Mr.Pankaj Gupta, Advs. Versus SMT. JAGROSHNI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Adv. for respondents no.1 to 5. along with respondent no.1 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Respondent no.1 is present in Court along with her counsel and she submits that her elder daughter respondent no.2 is a divorcee and staying with her along with her minor child. She further submits that both her sons, namely, respondents no.3 and 5 are married. She further submits that respondent no.5 is staying with her. She further submits that respondent no.4 is also married and living with her husband.2. The appellant has deposited the entire award amount with the Registrar General of this Court out of which 60% amount has already been released and the balance 40% is lying with...
Surender Kumar vs.delhi Transport Corporation & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2016
* (i) IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAC.APP. 898/2014 Date of decision: December 08, 2016 DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION & ANR. ... Appellants Through: Ms.Avnish Ahlawat & Ms.Latika Choudhary, Advocates. Versus SURENDER KUMAR & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Saurabh Kansal, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr.Priyadarshi Acharya, Advocate for respondent No.2/Insurer. (ii) + MAC.APP. 899/2014 DELHI TRANSPORT CORPOATION & ANR. ... Appellants Through: Ms.Avnish Ahlawat & Ms.Latika Choudhary, Advocates. Versus NEETU THAKUR & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Saurabh Kansal, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr.Priyadarshi Acharya, Advocate for respondent No.6/Insurer. SURENDER KUMAR (iii) + MAC.APP. 316/2015 & C.M.No.6112/2015 Versus ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Saurabh Kansal, Advocate MAC.APP.898/2014 MAC.APP.899/2014 MAC.APP.316/2015 Page 1 of 6 DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Avnish Ahlawat & Ms.Latika Choudhary, Advocates for respondent ...
Narender Pandey vs.radhey Shyam & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2016
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:8.12.2016 Through Mr.Pradeep Kr.Saini,Advocate ........ Petitioner RC.REV. 93/2016 NARENDER PANDEY RADHEY SHYAM & ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH versus Through Mr.Neeraj Bhardwaj, Advocate ..... Respondent JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. This revision petition is filed under Section 25 (B) 8 of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the DRC Act) seeking to impugn the order dated 28.10.2015 dismissing the application filed by the petitioner seeking leave to defend and passing an eviction order against the petitioner.2. The facts pertaining to the present petition are virtually identical to another petition which was heard today, namely, RC Revision 54/2016 titled Ram Awadh Yadav vs. Radhey Shyam and Others. The contentions raised by the petitioner are also virtually identical to the above noted Revision Petition.3. By order passed today the said Revision Petition has been dismissed. The present ...
Doon Public School vs.state of Nct Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2016
* + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.4777/2016 8th December, 2016 DOON PUBLIC SCHOOL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Manoj V. George and Ms. Shilpa George, Advocates. versus STATE OF NCT DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Santosh Kr. Tripathi, ASC and Mr. Rizwan, Advocate for R-1 and 2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner/school impugns the report-cum-order of the Director of Education dated 12.1.2015. The report/order dated 12.1.2015 was issued by the Director of Education pursuant to the directions allowing the writ petition W.P. (C) No.6868/2012 by this Court vide judgment dated 13.11.2013. W.P. (C) 6868/2012 and which writ petition was filed by the petitioners who are respondent nos. 3 to 7 in this writ petition.2. W.P. (C) 6868/2012 was filed by the respondent nos. 3 to 7 herein pleadin...
Vikas vs.state (Gnct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2016
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :11. h NOVEMBER, 2016 DECIDED ON :08. h DECEMBER, 2016 + CRL.A.1461/2014 & CRL.M.B. 1058/2016 VIKAS ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Puneet Singhal, Advocate with versus Mr.Ankur Chaudhary, Advocate. STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through : Ms.Meenakshi Dahiya, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Challenge in this appeal is a judgment dated 12.08.2014 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.160/1/14 arising out of FIR No.38/2014 u/s 392/397/411 IPC PS Model Town whereby the appellant Vikas was held guilty for committing offence punishable under Section 392 read with Section 397 IPC. By an order dated 12.08.2014, he was sentenced to undergo RI for seven years with fine `2,000/-; default sentence being SI for two months.2. Briefly stated, the prosecution case as set up in the charge-sheet was that on 15.01.2014 at about 10:30 p.m. the appellant robbed the complainant Kamal of his mobile at knife p...
Swami Vivekanand Subharti University vs.union of India & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2016
$~33 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:08. 12.2016 + W.P.(C) 7340/2015 versus SWAMI VIVEKANAND SUBHARTI UNIVERSITY ...... Petitioner UNION OF INDIA & ANR Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS Mr. Bhagvan Swarup Shukla, CGSC with Mr. Mimansak Bhardwaj, Advocates for respondent No.1. Mr. Sanjeev Bhatnagar with Ms. Rupi Sagar, Advocates. ........ RESPONDENTS : : Mr. T. Singhdev with Ms. Puja Sarkar, Advocates for respondent No.2. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0812.2016 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner, by the present petition, seeks a direction to the respondent Union of India to accept the nomination of an elected representative of the petitioner as a member in the Dental Council of India. It is contended that the representation is sought under Section 3(d) of the Dentists Act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). It is submitted that all other requirements of the said Act a...
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.narender Singh & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2016
$~35 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:08. h December, 2016 + MAC.APP. 742/2015 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Animesh Sinha, Advocate Versus NARENDER SINGH & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Advocate for respondent No.1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant has challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.25,241.50 has been awarded to respondent No.1.2. The accident dated 17th December, 2010 resulted in minor injuries to respondent No.1. The Claims Tribunal awarded Rs.25,000/- towards pain and suffering and Rs.241.50 for medical treatment.3. Learned counsel for the appellant urged at the time of hearing that the amount awarded to respondent No.1 is on higher side. It is further submitted that the appellant is entitled to recovery rights against respondents No.2 and 3 as the driving licence of respondent No.2 was found to be fake.4. Respondent No....
Jatinder Kumar Sachdeva vs.the Union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2016
$~8 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:08. 12.2016 + W.P.(C) 1492/2016 JATINDER KUMAR SACHDEVA ........ Petitioner versus THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Rishabh Kapoor with Mr. Saurabh Kapoor and Mr. Mayank Jain, Advocates. For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Vivekanand Mishra, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Sanjeev Narula with Mr. Abhishek Ghai, Advocates for respondent Nos.2 to 4. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0812.2016 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks a mandamus, thereby, directing the respondents to unconditionally release the gold kara (bracelet) seized/detained by Detention Memo dated 11.02.2015.2. It is contended that on 11.02.2015, the petitioner arrived from Dubai at IGI Airport Terminal T-3. The petitioner was intercepted by the Custom Officers at the exit gate before crossing the green channel and was W.P.(C) No.1492/2016 Page 1 o...
- ‹ Prev
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- Next ›
- Last »