Delhi Court December 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs.sarita & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2016
$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: December 08, 2016 MAC.APP. 532/2014 THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD Through: Mr. JPN Shahi, Advocate ..... Appellant versus .....Respondents + Through: Nemo SARITA & ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % (ORAL) JUDGMENT Impugned Award of 9th April, 2014 grants compensation of `3,56,171/- with interest @ 7.5% per annum to respondents- claimants on account of death of one Ravinder Prasad in a road accident on 22nd February, 2011. Since the facts are not in dispute, therefore, they are not required to be reproduced here. Appellant-insurer in this appeal seeks the grant of recovery rights qua respondent No.7-Mohan Mahto, who is the owner of the motorcycle in question on the ground that the motorcycle was being driven by son of respondent No.7-Mohan Mahto, who was a minor. MAC. APP.532/2014 Page 1 of 3 Respondent No.7-Mohan Mahto was served by way of publication, but none had appeared on his behalf. As per order of 4th Apr...
Union of India & Anr. Vs.the Defence Marine Engineering Technical Staf ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2016
$~R-1 & 2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Dated:8. h December, 2016 + W.P.(C) 244/2002 UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through : Mr. R.V. Sinha and Mr. A.S. Singh, Advocates versus THE DEFENCE MARINE ENGINEERING TECHNICAL STAFF WELFARE ASSOCIATION & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. S.S. Sastry and Mr. Rishi Manchanda, Advocates along with Respondent No.2/Mr. V.K. Chawla + W.P.(C) 7885/2007 UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE SECRETARY MINISTRY OF ........ Petitioner DEFENCE Through : Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Advocate versus SEWA SINGH Through : Mr. S.S. Sastry and Mr. Rishi ..... Respondent Manchanda, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. Both the writ petitions arise out of orders passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (in short the Tribunal). In W.P. (C) 244/2002 an order dated 31.08.2001 passed by the Tribunal in OA24032000 is impugned; while in W.P. (C) 7885/2007 an order dated 15.05.2...
Anurudh Prasad vs.radhey Shyam & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2016
$~A- * % + Date of decision:8.12.2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RC.REV. 56/2016 ANURUDH PRASAD RADHEY SHYAM & ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH Through Mr.Pradeep Kr.Saini,Advocate Through Mr.Neeraj Bhardwaj, Advocate versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. This revision petition is filed under Section 25 (B) 8 of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the DRC Act) seeking to impugn the order dated 28.10.2015 dismissing the application filed by the petitioner seeking leave to defend and passing an eviction order against the petitioner.2. The facts pertaining to the present petition are virtually identical to another petition which was heard today, namely, RC Revision 54/2016 titled Ram Awadh Yadav vs. Radhey Shyam and Others. The contentions raised by the petitioner are also virtually identical to the above noted Revision Petition.3. By order passed today the said Revision Petition has been dismissed. The present...
Prem Singh vs.state (Govt of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2016
$~ * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL. A. 1728/2014 Judgment reserved on:30. h November, 2016 Judgment pronounced on:8. h December, 2016 PREM SINGH . Appellant Through: Mr. Joginder Tuli, Mr. Ashu Kumar Sharma, Ms. Joshini Tuli and Ms. Babita Rana, Advocates VERSUS STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) .. Respondent Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for State CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE G. S. SISTANI HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J.1. The present Criminal Appeal has been filed under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the impugned judgment dated 25.11.2013 and order on sentence dated 15.01.2014 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Saket Court, New Delhi in Sessions Case No.70/11, by virtue of which the appellant has been convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 20,000/- and in default of payment of fine to further undergo simple imprisonment for a p...
Regional Provident Fund Commissioner vs.m/s Sriniwas Malliah Memorial ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2016
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LETTERS PATENT APPEAL No.450/2010 Reserved on:5. h October, 2016 % REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER ....Appellant Date of Decision:8. h December, 2016 Through Mr. Balraj Dewan, Advocate. Versus M/S SRINIWAS MALLIAH MEMORIAL THEATRE CRAFTS TRUST (REGD.) ..Respondent Through Ms. Richa Kapoor and Ms. Mallika Parma, ADvocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA SUNITA GUPTA, J.Who is an employee under The Employees, Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (hereinafter referred to as Act) is the question raised in this intra court appeal challenging the order dated 2nd June, 2010 passed by the Learned Single Judge in W.P. (C) No.2083 of 1989 titled as M/S Sriniwas Malliah Memorial Theatre Crafts Trust (Regd.) v. R.P.F.C.2. The respondent, a charitable trust, registered under the Income Tax Act, 1961, was engaged in promoting and imparting training in traditional handicrafts like puppet makin...
Kisan Sabji Mandi Nangloi Aadthi and Ors vs.govt of Nct of Delhi and O ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2016
$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 11576/2016 & CM456042016 (stay) 1. KISAN SABJI MANDI NANGLOI AADTHI AND ORS ........ Petitioners Through : Mr. Kirti Uppal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. P.I. Jose, Mr. Shashank Mishra, Mr. Kunal Manav and Mr.Siddharth Chopra, Advocates versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. D. Rajeshwar Rao, Advocate for R-1, 4 and 5. Ms. Avnish Ahlawat and Ms. Latika Chaudhary, Advocates for R-2 & 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % In view of the plea taken yesterday by Ms. Ahlawat, counsel for ORDER0812.2016 respondents No.2 and 3 that the present petition filed by Kisan Subzi Mandi Nangloi Aadhti Association for adding the names of its members to the electoral list to enable them to cast their votes in the election to be conducted on 12.12.2016, for filling up the vacancies in the Delhi Agricultural Marketing Board, APMC MNI Azadpur and for constituting new Marketing Committees in terms of the Notification date...
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.sarita & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2016
$~34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:08. h December, 2016 + MAC.APP. 737/2015 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Animesh Sinha, Adv. Versus SARITA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Adv. for R-1 to R-4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant has challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.16,07,000/- has been awarded to claimants/respondents no.1 to 4.2. The accident dated 17th December, 2010 resulted in the death of Ishwar Singh. The deceased was aged 34 years and was survived by his widow, minor son and parents who filed the claim petition before the Claims Tribunal. The deceased was working as a Supervisor in a private company earning Rs.8,000/- per month. The Claims Tribunal took the income of the deceased as Rs.8,000/-, deducted 1/4th towards the personal expenses and applied the multiplier of 16 to compute the loss of dependency as Rs..11,52,000/-...
Delhi Transport Corporation & Anr. Vs.surender Kumar & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2016
* (i) IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAC.APP. 898/2014 Date of decision: December 08, 2016 DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION & ANR. ... Appellants Through: Ms.Avnish Ahlawat & Ms.Latika Choudhary, Advocates. Versus SURENDER KUMAR & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Saurabh Kansal, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr.Priyadarshi Acharya, Advocate for respondent No.2/Insurer. (ii) + MAC.APP. 899/2014 DELHI TRANSPORT CORPOATION & ANR. ... Appellants Through: Ms.Avnish Ahlawat & Ms.Latika Choudhary, Advocates. Versus NEETU THAKUR & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Saurabh Kansal, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr.Priyadarshi Acharya, Advocate for respondent No.6/Insurer. SURENDER KUMAR (iii) + MAC.APP. 316/2015 & C.M.No.6112/2015 Versus ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Saurabh Kansal, Advocate MAC.APP.898/2014 MAC.APP.899/2014 MAC.APP.316/2015 Page 1 of 6 DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Avnish Ahlawat & Ms.Latika Choudhary, Advocates for respondent ...
Shri k.m.tomar vs.state Bank of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2016
* + % SHRI K.M.TOMAR IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.791/2000 8th December, 2016 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Shekhar Kumar, Advocate. versus STATE BANK OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajiv Kapur, Advocate for SBI. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner in this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India argues only one point to set aside the orders passed by the Disciplinary Authority dated 30.12.1991 passed in the present case and which is that the disciplinary authority has while passing the impugned order dated 30.12.1991 upheld all the charges against the petitioner although the Enquiry Officer vide his report dated 21.5.1991 had exonerated the petitioner with respect to some charges. It is argued that the procedure adopted by the disciplinary authority before passing of the order dated 30.12.1991 is illegal bec...
Shiv Shankar Mishra vs.radhey Shyam & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2016
$~A- * % + RC.REV. 55/2016 SHIV SHANKAR MISHRA RADHEY SHYAM & ORS versus ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Pradeep Kr.Saini,Advocate IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:8.12.2016 ..... Respondent Through Mr.Neeraj Bhardwaj, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. This revision petition is filed under Section 25 (B) 8 of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the DRC Act) seeking to impugn the order dated 28.10.2015 dismissing the application filed by the petitioner seeking leave to defend and passing an eviction order against the petitioner.2. The facts pertaining to the present petition are virtually identical to another petition which was heard today, namely, RC Revision 54/2016 titled Ram Awadh Yadav vs. Radhey Shyam and Others. The contentions raised by the petitioner are also virtually identical to the above noted Revision Petition.3. By order passed today the said Revision Petition has been dismissed. The pr...
- ‹ Prev
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- Next ›
- Last »