Delhi Court December 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ram Awadh Yadav vs.radhey Shyam & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2016
$~A- * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RC.REV. 54/2016 RAM AWADH YADAV Date of decision:08. 12.2016 ........ Petitioner versus RADHEY SHYAM & ORS Through: Mr.Pradeep Kr.Saini, Adv. ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Neeraj Bhardwaj, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. This revision petition is filed under Section 25 (B) 8 of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the DRC Act) seeking to impugn the order dated 28.10.2015 dismissing the application filed by the petitioner seeking leave to defend and passing an eviction order against the petitioner.2. The respondent/landlord filed the eviction petition under Section 14(6) read with 14(1)(e) and 25B of the DRC Act. The tenanted premises comprises a single room measuring 8 x 10 feet situated on the ground floor of the property bearing No.1881, Gali No.3, Kailash Nagar, Delhi. It is the case of the respondents/landlords that they are the lawful owners of the suit property by virtue...
Rajiv Chhikara vs.sandhya Mathur
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2016
* % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved On : December 05, 2016 Judgment Delivered On : December 08, 2016 + RAJIV CHHIKARA MAT.APP.(F.C.) No.163/2016 .....Appellant Represented by: Mr.Nimesh Chib, Advocate with Appellant in person versus SANDHYA MATHUR .....Respondent Represented by: Ms.Nandita Rao, Advocate with Mr.Vikram Deswal, Advocate and Respondent in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. The appellant and the respondent entered into marital bond on March 12, 2004 in accordance with Hindu rites and ceremonies in Delhi. Their relations soon became sour and the respondent herein filed a petition for divorce under Section 13(1)(ia) of HM Act alleging that there has always been a demand of dowry from the side of the appellant and that he took away all her money; used to lock her MAT. APP (FC) No.163/2016 Page 1 of 15 in the room before leaving for his job; beat her and ridicule her before his fri...
Nikhil Yadav vs.university of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2016
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 11232/2016 & CM439642016 NIKHIL YADAV ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Amit Khemka, Advocate versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Ms. Simran Jeet, proxy counsel for Mr. Mahinder J.S. Rupal, Advocate for R-1 to 4. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % This order is in continuation of the order dated 28.11.2016, on which ORDER0812.2016 1. date, counsel for the respondents No.1 to 4 had sought time to obtain instructions from the University with regard to the fate of the appeal, if any, preferred by the petitioner against the decisions dated 16.9.2016 of the Grievance Redressal Cell of the Delhi University, declining to interfere in the results of the DUSU Election 2016-17.2. Today, proxy counsel appearing for counsel for respondents No.1 to 4 hands over a copy of the letter dated 2.12.2016 addressed by the Joint Registrar (Academic) to the petitioner intimating him that the Appellate Committee constitut...
Atiqur Rehman vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2016
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RESERVED ON : NOVEMBER15 2016 DECIDED ON : DECEMBER08 2016 CRL.A. 536/2013 ATIQUR REHMAN Through : Mr.M.Rais Farooqui with Mr.S.A.Abdi, Advocates. ..... Appellant versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG Through : Mr.Akshai Malik, APP. S.P.GARG, J.1. Challenge in this appeal is a judgment dated 14.01.2013 of learned Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.emanating from FIR No.registered at Police Station Sadar Bazar by which the appellant-Atiqur Rehman was held guilty for committing offences under Section 376/366A/506(II) IPC. By an order dated 15.01.2013, he was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for ten years with fine of `10,000/-under Section 376 IPC; rigorous imprisonment for ten years with fine of `5,000/- under Section 366A IPC; and, rigorous imprisonment for Crl.A.536/2013 Page 1 of 7 seven years with fine of Rs. 5,000/- under Section 506 (II) IPC. All the sentences were to op...
Ramjee Singh vs.the Union of India Through Its Secretary, Department o ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2016
$~22. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 11566/2016 and CM APPL.45584-88/2016 1. RAMJEE SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Advocate with Dr. Rakesh Gosain, Mr. Indranil Ghosh, Mr. Sumeet Kumar Singh and Mr. Kunal Singh, Advocates versus THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF AYUSH, GOVT. OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rakesh Kumar, CGSC for R-1 and R-2 with Mr. A.K. Panigrahi, Advocate and Mr. Franklin L. Khobung, Director. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % The present petition has been filed by the petitioner praying inter alia ORDER0812.2016 for setting aside the notice dated 30.11.2016, issued by the respondent No.1/Ministry of Ayurveda, Yoga, Naturopathy and Unani, Sidha and Homeopathy (AYUSH), Government of India, proposing to hold the election to the post of President of the Central Council of Homoeopathy W.P.(C)11566/2016 Page 1 of 12 (hereinafter referred to as the Council) on 09.12.2016, and fu...
Manoj Bhatia vs.rafique Alam & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2016
$~10 & 11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAC.APP. 339/2011 Date of decision: December 08, 2016 MANOJ BHATIA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. N.L. Sahai, Advocate Versus RAFIQUE ALAM & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S.K. Ray, Advocate for respondent No.4 (i) UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD. Through: Mr. S.K. Ray, Advocate ..... Appellant (ii) + MAC.APP. 23/2012 SAMAY SINGH & ORS. Versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. B.K. Pandey, Advocate for respondents No.1a & 1b Mr. N.L.Sahai, Advocate for respondent No.4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT % ORAL C.M.No.229/2012 (u/S5of The Limitation Act r/w Sec. 151 CPC) In MAC.APP. 23/2012 Page 1 of 5 There is delay of 227 days in filing the accompanying appeal. As per order of 29th September, 2015, service is complete. Upon hearing, I find that the averments made in paragraphs No.3 & 4 of this application provide sufficient cause to condone the delay occasioned. The application is allowed and delay is condoned. The a...
Parmod Kumar Pandey & Ors. Vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2016
$~46 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + FAO3762010 Date of Decision:08. h December, 2016 PARMOD KUMAR PANDEY & ORS. ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Anshuman Bal, Adv. Versus UNION OF INDIA ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Joydeep Mazumdar, Standing counsel for Railways CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellants have challenged the order dated 29th May, 2009 whereby their application for restoration under Order 9 Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been dismissed by the Railway Claims Tribunal.2. The appellants are the parents of late Ashwani Kumar who was travelling in Unchahar Express on 16th August, 2006 at about 7.00 am. when he lost his balance due to a sudden jerk as the train increased its speed and he fell down from the train while washing his hands in the washbasin near the open door. The deceased was survived by his parents who filed the application before the Railway Claims Tribunal.3. The learned Tribunal dismissed the claim applica...
Shashi Bala Pathak vs.delhi Development Authority
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2016
$~ * + W.P.(C) 815/2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SHASHI BALA PATHAK ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. R.K. Saini, Advocate. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Dhanesh Relan with Ms. Akshita Manocha, Advocates. WITH + W.P.(C) 817/2015 SUBHASH CHAND DHIGAN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. R.K. Saini, Advocate. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Dhanesh Relan with Ms. Akshita Manocha, Advocates. WITH + W.P.(C) 4698/2015 & CM APPL. 8502/2015 SUSHMA LAKRA @ SUSHMA SYLDIAC BARA ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Maninder Acharya, Senior Advocate with Mr. Lokesh Kumar Sharma and Mr. Yashaswi S.K. Choubey, Advocates. versus W.P.(C) 815/2015 & Ors. Page 1 of 16 DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Dhanesh Relan with Ms. Akshita Manocha, Advocates. WITH + W.P.(C) 5824/2015 & CM APPL. 10508/2015 NIRMALA Through: Ms. Maninder Acharya, Senior ........ Petitioner Advocate with Mr. Lokesh Kumar Sharma and Mr....
Surinder Nayyar & Ors. Vs.south Delhi Municipal Corporation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of judgment :08. 12.2016. $~ * % + W.P.(C) 10491/2015 & C.M. No.26442/2015 SURINDER NAYYAR & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through Ms. Anusuya Salwan and Mr. Kunal Kohli, Advs. versus SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ..... Respondent Through Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.(Oral) 1 There are five petitioners before this Court. They are aggrieved by the act of the respondent-Corporation vide which the respondent had issued a circular dated 31.07.2015. In terms of this circular, reimbursement made to third party on account of quality assurance charges were directed to be recovered under intimation to the Quality Control Cell. This is the grievance of the petitioners. 2 The petitioners are Class-I contractors working with the South Delhi Municipal Corporation (SDMC). On 25.10.2006, a circular had been issued WP(C) No.10491/2015 Page 1 of 13 by the Superintendent Engineer, Quality Control Cell of t...
g.s. Dhodi vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2016
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3919/2015 Reserved on:24. h October, 2016 Date of decision:8. h December, 2016 G.S. DHODI Versus In person. ........ Petitioner GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ....... RESPONDENTS Mr. Vikrant Naraya Vasudeva, Through: Advocate for R-1, 2 & 4. Mr. Dev P. Bhardwaj, CGSC for UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA SANJIV KHANNA, J.G. S. Dhodi, the petitioner in this writ petition impugns order dated 18th July, 2014 passed in OA No.2208/2012 by the Principal Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal.2. The impugned order holds that the petitioner has been rightly denied non-functional scale of Rs.8000-13500 (pre-revised) with effect from 1st January, 1996 on notional basis and with effect from 1st December, 2006 on actual basis. The petitioner had also prayed for setting aside or quashing the orders dated 17th March, 2011 and 20th March, 2012, by which his prayer for grant of non-functional scale of ...
- ‹ Prev
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- Next ›
- Last »