Delhi Court December 2016 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

AI Brief & Ask
Semantic AI Search
Devil's Bench

Try free for 7 days Semantic AI Search

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Dec 09 2016

Ravindra Kumar Shukla & Ors. Vs.national Insurance Co. Ltd.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-09-2016

* (i) IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: December 09, 2016 + MAC. APP3242016 KIRAN Through: Mr.Naresh Gupta, Advocate ..... Appellant Versus NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Dubey & Ms. Suchi Singh, Advocates (ii) + MAC. APP3942016 KANNU Through: Mr.Naresh Gupta, Advocate ..... Appellant Versus NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Dubey & Ms. Suchi Singh, Advocates (iii) + MAC. APP9152016 RAVINDRA KUMAR SHUKLA & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr.Naresh Gupta, Advocate Versus NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Dubey & Ms. Suchi Singh, Advocates MAC.APP.324, 394 & 915 of 2016 MAC.APP.940, 949 & 952 of 2015 Page 1 of 11 (iv) + MAC. APP9402015 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Dubey & Ms. Suchi Singh, Advocates (v) KIRAN & ORS. Versus Through: Mr.Naresh Gupta, Advocate ........ RESPONDENTS + MAC. APP9492015 & C.M.N...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 09 2016

Kunal Singh vs.central Bureau of Investigation

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-09-2016

* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI KUNAL SINGH Decided on:9. h December, 2016 CRL.M.C. 4589/2016 Represented by: Mr. Meet Malhotra, Sr. Adv. ........ Petitioner with Mr. Ajit K. Singh, Mr. Kumar Sameer, Advs. Represented by: Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, Spl. PP. ..... Respondent versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A. 19201/2016 Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 4589/2016 1. Aggrieved by the order of the learned Special Judge dated 5th October, 2012 on an application filed by the investigating officer for grant of pardon to accused Pankaj Bajaj under Section 306 Cr.P.C., the petitioner who is a co-accused prefers the present petition.2. The operative portion of the impugned order reads as under: 3. I have made inquiries from the accused Pankaj Bajaj and have gone through the material on record including his statement u/s. 164 Cr.P.C. recorded by Ms. Sheetal Chaudhary, Ld. MM, New Delhi on 03.1...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 09 2016

Gaya Prasad Pal @ Mukesh vs.state

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-09-2016

* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 538/2016 Reserved on:24. h August, 2016 Pronounced on:9. h December, 2016 GAYA PRASAD PAL @ MUKESH ..... Appellant STATE Through: Mr. Sumeet Verma, Advocate Versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Varun Goswami, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT R.K. GAUBA, J:1. The appellant stands convicted and is aggrieved by judgment dated 15th October, 2015 (in Sessions Case No.163/2013) on the charge with the gravamen of he having assaulted and committed forcible sexual intercourse with his less-than-14 years old step- daughter making her pregnant with his child and subjecting her to criminal intimidation. The trial held in the court of Additional Sessions Judge, also designated as Special Court under Section 28 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Crl. A. No.538/2016 Page 1 of 72 Act) for New Delhi district, had arisen out of report under Section 173 of th...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 09 2016

Godfrey Phillips (I) Ltd vs.union of India & Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-09-2016

$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 6507/2014 & CM Nos. 15540/2014 & 34388/2016 Judgment delivered on:09. 12.2016 GODFREY PHILLIPS (I) LTD versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ....... Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Mr Aditya Singh with Mr Sumeet Tahilramani Mr Yeeshu Jain with Ms Jyoti Tyagi for LAC/L&B Mr Dhanesh Relan for DDA. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the... RESPONDENTS : CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. A declaration is sought to the effect that the acquisition proceeding initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the 1894 Act) in respect of which Award No.10/87-88 dated 20...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 09 2016

National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.kannu & Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-09-2016

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 09 2016

Arif Saifi vs.parveen Saifi & Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-09-2016

$~46 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :9. h DECEMBER, 2016 + CRL.REV.P.799/2016 ARIF SAIFI ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.Aman Usman, Advocate. versus PARVEEN SAIFI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.(Oral) CRL.M.A.No.19210/2016 (Exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CRL.REV.P.799/2016, CRL.M.A.Nos.19209/2016 & 19211/2016 1. Present revision petition under SectionsCr.P.C. has been preferred by the petitioner to challenge the legality and correctness of an order dated 01.09.2016 of learned Principal Judge, Family Courts, whereby he was directed to pay interim maintenance @ `5,000/- per month for the wife and `2,500/- per month each for the daughters.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and have examined the file.... Petitioners counsel urged that the petitioner has monthly Crl.Rev.P.799/2016 Page 1 of 2 income of `6,000/- and he is u...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 09 2016

Delhi Transport Corporation vs.rajvir Singh

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-09-2016

$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 11600/2016 DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION Date of decision:9. h December, 2016 ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Sarfarz Khan and Mr. Ataur Rahman, Advocates. Versus RAJVIR SINGH Through Ms. Kittu Bajaj, Advocate. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) The order under challenge passed by the Principal Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal dated 12th July, 2016 allows OA No.4230/2011 filed by Rajvir Singh, the respondent before us with a direction that he should be paid pension and other retirement benefits within 60 days from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. Delhi Transport Corporation, the petitioner has been also directed to pay interest as applicable to General Provident Fund on the arrears W.P. (C) 11600/2016 Page 1 of 4 from the date of retirement i.e. 30th November, 2010, till actual payment.2. It is an accepted case that employees of ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 09 2016

Smt. Rajni @ Rajni Saxena vs.smt. Laxmi Devi and Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-09-2016

$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:09. 12.2016 CM(M) 1273/2016, CAVEAT No.1048 & CM No.45768/2016 (stay) SMT. RAJNI @ RAJNI SAXENA ....Petitioner. Through: Mr.Jagdish Chandra, Advocate. Versus Through: Mr.D.K.Sharma, Advocate. ....Respondents SMT. LAXMI DEVI AND ANR. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) CAVEAT No.1048/2016 Since the learned counsel for the respondents has entered appearance, the caveat sands discharged. CM(M) 1273/2016 & CM No.45768/2016(stay) 1. The present petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the eviction order dated 15.10.2016 passed by the Rent Control Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the 'RCT') whereby the RCT set aside the order of the ARC dated 13.01.2016.2. The respondent herein/landlord filed an eviction petition under Section 14(1)(a) of the DRC Act (in short the 'DRC Act') against the petitioner stating that the petitioner is a tenant in respect of the one...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 09 2016

The Chancellor, Masters & Scholars of University of Oxford & Ors vs.ra ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-09-2016

* % + THE CHANCELLOR, MASTERS & SCHOLARS OF UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD & ORS ..... Appellants Represented by: Mr.Sudhir Chandra and Ms.Pratibha M.Singh, Sr.Advocates instructed by Mr.Saikrishna Rajagopal, Mr.Sidharth Chopra, Mr.Sahil Sethi, Ms.Sneha Jain, Mr.Devanshu Khanna, Mr.Prasanna and Ms.Rachel Mamatha, Advocates for appellants Mr.Pravin Anand, Advocate with Mr.Dhruv Anand, Ms.Udita Patro and Mr.Shamim Nooreyezdan, Advocates for interveners IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on : December 07,2016 Judgment Delivered on : December 09, 2016 RFA(OS) 81/2016 versus RAMESHWARI PHOTOCOPY SERVICES & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Represented by: Mr.Sourabh Seth, Advocate with Mr.Neeraj Yadav and Mohd.Umar Iqbal Khan, Advocates for R-1 Mr.Aman Sinha, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Sourabh Banerjee, Mr.Sanjai Pathak and Mr.Pravesh Thakur, Advocates for R-2 Mr.Anup Bhambani, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Jawahar Raja, RFA(OS) No.81/2016 Page 1 of 58 Mr.Gautam Bhatia and Mr.Chinmay K...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 09 2016

Kiran vs.national Insurance Co. Ltd. & Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-09-2016

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

‹ Prev
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
Next ›
Last »

Delhi Court December 2016 Judgments

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.