Delhi Court December 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Harihar Prasad Das vs.chairman, Central Pollution Control Board & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-14-2016
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.11669/2016 Date of decision:14. h December, 2016 HARIHAR PRASAD DAS ........ Petitioner In person. versus CHAIRMAN, CENTRAL POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): C.M. No.45966/2016 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W. P.(CIVIL) No.11669/2016 We have heard Harihar Prasad Das, the petitioner, who appears in person.2. The petitioner was appointed as an Assistant Law Officer on 2nd December, 1987 and promoted as Law Officer on 20th December, 1995.3. The petitioner, had retired from service on 30th April, 2013 from the post of Senior Law Officer, to which post he was promoted on 11th June, 2012. W.P. (C) No.11669/2016 Page 1 of 3 4. The petitioner had filed OA No.1493/2015 for direction to the respondents to promote him as Senior Law Officer with effect...
Saroj Gambhir vs.jaipal Singh Tanwar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-14-2016
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC. Revision No.514/2015 & C.M. No.20742/2015 Decided on :14. h December, 2015 SAROJ GAMBHIR ... Petitioner Through: Mr. S.P. Singh Chaudhari, Advocate. Versus Respondent Through: Mr. B.L. Chawla, Advocate. JAIPAL SINGH TANWAR CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a revision petition filed by the petitioner against the order of eviction dated 1.6.2015 by virtue of which the order of eviction was passed against the petitioner in respect of shop No.B-4, Shopping Centre, Tagore Garden, New Delhi measuring 140 square feet, more particularly, shown in red in the site plan.2. Before dealing with the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner, it may be pertinent here to give the brief background of the case. The respondent/landlord, Jaipal Singh Tanwar, filed an eviction petition against the petitioner/tenant under Section 14 (1) (e) in respect of a shop measuring 140 square feet bearing No.B-4, Shopping Centre, ...
Tc Sharma vs.state of Nct & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-14-2016
$~19 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 10110/2015 & CM No.27294/2015 & 7050/2016 Judgment delivered on:14. 12.2016 TC SHARMA ........ Petitioner STATE OF NCT & ORS versus ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : Mr. Tekchand Sharma, Adv. : Mr. Peeyoosh Kalra, ASC with Ms. Sona Babbar and Mr. Shiva Sharma, Adv. with SI Sandeep (Licensing Unit) CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) JUDGMENT1 The petitioner has filed this petition seeking a mandamus to the respondents to grant extension of time for purchase of pistol without first selling the gun.2. The... Petitioner already has an arms licence for a 12 DBBL Bore Gun. The petitioner intended to sell the same and purchase a Pistol/Revolver. The petitioner applied for permission and the respondents granted the same but imposed a condition that the petitioner first sells of his DBBL and then purchase the W.P.(C) No.10110/2015 Page 1...
M/S. Old Village Industries Ltd. Vs.commissioner of Income Tax-Iii and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-14-2016
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:14. 12.2016 + W.P.(C) 1707/1999 M/S. OLD VILLAGE INDUSTRIES LTD. Petitioner Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III AND ORS. ....Respondents Through: Ms. Shashi Kapila, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Pravesh Sharma and Sh. Sushil Kumar, Advocates. Sh. Ashok Manchanda, Sr. Standing Counsel with Ms. Lakshmi Gurung and Ms. Easha Kadian, Advocates, for revenue. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % The petition is bereft of merit and is accordingly dismissed. For detailed judgment, the decision dated 14.12.2016 in W.P.(C) 1706/1999 may be referred to. DECEMBER14 2016 S. RAVINDRA BHAT (JUDGE) DEEPA SHARMA (JUDGE) W.P.(C) 1707/1999 Page 1...
Sushila Devi Jain vs.adesh Kumar Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-11-2016
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC. Revision No.545/2015 Decided on :11. h December, 2015 SUSHILA DEVI JAIN ... Petitioner Through: Mr. V.K. Ohri, Advocate. Versus ADESH KUMAR GUPTA CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI Respondent V.K. SHALI, J.(ORAL) 1. By virtue of the present revision petition the petitioner has assailed the order dated 26.8.2015 passed by the learned ARC, South allowing the leave to defend application of the respondent on the ground that a triable issue is raised by the respondent/tenant with regard to availability of an alternative accommodation on the first floor.2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the present petitioner filed an eviction petition against the respondent in respect of Shop No.12/04, Yusuf Sarai, Main Market, New Delhi-16. It was stated in the petition that the petitioner is aged about 87 years suffering from various ailments and settled in Calcutta and because of the fact that she is old, she RC. Rev. No.545/2015 Page 1 of 8 is n...
Sushila Devi Jain vs.rajinder Kumar Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-11-2016
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC. Revision No.558/2015 Decided on :11. h December, 2015 SUSHILA DEVI JAIN ... Petitioner Through: Mr. V.K. Ohri, Advocate. Versus RAJINDER KUMAR GUPTA CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.(ORAL) Respondent 1. By virtue of the present revision petition the petitioner has assailed the order dated 26.8.2015 passed by the learned ARC, South allowing the leave to defend application of the respondent on the ground that a triable issue is raised by the respondent/tenant with regard to availability of an alternative accommodation on the first floor.2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the present petitioner filed an eviction petition against the respondent in respect of Shop No.2 of premises No.12/03, Yusuf Sarai, Main Market, New Delhi-16. It was stated in the petition that the petitioner is aged about 87 years suffering from various ailments and settled in Calcutta and because of the fact that RC. Rev. No.545/2015 Page 1 of 8 ...
Salwan Boys Senior Secondary School vs.dy. Director Education and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SALWAN BOYS SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Vinay Sabharwal, Advocate. $~33 * + W.P.(C) 11652/2016 versus DY. DIRECTOR EDUCATION AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Siddharth Shankar Ray, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA % C.M. Appl. No.45903/2016 (for exemption) ORDER0912.2016 Exemption allowed, subject all to just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 11652/2016 and C.M. Appl. No.45902/2016 (for stay) 1.... Petitioner, by this writ petition, impugns the order of the Director of Education dated 4.11.2016 and which reads as under:-"OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF ZONE-28, DISTRICT CENTRAL PLOT No.5, JHANDEWALAN, NEW DELHI Dated:-"04/11/2016 No.D.D.E./Z-28/2016/1739 To, The Manager/HOS, Salwan Boys Sr. Sec. School, Rajinder Nagar, New Delhi. W.P.(C) 11652/2016 page 1 of 3 Sub:-"Proposal of Dismissal in r/o Sh. C.J.Joyson. Sir/Madam, Vide UO No.8096 DE dated 19.10.2016 Directorate...
Shiv Shankar Yadav vs.l M Goyal & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2016
$~31 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA5542016 SHIV SHANKAR YADAV ..... Appellant Through : Mr. S. Azad, Advocate with appellant in person. versus L M GOYAL & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Vivek Kohli, Mr. Vishnu Anand and Ms. Yeshi Rinchhen, Advocates with respondent No.1 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % ORDER0912.2016 1. This order is in continuation of the orders dated 28.11.2016 and 8.12.2016.2. On the last date of hearing, costs of Rs.10,000/- was imposed on the appellant. The said costs have been tendered by learned counsel for the appellant to counsel for the respondents and duly accepted.3. The parties have interacted with each other today and have arrived at a settlement, the terms and conditions whereof are recorded herein below : (i) The appellant shall handover the vacant peaceful possession of the suit premises to the respondents on or before 30.6.2017 and in that duration, shall continue paying the use and occupation charges @ Rs.29...
National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.kiran & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2016
* (i) IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: December 09, 2016 + MAC. APP3242016 KIRAN Through: Mr.Naresh Gupta, Advocate ..... Appellant Versus NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Dubey & Ms. Suchi Singh, Advocates (ii) + MAC. APP3942016 KANNU Through: Mr.Naresh Gupta, Advocate ..... Appellant Versus NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Dubey & Ms. Suchi Singh, Advocates (iii) + MAC. APP9152016 RAVINDRA KUMAR SHUKLA & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr.Naresh Gupta, Advocate Versus NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Dubey & Ms. Suchi Singh, Advocates MAC.APP.324, 394 & 915 of 2016 MAC.APP.940, 949 & 952 of 2015 Page 1 of 11 (iv) + MAC. APP9402015 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Dubey & Ms. Suchi Singh, Advocates (v) KIRAN & ORS. Versus Through: Mr.Naresh Gupta, Advocate ........ RESPONDENTS + MAC. APP9492015 & C.M.N...
Deepak Aggarwal vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2016
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:09th December, 2016 CRL.REV.P. 853/2015 & CRL.M.(Bail) Nos. 8439/2015,1563/2016, CRL.M.A.No.13241/2016 DEEPAK AGGARWAL ........ Petitioner/Revisionist Through: Mr. Arjun Dewan and Mr. A.K. Pathak, Advocates. versus STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, APP for State. Mr. Rajiv K. Garg and Mr. Ashish Garg, Advocates for R-2/complainant. AND CRL.REV.P. 302/2016 & CRL.M. (Bail) 823/2016 DEEPAK AGGARWAL ........ Petitioner/Revisionist Through: Mr. Arjun Dewan and Mr. A.K. Pathak, Advocates. versus STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, APP for State. Mr. Rajiv K. Garg and Mr. Ashish Garg, Advocates for R-2/complainant. CRL.REV.P. 853/2015 and CRL.REV.P. 302/2016 Page 1 of 13 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA I.S. MEHTA, J.1. The instant revision petitions, i.e., Crl.Rev.P. 853/2015 and Crl.Rev.P. 302/2016, preferred by the revisionist under Section 397 read with Section 401 of Cr.P.C....
- ‹ Prev
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- Next ›
- Last »