Delhi Court December 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jindal Stainless Limited vs.damco India Private Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-14-2016
$~57 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ARB.P. 347/2016 JINDAL STAINLESS LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Abhimanyu Bhandari and Ms Kartika Sharma, Advocates. versus DAMCO INDIA PRIVATE LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr Virender Ganda, Senior Advocate with Mr Vipul Ganda, Mr Mohit Oommen and Mr Raghav Kakkar, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER1412.2016 VIBHU BAKHRU,J M/s Jindal Stainless Limited (hereafter 'JSL') has filed the present 1. petition under Section 11of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the Act), inter alia, praying that an Arbitrator be appointed to adjudicate the disputes that have arisen between the parties in connection with a contract dated 01.07.2013 (hereafter 'the Logistics Contract').2. JSL had entered into the Logistics Contract with respondent (hereafter 'DAMCO') to provide inbound and outbound logistics and supply chain management services for import of raw materials and export of stainless steel coils,...
Amita and Ors vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-14-2016
$~4 and 5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 10874/2016 AMITA AND ORS ........ Petitioner UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Through Mr. R.K. Shukla, Advocate. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Manish Mohan, CGSC along with Ms. Manisha Saroha and Mr. Shivam Chanan, Advocates for respondent Nos. 1 to 5. 5 + W.P.(C) 10521/2016 SAROJ RANI ........ Petitioner UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Through Mr. R.K. Shukla, Advocate. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Manish Mohan, CGSC along with Ms. Manisha Saroha and Mr. Shivam Chanan, Advocates for respondent Nos. 1 to 5. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHAWLA % Notice. Mr. Manish Mohan, CGSC accepts notice on behalf of all the ORDER1412.2016 respondents. Leave is granted to the petitioners to file supplementary affidavit incorporating the additional documents. Supplementary affidavit shall be W.P.(C) 10874/2016 and W.P.(C) 10521/2016 page 1 of 2 filed within two weeks. A copy of the supplementar...
Medhavi Krishna vs.university of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-14-2016
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:14. h December, 2016 MEDHAVI KRISHNA % + W.P.(C) 8232/2016, CM Nos. 34120/2016 & 44144/2016 UNIVERSITY OF DELHI AND ORS versus ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Adarsh Kumar Tiwari, Adv. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal and Ms. Simran Jeet, Advs. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.(ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers:-"a) to issue appropriate writ of mandamus/certiorari or any other writ/order directing the respondents to grant admission to the petitioner under PWD category in the Ph.D programme of Department of Buddhist Studies University of Delhi; and/or b) to pass any other appropriate order(s) or direction(s) in favour of the petitioners which this Honble Court may deem just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice. W.P.(C) No.8232/2016 Page 1 of 10 2. It is contended by the l...
Adishakti Digital Network and Ors vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-14-2016
$~5 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 10787/2016 Judgment delivered on:14. 12.2016 ADISHAKTI DIGITAL NETWORK AND ORS ........ Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS : : Ms. Radhika Gupta, Advocate. Mr Vikas Mahajan, CGSC with Mr. S.S. Rai, Advocates for UOI. Mr Kirtiman Singh, Advocate for TRAI. SI Vijay Kasana, PS Vasant Kunj. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1412.2016 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) W.P.(C) 10787/2016 1. Since, 12th December, 2016 was declared as a holiday on account of Milad-un-Nabi, the matter is taken up today.2. The petition has been filed seeking grant of time for installing the set-top boxes and till the completion of installation of set top W.P.(C) No.10787/2016 Page 1 of 4 boxes, the respondent be restrained from stopping the supply of analogue signal.3. The Ministry of Information & Broadcasting by Notification dated 11.11...
Subhash vs.state & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-14-2016
$~98 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Dated:14. h December, 2016 + W.P. (CRL.) 3522/2016 SUBHASH Through Mr.Sandeep Khatri, Advocate along ........ Petitioner with petitioner in person. versus STATE & ORS Through Mr.Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel ........ RESPONDENTS with Mr.Tushar Sannu, Advocate for State/ respondent No.1 along with Insp. Jarnail Singh & SI Karamvir, PS Narela, in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuance of writ/order/directions to the respondents in the nature of Habeas Corpus, thereby directing the respondents to produce the daughter of the petitioner, namely, Ms.Komal, who is missing since 30.09.2016.2. As per the petition, on 30.09.2016 at about 8.00 a.m. the daughter of the petitioner, Ms.Komal, aged about 19 years, went to attend her c lass a...
Manojaay Dabral vs.ravi Dabral
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-14-2016
$~16. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA9722016 MANOJAAY DABRAL ..... Appellant Through: Mr. N.K. Verma, Advocate with appellant in person. versus RAVI DABRAL Through: None ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % ORDER1412.2016 CM APPL. 46025/2016 (exemption) Subject to the appellant filing the certified/typed/legible copies of the documents annexed with the appeal within four weeks, the application is allowed and disposed of. RFA9722016 and CM APPL. 46023/2016 (stay), CM APPL. 46024/2016 (for condonation of delay of 4 days in filing the appeal) 1. The appellant/defendant has filed the present appeal against the judgment and decree dated 16.08.2016 in a suit for possession, damages, mesne profits and injunction instituted against him by his brother, the respondent/plaintiff in respect of flat bearing No.772, Pocket-V, Mayur Vihar, New Delhi.2. Under the impugned judgment and decree, the learned ADJ has granted the relief of possession in favour of the resp...
Pawan Tanwar vs.dmi Housing Finance
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-14-2016
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 11037/2016 & CMs 43109-10/2016 1. PAWAN TANWAR ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Sanjay Bhasin, Advocate versus DMI HOUSING FINANCE ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Ajay Kohli, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % This case is taken up today as 12.12.2016 was declared as a holiday ORDER1412.2016 on account of Milad-Un-Nabi (Birthday of Prohet Mohammad).2. Pursuant to the order dated 23.11.2016 on which date, counsel for the petitioner was directed to give a written intimation of the next date of hearing to the respondent, learned counsel enters appearance on behalf of the respondent and states that he shall be filing his power of attorney within one week. He further states that due to an error that has crept in the order dated 28.9.2016, passed by the learned CMM by wrongly mentioning the dimension of the property sought to be attached by the respondent, a fresh application has been filed, which shall be listed before t...
Hawa Singh vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-14-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 4552/2016 & Crl.M.A. No.19056/2016 + Date of Hearing & Order: December 14th, 2016 ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Dhananjai Rana, Adv. HAWA SINGH STATE & ANR. versus ..... Respondent Through Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, APP with SI Roshan Lal, PS Nangloi. Mr. Amit Rathore, Adv for Respondent no.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.(Oral) 1. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner, namely, Sh. Hawa Singh for quashing of FIR No.361/2011 dated 14.12.2011, under Section 354 IPC registered at Police Station Nangloi on the basis of the settlement/agreement arrived at Delhi Mediation Centre, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi respondent no.2 namely, Smt. Meenakshi dated 28.07.2016.2. respondent-State submitted that the respondent No.2 present in the Court has been identified to be the complainant/first-informant in the FIR in question by SI Roshan Lal.3. The factual matrix of the present case is that on 14.12.2...
Kiran Bala vs.sube Singh & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-14-2016
$~4 * + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA62016 & CM1342016 KIRAN BALA ..... Appellant Through : Mr. Rajiv Garg, proxy counsel for Mr. R.K. Jain, Advocate versus SUBE SINGH & ORS Through : None. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % ORDER1412.2016 This case is taken up today as 12.12.2016 was declared as a holiday on account of Milad-Un-Nabi (Birthday of Prophet Mohammad).2. 3. Process fee has been lying under objections. A perusal of the order sheets reveals that on 5.1.2016, notice was issued to the respondents returnable on 26.4.2016. On 26.4.2016, noting that no steps had been taken by the appellant to serve the respondents, last opportunity was granted to make compliances by all modes, including dasti, returnable before the Registrar on 30.8.2016.4. On 30.8.2016, it was again recorded by the Registrar that notice could not be issued to the respondents for want of process fee. In view of the said position, the matter was directed to be placed befo...
M/S Yug Ct Cable vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-14-2016
$~4 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:14. 12.2016 + W.P.(C) 10786/2016 M/S YUG CT CABLE versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS : : None. Mr Vikas Mahajan, CGSC with Mr. S.S. Rai, Advocates for UOI. Mr Kirtiman Singh, Advocate for TRAI. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1412.2016 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) W.P.(C) 10786/2016 1. Since, 12th December, 2016 was declared as a holiday on account of Milad-un-Nabi, the matter is taken up today.2. Notice was directed to be issued to the petitioner since this matter has been received on transfer from Supreme Court. Affidavit of service has been filed indicating that the notice has been duly served on the petitioner. W.P.(C) No.10786/2016 Page 1 of 4 3. The petition has been filed seeking grant of time for installing the set-top boxes and till the completion of installation of set top bo...
- ‹ Prev
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- Next ›
- Last »