Delhi Court December 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Loreal vs.collector of Stamps / Sdm-Kalkaji & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-14-2016
$~3 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 11656/2016 Judgment delivered on:14. 12.2016 M/S LOREAL ........ Petitioner COLLECTOR OF STAMPS / SDM-KALKAJI & ANR versus ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : Mr S.K.Bansal and Md Sazid Rayeen, Advocates.. : Ms Aayushi Gupta and Mr Raman Duggal, Advocates for R- 1/Collector of Stamps/ SDM Kalkaji. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) JUDGMENT CM No.45913/2016(exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 11656/2016 & CM No.45912/2016(stay) 1. The petitioner seeks quashing of the order of the Collector of Stamps assessing the stamp duty on the alleged deed of assignment dated 09.03.2006. W.P.(C) No.11656/2016 Page 1 of 3 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the said purported deed of assignment is not a valid document inasmuch as the stamp paper of Rs.10/-, which is affixed on page-1, does not ha...
Kmb-Era(jv) vs.airport Authority of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-14-2016
$~7 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ARB.P. 620/2016 KMB-ERA(JV) ........ Petitioner Through : Mr Manoj K. Singh and Mr Rahul Pandey, Advocates. versus AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through : Mr Pradeep Desodaya and Mr Rahul Singhal, Advocates for Ms Anjana Gosain, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER1412.2016 VIBHU BAKHRU, J The matter is taken up today since 12.12.2016 was declared a holiday.1. 2. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the Act) praying that an arbitrator be appointed to adjudicate the disputes that have arisen between the parties in relation to a contract entered into on 03.11.2008.3. clause - Clause 57(c) - which is set out below:-"The General Conditions of Contract (GCC) includes an arbitration Arbitration: c) Except where otherwise provided for in the contract all questions and disputes relating to the meaning of the specifications, design...
Saroj Rani vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-14-2016
$~4 and 5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 10874/2016 AMITA AND ORS ........ Petitioner UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Through Mr. R.K. Shukla, Advocate. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Manish Mohan, CGSC along with Ms. Manisha Saroha and Mr. Shivam Chanan, Advocates for respondent Nos. 1 to 5. 5 + W.P.(C) 10521/2016 SAROJ RANI ........ Petitioner UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Through Mr. R.K. Shukla, Advocate. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Manish Mohan, CGSC along with Ms. Manisha Saroha and Mr. Shivam Chanan, Advocates for respondent Nos. 1 to 5. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHAWLA % Notice. Mr. Manish Mohan, CGSC accepts notice on behalf of all the ORDER1412.2016 respondents. Leave is granted to the petitioners to file supplementary affidavit incorporating the additional documents. Supplementary affidavit shall be W.P.(C) 10874/2016 and W.P.(C) 10521/2016 page 1 of 2 filed within two weeks. A copy of the supplementar...
Avnija Ahluwalia(minor) vs.bikramjit Ahluwalia & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-14-2016
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:14. 12.2016 CS(OS) 2202/2011 and CRL.M.A. 4043/2010, I.A. 5155/2012, I.A. 16143/2014, I.A. 22465/2014, I.A. 8405/2016, I.A. 14602/2016, I.A. 16794/2009, I.A. 3976/2015, I.A. 11460/2013, I.A. 2589/2011, I.A. 3299/2012, I.A. 13260/2012, I.A. 12174/2013, I.A. 19252/2015, I.A. 477/2010, I.A. 13277/2012, I.A. 12227/2016 I.A. 4109/2013, CRL.M.A. 895/2011 and AVNIJA AHLUWALIA(MINOR) ..... Plaintiff Versus BIKRAMJIT AHLUWALIA & ORS. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Plaintiff For the Defendants CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU .... Defendants : Mr Manav Gupta, Ms Esha Dutta, Mr Sahil Garg and Ms Ridhi Munjal. : Mr Sanjay Sharma. JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J IA No.14602/2016 1. For the reasons stated in the application the delay of two days in filing the appeal (OA No.222/2016) is condoned and the same is allowed.2. The application stands disposed of. OA No.222/2016 3. The plaintiff has filed the present appeal un...
Obaidur Rahman vs.m/s Palfinger Cranes India Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-14-2016
$~1 (original side) * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 219/2014 OBAIDUR RAHMAN ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Romo Mohanty, Advocate with plaintiff in person. versus ..... Defendant M/S PALFINGER CRANES INDIA PVT LTD Through: Mr. R. Chandrachud, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % This case is taken up today as 12.12.2016 was declared as a holiday ORDER1412.2016 1. on account of Milad-Un-Nabi (Birthday of Prohet Mohammad).2. Pursuant to the parties being referred to mediation, a Settlement Agreement dated 07.12.2016 has been forwarded by the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre. The terms and conditions of the settlement are recorded in para 6 of the Settlement Agreement, wherein the plaintiff has agreed to settle the dispute with the defendant for a sum of Rs.15 lacs in full and final settlement. The said amount has already been handed over by the defendant to the plaintiff as recorded in the Settlement Agreement. The defendant has also handed ...
Ashwani Kumar & Ors. Vs.ndmc & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-14-2016
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA3462016 & CM Nos.20733-34/2016 % ASHWANI KUMAR & ORS. Date of Judgment:14. h December, 2016 ........ Petitioners NDMC & ORS. Through: Mr.Satish Kumar Tripathi, Advocate versus Through: Ms.Malvika Trivedi, Advocate with ........ RESPONDENTS Mr.Jitendra Kumar Tripathi, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Although this matter was adjourned for 19th January, 2017 since the matter is listed today, both counsel submit that the matter can be disposed of today itself. Challenge in this appeal is to the order passed by a Single Bench of this Court dated 3rd May, 2016. Learned counsel for the parties submit that the only bone of contention between the parties which remains today is that while disposing of the writ petition the Single Judge permitted the appellants to continue to carry on their activities provided they adhere to the norms as per the permission granted by the NDMC....
R S Gupta vs.govt of Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-14-2016
$~24 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 8156/2016 Judgment delivered on:14. 12.2016 R S GUPTA ........ Petitioner GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS versus ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Ranjan Roy, Adv. For the Respondent : Mr. Saurabh Chadda, Adv. with Mr. Ajay Kumar, LA, DOE CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 01.08.2016. It is contended that the appeal of the petitioner has been disposed of by the impugned order in the absence of the petitioner.2. It is contended that the appeal of the petitioner was listed on 29.07.2016. On the morning of 29.07.2016, the petitioner who was travelling by his motorcycle met with a road traffic accident. Because of heavy rain on the previous night, the motorbike of the petitioner slipped and the petitioner sustained injuries on his shoulder. The petitioner was advised bed rest. W.P.(C) No.8156...
M/S. Inter Craft Ltd. Vs.commissioner of Income Tax-Iii and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-14-2016
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:14. 12.2016 + W.P.(C) 1706/1999 M/S. INTER CRAFT LTD. Petitioner Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III AND ORS. + W.P.(C) 1707/1999 M/S. OLD VILLAGE INDUSTRIES LTD. Petitioner ....Respondents Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III AND ORS. ....Respondents Through: Ms. Shashi Kapila, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Pravesh Sharma and Sh. Sushil Kumar, Advocates. Sh. Ashok Manchanda, Sr. Standing Counsel with Ms. Lakshmi Gurung and Ms. Easha Kadian, Advocates, for revenue. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % These matters were originally listed for orders on 12th December, 2016. Since 12th and 13th December, 2016 were declared holidays, the same is being listed for orders today, i.e. 14th December, 2016.1. The petitioner in W.P.(C) 1706/1999 (hereafter "Inter Craft") challenges a demand by the respondent (hereafter called "the revenue"), demanding a sum of `72,17,068/- throug...
M/S Tripple "B" Finlease Investment Ltd vs.vipin Arora & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-14-2016
$~14 * % + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:14. h December, 2016 FAO2352015 M/S TRIPPLE "B" FINLEASE INVESTMENT LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. D.K. Nag and Ms. Apurva Upmanyu, Advocates versus VIPIN ARORA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. M.M. Kalra, Advocate for respondents No.1 & 2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) The appellant has challenged the order dated 05th March, 2015, whereby the learned Trial Court rejected the appellants application for restoration on the ground that the appellant has not sufficiently explained the delay in seeking restoration.2. The dispute between the parties relates to flat bearing No.B- 27/A, second floor, Dayanand Colony, Lajpat Nagar-IV, New Delhi in respect of which both the parties filed separate suits. The respondents suit bearing No.216/2004 is pending before the Trial Court whereas the appellants suit was dismissed in default and the appellants application for restoration has been dismissed ...
M/S Hcil, Adhikarya Arss (Jv) vs.rail Vikas Nigam Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-14-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:14. 12.2016 + O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 60/2016 & IA No.10971/2016 M/S HCIL, ADHIKARYA ARSS (JV) versus RAIL VIKAS NIGAM LTD. ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent + O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 61/2016 & IA No.10973/2016 WITH M/S HCIL, ADHIKARYA ARSS (JV) versus RAIL VIKAS NIGAM LTD. Advocates who appeared in these cases: ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : Mr Arvind Minocha and Mr Mayank Kshirsagar. : Mr Aman Sinha, Senior Advocate with Mr Anil Seth and Mr Parvesh Thakur. CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU VIBHU BAKHRU, J JUDGMENT1 The petitioner (hereafter 'HCIL') has filed these petitions under Section 14 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter 'the Act'), inter alia, praying that the Arbitral Tribunal constituted to adjudicate the disputes between the parties be declared as de jure and de facto incompetent to proceed and to terminate the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal. O....
- ‹ Prev
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- Next ›
- Last »