Delhi Court December 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Tarvinder Singh Marwah vs.the Director, Director of Gurdwara Election ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2016
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 11466/2016 & CMs 45215/2016 and 44952/2016 1. TARVINDER SINGH MARWAH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. R.S. Suri, Senior Advocate with Ms. Pallavi Tayal, Advocate versus THE DIRECTOR, DIRECTOR OF GURDWARA ELECTION & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Satyakam, ASC with Mr. Joginder Singh, EO, DGE. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % This order is in continuation of the order dated 7.12.2016, on which ORDER1612.2016 date, Mr. Satyakam, learned counsel for the respondents, who appeared on advance notice, had opposed the maintainability of the present petition on the ground that the petitioner has approached the Court with unclean hands having failed to state that as recently as in the month of September, 2016, he had filed an application seeking impleadment in a disposed of writ petition, registered as W.P.(C) 4155/ 2016 entitled Paramjit Singh Sarna vs. The Director, Directorate of Gurudwara Elections. The said application wa...
Shirish m.barve vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2016
Judgment delivered on:16. 12.2016 $~15 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 11733/2016 SHIRISH M.BARVE ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA .... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : : Mr.Saurabh Bhargavan and Mr S.K.Chaubey Mr Ruchir Mishra and Mr Mukesh Kumar Tiwari CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1612.2016 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. Present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent-UOI to consider and decide the application for renewal of certificate of Notary filed by the petitioner.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner draws the attention of this Court to judgment passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court dated 11th September, 2015 in W.P. (C) No.8503/2015 titled Neelam Sharma Versus Union of India.3. This Court is of the opinion that as the representation/renewal WP(C) 11747/2016 Page 1 of 2 application; filed by the petitioner is still pending, the respondent...
Union of India vs.shrey Bajaj and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~31 * + W.P.(C) 11739/2016 Date of Decision :16. h December, 2016 UNION OF INDIA ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha, Advocate versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Anil Singal,Advocate for R-1 Mr. Sumit K. Batra, Advocate for R-2 SHREY BAJAJ AND ANR CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) Caveat No.1062/2016 1. Caveat will be heard when the stay application is taken up for hearing.2. Caveat is accordingly disposed of. CM No.46236-37/2016 1.2. Exemptions allowed subject to all just exceptions. The applications stand disposed of. W.P.(C) 11739/2016 and CM No.46235/2016 1. Staff Selection Commission vide advertisement published in the Employment News dated 16.03.2013 had invited applications for the posts of Sub Inspectors in Delhi Police and Central Armed Police Forces, Assistant Sub Inspectors in the Central Industrial Security W.P.(C) 11739/2016 Page 1 of 9 Force and I...
Ms. Neeru Abrol vs.chairman and Managing Director National Fertilizers ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2016
* + % MS. NEERU ABROL IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P. (C) No.4510/2016 16th December, 2016 ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Anju Bhattacharya, Advocate with Mr. Elgin Matt John, Advocate. versus CHAIRMAN FERTILIZERS LIMITED & ANR. AND MANAGING DIRECTOR NATIONAL ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Dipak Kumar Jena, Advocate with Mr. Jalandhar Das, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Vikram Jetley, Advocate for respondent No.2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. YES VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner who retired as the Chairman and Managing Director of the respondent no.1/National Fertilizers Limited/employer essentially claims gratuity and leave encashment benefit by placing reliance upon Rules 35A and 35B of the NFL Employees (Conduct, Discipline & Appeal) Rules W.P. (C) No.4510/2016 Page 1 of 9 (hereinafter referred to as the NFL Rules).... Petitioner ...
Dap Buildcon Pvt Ltd vs.b.b. Lal Aggarwal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2016
$~1 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 85/2016 DAP BUILDCON PVT LTD ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Mukul Talwar, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sunil Kumar, Mr. Ankit Dixit and Mr. Nitin Sharma, Advs. Versus B.B. LAL AGGARWAL ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Kirti Uppal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW Satish Sharma, Adv. ORDER1612.2016 % IAs No.9656/2016 & 9657/2016 (both of defendant for leave to defendant and for condonation of 12 days delay in applying therefor) & IA No.12094/2016 (for condonation of 12 days delay in filing reply to IA No.9656/2016) 1. The application of the defendant for leave to defend the suit under Order XXXVII of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) for recovery of Rs.2,76,00,000/- with interest is accompanied with an application for condonation of twelve days delay in applying for leave to defend and the application of the plaintiff for condonation of twelve days delay in filing reply to application for leave to defend are for co...
Pooja Taneja vs.the State of Nct of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2016
$~41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 624/2015 POOJA TANEJA Judgment reserved on 1st December, 2016 Judgment pronounced on 16th December, 2016 ........ Petitioner Through :Mr. Vikas Pahwa, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Chandrani Prasad, Ms. Mitari Thakkar, Mr. Kinnori Ghosh and Mr. Aditya Dogra, Advs. versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. R.S. Kundu, ASC with Mr. Ankit Kumar Gulia, Adv. & SI Deepak Kumar, P.S. Rajouri Garden, Delhi for the State Mr. Dayanan Krishnan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Baldev Raj, Mr. Shikha Tyagi and Mr. Sumit Sandeep Tyagi, Advs. for respondent No.5 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK A.K. PATHAK, J.W.P.(CRL) 624/2015 1. Aggrieved by the judgment dated 21st January, 2015, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi in Crl. Revision Petition No.Page 1 of 18 83/1/14, petitioner has filed this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Pr...
Ramesh Fakirrao Kuyate vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2016
Judgment delivered on:16. 12.2016 $~59 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 11747/2016 RAMESH FAKIRRAO KUYATE versus ........ Petitioner UNION OF INDIA .... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent : Mr.Saurabh Bhargavan and Mr S.K.Chaubey Mr Ruchir Mishra and Mr Mukesh Kumar Tiwari CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1612.2016 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. Present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent-UOI to consider and decide the application for renewal of certificate of Notary filed by the petitioner.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner draws the attention of this Court to judgment passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court dated 11th September, 2015 in W.P. (C) No.8503/2015 titled Neelam Sharma Versus Union of India.3. This Court is of the opinion that as the representation/renewal WP(C) 11747/2016 Page 1 of 2 application; filed by the petitioner is still pending, the res...
Manglam Express Cargo Pvt. Ltd. Vs.union of India & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2016
$~27 to 30 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 11364/2015 & C.M.No.29867/2015 MANGLAM EXPRESS CARGO PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Ashish Mohan with Mr.Mohit Kumar, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Jagjit Singh with Mr.Shipra Shukla and Mr.Preet Singh, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 11365/2015 & C.M.No.29869/2015 MANGLAM EXPRESS CARGO PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Ashish Mohan with Mr.Mohit Kumar, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Jagjit Singh with Mr.Shipra Shukla and Mr.Preet Singh, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 11708/2015 & C.M.No.31144/2015 GOLDEN LOGISTICS ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Ashish Mohan with Mr.Mohit Kumar, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Jagjit Singh with Mr.Shipra Shukla and Mr.Preet Singh, Advocates. W.P.(C) 11364/2015 & Ors. Page 1 of 4 + W.P.(C) 11819/2015 & C.M.No.31398/2015 M/S GOLDEN LOGISTICS ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Ashish...
State (Nct of Delhi) vs.vinay Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2016
$~41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + DECIDED ON :16. h DECEMBER, 2016 CRL.A.764/2014 STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Appellant Through : Ms.Meenakshi Dahiya, APP. versus VINAY KUMAR ..... Respondent Through : Mr.R.K.Bachchan, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.(Oral) 1. Present appeal has been preferred by the State for enhancement of sentence. The appeal is contested by the respondent.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the file. By a judgment dated 21.11.2013 in Sessions Case No.28/N/13 arising out of FIR No.439/2012 PS Rajouri Garden, the respondent was held guilty for committing offences punishable under Section 21(b) of NDPS Act. By an order dated 21.11.2013, he was awarded RI for one month and fourteen days with fine `1,000/-. Aggrieved by the lenient view taken by the Trial Court, State has filed the instant appeal for enhancement of the sentence considering the gravity of the offence.3. On 07.11.2012, the responden...
Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Vs.sujatasen & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2016
$~43 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:16. h December, 2016 ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ravi Sabharwal, Adv. versus + MAC.APP. 773/2016 & CM No.35142/2016 SUJATASEN & ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA Through: Ms. Suman N. Rawat, Adv. ........ RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant has challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.10,15,360/- has been awarded to respondents No.1 to 3.2. The accident dated 01st August, 2014 resulted in the death of Bimaleswar Sen. The deceased was aged 72 years at the time of accident and was survived by his widow and two daughters who filed the claim petition before the Claims Tribunal. The deceased was a retired Government Servant drawing a pension of Rs.19,508/- per month at the time of accident. The Claims Tribunal deducted 1/3rd towards personal expenses of deceased and applied the multiplier of 5 to compute the loss of dependency at Rs.7,80,360/-. The ...
- ‹ Prev
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- Next ›
- Last »