Delhi Court December 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Patna Homeopathic Medical College & Hospital vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2016
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:16. h December, 2016 % + W.P.(C) 11228/2016, CM No.43954/2016 PATNA HOMEOPATHIC MEDICAL COLLEGE & HOSPITAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Nagendra Rai, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Aakash Kumar & Mr. Shantanu Saga, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajendra Sahu, GP for R-1/UOI with Mr. Sameer Sharma, Adv. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.(ORAL) CM No.43954/2016 1. By this order I shall dispose of the aforesaid application filed by the petitioner seeking stay of the impugned communication dated November 4, 2016.2. Mr. Nagendra Rai, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner would submit, vide the impugned communication, the respondent No.1 has inter-alia expressed itself that the permission for making admission shall be denied to the petitioner for the academic session 2017-2018, if the W.P.(C) No.11228/2016 Page 1 of 6 petitioner does not fulfil the eligibility conditions by ...
Gammon India Ltd. Vs.delhi Development Authority
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2016
$~ F-179 * + GAMMON INDIA LTD. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. 672/2008 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Subramaniam Prasad, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sumit Goel, Ms. Raveena Rai, Mr. Akash Jindal, Advocates. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR Through: ..... Respondent ORDER1612.2016 % 1. This is a petition by Gammon India Limited (GIL) under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) challenging an Award dated 22nd August 2008 passed by the sole Arbitrator in the disputes between the parties arising out of a contract awarded by the Respondent Delhi Development Authority (DDA) to the... Petitioner for the construction of Trumpets, flyovers, grade separators at various places in Delhi.2. This Court has heard the submissions of Mr. Subramaniam Prasad, learned Senior counsel appearing for the... Petitioner. Despite the matter being listed on several occasions, none appeared for the DDA. Nevertheless, the reply filed by the DDA...
Subhadara vs.vijender Singh & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2016
$~1 to 3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + REVIEW PET. 380/2016 in RSA2592015 Date of Decision:16. 12.2016 SUBHADARA Through: Mr.Vipin K. Singh, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus VIJENDER SINGH & ORS Through: None. ........ RESPONDENTS + REVIEW PET. 390/2016 in RSA2552015 SUBHADARA Through: Mr.Vipin K. Singh, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus SURENDER SINGH & ORS. Through: None. ........ RESPONDENTS + REVIEW PET.389/2016 in RSA2562015 SUBHADARA Through: Mr.Vipin K. Singh, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus RAVINDER SINGH & ORS. Through: None. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J.(ORAL) Rev.Pet. Nos.380/2016, 390/2016 & 389/2016 Page 1 of 11 CM Appln.30880/2016 in Rev.Pet.380/2016; CM Appln.31675/2016 in Rev.Pet.390/2016; & CM Appln. 31672/2016 in Rev.Pet.389/2016 1.2. Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The applications stand disposed of. CM Appln.30882/2016 in Rev.Pet.380/2016; CM Appln.31677/2016 in Rev.Pet.39...
Dhan Devi vs.laxmi Devi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2016
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RSA4452015 DHAN DEVI Judgment Reserved on: December 08, 2016 Judgment Delivered on: December 16, 2016 Represented by: Mr.J.C.Mahindro, Advocate. ..... Appellant versus LAXMI DEVI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Represented by: Mr.Ravinder Tyagi, Ms.Kartika Tyagi, Ms.Kanishka Tyagi and Ms.Divya Singhal, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI JUDGMENT RSA4452015 1. This Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure has been filed against the concurrent judgment of the Courts below; of the Trial Court dated 24.07.2014 and of First Appellate Court dated 09.09.2015, by which the suit of the respondents/plaintiffs has been decreed for possession against the appellant/defendant in respect of suit property bearing No.B-278, J.J.Colony, Budh Nagar, Inderpuri, New Delhi as shown red in the site plan Ex.PW-2/D and the appeal preferred by the appellant defendant has been dismissed.2. The following substantial question of l...
Dr Arora and Ors vs.sales Tax Bar Association
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2016
$~25. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 11777/2016 and CM APPL. 46466-46467/2016 1. DR ARORA AND ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajesh Jain, Advocate with Mr. K.J.Bhatt, Mr. V.K. Jain, Mr. Virag Tiwari and Mr. Sudhir Sangal, Advocates versus SALES TAX BAR ASSOCIATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kirti Uppal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Awadh Kaushik, Advocate and Mr .Sanjay Sharma, President and Mr. Suresh Agrawal, Secretary of the respondent/Association in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % The present petition has been filed by five petitioners out of whom, ORDER1612.2016 petitioners No.1 to 4 are Chartered Accountants by profession and members of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India and the petitioner No.5 is a Value Added Tax practitioner in whose favour, the Commissioner of Trade and Taxes has issued a certificate of enrolment. All the petitioners are aggrieved by the Notice dated 07.12.2016 issued by the respondent/Sales Tax Bar Asso...
Pme Power Solutions (India) Ltd. Vs.export Import Bank of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2016
$~2. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 11717/2016 and CM APPL. 46123-25/2016 PME POWER SOLUTIONS (INDIA) LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Alok Krishna Agarwal, Advocate with Mr. Mayank Bughani, Advocate versus Through: None ........ RESPONDENTS EXPORT IMPORT BANK OF INDIA & ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % The present petition has been filed by the petitioner praying inter alia ORDER1612.2016 1. for issuing directions to the respondent No.1/Exim Bank to restrain it from disbursing any further amount to the respondent No.4, an entity situated in Lusaka, Zambia in respect of a project that was being executed by the petitioner in Zambia.2. After addressing arguments at some length on the maintainability of the present petition, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition, while reserving the right of the petitioner to seek its remedies against the respondents No.1 and 4, as may be available to it in ...
The Commissioner, Transport vs.bsc-c&c Jv
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~29 * + THE COMMISSIONER, TRANSPORT O.M.P. (COMM) 567/2016 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Guru Krishnakumar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Gautam Narayan, Mr. R.A. Iyer, Mr. Mohan Raj & Ms. Shruthi P., Advocates. BSC-C&C JV versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Navin Kumar, Ms. Rashmeet Kaur & Ms. Arpana Majumdar, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR ORDER1612.2016 % IA No.15580/2016 (for exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. IA No.15582/2016 (for condonation of delay in re-filing the petition) 2. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay in re-filing the petition is condoned.3. The application is disposed of. IA No.15581/2016 (for condonation of delay in filing the petition) 4. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay in re-filing the petition is condoned. O.M.P. (COMM) 567/2016 Page 1 of 12 5. The application is disposed of. O.M.P. (COMM) 567/2016 & IA No.15583/2016 (for stay) 6. Notice. Mr. Navin Kumar, l...
Santosh Kumari Chadha vs.railway Employees Cghs Ltd. & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2016
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 7541/2013 Date of decision:16. h December, 2016. SANTOSH KUMARI CHADHA ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Atul Kumar Singh, Advocate. versus RAILWAY EMPLOYEES CGHS LTD. & ANR ..... Respondent Through Ms. Jyoti Taneja, Advocate respondent No.2, GNCTD/RCS. for CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) Santosh Kumari Chadha, the writ petitioner, was enrolled as a member of the Railway Employees Cooperative Group Housing Society Ltd. (Cooperative Society, for short) on 14th June, 1977.2. In 1991, Santosh Kumari Chadha claims that she learnt that her name had been deleted from the list of members, perceptibly for the reason that she had resigned.3. Santosh Kumari Chadha challenged the Cooperative Society and invoked her right by initiating arbitration proceedings under Section 60 of the Delhi Cooperative Societies Act, 1972. An arbitrator was appointed and by an interim order in th...
Farm Manufacturing Co. Vs.delhi Development Authority
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:16. 12.2016 O.M.P. (COMM) 243/2016& IA Nos.5813/2016 & 15159/2016 % + FARM MANUFACTURING CO. ........ Petitioner Versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : Mr H. C. Mittal, Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr Dinesh Relan, Standing counsel with : Ms Kanika Singh, Assistant Standing counsel. CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the Act) impugning an arbitral award dated 14.01.2016 (hereafter the impugned award) made by the sole arbitrator. Factual Background 2. The principal dispute between the parties relates to the imposition of misuse charges for a plot bearing No.A-18, G.T. Karnal Road, Industrial Area, Delhi-110033 (hereafter the Property).3. By a perpetual lease deed dated 29.08.1972, the Property was leased ...
Bishamber & Ors. Vs.state of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2016
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on : December 16, 2016 CRL.A. No.101/2000 BISHAMBER & ORS. Through: Mr.Rajeev Sharma, Ms.Radhalakshmi ..... Appellants R., Advocates versus STATE OF DELHI Through: Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI JUDGMENT P.S.TEJI, J.1. Aggrieved by the judgment of conviction dated 15.02.2000 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi convicting the appellants for the offence punishable under Section 304-B of Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as I.P.C.), and order on sentence dated 15.02.2000, whereby the appellants have been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of seven years.2. The factual matrix emerges from the record is that the marriage of Mithlesh (since deceased) was solemnized with Ravinder Kumar on 28.11.1985 as per Hindu rites and ceremonies. Furniture, one sofa set, dining table, washing machine and 10 to...
- ‹ Prev
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- Next ›
- Last »