Delhi Court December 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Samiah International Builders Pvt Ltd vs.sanjeev Nirvani
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-19-2016
$~9 * + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA4682016 & CMs 25815-17/2016 SAMIAH INTERNATIONAL BUILDERS PVT LTD..... Appellant Through : Mr. Akshit Gadhok and Mr. Harish Sharma, Advocates versus SANJEEV NIRVANI ..... Respondent Through : Respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % Pursuant to the parties being referred to the Delhi High Court ORDER1912.2016 Mediation and Conciliation Centre, a Settlement Agreement dated 7.12.2016 has been placed on record.2. Counsel for the appellant and the respondent, who appears in person, state that the terms and conditions of the settlement have been set out in para 6 of the Settlement Agreement, whereunder it has been agreed that the appellant shall pay a sum of Rs.4.40 lacs to the respondent in full and final settlement of all his claims, subject matter of the present appeal. The said amount has been agreed to be paid by the appellant to the respondent in four equal instalments of Rs.1.10 lacs each, commencing from 15.1...
Rakesh Dhingra vs.national Scheduled Castes Finance & Development Corp ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-19-2016
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P. (C) No.2177/1996 Reserved on:7. h December, 2016 Pronounced on:19. h December, 2016 RAKESH DHINGRA... Petitioner in person. ........ Petitioner Through: versus NATIONAL SCHEDULED CASTES FINANCE & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Jagat Singh, Advocate for R-1. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner impugns the order of the Disciplinary Authority dated 14.12.1994 imposing the penalty of removal from services. The petitioner was an employee with the respondent No.1/National Scheduled Castes Finance and Development Corporation/employer.... Petitioner also impugns the order dated 24.3.1995 passed by the Appellate Authority dismissing the appeal of the petitioner against the order of the Disciplinary Authority dated 14.12.1994.... Petitioner also seek...
Akira Marketing Private Limited vs.azure Hospitality Private Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-19-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order reserved on:08.12.2016 Order delivered on:19.12.2016 CO. APPL. (M) 162/2016 IN THE MATTER OF: AKIRA MARKETING PRIVATE LIMITED Applicant No.1/Amalgamating Company No.1 AND MAMA CATERING PRIVATE LIMITED .....Applicant No.2/Amalgamating Company No.2 AND CLARIDGES HOSPITALITY PRIVATE LIMITED .....Applicant No.3/Amalgamating Company No.3 WITH AZURE HOSPITALITY PRIVATE LIMITED Applicant No.4/Amalgamated Company Through: Mr. Anirudh Das, Mr. Kamaljeet Singh and Mr. Vikram Shah, Advocates for the Applicants CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.1. The present application has been filed jointly, under Section 391 of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) read with Rule 9 of CO.APPL.(M) 162/2016 Page 1 of 1 the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 by Akira Marketing Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as Amalgamating Company No.1), Mama Catering Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as Amalgamating Com...
Ajay Gautam vs.pio Delhi Waqf Board and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-19-2016
Judgment delivered on:19. 12.2016 $~57 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 11830/2016 AJAY GAUTAM PIO DELHI WAQF BOARD AND ANR versus ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Through Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : :... Petitioner in person. Hashmat Nabi, Advocate for respondent No.1. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1912.2016 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner impugns order dated 14.09.2016, passed by the Central Information Commission, whereby, the case of the petitioner has been decided in terms of order dated 29.07.2016 in an earlier decided case No.CIC/SA/A/2016/001672.2. The petitioner, who appears in person, submits that the said case, on the basis of which the impugned order has been passed, pertains to an RTI application with regard to the Mosque at Darya WP(C) 11830/2016 Page 1 of 3 Ganj, whereas, the present appeal pertains to an RTI application with regard to (1) Madni Jasjid, (2) M...
Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Vs.onil Kumar Gulati & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-19-2016
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:19. h December, 2016 ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. Through: Mr. Ravi Sabharwal, Advocate ..... Appellant ONIL KUMAR GULATI & ANR Through: Mr. Navneet Goyal, Advocate for Respondent No.1 ....... RESPONDENTS Versus + MAC.APP. 80/2012 (i) (ii) + MAC.APP. 1080/2012 (iii) + MAC.APP. 1081/2012 ANMOL SETHI & ANR KRISHAN & ANR Versus Versus ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. Through: Mr. Ravi Sabharwal, Advocate ..... Appellant Through: Nemo ....... RESPONDENTS ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. Through: Mr. Ravi Sabharwal, Advocate ..... Appellant ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Navneet Goyal, Advocate for Respondent No.1 MAC.APP.80, 1080 & 1081 of 2012 MAC.APP.381/2013 Page 1 of 6 KRISHAN (iv) + MAC.APP. 381/2013 Versus Through: Mr. Navneet Goyal, Advocate ..... Appellant ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. & ANR. ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ravi Sabharwal, Advocate for Respondent No.1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (O ...
Vijay Sawhney vs.mrilani Chopra & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-19-2016
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI PRONOUNCED ON:19. 12.2016 RESERVED ON:28. 07.2016 FAO (OS) 402/2007, CM APPL.2839/2008 VIJAY SAWHNEY ..... Appellant Versus MRILANI CHOPRA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS FAO (OS) 404/2007 CDR. AJAY K. SAWHNEY ..... Appellant Versus G.B. PANT UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE AND TECHNOLOGY THROUGH: ITS VICE CHANCELLOR & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Appearance: Mr. Anip Sachthey with Mr. Mohit Paul, Ms. Anjali Chauhan and Ms. Diksha Jhingar, Advocates for appellant in FAO (OS) 402/2007. Mr. Meet Malhotra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ravi S.S. Chauhan, Mr. Manjeet Chawla and Ms. Pallak Singh, Advocates for appellant in FAO (OS) 404/2007. Mr. Manoj Swarup with Mr. Ashish Mohan, Advocates for respondents in both matters. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.1. The appellants are aggrieved by the order dated 31.05.2007 of the Single Judge in IA No.2551 of 1983 and IA No.6540 of 2005 filed in CS (OS) FAO ...
Augere Wireless Broadband India Private Limited vs.bharti Airtel Limit ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-19-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:09.11.2016 Judgment Pronounced on:19. 12.2016 CO. PETITION5302016 IN THE MATTER OF:-"AUGERE WIRELESS BROADBAND INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED PETITIONER/TRANSFEROR COMPANY AND BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED .. TRANSFEREE COMPANY Through: Mr. Abhinav Vashisth, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Anirudh Das and Mr. Kamaljeet Singh, Advocates Ms. Aparna Mudium, Assistant Registrar of Companies Mr. Rajiv Bahl, Advocate for the Official Liquidator CORAM: HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J1 The present Petition under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by Augere Wireless Broadband India Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as Transferor CO.PET. 530/2016 Page 1 of 1 Company/Petitioner) to seek approval of the Scheme of Amalgamation (hereinafter referred to as the Scheme) of the Transferor Company with Bharti Airtel Limited (hereinafter referred to as Transferee Compan...
Yogita Godara vs.food Corporation of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-19-2016
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % YOGITA GODARA W.P.(C) No.11817/2016 19th December, 2016 ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. K.B. Hina, Advocate with petitioner in person. FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA & ANR. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Neemlima Tripathi, Advocate for R-1. Mr. Harish Kumar Garg and Ms. Puuram Kumari, Advocates for R-2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. YES VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. Appl. No.46613/2016 (for exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) No.11817/2016 and C.M. Appl. No.46612/2016 (for stay) 1. By this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner impugns the order dated 17.11.2016 of the respondent No.1/Food Corporation of India/employer terminating the services of the W.P. (C) No.11817/2016 Page 1 of 11 petitioner on the ground that the petitioner was only an OBC in the list of Government of Nat...
Mku Ltd vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-19-2016
$~41 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. (COMM) 571/2016 MKU LTD ........ Petitioner Through: Ms Geeta Sharma, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Ms Sunieta Ojha, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % VIBHU BAKHRU, J ORDER1912.2016 IA No.15673/2016 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The application stands disposed of. O.M.P. (COMM) 571/2016& IA No.15672/2016 3. Issue notice. The learned counsel for the respondent accepts notice.4. With the consent of the parties, the matter is taken up for final hearing. Introduction 5. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 34 of the O.M.P. (COMM) 571/2016 Page 1 of 14 Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the Act) assailing the order dated 09.09.2016 (hereafter 'the impugned award') passed by the sole Arbitrator under Section 33 of the Act, modifying the Interim Award dated 12.02.2016. The dispute between the parties relates to a contract dated 27.04.2010 ...
Sms Paryavaran Ltd. & Ors. Vs.intergen Energy Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-19-2016
* % + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:19. h December, 2016 CRL.M.C. 4724/2016 SMS PARYAVARAN LTD & ORS ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Gagan Chhabra, Ms. Richa Narang, Mr. Mayank Chawla & Mr. Rohit Puri, Advs. versus INTERGEN ENERGY LTD Represented by: CRL.M.C. 4746/2016 SMS PARYAVARAN LTD & ORS. ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Gagan Chhabra, Ms. Richa Narang, Mr. Mayank Chawla & Mr. Rohit Puri, Advs. versus INTERGEN ENERGY LTD. Represented by: CRL.M.C. 4747/2016 SMS PARYAVARAN LTD. & ORS. ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Gagan Chhabra, Ms. Richa Narang, Mr. Mayank Chawla & Mr. Rohit Puri, Advs. versus INTERGEN ENERGY LTD. Represented by: ..... Respondent Page 1 of 8 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) Crl. M.A. No.19677/2016 in CRL.M.C. 4724/2016. Crl. M.A. No.19734/2016 in CRL.M.C. 4746/2016. Crl. M.A. No.19736/2016 in CRL.M.C. 4747/2016. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptio...
- ‹ Prev
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- Next ›
- Last »