Delhi Court December 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kullu Valley Leisure Resorts Private Limited vs.b R Bee Products Priva ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-19-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:15. 11.2016 Judgment pronounced on:19.12.2016 CO.PET. 459/2016 IN THE MATTER OF:-"KULLU VALLEY LEISURE RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED ..Petitioner no.1/Transferor Company AND B R BEE PRODUCTS PRIVATE LIMITED ..Petitioner no.2/Transferee Company Through: Mr.Sudhir K. Makkar, Senior Advocate with Ms. Singh,Advocates petitioners Meenakshi for the CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.1. This joint petition has been filed jointly under Sections 391(2) and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereafter referred to as the Act) seeking sanction to the proposed scheme of Amalgamation (hereafter referred to as the proposed scheme) of Kullu Valley Leisure Resorts Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner no.1/Transferor Company) with B R CO.PET. 459/2016 Page 1 of 1 Bee Products Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner no.2/Transferee Company).2. The registered offices of the... Petitio...
Samtech Informatics Private Limited vs.asf Infrastructure Private Limi ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-19-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved On:15. 11.2016 Judgment Pronounced On:19. 12.2016 CO.PET. 330/2016 IN THE MATTER OF:-"SAMTECH INFORMATICS PRIVATE LIMITED... Petitioner/Transferor Company no.1 AND VICTORIA TELECOM SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED... Petitioner/Transferor Company no.2 WITH ASF INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED... Petitioner/Transferee Company Through: Mr.Ashish Middha, Advocate for the... Petitioners Ms. Aparna Mudiam, Asst. Registrar of Companies for the Regional Director Mr. Rajiv Bahl, Advocate for the Official Liquidator CO.PET.330/2016 Page 1 of 1 CORAM: HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.CO.APPL. representation/affidavit on behalf of the Regional Director) (Condonation 4012/2016 of delay in filing This application seeks condonation of delay, which is stated to be of 70 days on the part of the Regional Director in filing the representation/affidavit. Issue notice. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner acce...
Store One Retail India Limited vs.annapurna Infrastruture Pvt Ltd & Or ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-19-2016
$~40 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. (COMM) 570/2016 STORE ONE RETAIL INDIA LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Rajiv Nayar, Senior Advocate with Mr Sudhir Sharma, Mr Sanjeev Kumar Sharma, Mr Abhishek Swaroop, Mr Abhishek and Mr Ritesh Kumar, Advocates. versus ANNAPURNA INFRASTRUTURE PVT LTD & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Manish Sharma, Ms Chandni Mehra, Mr Abhishek Agarwal, Advocate for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU ORDER1912.2016 % VIBHU BAKHRU, J IA No.15671/2016 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CAV. No.1065/2016 The learned counsel for the respondent no.3/caveator has entered 2. appearance. The caveat stands discharged. O.M.P. (COMM) 570/2016 Page 1 of 14 O.M.P. (COMM) 570/2016 and IA No.15670/2016 3. Store One Retail India Limited (hereafter Store One) has filed the present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the Act) impugning an arbitral award dated 09.09.2016 (hereafter the ...
Mussoorie Trading Company Private Limited vs.jaigeet Trading Private L ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-19-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order reserved on:28. 11.2016 Order delivered on:19.12.2016 CO. APPL. (M) 160/2016 IN THE MATTER OF: MUSSOORIE TRADING COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED ...Applicant/Transferor Company/Demerged Company AND JAIGEET TRADING PRIVATE LIMITED Applicant /Transferee Company/Resulting Company Through: Mr. Anirudh Das and Mr. Vikram Shah, Advocates for the Applicants. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.1. The present application has been filed jointly, under Section 391 of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) read with Rule 9 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959, by Mussoorie Trading Company Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as the Demerged/Transferor Company) and Jaigeet Trading Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as the Resulting/Transferee Company) in connection with the Scheme of Demerger CO.APPL.(M) 160/2016 Page 1 of 1 and Arrangement (hereinafter referred to as the Scheme) between the Demerged...
Shri Harish Chander vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-19-2016
* + % SHRI HARISH CHANDER UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P. (C) No.6941/2000 19th December, 2016 None. ........ Petitioner Through: versus Through: None. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks the relief of regularization of his services with retrospective effect from the date of his initial appointment on 4.4.1991 with the respondent no.3/employer.... Petitioner by this writ petition pleads that the petitioner was appointed to the post of Sweeper on ad hoc basis for a first time on 4.4.1991 for six months and thereafter he was appointed again for four months w.e.f. 9.10.1991 without the break in service.... Petitioner was again reappointed for four months vide office order dated 11.2.1992 and such ad hoc appointments kept on continuing again and again till 25.6.1997 aft...
Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Vs.anmol Sethi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-19-2016
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:19. h December, 2016 ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. Through: Mr. Ravi Sabharwal, Advocate ..... Appellant ONIL KUMAR GULATI & ANR Through: Mr. Navneet Goyal, Advocate for Respondent No.1 ....... RESPONDENTS Versus + MAC.APP. 80/2012 (i) (ii) + MAC.APP. 1080/2012 (iii) + MAC.APP. 1081/2012 ANMOL SETHI & ANR KRISHAN & ANR Versus Versus ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. Through: Mr. Ravi Sabharwal, Advocate ..... Appellant Through: Nemo ....... RESPONDENTS ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. Through: Mr. Ravi Sabharwal, Advocate ..... Appellant ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Navneet Goyal, Advocate for Respondent No.1 MAC.APP.80, 1080 & 1081 of 2012 MAC.APP.381/2013 Page 1 of 6 KRISHAN (iv) + MAC.APP. 381/2013 Versus Through: Mr. Navneet Goyal, Advocate ..... Appellant ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. & ANR. ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ravi Sabharwal, Advocate for Respondent No.1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (O ...
Cdr. Ajay K. Sawhney vs.g.b. Pant University of Agriculture and Techno ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-19-2016
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI PRONOUNCED ON:19. 12.2016 RESERVED ON:28. 07.2016 FAO (OS) 402/2007, CM APPL.2839/2008 VIJAY SAWHNEY ..... Appellant Versus MRILANI CHOPRA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS FAO (OS) 404/2007 CDR. AJAY K. SAWHNEY ..... Appellant Versus G.B. PANT UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE AND TECHNOLOGY THROUGH: ITS VICE CHANCELLOR & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Appearance: Mr. Anip Sachthey with Mr. Mohit Paul, Ms. Anjali Chauhan and Ms. Diksha Jhingar, Advocates for appellant in FAO (OS) 402/2007. Mr. Meet Malhotra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ravi S.S. Chauhan, Mr. Manjeet Chawla and Ms. Pallak Singh, Advocates for appellant in FAO (OS) 404/2007. Mr. Manoj Swarup with Mr. Ashish Mohan, Advocates for respondents in both matters. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.1. The appellants are aggrieved by the order dated 31.05.2007 of the Single Judge in IA No.2551 of 1983 and IA No.6540 of 2005 filed in CS (OS) FAO ...
Ram Bilash Mahto and Ors. Vs.food Corporation of India Workers Union a ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-19-2016
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:14. 07.2016 Pronounced on:19. 12.2016 CONT. APP. (C) 24/2012 RAM BILASH MAHTO AND ORS. Appellants Through: Sh. Sanjiv Bahl, Advocate. Versus FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA WORKERS UNION AND ORS. ....Respondents Through: Sh. Rajiv Talwar, Advocate, for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. In this contempt appeal, the appellants are aggrieved by the order dated 19.01.2012 passed by the learned Single Judge in Cont. Cas (C) No.40/2010 holding them guilty of contempt of court and sentencing them to simple imprisonment for 5 days and a fine of `1000/-.2. The first respondent (hereinafter the Union) is a registered trade Union under the Trade Unions Act, and the second respondent is its elected President. The election was held in furtherance of the orders of this Court dated 15.12.2006 in FAO(OS) No.33/2006 and common judgement dated 31.03.2006...
Narmada Asbestos Pipes Private Limited vs.carnation Developers Private ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-19-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved On:18.11.2016 Judgment Pronounced On:19.12.2016 CO.PET. 316/2015 IN THE MATTER OF:-"NARMADA ASBESTOS PIPES PRIVATE LIMITED Transferor Company/... Petitioner Company-I AND CARNATION DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED Transferee Company /... Petitioner Company-II Through: Mr. Sumit Roy and Mr. Vishal Dutt, Advocates for... Petitioners Ms. Aparna Mudiam, Assistant Registrar of Companies for the Regional Director Mr. Rajiv Bahl, Advocate for the Official Liquidator CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J1 The present Petition has been filed jointly, under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) read with Rules 6 and 9 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959, by Narmada Asbestos Pipes CO.PET. 316/2015 Page 1 of 1 Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as Transferor Company/Petitioner No.1) and Carnation Developers Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as Transfere...
Consolidated Finvest & Investments Limited vs.jindal Photo Investments ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-19-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:09. 11.2016 Judgment pronounced on:19.12.2016 CO.PET. 220/2016 IN THE MATTER OF:-"CONSOLIDATED FINVEST & INVESTMENTS LIMITED... Petitioner /Transferor Company no.1 AND CONSOLIDATED GREEN FINVEST PRIVATE LIMITED... Petitioner/Transferor Company No.2 AND JINDAL IMPERATIVE SPECIALIST LIMITED... Petitioner/Transferor Company No.3 HINDUSTAN POWERGEN LIMITED AND AND... Petitioner/Transferor Company No.4 JINDAL SOLAR POWERTECH LIMITED... Petitioner/Transferor Company No.5 AND CO.PET.220/2016 Page 1 of 1 JINDAL POLY FILMS INVESTMENT LIMITED... Petitioner/Transferor Company No.6 AND BUDHIYA MARKETING PRIVATE LIMITED Non-Petitioner/Transferor Company no.7 AND EDWARD SUPPLY PRIVATE LIMITED Non-Petitioner/Transferor Company No.8 AND JESMIN INVESTMENTS LIMITED Non-Petitioner/Transferor Company No.9 AND CORNET VENTURES LIMITED Non-Petitioner/Transferor Company No.10 JINDAL PHOTO INVESTMENTS LIMITED WITH... Petitioner/Transferee Company Thr...
- ‹ Prev
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- Next ›
- Last »