Skip to content

Delhi Court December 2016 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Dec 20 2016

Amit Dabas vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-20-2016

% + THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:20. 12.2016 W.P.(C) 9101/2014 & CM50142015 BHIM SINGH versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANOTHER AND ...... Petitioner ...... RESPONDENTS ... Petitioner ....... RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner Respondents Petitioners Respondents Petitioner Respondents Page 1 of 29 + W.P.(C) 58/2015 & CM50082015 SUNIL KUMAR versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR + W.P.(C) 68/2015 & CM50182015 BHAGIRATH versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR SATISH BHARDWAJ & ANR + W.P.(C) 240/2015 & CM112702015 + W.P.(C) 241/2015 & CM112862015 HANUMANT SINGH GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR versus versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR W.P.(C) No.9101/2014 & Ors + W.P.(C) 242/2015 & CM112712015 SURAT SINGH versus ........ Petitioner GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ....... RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioners GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR Respondents + W.P.(C) 243/2015 & CM125312015 BHUPINDER & ORS versus + W.P.(C) 244/2015 & CM112742015 SULTAN SINGH versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI &...


Dec 20 2016

Pritam and Ors vs.union of India and Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-20-2016

$~59 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:20. 12.2016 W.P.(C) 352/2016 & CM14642016 PRITAM AND ORS versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Advocates who appeared in this case: ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS For the... Petitioner s For the Respondent UOI For the Respondent LAC & L&B : Mr Aashish Gumber : Mr Rajesh Kumar with Mr Pradeep Jha & Ms Santwana : Ms Ruchika Rathi CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) JUDGMENT1 By way of this writ petition the petitioners seek the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. The petitioners, consequently, seek a declaration that the acquisition proceeding initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the 1894 WP(C) 352/2016 Page 1 of 3 Act) and in resp...


Dec 20 2016

National Investor Forum Regd. Vs.golden Forests India Ltd.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-20-2016

$~38 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:20. 12.2016 + W.P.(C) 1399/2010 NATIONAL INVESTOR FORUM REGD. GOLDEN FORESTS INDIA LTD. Through: None. Versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Neeraj Malhotra with Mr. Rupal Luthra, Advocates for SEBI. Ms. Suruchi Aggarwal, Advocate for GFIL. Mr. Keshav Mohan and Mr. Deepak Pathak, Advocates for EPFO. % 1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT The Golden Forests (India) Ltd (GFIL) was incorporated in 1987. Between the years 1991 and 1997, its promoters set-up over 100 companies, including Golden Tourist Resorts and Developers Ltd (1991), Golden Lease Finance Ltd (1994), Golden Projects Ltd (1996), Himachal Country Resorts Ltd, etc (hereafter called GFIL group). Golden Projects Ltd introduced a number of investment schemes promising handsome returns, luring investors and depositors, and in three years collected several hundred crores of Rupees. L...


Dec 20 2016

Raj Singh vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-20-2016

% + THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:20. 12.2016 W.P.(C) 9101/2014 & CM50142015 BHIM SINGH versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANOTHER AND ...... Petitioner ...... RESPONDENTS ... Petitioner ....... RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner Respondents Petitioners Respondents Petitioner Respondents Page 1 of 29 + W.P.(C) 58/2015 & CM50082015 SUNIL KUMAR versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR + W.P.(C) 68/2015 & CM50182015 BHAGIRATH versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR SATISH BHARDWAJ & ANR + W.P.(C) 240/2015 & CM112702015 + W.P.(C) 241/2015 & CM112862015 HANUMANT SINGH GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR versus versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR W.P.(C) No.9101/2014 & Ors + W.P.(C) 242/2015 & CM112712015 SURAT SINGH versus ........ Petitioner GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ....... RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioners GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR Respondents + W.P.(C) 243/2015 & CM125312015 BHUPINDER & ORS versus + W.P.(C) 244/2015 & CM112742015 SULTAN SINGH versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI &...


Dec 20 2016

Tarif Singh Dabas vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-20-2016

% + THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:20. 12.2016 W.P.(C) 9101/2014 & CM50142015 BHIM SINGH versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANOTHER AND ...... Petitioner ...... RESPONDENTS ... Petitioner ....... RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner Respondents Petitioners Respondents Petitioner Respondents Page 1 of 29 + W.P.(C) 58/2015 & CM50082015 SUNIL KUMAR versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR + W.P.(C) 68/2015 & CM50182015 BHAGIRATH versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR SATISH BHARDWAJ & ANR + W.P.(C) 240/2015 & CM112702015 + W.P.(C) 241/2015 & CM112862015 HANUMANT SINGH GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR versus versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR W.P.(C) No.9101/2014 & Ors + W.P.(C) 242/2015 & CM112712015 SURAT SINGH versus ........ Petitioner GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ....... RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioners GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR Respondents + W.P.(C) 243/2015 & CM125312015 BHUPINDER & ORS versus + W.P.(C) 244/2015 & CM112742015 SULTAN SINGH versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI &...


Dec 20 2016

Satish Chander vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-20-2016

% + THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:20. 12.2016 W.P.(C) 9101/2014 & CM50142015 BHIM SINGH versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANOTHER AND ...... Petitioner ...... RESPONDENTS ... Petitioner ....... RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner Respondents Petitioners Respondents Petitioner Respondents Page 1 of 29 + W.P.(C) 58/2015 & CM50082015 SUNIL KUMAR versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR + W.P.(C) 68/2015 & CM50182015 BHAGIRATH versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR SATISH BHARDWAJ & ANR + W.P.(C) 240/2015 & CM112702015 + W.P.(C) 241/2015 & CM112862015 HANUMANT SINGH GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR versus versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR W.P.(C) No.9101/2014 & Ors + W.P.(C) 242/2015 & CM112712015 SURAT SINGH versus ........ Petitioner GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ....... RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioners GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR Respondents + W.P.(C) 243/2015 & CM125312015 BHUPINDER & ORS versus + W.P.(C) 244/2015 & CM112742015 SULTAN SINGH versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI &...


Dec 20 2016

Gruner India Private Limited vs.director of Income Tax (Transfer Prici ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-20-2016

$~3 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ITA7082016 GRUNER INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Prem Lata Bansal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Paras Chaudhary, Adv. versus DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (TRANSFAR PRICING)-1 Through: Mr. Dileep Shivpuri, Mr. Sanjay Kumar and Mr. Vikrant A. Maheshwari, Advs. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI % ORDER2012.2016 Issue notice.1. 2. Mr. Dileep Shivpuri accepts notice for the respondent. With consent, the appeal is taken up for disposal. The question of law sought to be urged in this appeal by the 3. assessee is: whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (in short the Tribunal) was right in holding that segregation of the transaction including inter alia royalty and fee for technical services, was not permissible in the circumstances of the case.4. The facts necessary for disposal of this appeal, having regard to the final order that this Court proposes to pass, are that the assessee...


Dec 19 2016

Sh. s.n. Kathuria vs.central Bank of India & Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-19-2016

* + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.10697/2016 19th December 2016 SH. S.N. KATHURIA Mr. Sarfaraz Khan, Adv. ........ Petitioner Through: versus CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. R.S.Mathur, Adv. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) CM Nos. 41885-41886/2016 (exemptions) 1. Exemptions allowed subject to just exceptions. CMs stand disposed of. W.P.(C) No.10697/2016 2. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India impugns the orders passed by the respondent/Central Bank of India/ employer dated 6.4.2015 and 17.10.2015 whereby the petitioner has been inflicted the punishment of dismissal from services which shall be a disqualification for future employment.3. The orders dated 6.4.2015 and 17.10.2015 have been passed at Mumbai. The entire enquiry proceedings were also held at Mumbai and W.P. (C) No.10697/2016 Page 1 of 2 even the show cause notice/charg...


Dec 19 2016

Kalindee Rail Nirman (Engineers) Limited vs.texmaco Rail & Engineering ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-19-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved On:17. 11.2016 Judgment Pronounced On:19.12.2016 CO.PET. 542/2015 IN THE MATTER OF:-"KALINDEE RAIL NIRMAN (ENGINEERS) LIMITED Petitioner/Amalgamating Company AND TEXMACO RAIL & ENGINEERING LIMITED Amalgamated Company Through: Mr. Abhinav Vasisth, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Anirudh Das, Mr. Kamaljeet Singh and Mr. Vikram Shah, Advocates for the... Petitioner Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Arushi, Mr. P.V. Dinesh, Mr. Sindhu T.P., Ms. Arushi Singh and Mr. Dinesh Kumar for Impleader/Objector Mr. Rajiv Bahl, Advocate for the Official Liquidator Ms. Aparna Mudium, Assistant Registrar of Companies for the Regional Director CO.PET.542/2015 Page 1 of 10 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT CO.APPL. 1392/2016 The present application has been filed by Mrs. Brij Lata Gemini, praying as follows:-"impleading the Applicant as in the present In the above facts and circumstance and in the interest of justice, it is most res...


Dec 19 2016

Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Vs.krishan & Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-19-2016

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:19. h December, 2016 ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. Through: Mr. Ravi Sabharwal, Advocate ..... Appellant ONIL KUMAR GULATI & ANR Through: Mr. Navneet Goyal, Advocate for Respondent No.1 ....... RESPONDENTS Versus + MAC.APP. 80/2012 (i) (ii) + MAC.APP. 1080/2012 (iii) + MAC.APP. 1081/2012 ANMOL SETHI & ANR KRISHAN & ANR Versus Versus ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. Through: Mr. Ravi Sabharwal, Advocate ..... Appellant Through: Nemo ....... RESPONDENTS ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. Through: Mr. Ravi Sabharwal, Advocate ..... Appellant ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Navneet Goyal, Advocate for Respondent No.1 MAC.APP.80, 1080 & 1081 of 2012 MAC.APP.381/2013 Page 1 of 6 KRISHAN (iv) + MAC.APP. 381/2013 Versus Through: Mr. Navneet Goyal, Advocate ..... Appellant ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. & ANR. ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ravi Sabharwal, Advocate for Respondent No.1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (O ...


  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial