Delhi Court December 2016 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2016 Page 2 of about 517 results (0.020 seconds)Uttar Pradesh State Roadways Transport Corporation vs.r.k. Sachdeva & ...
Court: Delhi
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:23. d December, 2016 + MAC.APP. 182/2008 UTTAR PRADESH STATE ROADWAYS TRANSPORT CORPORATION Through: ..... Appellant Ms. Garima Prashad and Mr. Shadab Khan, Advocate Versus R.K. SACHDEVA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Advocate Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Advocate for National Insurance Co. Ltd. + MAC.APP. 242/2008 R.K. SACHDEVA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Advocate Versus UTTAR PRADESH STATE ROADWAYS TRANSPORT CORPORATION & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Garima Prashad and Mr. Shadab Khan, Advocate Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Advocate for National Insurance Co. Ltd. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT1 Both the parties have challenged the award passed by the Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.3,42,000/- has been MAC. APP. Nos.182/2008 & 242/2008 Page 1 of 5 awarded in respect of death of Suruchi Sachdeva. The claimants are seeking enhancement of the award amount whereas U.P. S...
Tag this Judgment!Energo Engineering Projects Ltd vs.trf Ltd
Court: Delhi
$~ * + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:23. 12.2016 FAO(OS) (COMM) 112/2016 & CM No.42025/2016 (for additional documents) ENERGO ENGINEERING PROJECTS LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Adv. with TRF LTD Mr.Dhruv Dewan, Ms.Reena Choudhary & Mr.Saurabh Seth, Advs. versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Amit Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Sumeet Gadodia, Mr. Gautam Singh and Mr.Kaushik Poddar, Advs. FAO(OS) (COMM) 113/2016 & CM No.42028/2016(for additional documents) ENERGO ENGINEERING PROJECTS LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Dhruv Dewan, Ms.Reena Choudhary & Mr.Saurabh Seth, Advs. FAO(OS)(Comm).112, 113, 114, 115 & 116/2016 1 + + TRF LTD versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Amit Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Sumeet Gadodia, Mr. Gautam Singh, Mr.Kaushik Poddar, Advs. FAO(OS) (COMM) 114/2016 & CM No.42031/2016(for additional documents) ENERGO ENGINEERING PROJECTS LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Dhruv Dewan, ...
Tag this Judgment!Kamlesh@baby vs.the State
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. No.322/2001 KAMLESH@BABY Through Date of Decision :23. d December, 2016 ..... PETITIONER Mr.Manoj Sharma, Adv. with Mr.Saurabh Sharma, Adv. THE STATE versus Through ..... RESPONDENT Mr.Sudershan Joon, APP for State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J1 Aggrieved by the judgment of conviction dated 18th April, 2001 convicting the appellant finding her guilty under Sections 21/of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as NDPS Act, 1985) and order on sentence dated 19th April, 2001 vide which the sentence was passed to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of ten years and to pay a fine of Rs.1,00,000/- for the offence punishable under Section 21 of the NDPS Act, in default of payment of fine, convict was to suffer further simple imprisonment for three years.2. The facts in brief are that a secret information was received on the basis of which the police of Narcotic Branch, on 1...
Tag this Judgment!Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.soman Singh & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:23. d December, 2016 + F.A.O. 240/2012 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Advocate Versus SOMAN SINGH & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Pratima N. Chauhan, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT1 The appellant has challenged the order of the Commissioner, Employees Compensation whereby compensation of Rs.3,68,340/- has been awarded to respondents No.1 to 6.2.... RESPONDENTS No.1 to 6 are the parents, widow and three minor children of Iqbal Singh and they filed an application for compensation before Commissioner, Employees Compensation arising out of the death of Iqbal Singh. It was pleaded in the application that Iqbal Singh was working as a driver under respondent No.7 on truck No.HR-38F-6765 and had gone to Agra. On 10th May, 2002, the vehicle bearing No.HR-38F-6765 (Truck) was being adjusted for being loaded by the second driver and while doing so, the truck w...
Tag this Judgment!Suman Devi & Ors. Vs.suresh Joshi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:23. d December, 2016 + MAC. APPL. 1100/2014 & C.M. APPL. 19971/2014 SUMAN DEVI & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. O.P. Mainie, Advocate Versus SURESH JOSHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sameer Nandwani and Mr. P. Acharya, Advocates for respondent No.3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT1 The appellants have challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.3,75,000/- has been awarded to the appellants. The appellants seek enhancement of the award amount.2. The accident dated 22nd August, 2010 resulted in the death of Rahul. The deceased was a bachelor aged 16 years studying in 9th standard at the time of the accident. He was survived by his mother and unmarried sister who filed the claim petition before the Claims Tribunal.3. The Claims Tribunal took the notional income of the deceased as Rs.15,000/- per annum, applied to the multiplier of 15 to compute the loss of dependency as...
Tag this Judgment!Shahjan Sheikh @ Tunnu @ Sajan vs.state
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on : December 23rd, 2016 BAIL APPLN. 2443/2016 SHAHJAN SHEIKH @ TUNNU @ SAJAN ........ Petitioner Through Mr.S.P. Singh and Mr.Krishna Kant Sharma, Advs. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through Mr.M.S. Oberoi, APP with SI Dheeraj Yadav, Special Cell. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI % P.S. TEJI, J.ORDER1 The present application under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the Cr. P.C.), has been filed by the petitioner for seeking regular bail in a case registered as FIR No.32/2013, under Sections 489B/489C/120-B of Indian Penal Code, at Police Station Special Cell, Delhi Police.2. The facts in brief are that the present case was registered on the basis of secret information that a syndicate was involved in illegal circulation of Fake Indian Currency Notes (FICN), printed in Pakistan and the same were being infiltrated through Indo-Bangladesh Border. Bail Appl. No.2443/2016 Page 1 of 5 ...
Tag this Judgment!Court on Its Own Motion vs.anil Dureja
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CCP (REF) 1/2016 COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION ..... Amicus Curiae Through Mr.Gautam Narayan with Ms.Shruthi Parasa, Advocate. ANIL DUREJA versus ..... Respondent Through Mr. Naushad Ahmed Khan, ASC (Civil) with Ms. Nancy Wadhwa, Advocate. Respondent in person. % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN Date of Decision:23. d December, 2016 JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present reference of contempt has been received from the Court of Mr. Ajay Kumar Malik, Metropolitan Magistrate, Central, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in which the accused No.1-Shamsha Begum had submitted that she had been arrested illegally during night hours in violation of Section 46(4) of Code of Criminal Procedure (for short Cr.P.C.) as well as the binding directions issued by the Supreme Court in D.K. Basu Vs. State of W.B., (1997) 1 SCC416and Sheela Barse Vs. State of Maharasthra, (1983) 2 SCC96: AIR1983SC378 2. The Metropolitan Magistrate while referring the matter has observed in...
Tag this Judgment!Rajat Sachdeva & Ors. Vs.uttar Pradesh State Roadways Transport Corpor ...
Court: Delhi
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:23. d December, 2016 + MAC.APP. 214/2008 UTTAR PRADESH STATE ROADWAYS TRANSPORT CORPORATION Through: ..... Appellant Ms. Garima Prashad and Mr. Shadab Khan, Advocate Versus RAJAT SACHDEVA & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Advocate Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Advocate for National Insurance Co. Ltd. + MAC.APP. 512/2008 RAJAT SACHDEVA & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Advocate Versus UTTAR PRADESH STATE ROADWAYS TRANSPORT CORPORATION & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Garima Prashad and Mr. Shadab Khan, Advocate Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Advocate for National Insurance Co. Ltd. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT1 Both the parties have challenged the award passed by the Claims Tribunal of Rs.6,64,000/- has been awarded to Rajat Sachdeva. U.P. State Road Transport Corporation is seeking reduction of the MAC. APP. Nos.214/2008 & 512/2008 Page 1 of 4 award amount whereas claimants are seek...
Tag this Judgment!j.s. Sehrawat vs.delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board & Anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.12174/2016 + % J.S. SEHRAWAT23d December, 2016 Through: Mr. Apurb Lal, Advocate with Ms. ........ Petitioner Meenu Pandey, Advocate. DELHI URBAN SHELTER IMPROVEMENT BOARD & ANR. versus Through: Mr. Manu Padalia, Advocate. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. No.48059/2016 (exemption) 1. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. +W.P.(C) No.12174/2016 2. By this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner impugns the show cause notice dated 21.9.2016 by which it is proposed by the disciplinary authority to impose the penalty upon the petitioner of dismissal from services inasmuch as petitioner has W.P.(C) No.12174/2016 Page 1 of 5 been convicted by the criminal court. The impugned show cause notice dated 21.9.2016 reads as under:-" Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board Govt. of ...
Tag this Judgment!The New India Assurance Co Ltd vs.poonam Sharma & Ors
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:23. d December, 2016 $~ * % + MAC.APP. 1192/2013 and CM270542016 POONAM SHARMA & ORS versus THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Adv. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Vishal Raj Sehijpal, Mr. Sunil Sagar, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT1 The appellant has challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.36,91,000/- has been awarded by the Claims Tribunal.2. The accident dated 05th May, 2013 resulted in the death of Vikas Sharma. The deceased was aged 35 years at the time of the accident and was survived by his widow, two sons and one daughter who filed the claim petition before the Claims Tribunal. It was claimed that the deceased was working as a field man with M/s Steel Paradise India Pvt. Ltd. earning Rs.16,000/- per month. The Claims Tribunal took Rs.16,000/- per month as the income of the deceased, added 50% towards future prospects, deducted 1/4...
Tag this Judgment!