Delhi Court November 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Neetu Sejwal vs.deen Dayal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-29-2016
$~30 * + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA9292016 NEETU SEJWAL ..... Appellant Through Mr.Lal Singh, Advocate with appellant in person versus DEEN DAYAL Through ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % The appellant/defendant is aggrieved by the impugned judgment and ORDER2911.2016 decree dated 29.2.2016, passed by the trial court in a suit for possession, recovery of arrears of rent and mesne profits and injunction instituted by the respondent/plaintiff in respect of the first floor of premises bearing No.D- 14/157, Sector-3, Rohini, New Delhi on the ground that the entire premises comprising of ground floor, first floor, second floor and terrace above the second floor had been purchased by her from Mr.Bal Kishan by virtue of a duly registered Sale Deed dated 3.1.2011 and the tenancy of the appellant/defendant had been terminated in accordance with law.2. Under the impugned judgment and decree, the trial court has directed the appellant/defendant to hand o...
Harish Peswani vs.jaishree Peswani & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-29-2016
$~17. * + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) No.498/2016 & IA No.12006/2016 (under Order XXXIX Rules 1&2 CPC). HARISH PESWANI ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. J.P. Sengh, Sr. Adv. with Mr. A.C. Bhasin and Ms. Manisha Mehta, Advs. versus ..... Defendants Through: None. JAISHREE PESWANI & ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW % ORDER2911.2016 It is the case of the plaintiff Harish Peswani in the plaint (i) that the plaintiff and the defendant no.3 Sh. Deepak Peswani are the sons of defendant no.1 Smt. Jaishree Peswani, while the defendants no.2(a) to 2(c) namely Smt. Divya Peswani, Ms. Varsha Peswani and Ms. Khushboo Peswani are the widow and daughters respectively and only legal heirs of Shri Naresh Peswani deceased son of defendant no.1; (ii) that the father of the plaintiff Shri Parmanand Peswani died intestate on 1st May, 2009 leaving the plaintiff and the defendants as his only heirs; (iii) the entire family was residing in property no.481, Jahangir Puri, Del...
Mehar Chand Sharma and Ors vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-29-2016
$~54 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:29. 11.2016 % + WP(C) No.10223/2015 MEHAR CHAND SHARMA AND ORS versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Advocates who appeared in this case: ....... Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS For the... Petitioner For the Respondent L&B/LAC For the Respondent DDA For the Respondent DMRC For the Respondent UOI :Mr Raj Bahadur Singh :Mr Yeeshu Jain and Ms Jyoti Tyagi : Mr Sanjeev Sabharwal & Ms Shobhna Takiar : Mr R.V. Sinha : Mr Rajesh Mishra with Mr Manuj Kaushik CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioners seek the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act), which came into effect on 01.01.2014. A declaration is sought to the effect that the acquisition proceeding, which is the subject- matter of the present petition, ...
Jeet Singh vs.ram Lal (Deceased) Thr Lrs
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-29-2016
$~ 1 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: November 29, 2016 RSA3352016 JEET SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr.B.S.Randhawa & Mr.Dinesh Kothari, Advocates. versus RAM LAL (DECEASED) THR LRS Through: None. CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI JUDGMENT (Oral) ..... Respondent 1. This Regular Second Appeal has been preferred against the concurrent judgment/finding of the learned Trial Court and First Appellate Court in respect of the staircase situated on the left side of shop No.WZ-256, F/7, Main Market, Inderpuri, New Delhi-110012 which has been claimed by the appellant to be a common property with the owner of shop No.WZ-256, F/6, Main Market, Inderpuri, New Delhi-110012.2. Civil Suit No.210/2000 filed by the appellant seeking the decree of permanent and mandatory injunction restraining the respondent/defendant from causing any obstruction in the common staircase as well direction to the respondent/defendant for removal of the obstruction in the staircase, ...
Smt Laxmi Jha & Ors. Vs.sh Manish Gupta & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-29-2016
$~9 to 11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:29. h November, 2016 + MAC.APP. 639/2013 & C.M.No.15434/2013 TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Arbaaz Hussain, Advocate for Ms.Shantha Devi Raman, Advocate versus LAXMI JHA & ORS. (i) Through : Mr.Anshuman Bal, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 to 4. ........ RESPONDENTS (ii) + MAC.APP. 663/2013 TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Arbaaz Hussain, Advocate for Ms.Shantha Devi Raman, Advocate versus SH BABLU & ORS Through : Mr.Anshuman Bal, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 to 4 ........ RESPONDENTS (iii) + MAC.APP. 866/2013 SMT LAXMI JHA & ORS ..... Appellants Through : Mr.Anshuman Bal, Advocate versus MAC.APP.639, 663 & 866 of 2013 Page 1 of 4 SH MANISH GUPTA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr.Arbaaz Hussain, Advocate for Ms.Shantha Devi Raman, Advocate for respondent No.3/Insurer. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) The above three appeals are d...
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs.ruchi Suri & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-29-2016
$~33 * % + MAC.APP.360/2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:29. h November, 2016 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD...... Appellant Through: Mr. Shomik Mazumdar, Adv. versus RUCHI SURI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Divyanshu Sahay, Adv. for R1 and R2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant has challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.3,30,500/- has been awarded to respondents No.1 and 2.2. The accident dated 07th November, 1998 resulted in the death of Gajinder Malhotra. The deceased was survived by his father and two sisters who filed the claim petitions before the Claims Tribunal. During the pendency of the claim petitions, the father of the deceased expired and his right to sue survived on the two daughters, namely the sisters of the deceased. The deceased was aged 23 years at the time of the accident. The Claims Tribunal took minimum wages of Rs.2,385/- in respect of a matriculate, added ...
Parminder Singh vs.inderjeet Singh & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-2016
$~11 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: November 28, 2016 RSA2492016 PARMINDER SINGH ..... Appellant Through : Mr.J.Burman, Advocate. versus INDERJEET SINGH & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr.Mohd.Imran and Mr.Rizwan, Advocates for R-1. Mr.B.L.Chawla, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI JUDGMENT (Oral) 1. This Regular Second Appeal has been preferred by the appellant/plaintiff impugning the order dated May 30, 2015 passed in RCA No.2/2016 whereby the First Appellate Court upheld the judgment dated November 23, 2015 passed by the learned Trial Court in Civil Suit No.523/2013 dismissing the suit for non-production of evidence by the plaintiff.2. I have heard learned counsel for the appellant/plaintiff as well as learned counsel for respondent No.2 the contesting respondent.3. Mr.B.L.Chawla, learned counsel for the respondent No.2 has submitted that since no substantial question of law arises in this appeal, the same may be dismisse...
Jai Bhagwan vs.state of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-2016
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. No.785/2000 + JAI BHAGWAN Judgment reserved on :17. h November, 2016 Date of decision :28. h November, 2016 ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Sumeet Verma and Mr. Abhijeet STATE OF DELHI Sharma, Advs. versus Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, Addl.P.P. for the ..... Respondent State CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. This appeal has been instituted by the appellant Jai Bhagwan son of Sh.Hukum Singh assailing the impugned judgment dated 13.11.2000 and impugned order on sentence dated 15.11.2000 of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, New Delhi in Sessions Case No.1in relation to FIR No.616/95, P.S. Ambedkar Nagar. Vide the impugned judgment dated 13.11.2000, the accused/the appellant herein was convicted for the commission of the offence punishable under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 and vide the impugned order on sentence dated 15.11.2000, he was sentenced to imprisonme...
Deepak Kumar Mittal vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-2016
$~13. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6029/2016 and CM APPL. 35593/2016 1. DEEPAK KUMAR MITTAL Through Mr.Rama Shanker, Ms.Kamlesh & Mr.Saurabh, Advocates ........ Petitioner versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Anil Dabas, Advocate for R-1/UOI Mr.L.R.Goyal, Advocate for R-4/Axis Bank UNION OF INDIA & ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % The present petition has been filed by the petitioner praying inter alia ORDER2811.2016 for issuance of directions to the respondent No.4/Axis Bank, Tri Nagar Branch, New Delhi to de-freeze the current account bearing No.914020035642059 in the name of M/s Bhagayashri Corporation, the proprietorship firm of the petitioner and further, to quash a letter dated 7.4.2016, issued by the respondent No.4/Bank informing him that his account has been frozen on the instructions of the respondent No.3.2. A counter affidavit has been filed by the respondent No.4/Axis Bank wherein it has been averred that on the Head Office of the Axis ...
Ajay Sahni & Anr vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-2016
$~R-18 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:28. 11.2016 W.P.(C) 5402/2015 & CM97382015 AJAY SAHNI & ANR versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS L&B/LAC For the Respondent DDA ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS : Ms Iti Sharma : Mr Yeeshu Jain with Ms Jyoti Tyagi : Mr Arjun Pant CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR JUSTICE JAYANT NATH BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) JUDGMENT1 By way of this writ petition the petitioners seek the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. The petitioners, consequently, seek a declaration that the acquisition proceeding initiated WP(C) 5402/2015 Page 1 of 3 under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the 1894 Act) and in respect of which A...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »