Delhi Court November 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Icici Bank Ltd. Vs.sanjoy Saha
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-30-2016
$~50 to 66 (17 matters) * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:30. h November, 2016 (1) + (2) + + (3) + (4) (5) + + (6) + (7) (8) + (9) + (10) + (11) + (12) + (13) + (14) + (15) + (16) + (17) + FAO2702015 FAO2732015 FAO3892015 & C.Ms.26339/2015 & 14072/2016 FAO12016 & C.M.105/2016 FAO52016 & C.M.120/2016 FAO62016 & C.M.123/2016 FAO82016 & C.M.162/2016 FAO92016 & C.M.165/2016 FAO722016 & C.M.5233/2016 FAO802016 & C.Ms.5729-31/2016 FAO1682016 & C.Ms.14485/16, 144FAO1692016 & C.Ms.14497/16, 144FAO1742016 & C.Ms.15071/16, 150FAO1792016 & C.Ms.15196/16, 151FAO1942016 & C.Ms.16171, 16173-FAO1952016 & C.Ms.16178-180/2016 FAO2002016 & C.Ms.16843/16, 16845/16, 168ICICI BANK LTD versus ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Punit Bhalla, Advocate P K GOSWAMI SONU BHADHANA & ANR (1) RAJESH KUMAR (2) (3) MOHINDER KUMAR GOYAL (4) (5) RAJU ARORA (6) (7) VIRENDER SINGH (8) (9) PRABHU DAYAL SANJOY SAHA POONAM SHARMA FAOs 270/2015 & other connected matters Page 1 of 5 (10) ANIL KUMAR (11) SON...
Icici Bank Ltd. Vs.vidya Bhusan
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-30-2016
$~50 to 66 (17 matters) * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:30. h November, 2016 (1) + (2) + + (3) + (4) (5) + + (6) + (7) (8) + (9) + (10) + (11) + (12) + (13) + (14) + (15) + (16) + (17) + FAO2702015 FAO2732015 FAO3892015 & C.Ms.26339/2015 & 14072/2016 FAO12016 & C.M.105/2016 FAO52016 & C.M.120/2016 FAO62016 & C.M.123/2016 FAO82016 & C.M.162/2016 FAO92016 & C.M.165/2016 FAO722016 & C.M.5233/2016 FAO802016 & C.Ms.5729-31/2016 FAO1682016 & C.Ms.14485/16, 144FAO1692016 & C.Ms.14497/16, 144FAO1742016 & C.Ms.15071/16, 150FAO1792016 & C.Ms.15196/16, 151FAO1942016 & C.Ms.16171, 16173-FAO1952016 & C.Ms.16178-180/2016 FAO2002016 & C.Ms.16843/16, 16845/16, 168ICICI BANK LTD versus ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Punit Bhalla, Advocate P K GOSWAMI SONU BHADHANA & ANR (1) RAJESH KUMAR (2) (3) MOHINDER KUMAR GOYAL (4) (5) RAJU ARORA (6) (7) VIRENDER SINGH (8) (9) PRABHU DAYAL SANJOY SAHA POONAM SHARMA FAOs 270/2015 & other connected matters Page 1 of 5 (10) ANIL KUMAR (11) SON...
Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs.kamal Dev Singh & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-30-2016
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:30. h November, 2016 FAO352012 & CM No.1223/2012 Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, proxy counsel. ..... Appellant 24 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD KAMAL DEV SINGH & ORS versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Deepak Maharaj and Mr. Akhilendra N. Singh, Advs. for R1. Mr. D.K. Nag, Adv. for IRDA. Mr. Sukhbir Singh and Mr. Nishant Singh, Advs. for R3. + FAO1062012 & CM No.4390/2012 25 UNITED TRAILER SERVICES ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sukhbir Singh and Mr. versus Nishant Singh, Advs. KAMAL DEV SINGH & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Deepak Maharaj and Mr. Akhilendra N. Singh, Advs. for R1. Mr. A.K. Soni, proxy counsel for Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Mr. D.K. Nag, Adv. for IRDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide order dated 08th December, 2011, the Commissioner, FAO Nos.35/2012 & 106/2012 Page 1 of 4 Employees Compensation awarded compensation of Rs.4,23,580/- to respondents No.1 and 2.2. The accident ...
Tata Aig General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.laxmi Jha & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-29-2016
$~9 to 11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:29. h November, 2016 + MAC.APP. 639/2013 & C.M.No.15434/2013 TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Arbaaz Hussain, Advocate for Ms.Shantha Devi Raman, Advocate versus LAXMI JHA & ORS. (i) Through : Mr.Anshuman Bal, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 to 4. ........ RESPONDENTS (ii) + MAC.APP. 663/2013 TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Arbaaz Hussain, Advocate for Ms.Shantha Devi Raman, Advocate versus SH BABLU & ORS Through : Mr.Anshuman Bal, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 to 4 ........ RESPONDENTS (iii) + MAC.APP. 866/2013 SMT LAXMI JHA & ORS ..... Appellants Through : Mr.Anshuman Bal, Advocate versus MAC.APP.639, 663 & 866 of 2013 Page 1 of 4 SH MANISH GUPTA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr.Arbaaz Hussain, Advocate for Ms.Shantha Devi Raman, Advocate for respondent No.3/Insurer. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) The above three appeals are d...
Basanti Lata Mahapatra & Anr vs.gannoji Srinu & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-29-2016
$~31 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:29. h November, 2016 MAC.APP. 616/2012 BASANTI LATA MAHAPATRA & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Rajesh Dwivedi and Mr. Zahid Ali, Advs. versus GANNOJI SRINU & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Amit Kumar Pandey, Adv. as amicus curiae. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant has challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.6,17,560/- has been awarded to the appellants. The appellants seek enhancement of the award amount. The accident dated 29th December, 2007 resulted in the death of 2. Debashish Das Mahaptara. The deceased was aged 22 years at the time of the accident and was survived by his parents who filed the claim petition before the Claims Tribunal. The deceased was B.Tech, working as a Management Trainee, earning Rs. 8,334/- per month.3. The Claims Tribunal took minimum wages of Rs.4,230/-, added 50% towards future prospects, deducted 50% towards per...
S a Infrastructure Consultants Pvt Tld vs.national Highway Authority o ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-29-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:29. 11.2016 $~20 * % + W.P.(C) 8736/2016 & CM No.35837/2016 S A INFRASTRUCTURE CONSULTANTS PVT TLD versus NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA Advocates who appeared in this case:-"For the... Petitioner ...... Petitioner ... Respondent For the Respondent : Mr Joy Basu, Sr Advocate with Mr Alok Agarwal, Mr Sudhir Mishra, Ms Ritwika Nanda and Mr Abhinav : Mr S. Nanda Kumar, Mr Parivesh Singh, Mr M.S. Saran Kumar and Mr Prateek Gupta CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition has been filed in respect of the Request for Proposal (RFP) dated 22.02.2016 as also the RFP dated 09.09.2016 pertaining to the project Independent Engineer Services for Six-Laning of Vijaywada-Gundugolanu Section of NH-5 from km 1076.48 to km 1022.48 including 6-lane Hanuman Junction bypass (length 6.72 km) and 4-lane Vijaywada bypass (length-47.88 km) [Total Lengt...
Tata Aig General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.sh Bablu & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-29-2016
$~9 to 11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:29. h November, 2016 + MAC.APP. 639/2013 & C.M.No.15434/2013 TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Arbaaz Hussain, Advocate for Ms.Shantha Devi Raman, Advocate versus LAXMI JHA & ORS. (i) Through : Mr.Anshuman Bal, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 to 4. ........ RESPONDENTS (ii) + MAC.APP. 663/2013 TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Arbaaz Hussain, Advocate for Ms.Shantha Devi Raman, Advocate versus SH BABLU & ORS Through : Mr.Anshuman Bal, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 to 4 ........ RESPONDENTS (iii) + MAC.APP. 866/2013 SMT LAXMI JHA & ORS ..... Appellants Through : Mr.Anshuman Bal, Advocate versus MAC.APP.639, 663 & 866 of 2013 Page 1 of 4 SH MANISH GUPTA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr.Arbaaz Hussain, Advocate for Ms.Shantha Devi Raman, Advocate for respondent No.3/Insurer. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) The above three appeals are d...
Kanti vs.raj Pal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-29-2016
$~32 * % + MAT.APP. 36/2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:29. h November, 2016 KANTI RAJ PAL Through: Mr. Parambir Singh and Ms. ..... Appellant Reena Bhola, Advs. versus Through: Mr. Rajat Aneja, Ms. Chandrika ..... Respondent Gupta and Ms. Arohi Holani, Advs. with respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant has challenged the decree of divorce granted by the Learned Additional District Judge under Section 13(1A)(i) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.2. The parties were married in the year 1989 and they lived together till 25th December, 2003 when the appellant left the matrimonial home. The respondent filed the petition for divorce against the appellant in 2004 which resulted in a decree of judicial separation on 04th December, 2007. After the expiry of one year of the judicial separation, the respondent filed a fresh petition of divorce under Section 13(1A)(i) of the Hindu Marriage Act which resulted in a decre...
The Managing Committe of the Pinnacle School vs.directorate of Educati ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-29-2016
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:29. h November, 2016 LPA2762016 THE MANAGING COMMITTE OF THE PINNACLE SCHOOL Through: Mr. Ashok Chhabra, Advocate Appellant Versus DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION & ANR . Respondents Through: Mr. Gautam Narayan, ASC with Mr.R.A. Iyer, Advocate for respondent No.1 Mr. Daljeet Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr.Chandrashekhar, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL JUDGMENT MS. G. ROHINI, CHIEF JUSTICE CM No.16349/2016 (delay in filing) CM No.16350/2016 (delay in re-filing) These applications have been filed for condonation of the delay of 04 days in filing the appeal and the delay of 180 days in re-filing the appeal. Heard the learned counsel for both the parties. In the facts and circumstances explained in the applications, the delay in filing as well as re-filing is hereby condoned. Both the applications are accordingly disposed of. W.P.(C) Nos.6984/2014 & 8559/2014 Page 1 o...
Lakhmeeri and Ors vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-29-2016
$~44 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:29. 11.2016 % + WP(C) No.10159/2015 & CM250702015 LAKHMEERI AND ORS versus ....... Petitioners UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent L&B/LAC For the Respondent DDA :Mr Raj Bahadur Singh :Mr Yeeshu Jain and Ms Jyoti Tyagi :Mr Sanjeev Sabharwal with Mr Hem Kumar CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioners seek the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act), which came into effect on 01.01.2014. A declaration is sought to the effect that the acquisition proceeding, which is the subject- matter of the present petition, ought to be deemed to have lapsed in view of the Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act.2. The number of the aw...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »