Delhi Court November 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Surinder Kumar vs.delhi Development Authority and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-02-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~14, 15, 18, 19, 20, 21, 25 & 26 * + W.P.(C) 4677/2016 SHAMA ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Hemant Singh with Mr.Tarun versus Khanna, Advocates. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms.Manika Tripathy Pandey with Mr.Ashutosh Kaushik, Advocates for DDA. Ms.Sakshi Popli, Advocate for R- 2/SDM Punjabi Bagh. Mr.Pradeep Kumar Kanoongo from SDM Office, Punjabi Bagh. + W.P.(C) 4741/2016 RAJENDER KUMR ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Hemant Singh with Mr.Tarun Khanna, Advocates. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms.Manika Tripathy Pandey with Mr.Ashutosh Kaushik, Advocates for DDA. Mr.Gaurav Varma, Advocate for R-2. Mr.Pradeep Kumar Kanoongo from SDM Office, Punjabi Bagh. + W.P.(C) 12115/2015 PYARE LAL ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Hemant Singh with Mr.Tarun Khanna, Advocates. Page 1 of 9 W.P.(C) 4677/2016 & Ors. Versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms.Manika...
Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan vs.edunuri Moundenar Reddy
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-02-2016
$~34. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WRIT PETITION(CIVIL) No.10208/2016 Date of decision:2. d November, 2016 KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA SANGATHAN ........ Petitioner Through Mr. S. Rajappa, Advocate. versus EDUNURI MOUNDENAR REDDY Through Nemo. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner-Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan, we do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order dated 17th May, 2016 passed by the Principal Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal (Tribunal, for short) in OA No.2363/2008.2. The respondent- Edunuri Moundenar Reddy was appointed as a Post-Graduate Teacher in Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangthan in 1986. From July 1997 to July 2001, he was sent on deputation as Principal, Navodaya Vidyalaya. Subsequently, he was promoted to the post of Principal in W.P. (C) No.10208/2016 Page 1 of 11 Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangthan by transfer on deputation v...
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs.mehraj Khan & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-02-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~31 * % + MAC.APP. 179/2016 and C.M. Appl. 6924/2016 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. Date of Decision:02. d November, 2016 Through: Mr. J.P.N. Shahi, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus MEHRAJ KHAN & ORS. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Navneet Goyal and Ms. Sneha Savant, Advocates for respondent No.1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) The appellant has challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal 1. whereby the compensation of Rs.32,99,530/- has been awarded to respondent No.1. The accident dated 26th March, 2011 resulted in crush injuries 2. on left thigh (inguinal region till lower 1/3rd) with lost distal pulsation and pubic area involving scrotum and base of phallus extending upto inguinal region, thigh and pelvis. Respondent No.1 was diagnosed with femoral artery thrombosis (at inguinal level) with fracture shaft of femur (left) with massive skin flap avulsion on left thigh and extensive wound extending into both groin and ...
Shama vs.delhi Development Authority and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-02-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~14, 15, 18, 19, 20, 21, 25 & 26 * + W.P.(C) 4677/2016 SHAMA ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Hemant Singh with Mr.Tarun versus Khanna, Advocates. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms.Manika Tripathy Pandey with Mr.Ashutosh Kaushik, Advocates for DDA. Ms.Sakshi Popli, Advocate for R- 2/SDM Punjabi Bagh. Mr.Pradeep Kumar Kanoongo from SDM Office, Punjabi Bagh. + W.P.(C) 4741/2016 RAJENDER KUMR ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Hemant Singh with Mr.Tarun Khanna, Advocates. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms.Manika Tripathy Pandey with Mr.Ashutosh Kaushik, Advocates for DDA. Mr.Gaurav Varma, Advocate for R-2. Mr.Pradeep Kumar Kanoongo from SDM Office, Punjabi Bagh. + W.P.(C) 12115/2015 PYARE LAL ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Hemant Singh with Mr.Tarun Khanna, Advocates. Page 1 of 9 W.P.(C) 4677/2016 & Ors. Versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms.Manika...
Sardar Sewa Singh vs.delhi Development Authority & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-02-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~14, 15, 18, 19, 20, 21, 25 & 26 * + W.P.(C) 4677/2016 SHAMA ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Hemant Singh with Mr.Tarun versus Khanna, Advocates. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms.Manika Tripathy Pandey with Mr.Ashutosh Kaushik, Advocates for DDA. Ms.Sakshi Popli, Advocate for R- 2/SDM Punjabi Bagh. Mr.Pradeep Kumar Kanoongo from SDM Office, Punjabi Bagh. + W.P.(C) 4741/2016 RAJENDER KUMR ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Hemant Singh with Mr.Tarun Khanna, Advocates. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms.Manika Tripathy Pandey with Mr.Ashutosh Kaushik, Advocates for DDA. Mr.Gaurav Varma, Advocate for R-2. Mr.Pradeep Kumar Kanoongo from SDM Office, Punjabi Bagh. + W.P.(C) 12115/2015 PYARE LAL ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Hemant Singh with Mr.Tarun Khanna, Advocates. Page 1 of 9 W.P.(C) 4677/2016 & Ors. Versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms.Manika...
Chaudhary Skin Trading Company vs.pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-21
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-02-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~18-22 & 7 * % + DECIDED ON:02. 11.2016 W.P. (C) 3837/2016, CM APPL.16315/2016 CHAUDHARY SKIN TRADING COMPANY ........ Petitioner PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-21 ..... Respondent versus W.P. (C) 3839/2016, CM APPL.16318/2016 NASIRA BEGUM PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-21 ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner versus W.P. (C) 3841/2016, CM APPL.16320/2016 ARSHIA AHMED QURESHI PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-21 ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner versus W.P. (C) 3842/2016, CM APPL.16322/2016 M.K. LEATHER TRADING COMPANY PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-21 ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner versus W.P. (C) 3843/2016, CM APPL.16324/2016 MOHD. KAMIL PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-21 ..... Respondent versus ........ Petitioner W.P.(C) 9935/2016, CM APPL.39493-39495/2016 M. K. OVERSEAS PVT. LTD. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 06 ..... Respondent ....... Petitioner versus Appearance: Mr. Jayant K. Mehta with Mr. Saurabh Dev Karan Singh and Mr. S...
Ashok Kumar Gupta vs.varun Kumar Goel
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-02-2016
$~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:2. 11.2016. + CM(M) 595/2016 & CM No.22560/2016 ASHOK KUMAR GUPTA ........ Petitioner Through Mr.M.L.Mahajan & Mr.Gaurav Mahajan, Advocates versus VARUN KUMAR GOEL ..... Respondent Through Mr.Kumar Vikram, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. By the present petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks to impugn the order dated 14th July, 2014 by which order the trial court dismissed the application of the petitioner under Order 12 Rule 6 CPC.2. The petitioner has filed the suit for possession, recovery of arrears of rent, damages and mesne profits for property bearing No.08, Chabra Complex, situated at Veer Savarkar Block, Delhi 110092. The parties entered into a rent agreement dated 23.02.2011 duly registered in the office of Sub-Registrar-VIII, Delhi. The agreed monthly rent was Rs.16,000/-.3. It is the case of the petitioner that the respondent...
D K Mukhopadhyaya vs.bses Yamuna Power Ltd and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-02-2016
$~80 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:2. d November, 2016 W.P.(C) 10202/2016 & CM No.40317/2016 D K MUKHOPADHYAYA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Soumyajit Pani, Adv. versus BSES YAMUNA POWER LTD AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sandeep Prabhakar and Mr. Vikas Mehta, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) 1. It is the petitioners case that he was not considered for the promotion to the post of DGM in the DPC exercise held in 2004. According to the petitioner, two persons junior to him i.e. Mr. A.K. Sharma and Mr. Tarun Bhatnagar were promoted in the DPC exercise of 2002-03; the petitioner should have been considered in the said exercise since he was eligible for consideration; the pendency of a criminal case against him, should have been addressed by adoption of the Sealed Cover procedure. Nevertheless, the petitioner was promoted in the DPC exercise of 2. 2006 to the post of DGM w.e.f. 01.01.2006 by an order dated 2...
Babloo vs.delhi Development Authority and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-02-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~14, 15, 18, 19, 20, 21, 25 & 26 * + W.P.(C) 4677/2016 SHAMA ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Hemant Singh with Mr.Tarun versus Khanna, Advocates. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms.Manika Tripathy Pandey with Mr.Ashutosh Kaushik, Advocates for DDA. Ms.Sakshi Popli, Advocate for R- 2/SDM Punjabi Bagh. Mr.Pradeep Kumar Kanoongo from SDM Office, Punjabi Bagh. + W.P.(C) 4741/2016 RAJENDER KUMR ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Hemant Singh with Mr.Tarun Khanna, Advocates. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms.Manika Tripathy Pandey with Mr.Ashutosh Kaushik, Advocates for DDA. Mr.Gaurav Varma, Advocate for R-2. Mr.Pradeep Kumar Kanoongo from SDM Office, Punjabi Bagh. + W.P.(C) 12115/2015 PYARE LAL ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Hemant Singh with Mr.Tarun Khanna, Advocates. Page 1 of 9 W.P.(C) 4677/2016 & Ors. Versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms.Manika...
Tania Das Gupta & Ors vs.the State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-02-2016
$~26. * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI TEST.CAS. 11/2013 & IA Nos. 10944/2016 & 10945/2016 Judgment dated 02nd November, 2016 TANIA DAS GUPTA & ORS ........ Petitioners THE STATE Through : Mr. S N Mitra, Advocate versus ..... Respondent Through : None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) IA Nos. 10944/2016 & 10945/2016 1. The present case was filed to seek letters of administration in respect of the estate of late Sh. Prabuddha Das Gupta. The petitioners before the Court are the wife and two daughters of the deceased, being the only surviving Class-I legal heirs. Citations were duly published and the brother of the deceased, being the only other close relative, did not object to the grant, the letter of administration was granted to the petitioners vide order dated 25.10.2013. The estate constituted of the following immovable properties: a. Flat No.505, Plot No.10, Sheetal Vihar, CGHS Ltd., Sector-23, Dwarka, New Delhi b. House No.3 AASRA Nilaya Roa...
- ‹ Prev
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 51
- Next ›
- Last »