Delhi Court November 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Commissioner of Income Tax International Taxation-3 Delhi vs.formula O ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-30-2016
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:15. 11.2016 Pronounced on:30. 11.2016 + W.P.(C) 9509/2016, C.M. APPL.38021/2016, 41063/2016, 41235/2016 & 41236/2016 COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION-3, DELHI versus FORMULA ONE WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP LTD. & ANR. INCOME TAX INTERNATIONAL ........ Petitioner + W.P.(C) 10145/2016, C.M. APPL.40169/2016 JAIPRAKASH ASSOCIATES LTD. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX versus ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Through : Sh. S. Ganesh, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Anuradha Dutt, Ms. Fereshte Sethna, Sh. Sachit Jolly, Sh. Gautam Swarup, Sh. Siddhartha Singh and Sh. Amaya Pant, Advocates, for petitioner in W.P.(C) 10307/2016 and for Respondent No.1 in W.P.(C) 9509/2016 & W.P.(C) 10145/2016. Sh. Arvind Datar, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Kamal Deep Dayal, Sh. Ankur Saigal and Sh. Shayan, Advocates, for JAL. Sh. G.C. Shrivastava, Sr. Standing Counsel and Sh. Rahul Chaudhary, Sr. Standing Counsel, for Income Tax Department. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVI...
Imran vs.state Govt. Of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-30-2016
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on : November 30, 2016 BAIL APPLN. 2422/2016 IMRAN Through: Mr.Ajayinder ........ Petitioner Mr.Tarunesh Sangwan, Mr.S.N. Sharma, Kumar, Mr.Kunal Chopra, Mr.Rohan Sharma, Mr.V.P. Singh, Mr.Anirudha Kumar, Mr.Irfan and Firdous, Ms.Richa Mr.Narendra Singh, Advocates. versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Ashish Dutta, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with Sub- Inspector Sachin Kumar, Police Station Amar Colony, New Delhi. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI JUDGMENT P.S.TEJI, J.The present application has been filed by the petitioner under 1. Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for the grant of bail in FIR No.609/2016 under Section 384/3of IPC, Police Station Amar Colony, New Delhi. In a nutshell, the FIR of this case was registered at the instance 2. of Muzammil, who stated in his complaint that on 10.10.2016 at about 3.15 AM, the petitioner alongwith his two brothers and f...
Joginder Dhka & Ors vs.rajinder Dhka
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-30-2016
$~21. * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA9332016 JOGINDER DHKA & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Ms. Drishty Madan and Mr. Amit Madan, Advocates with appellants in person. versus Through: None RAJINDER DHKA CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % ORDER3011.2016 ..... Respondent CM APPL. 44483/2016 (for extension of time to file the court fee) Subject to the appellants making good the deficiency in the court fee within one week, the application is allowed and disposed of. CM APPL. 44481/2016 (exemption) Subject to the appellants filing the certified/typed/legible copies of the documents annexed with the appeal within four weeks, the application is allowed and disposed of. RFA9332016 and CM APPL. 44482/2016 (stay) 1. The appellants/defendants are aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 31.08.2016 passed by the trial court in a suit for recovery of possession and permanent injunction instituted against them by their brother, the respondent/plaintiff in respect of premises No....
Amarnath@kallu & Anr. Vs.the State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-30-2016
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. No.61/2002 Date of Decision :30. h November, 2016 AMARNATH@KALLU & ANR. ..... PETITIONERS Through Ms.Inderjit Sidhu, Adv. versus THE STATE ..... RESPONDENT Through Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, APP with SI Jainender Kumar, PS Anand Vihar. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J1 Aggrieved by the judgment of conviction dated 18th August, 2001 convicting the appellants finding them guilty under Section 308 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and order on sentence dated 20th August, 2001 vide which the sentence was passed against the accused to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of two years each and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- each, and in default of payment of fine, to undergo further simple imprisonment for six months, the present has been preferred by the appellants.2. The facts in brief are that a complaint was made by Shri Kapil, son of Wakil Mohammad, in which it was alleged against Crl.A. No.61/2002 Page 1 of 1...
Icici Bank Ltd. Vs.manjeet Kaur
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-30-2016
$~50 to 66 (17 matters) * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:30. h November, 2016 (1) + (2) + + (3) + (4) (5) + + (6) + (7) (8) + (9) + (10) + (11) + (12) + (13) + (14) + (15) + (16) + (17) + FAO2702015 FAO2732015 FAO3892015 & C.Ms.26339/2015 & 14072/2016 FAO12016 & C.M.105/2016 FAO52016 & C.M.120/2016 FAO62016 & C.M.123/2016 FAO82016 & C.M.162/2016 FAO92016 & C.M.165/2016 FAO722016 & C.M.5233/2016 FAO802016 & C.Ms.5729-31/2016 FAO1682016 & C.Ms.14485/16, 144FAO1692016 & C.Ms.14497/16, 144FAO1742016 & C.Ms.15071/16, 150FAO1792016 & C.Ms.15196/16, 151FAO1942016 & C.Ms.16171, 16173-FAO1952016 & C.Ms.16178-180/2016 FAO2002016 & C.Ms.16843/16, 16845/16, 168ICICI BANK LTD versus ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Punit Bhalla, Advocate P K GOSWAMI SONU BHADHANA & ANR (1) RAJESH KUMAR (2) (3) MOHINDER KUMAR GOYAL (4) (5) RAJU ARORA (6) (7) VIRENDER SINGH (8) (9) PRABHU DAYAL SANJOY SAHA POONAM SHARMA FAOs 270/2015 & other connected matters Page 1 of 5 (10) ANIL KUMAR (11) SON...
Sterlite Technologies Ltd vs.bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-30-2016
$~ * 1 + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ARB.P. 601/2014 STERLITE TECHNOLOGIES LTD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rohan Dheman, Advocate. versus BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajiv Tyagi with Mr. Divakar Kumar and Mr. P. Sharma, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR ORDER3011.2016 1. This petition has a chequered history. The facts have been set out in some detail paras 2 to 11 of the judgment dated 11th June 2014 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in Arbitration Appeal No.4 of 2012 which read as under: 2. Brief facts are that Appellant had been supplying the Respondent with PIJF underground cables for some time and has been a successful bidder in several earlier tenders. The contract between the parties was for supply of PIJF underground cables, on a long-term recurrent basis. There was a clause in the contract which entitled the Respondent, BSNL to come out with circulars indicating the price of copper, one of the basic raw material...
Icici Bank Ltd. Vs.mohinder Kumar Goyal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-30-2016
$~50 to 66 (17 matters) * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:30. h November, 2016 (1) + (2) + + (3) + (4) (5) + + (6) + (7) (8) + (9) + (10) + (11) + (12) + (13) + (14) + (15) + (16) + (17) + FAO2702015 FAO2732015 FAO3892015 & C.Ms.26339/2015 & 14072/2016 FAO12016 & C.M.105/2016 FAO52016 & C.M.120/2016 FAO62016 & C.M.123/2016 FAO82016 & C.M.162/2016 FAO92016 & C.M.165/2016 FAO722016 & C.M.5233/2016 FAO802016 & C.Ms.5729-31/2016 FAO1682016 & C.Ms.14485/16, 144FAO1692016 & C.Ms.14497/16, 144FAO1742016 & C.Ms.15071/16, 150FAO1792016 & C.Ms.15196/16, 151FAO1942016 & C.Ms.16171, 16173-FAO1952016 & C.Ms.16178-180/2016 FAO2002016 & C.Ms.16843/16, 16845/16, 168ICICI BANK LTD versus ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Punit Bhalla, Advocate P K GOSWAMI SONU BHADHANA & ANR (1) RAJESH KUMAR (2) (3) MOHINDER KUMAR GOYAL (4) (5) RAJU ARORA (6) (7) VIRENDER SINGH (8) (9) PRABHU DAYAL SANJOY SAHA POONAM SHARMA FAOs 270/2015 & other connected matters Page 1 of 5 (10) ANIL KUMAR (11) SON...
Army Welfare Housing Organisation vs.m/s Mathur & Kapare Associates Pv ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-30-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:30. 11.2016 + O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 1/2016 & IA No.648/2016 ARMY WELFARE HOUSING ORGANISATION ........ Petitioner versus M/S MATHUR & KAPARE ASSOCIATES PVT LTD. .....Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU :Mr Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate with Mr A.K. Tewari. :Mr Sudhanshu Batra, Senior Advocate with Mr Bhuvan Gugnani. VIBHU BAKHRU, J JUDGMENT1 The Army Welfare Housing Organisation (hereafter 'AWHO') has filed the present petition under Section 14 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter 'the Act'), inter alia, praying as under:"In the premise it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon' ble Court may the pleased to declare, hold and direct that: (a) The Sole Arbitrator having been rendered 'de jure / functus officio' on and after 10 October 2015 on account of the... Petitioner declining to accord / grant consent for enlar...
United Trailer Services vs.kamal Dev Singh & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-30-2016
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:30. h November, 2016 FAO352012 & CM No.1223/2012 Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, proxy counsel. ..... Appellant 24 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD KAMAL DEV SINGH & ORS versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Deepak Maharaj and Mr. Akhilendra N. Singh, Advs. for R1. Mr. D.K. Nag, Adv. for IRDA. Mr. Sukhbir Singh and Mr. Nishant Singh, Advs. for R3. + FAO1062012 & CM No.4390/2012 25 UNITED TRAILER SERVICES ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sukhbir Singh and Mr. versus Nishant Singh, Advs. KAMAL DEV SINGH & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Deepak Maharaj and Mr. Akhilendra N. Singh, Advs. for R1. Mr. A.K. Soni, proxy counsel for Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Mr. D.K. Nag, Adv. for IRDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide order dated 08th December, 2011, the Commissioner, FAO Nos.35/2012 & 106/2012 Page 1 of 4 Employees Compensation awarded compensation of Rs.4,23,580/- to respondents No.1 and 2.2. The accident ...
Satish Kumar vs.the State (n.c.t. Of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-30-2016
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.REV.P. 695/2016 and Crl.M.(Bail) 1937/2016 Date of Decision:30. h November, 2016 SATISH KUMAR ..... Revisionist Through: Mr.Sanjay and Mr.G.P.Singh, Advocates. versus THE STATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI) & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.G.M.Farooqui, APP for State with ASI Rajender Prasad, P.S. Delhi Cantt., Delhi. % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA I.S. MEHTA, J.1. The instant revision petition filed under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Cr.P.C. is arising out of the impugned judgment dated 22.03.2016 and order on sentence dated 07.04.2016 passed by MM(03), Patiala House Courts, New Delhi in case No.3/2B/14 and CRL.REV.P. 695/2016 Page 1 of 10 subsequent order dated 26.09.2016 passed by ASJ- 03, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi in case CA No.31/16, in FIR No.2under Section 325 of the IPC.2. The brief facts stated are that on the basis of the statement of the respondent No.2/complainant, i.e., Rahul, an FIR No.293/2006 was regis...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »