Delhi Court November 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
United India Insurance Company Ltd. Vs.shakuntla & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~24 * % + MAC.APP. 779/2015 & CM Nos.23284/2015, 33768/2016 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. Date of Decision:03rd NOVEMBER, 2016 Through: Mr.Amit Gaur, Advocate ..... Appellant versus SHAKUNTLA & ORS. Through: Mr.R.K. Gautam, Mr. ........ RESPONDENTS Jugesh Kumar, Mr.Sagar Roy, Advocates for respondents No.1 to 6. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant has challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.7,75,860/- has been awarded to claimants/respondents no.1 to 6. On 29th November, 2012, Motiya (hereinafter referred to as 2. victim) was returning from Badarpur to his home in Madangir. He was waiting for the bus at the Badarpur bus stand when DTC bus No.DL-1PC-8319 came. The victim was boarding the bus from the backdoor when the driver drove the bus whereupon the victim fell out and the bus ran over his left leg resulting in multiple fracture and grievous injuries. A rod was inserted in...
m/s.lesag Hbb(i) Ltd. & Ors vs.commr.of Central Excise Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2016
$~100 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON:03. 11.2016 + W.P. (C) 4819/1999 M/S.LESAG HBB(I) LTD. & ORS ....... Petitioners Through: None. versus COMMR.OF CENTRAL EXCISE DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Pramod Kumar Rai, Sr. Standing Counsel and Mr. Deepak Anand, Jr. Standing counsel. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(ORAL) 1. The three individuals in this writ petition seek direction for the quashing of an order dated 07.01.1999 which imposes penalty upon them. The impugned order was made pursuant to a show cause notice issued to the Company Lesag HBB (India) Limited and the other three petitioners before the court. The show cause notice, inter alia, was that the petitioners are 100% Export Oriented Unit manufacturing and exporting electronic parts had indulged in mis-declaration with respect to importation of goods. The show cause notice was defended by the petitioners; culminated in an advers...
Rup Basant vs.sanjana Chopra
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2016
$~3 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:03. 11.2016 CM(M) 1044/2016 RUP BASANT Through versus (Presence not given) ........ Petitioner SANJANA CHOPRA Through None. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. The present petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to impugn the order dated 07.09.2016 by which an application filed by the petitioner under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC was dismissed by the trial court.2. The relevant background facts are that the respondent has filed a suit for mandatory and permanent injunction against the petitioner seeking a decree of permanent injunction to restrain him from interfering using or causing to be used front portion of the half terrace for any purpose like water tanks, TV antenna etc. regarding the property No.247, Block A, Shivalik Colony, Malviya Nagar, New Delhi.3. As per plaint, petitioner was the owner of the property which is allotted to him by the Pres...
Ares Investment Llc vs.international Print-O-Pac Ltd. & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-02-2016
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + ARES INVESTMENT LLC Judgment delivered on:02. 11.2016 ARB. A. (COMM.) 4/2016 & CAV702016, CRL M.A. 1907/2016 ..... Appellant versus ........ RESPONDENTS INTERNATIONAL PRINT-O-PAC LTD. & ORS. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant For the... RESPONDENTS CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU : Mr Jayant Mehta, Mr Inder Raj, Ms Tanushree Ghosh and Mr Shaurya Kuthiala. : Mr Tejas Karia and Mr Akhl Anand for R-1. Mr Arun Kathpalia, Mr Swapnil Gupta, Mr R.K. Gupta and Mr Eransh Mishra for R-2 to R-6. VIBHU BAKHRU, J JUDGMENT1 Ares Investment LLC (hereafter AIL) a company incorporated in Mauritius - has filed the present appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter 'the Act') impugning an order dated 19.10.2015 (hereafter 'the impugned order') passed by the Arbitral Tribunal, under Section 17 of the Act.2. The principal controversy involved in the present appeal relates to AIL's right to information...
Pyare Lal vs.delhi Development Authority & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-02-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~14, 15, 18, 19, 20, 21, 25 & 26 * + W.P.(C) 4677/2016 SHAMA ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Hemant Singh with Mr.Tarun versus Khanna, Advocates. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms.Manika Tripathy Pandey with Mr.Ashutosh Kaushik, Advocates for DDA. Ms.Sakshi Popli, Advocate for R- 2/SDM Punjabi Bagh. Mr.Pradeep Kumar Kanoongo from SDM Office, Punjabi Bagh. + W.P.(C) 4741/2016 RAJENDER KUMR ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Hemant Singh with Mr.Tarun Khanna, Advocates. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms.Manika Tripathy Pandey with Mr.Ashutosh Kaushik, Advocates for DDA. Mr.Gaurav Varma, Advocate for R-2. Mr.Pradeep Kumar Kanoongo from SDM Office, Punjabi Bagh. + W.P.(C) 12115/2015 PYARE LAL ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Hemant Singh with Mr.Tarun Khanna, Advocates. Page 1 of 9 W.P.(C) 4677/2016 & Ors. Versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms.Manika...
Jal Kaur Educational Society & Ors vs.delhi Development Authority & Or ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-02-2016
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment :02. 11.2016 W.P.(C) 4853/2013 & C.M. No.3596/2014 JAL KAUR EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY & ORS ........ Petitioners Through Mr.Prakash Gautam and Mr.Vivek Ojha, Advocates. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA/R-1. Mr.Naushad Ahmed Khan, ASC for GNCTD/R-2. Mr.S.D.Windlesh, Advocate UOI/R-3. for CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.(oral) 1... Petitioner before this Court is Jal Kaur Educational Socierty, a society registered under the Societies Registration Act. The petition has been filed through its Chairman. 2 The contention in the petition is that a colony namely Lado Sarai Extension came into existence in the year 1908. On 13.11.1059 a W.P.(C) 4853/2013 Page 1 of 10 Notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) was issued for acquiring total land measuring 24 bighas situated in Villag...
Mohd. Kamil vs.pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-21
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-02-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~18-22 & 7 * % + DECIDED ON:02. 11.2016 W.P. (C) 3837/2016, CM APPL.16315/2016 CHAUDHARY SKIN TRADING COMPANY ........ Petitioner PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-21 ..... Respondent versus W.P. (C) 3839/2016, CM APPL.16318/2016 NASIRA BEGUM PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-21 ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner versus W.P. (C) 3841/2016, CM APPL.16320/2016 ARSHIA AHMED QURESHI PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-21 ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner versus W.P. (C) 3842/2016, CM APPL.16322/2016 M.K. LEATHER TRADING COMPANY PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-21 ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner versus W.P. (C) 3843/2016, CM APPL.16324/2016 MOHD. KAMIL PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-21 ..... Respondent versus ........ Petitioner W.P.(C) 9935/2016, CM APPL.39493-39495/2016 M. K. OVERSEAS PVT. LTD. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 06 ..... Respondent ....... Petitioner versus Appearance: Mr. Jayant K. Mehta with Mr. Saurabh Dev Karan Singh and Mr. S...
Transstroy Obedullaganj - Betul Tollways vs.national Highways Authorit ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-02-2016
$~19 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 417/2016 & IA13113/2016 TRANSSTROY OBEDULLAGANJ - BETUL TOLLWAYS Through : Mr Anil Airi, Sr Adv with Mr M Y ........ Petitioner Deshmukh, Mr Ravi Krishan Chandna & Mr Ch.Sriniwasrao, Advs. NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA & ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr Jos Chirmel, Mr Abu John Mathew, Ms Atishaya Kaushal, & Mr Udita Malviya, Advs for R1. Mr Vinay Sharma, Adv for R2. Mr Harshvardhan Singh, Standing Counsel with Dr Kumar Jwala, Mr Rajesh Kumar & Mr Gaurav Kumar Singh, Advs for R3/Allahabad Bank. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER0211.2016 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 Transstroy Obedullaganj - Betul Tollway Private Limited (hereafter TOBT) has filed the present petition under section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter 'the Act'),inter alia, praying as under:-""(A) Restrain the Respondent No.1 from invoking/ encashing the following Bank Guarantees till the time of adjudication o...
Maruti Udyog Ltd vs.classic Motors Ltd. And Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-02-2016
* % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:2. d November, 2016. CS(OS) 87/1998, IA No.353/1998 (u/O XXXVIII R-5 CPC), IA No.4241/1998 (u/O VI R-17 CPC), IA No.9833/1998 (u/O I R-10 CPC) & IA No.11482/1998 (u/S8of Arbitration Act) & IA No.9310/1999 (u/S151CPC) MARUTI UDYOG LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Mudit Shrama and Mr. Tanmaya Nirmal, Advs. Versus CLASSIC MOTORS LTD. AND ANR. Through: Mr. Kanwal Chaudhary, Adv. ..... Defendants AND CS(OS) 74/2016 (earlier OMP No.107 of 1999) & IA No.8518/2008 (u/O VI R-17 CPC) MARUTI UDYOG LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Mudit Shrama and Mr. Tanmaya Nirmal, Advs. Versus CLASSIC MOTORS LTD. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 Through: Mr. Kanwal Chaudhary, Adv. ..... Defendant CS(OS) No.87/1998 was filed by Maruti Udyog Ltd. (MUL) against Classic Motors Ltd. (CML) and Mr. Narender Anand for recovery of CS(OS) Nos.87/1998 & 74/1016 Page 1 of 26 Rs.4,26,93,000/- with interest, pleading: (i) that MUL, had in the ye...
Nasira Begum vs.pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-21
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-02-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~18-22 & 7 * % + DECIDED ON:02. 11.2016 W.P. (C) 3837/2016, CM APPL.16315/2016 CHAUDHARY SKIN TRADING COMPANY ........ Petitioner PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-21 ..... Respondent versus W.P. (C) 3839/2016, CM APPL.16318/2016 NASIRA BEGUM PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-21 ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner versus W.P. (C) 3841/2016, CM APPL.16320/2016 ARSHIA AHMED QURESHI PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-21 ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner versus W.P. (C) 3842/2016, CM APPL.16322/2016 M.K. LEATHER TRADING COMPANY PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-21 ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner versus W.P. (C) 3843/2016, CM APPL.16324/2016 MOHD. KAMIL PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-21 ..... Respondent versus ........ Petitioner W.P.(C) 9935/2016, CM APPL.39493-39495/2016 M. K. OVERSEAS PVT. LTD. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 06 ..... Respondent ....... Petitioner versus Appearance: Mr. Jayant K. Mehta with Mr. Saurabh Dev Karan Singh and Mr. S...
- ‹ Prev
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 49
- 50
- 51
- Next ›
- Last »