Delhi Court November 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Karan Singh & Ors vs.state of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2016
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 2286/2016 & Crl.M.A. No.9603/2016 KARAN SINGH & ORS Date of Decision: November 3rd, 2016 ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajan Chaudhary, Advocate Versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State Mr. Ritesh Oberoi, advocate for the complainant CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.1. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioners, namely, Sh. Karan Singh, Sh. Trilok Chand @ Shekhar, Smt. Vimla Devi, Sh. Narottam, Smt. Archana, Ms. Monika and Ms. Babli for quashing of FIR No.120/2014 dated 01.06.2014, under Sections 498-A/4IPC registered at Police Station Hauz Qazi on the basis Settlement Deed executed between the petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2, namely, Ms. Sonia on 11.08.2014.2. respondent-State submitted that the respondent No.2, present in the Court has been identified to be the complainant/first-info...
Javed @ Naneh vs.the State & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2016
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 976/2016 JAVED @ NANEH Date of Decision: November 3rd, 2016 ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Arun Sharma, Adv. versus THE STATE & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.M.P. Singh, APP for the State. SI Rishipal, PS Jama Masjid. Mr.Himanshu Choudhary, Adv. with Respondent no.3 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.Learned Additional Public Prosecutor 1. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner, namely, Sh. Javed @ Naneh for quashing of FIR No.48/2011 dated 10.09.2011, under Section 3IPC registered at Police Station Jama Masjid on the basis of the Compromise Deed executed between the petitioner and respondent no.3, namely, Sh. Mohd. Sajid on 30.03.2016.2. respondent-State submitted that the respondent no.3, present in the Court has been identified to be the complainant/first-informant in the FIR in question by his counsel.3. The factual matrix of the present case is on the allegat...
Sunil Kumar & Ors. Vs.the State & Ors (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2016
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 1639/2016 Date of Decision: November 3rd, 2016 ........ Petitioners SUNIL KUMAR & ORS. Through Mr.D.K. Pandey, Adv. versus THE STATE & ORS (NCT OF DELHI) ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.M.P. Singh, APP for the State with ASI Jaipal, PS Adarsh Nagar. Respondent no.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.1. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioners, namely, Sh. Sunil Kumar, Sh. Prakash Chand Sharma, Smt. Kamla Devi, Ms. Seema Rani, Sh. Anil Kumar Sharma and Sh. Chaman Lal Sharma for quashing of FIR No.194/2013 dated 15.07.2013, under Sections 498-A/406 IPC registered at Police Station Adarsh Nagar on the basis of the Mediation Report, Mediation Centre, Rohini Courts on the basis of the settlement arrived at between petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2, namely, Smt. Suman on 28.01.2015.2. respondent-State submitted that the respondent No.2, present in the Court has been identifi...
Durga Devi vs.state of Govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2016
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on : November 03, 2016 CRL.M.C. 2172/2016 DURGA DEVI Through: Mr. Jawahar Singh, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus STATE OF GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with Sub-Inspector Sandeep Kumar, Police Station Mehrauli, Delhi Mr. Subhash Chand Budhiraja, Advocate for respondent No.2 Ms. Sunita Ojha, Ms. Akanksha Jotriwal, Advocate for respondent No.3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI JUDGMENT P.S.TEJI, J.1. By this petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of Cr. P.C. the petitioner is seeking an order thereby quashing the impugned order dated 18.08.2015 passed by learned Additional Sessions in Criminal Revision Judge Crl. M.C.No.2172/2016 Page 1 of 10 No.30/2015, vide which the revision petition preferred by the petitioner was dismissed and the order passed by learned Metropolitan Magistrate...
Mohit Tiwari vs.state & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2016
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: November 3rd, 2016 CRL.M.C. 3208/2016 MOHIT TIWARI ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Aditya Kala, Adv. versus STATE & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms.G.M. Farooqui, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.The present petition has been filed under Section 482 of the 1. Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter shall be referred as Cr.P.C.) for restoration of criminal revision petition no.05/2015 titled Mohit Tiwari v. State & Ors. dismissed in default on 19.03.2016 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-04, North West, Rohini, Delhi.2. Facts, in brief, are that an application under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. was filed by the petitioner before the learned Magistrate. In the application, it was alleged that the petitioner is the owner of land measuring 3 bigha 17 biswa out of Khasra No.371 min. Village Sayed Nangloi, Delhi and he purchased the said plot from its lawful owner. Some land grabbers in collusion with local...
Anarkali vs.icici Lombard Gen Ins Co Ltd & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:03. d November, 2016 $~2 * % + MAC. APP. 733/2015 ANARKALI Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate ........ Petitioner Versus ICICI LOMBARD GEN INS CO LTD & ANR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Garud M.V., Advocate for respondent No.1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant has challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.2,73,375/- has been awarded to the appellant. On 09th September, 2011, Amit Dubey was travelling as a 2. pillion rider on motorcycle No.DL-1SU-1571 being driven and owned by respondent No.1. The motorcycle met with an accident on G.T. Road near Shashtri Park resulting in the death of Amit Dubey. The deceased was aged 27 years at the time of the accident and was in private service and was earning Rs.40,000/- per annum. The deceased was survived by his mother who filed the claim petition under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act. took the income of the deceased ...
S. Surender Singh & Ors. Vs.state (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2016
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 2276/2016 Date of Decision: November 3rd, 2016 S. SURENDER SINGH & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through Mr.O.P. Sharma, Adv. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms.Manjeet Arya, APP for the State. SI Veer Parkash, PS, CWC, Nanak Pura. Mr.Dev Raj Agarwal, Adv. with Mr.F. Akhtar, Adv. with respondent no.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by 1. the petitioners, namely, Sh. Surender Singh, Sh. Sardar Rajender Singh and Smt. Inder Jeet Kaur for quashing of FIR No.86/2010 dated 28.05.2010, under Sections 498-A/4IPC registered at Police Station Crime (Women) Cell on the basis of a settlement between petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2, namely, Smt. Harjeet Kaur.2. respondent-State submitted that the respondent No.2, present in the Court has been identified to be the complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question by h...
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs.shri Rakesh Sood & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:03rd NOVEMBER, 2016 $~9 * % + MAC.APP. 366/2014 & CM361012016 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. Through: Mr.J.P.N. Shahi, Advocate ..... Appellant versus SHRI RAKESH SOOD & ANR. Through: Mr.S.N.Parashar, Advocate ........ RESPONDENTS for CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA respondent no.1. JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant has challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.11,43,154/- has been awarded to respondent no.1. The accident dated 5th December, 2007 resulted in the fracture 2. of mid shaft of tibia and fibula right side, multiple fracture of ribs left side, fracture of left clavicle and fracture of right leg. Respondent no.1 underwent surgery of the right leg for fixation of plates at Maharaja Agrasen Hospital where he remained hospitalised from 6th December, 2007 to 13th December, 2007. On 5th July, 2008, respondent no.1 was admitted in Bhagwan Mahavir Hospital till 7th July, 2008 for removal of ...
Rakesh Verma vs.laxmi Narayan Mandir Nirman Sabha & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:03. 11.2016 $~A-41 * % + RC.REV. 513/2016 & CM Nos. 39399-401/2016 RAKESH VERMA ........ Petitioner Through Mr.C.Mukund, Mr.Gaurav Kr.Singh & Mr.Nagender Yadav, Advocates. versus LAXMI NARAYAN MANDIR NIRMAN SABHA & ANR Through None ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(Oral) The present revision petition is filed under Section 25 (B) (8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act (hereinafter referred to as the DRC Act) seeking to impugn the order dated 23.04.2016 by which the application for leave to defend of the petitioner was dismissed and an eviction order was passed regarding shop No.D-1/1, Ground Floor of Laxmi Narayan Mandir, Nirman Sabha (Regd.), D-Block, Jafrabad Road, New Seelampur, Delhi-110053. Six identical petitions were filed by the respondents for different shops located on the ground floor. The ARC has passed a common order regarding the same. Against the eviction order dated 23.04.2016 ...
Faimuddin Khan Saifi @ Faheem Khan & Ors vs.the State (Govt of Nct Del ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2016
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 2379/2016 Date of Decision: November 3rd, 2016 FAIMUDDIN KHAN SAIFI @ FAHEEM KHAN & ORS.Petitioners Through Mr.M.D. Nasir, Adv. versus THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT DELHI) & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.G.M. Farooqui, APP for the State SI Lalit Kumar, PS Jaitpur. Mr.Rajesh Kumar, Adv. with Respondent no.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.1. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioners, namely, Sh. Faimuddin Khan Saifi @ Faheem Khan, Sh. Fakruddin, Sh. Tajuddin, Sh. Sirajuddin, Sh. Nasiruddin Saifi @ Nasru and Ms. Shabana for quashing of FIR No.81/2012 dated 11.03.2012, under Sections 498-A/406 IPC registered at Police Station Jaitpur on the basis of the Mediation Centre, Saket Courts, New Delhi between the petitioners and respondent no.2, namely, Sh. Rukhsana on 20.05.2014.2. respondent-State submitted that the respondent No.2, present in the Court has been identified to b...
- ‹ Prev
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- Next ›
- Last »