Delhi Court November 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs.shri Rishabh Sood & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:03. d NOVEMBER, 2016 $~30 * % + MAC.APP. 364/2014 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. Through: Mr.J.P.N. Shahi, Advocate versus ..... Appellant SHRI RISHABH SOOD & ANR. Through: Mr.S.N.Parashar, Advocate ........ RESPONDENTS for CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA respondent no.1. JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant has challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.1,69,000/- has been awarded to respondent no.1. The accident dated 5th December, 2007 resulted in the fracture 2. of mid shaft of right tibia, fracture lower end of fibula right leg, right sciatic nerve injury at upper popliteal fossa, fracture right leg treated with fixation of screws, fracture acetabulam right side and fracture nasal bone. Respondent no.1 remained hospitalised from 6th December, 2007 to 13th December, 2007. Respondent no.1 underwent surgery of the right lower leg in which plate with screws was fixed. Respondent No.1 further under...
Amrik Singh vs.state Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2016
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 2523/2016 AMRIK SINGH Date of Decision: November 3rd, 2016 ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Javed Ahmad, Adv. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.G.M. Farooqui, APP for the State with SI Pawan Kumar, DIU/Outer Respondent no.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.Learned Additional Public Prosecutor The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by 1. the petitioner, namely, Sh. Amrik Singh for quashing of FIR No.367/2012 dated 06.12.2012, under Sections 420/468/4IPC registered at Police Station Aman Vihar on the basis of the Settlement executed at the Delhi Mediation Centre, Rohini District Courts, Delhi executed between the petitioner and respondent No.2, namely, Sh. Rakesh on 19.05.2016.2. respondent-State submitted that the respondent no.2, present in the Court has been identified to be the complainant/first informant in the FIR in question by SI Pawan Kumar. The factu...
Vinod Kumar Birla vs.laxmi Narayan Mandir Nirman Sabha & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:03. 11.2016 RC.REV. 512/2016 & CM Nos. 39393-95/2016 $~A-40 * % + VINOD KUMAR BIRLA ........ Petitioner Through Mr.C.Mukund, Mr.Gaurav Kr.Singh & Mr.Nagender Yadav, Advocates. versus LAXMI NARAYAN MANDIR NIRMAN SABHA & ANR Through None. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(Oral) The present revision petition is filed under Section 25 (B) (8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act (hereinafter referred to as the DRC Act) seeking to impugn the order dated 23.04.2016 by which the application for leave to defend of the petitioner was dismissed and an eviction order was passed regarding shop No.D-1/3, Ground Floor of Laxmi Narayan Mandir, Nirman Sabha (Regd.), D-Block, Jafrabad Road, New Seelampur, Delhi-110053. Six identical petitions were filed by the respondents for different shops located on the ground floor. The ARC has passed a common order regarding the same. Against the eviction order dated 23.04....
Sunil Kumar Singh vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2016
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 6880/2016 Judgment delivered on:03. 11.2016 SUNIL KUMAR SINGH UNION OF INDIA & ORS. versus Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS : : ........ Petitioner ....... RESPONDENTS None. Mr Vikas Mahajan and Mr Amit Mehta, Advocates for Union of India. Mr Abhishek Malhotra and Mr Rijul Taneja, Advocates for the applicant. Mr Yashvardhan, Mr Himanshu Kulshreshtha and Mr Devender Singh, Advocates for Intervener. Mr Kirtiman Singh, Mr Waize Ali Noor and Mr Pranav Agrawal, Advocates for TRAI. Mr Saurabh Srivastava and Mr Ranjeet Singh Sidhu for Intervener/Star India Pvt. Ltd.. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0311.2016 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) W.P.(C) 6880/2016 1. Notice was directed to be issued to the petitioner since this matter has been received on transfer from Supreme Court. Affidavit of service has been filed which shows that the petitioner has refused to accept the W.P...
Sri Chowdeshwary Cable Network vs.ministry of Information & Broadcasti ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2016
$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 7186/2016 Judgment delivered on:03. 11.2016 SRI CHOWDESHWARY CABLE NETWORK ........ Petitioner versus MINISTRY OF INFORMATION & BROADCASTING & ORS. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS None. : : ....... RESPONDENTS Mr Vikas Mahajan and Mr Amit Mehta, Advocates for Union of India. Mr Abhishek Malhotra and Mr Rijul Taneja, Advocates for the applicant. Mr Yashvardhan, Mr Himanshu Kulshreshtha and Mr Devender Singh, Advocates for Intervener. Mr Kirtiman Singh, Mr Waize Ali Noor and Mr Pranav Agrawal, Advocates for TRAI. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0311.2016 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) W.P.(C) 7186/2016 1. Notice was directed to be issued to the petitioner since this matter has been received on transfer from Supreme Court. Affidavit of service has been filed indicating that the notice has been duly served on the petitioner.2. The petition has been filed seeking grant...
Ram Phal vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2016
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RAM PHAL STATE & ANR. Decided on:3. d November, 2016 CRL.M.C. 2574/2016 Represented by: Mr. Ravinder Yadav with Ms. ........ Petitioner Arti Anupriya & Mr. Satpal Yadav, Advs. versus Represented by: Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP with SI ..... Respondent R.P. Yadav, PS Vasant Kunj South. Mr. Saurabh Kansal & Ms. Pallavi S.Kansal, Advs. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. Aggrieved by the order dated 18th July, 2013 summoning the petitioner for offence punishable under Section 326/120B IPC along with co- accused Dilip Kumar Biswas, the petitioner prefers the present petition.2. The petitioner had earlier also challenged the impugned order of summoning before this Court vide Crl.M.C. 38/2016 which was withdrawn urging that some new facts have emerged thus the learned counsel had instructions to withdraw the petition with liberty to file fresh one. Liberty as prayed was granted by this Court vide order dated 1st Apri...
Rajesh Kumar vs.laxmi Narayan Mandir Nirman Sabha & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2016
$~A-43 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:03. 11.2016 RC.REV. 516/2016 & CM Nos. 39447-449/2016 RAJESH KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through Mr.C.Mukund, Mr.Gaurav Kr.Singh & Mr.Nagender Yadav, Advocates. versus LAXMI NARAYAN MANDIR NIRMAN SABHA & ANR Through None ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(Oral) The present revision petition is filed under Section 25 (B) (8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act (hereinafter referred to as the DRC Act) seeking to impugn the order dated 23.04.2016 by which the application for leave to defend of the petitioner was dismissed and an eviction order was passed regarding shop No.D-1/8, Ground Floor of Laxmi Narayan Mandir, D-Block, Jafrabad Road, New Seelampur, Delhi-110053. Six identical petitions were filed by the respondents for different shops located on the ground floor. The ARC has passed a common order regarding the same. Against the eviction order dated 23.04.2016 pertaining to another ...
Mohd Ashiq @ Asif & Ors vs.the State & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2016
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 1051/2016 MOHD ASHIQ @ ASIF & ORS ........ Petitioners Date of Decision: November 03, 2016 Through: Versus Farhar Qadeeri, Advocate THE STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Amit Chadha, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with WSI Khusboo, Police Station Khajuri Khas, Delhi CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.1. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioners, namely, Sh. Mohd. Ashiq @ Asif, Sh. Abdul Karim, Smt. Zahida Begum, Sh. Aamir and Km. Sugra Bano for quashing of FIR No.27/2010 dated 03.02.2010, under Sections 498-A/4IPC and Sections Dowry Prohibition Act registered at Police Station Khajuri Khas on the basis of Compromise Deed executed between the petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2, namely, Smt. Afroz Bano on 12.02.2016. respondent-State 2. submitted that the respondent No.2, present in the Court has been identified to be the complainant/first-informant in the FIR...
Ateek Ahmed & Ors vs.state of n.c.t of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2016
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 2525/2016 Date of Decision: November 3rd, 2016 ........ Petitioners ATEEK AHMED & ORS Through Mr.Q.U. Ansari, Adv. Versus STATE OF N.C.T OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms.Meenakshi Chauhan, APP for the State. SI K.P. Singh, PS Seelampur. Mr.Zakir Raja, Adv. with Respondent no.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.1. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioners, namely, Sh. Ateek Ahmed, Sh. Riyaz Ahmed, Sh. Tasleem Ahmed, Smt. Azra and Smt. Nazma for quashing of FIR No.302/2005 dated 11.06.2005 under Sections 498-A/4IPC and Sections Dowry Prohibition Act registered at Police Station Seelampur on the basis of Mediation Report of Delhi Mediation Centre, Karkardooma Courts, in view of the settlement arrived at between the petitioners and respondent no.2, namely, Smt. Shaheen Naz on 23.05.2012.2. respondent-State submitted that the respondent No.2, present in the Cour...
Sachin Singal & Ors vs.the State (Govt of Nct of Delhi ) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2016
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 2249/2016 Date of Decision: November 3rd, 2016 ........ Petitioners SACHIN SINGAL & ORS Through Mr.Anant Singh Malik, Adv versus THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ) & ANR ....... RESPONDENTS Through Mr.M.P. Singh, APP for the State. SI Sanjay, PS Ambedkar Nagar. Respondent no.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.1. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioners, namely, Sh. Sachin Singal, Sh. Gaurav, Smt. Krishna, Sh. Jagdish and Smt. Sunita for quashing of FIR No.376/2013 dated 16.08.2013, under Sections 498-A/4IPC registered at Police Station Ambedkar Nagar on the basis of a deed of settlement arrived at between petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2, namely, Smt. Kirti Mehalwal in the Court of Ms. Poonam A. Bamba, Principal Judge, South Family Court, Saket Court Complex, New Delhi 03.08.2015.2. respondent-State submitted that the respondent No.2, present in the Court has been id...
- ‹ Prev
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- Next ›
- Last »