Delhi Court November 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Prem Prakash Rastogi vs.laxmi Narayan Mandir Nirman Sabha & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2016
$~A-42 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:03. 11.2016 RC.REV. 515/2016 & CM Nos. 39437-439/2016 PREM PRAKASH RASTOGI ........ Petitioner Through Mr.C.Mukund, Mr.Gaurav Kr.Singh & Mr.Nagender Yadav, Advocates. versus LAXMI NARAYAN MANDIR NIRMAN SABHA & ANR Through None ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(Oral) The present revision petition is filed under Section 25 (B) (8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act (hereinafter referred to as the DRC Act) seeking to impugn the order dated 23.04.2016 by which the application for leave to defend of the petitioner was dismissed and an eviction order was passed regarding shop No.D-1/2, Ground Floor of Laxmi Narayan Mandir, Nirman Sabha (Regd.), D-Block, Jafrabad Road, New Seelampur, Delhi-110053. Six identical petitions were filed by the respondents for different shops located on the ground floor. The ARC has passed a common order regarding the same. Against the eviction order dated 23....
Narinder Singh & Ors vs.the State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2016
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 982/2016 NARINDER SINGH & ORS Date of Decision: November 3rd, 2016 ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Mr. Anil Kumar Advocate Versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with Inspector Anwar Khan, Police Station KNK Marg, New Delhi CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.1. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioners, namely, Sh. Narinder Singh, Sh. Darshan Singh, Smt. Anjana Kaur, Smt. Pinki Kaur, Smt. Paramjeet Kaur, Ms. Ajeet Kaur, Ms. Satnam Kaur and Sh. Mehar Singh for quashing of FIR No.402/2011 dated 03.10.2011, under Sections 498-A/406 IPC registered at Police Station K.N. Katju Marg on the basis of settlement arrived at between the parties on 14.12.2013 as mentioned in the joint statement by the petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2, namely Smt. Gurmeet Kaur before Ld. Principal J...
Balwinder Singh & Ors vs.the State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2016
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 1646/2016 BALWINDER SINGH & ORS Date of Decision: November 3rd, 2016 ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Jitender Singh, Advocate Versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with Sub-Inspector Sachin Kumar Verma, Police Station Sarai Rohilla, Delhi CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.1. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioners, namely, Sh. Balwinder Singh, Sh. Bachan Singh, Sh. Sawarn Singh, Smt. Amarjeet Kaur, Smt. Jaswinder Kaur and Smt. Leela Devi for quashing of the FIR No.320/2012 dated 14.09.2012 under Sections 498-A/406 IPC registered at Police Station Sarai Rohilla on the basis of report of Counseling Cell, Family Court, Tis Hazari Court in view of the settlement arrived at between the petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2, namely Ms. Kiranjeet Kaur on 13.04.2015.2. respondent-State submitt...
Sunil & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2016
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 1642/2016 Date of Decision: November 3rd, 2016 ........ Petitioners Through Mr.Ravish Roshan, Adv. with Mr.Kumar Nikhil, Adv. SUNIL & ORS. STATE & ANR. versus Through Ms.Manjeet Arya, APP for the State ........ RESPONDENTS SI Somna, PS Kanjhawala. Respondent no.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.1. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioners, namely, Sh. Sunil, Sh. Shankar, Smt. Kailash, Sh. Anil and Sh. Atul for quashing of FIR No.459/2014 dated 19.06.2014, under Sections 498-A/4IPC registered at Police Station Kanjhawla on the basis of a written compromise executed between petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2, namely, Smt. Meenakshi before the Panchayat on 28.02.2015.2. respondent-State submitted that the respondent No.2, present in the Court has been identified to be the complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question by SI Somna.3. The factual matrix of the present ...
Nafees vs.the State Govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2016
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 2272/2016 NAFEES Date of Decision: November 3rd, 2016 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. M.M. Ansari, Advocate Versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with Sub-Inspector Amit Verma, Police Station Gokalpuri, Delhi CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI Learned Additional Public Prosecutor P.S.TEJI, J.1. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner, namely, Sh. Nafees for quashing of FIR No.340/2012 dated 12.09.2012, under Sections 498-A/4IPC and Section 4 Dowry Prohibition Act registered at Police Station Gokal Puri on the basis of Compromise Deed executed between the petitioner and respondent no.2, namely, Smt. Shagufta @ Rubi on 25.09.2013.2. respondent-State submitted that the respondent No.2, present in the Court has been identified to be the complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question by SI Ami...
Chandan Singh vs.the State & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2016
CHANDAN SINGH THE STATE & ANR Date of Decision: November 3rd, 2016 ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Habibur Rahman, Adv. versus ..... Respondent Through Mr.G.M. Farooqui, APP with SI Raj Kumar, PS Neb Sarai. Respondent no.2 in person. * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 1105/2016 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.for Learned Additional Public Prosecutor 1. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner, namely, Sh. Chandan Singh for quashing of FIR No.151/2016 dated 16.02.2016, under Section 304A IPC registered at Police Station Neb Sarai on the basis of the settlement arrived at between the petitioner and respondent no.2, namely, Smt. Leela Devi.2. respondent-State submitted that the respondent no.2, present in the Court has been identified to be the wife of the deceased Sh. Umed Singh in the FIR in question by SI Raj Kumar.3. The factual matrix of the present case is on the allegation that the petitioner herein had taken a...
Varun Bhatia & Ors vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2016
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 2515/2016 Date of Decision: November 3rd, 2016 ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Sanjay Sharma, Advocate VARUN BHATIA & ORS versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. G.M. Farooqui, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with Sub- Inspector Virender, Police Station Vijay Vihar, Delhi Mr. A.K. Mishra, Advocate for respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.1. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioners, namely, Sh. Varun Bhatia, Smt. Sarla Bhatia, Mr. Tarun Bhatia, Ms. Kamlesh and Ms. Pushpa for quashing of FIR No.360/2013 dated 30.07.2013, under Sections 498-A/4IPC registered at Police Station Vijay Vihar on the basis of a deed of settlement arrived at between petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2, namely, Smt. Swati Bhatia before the Court of Ms. Shefali Barnala Tandon , MM, Mahila Court, Rohini on 02.03.2015.2. for respondent-State submitted that t...
Ramesh Chand & Ors vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2016
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 1641/2016 RAMESH CHAND & ORS Date of Decision: November 3rd, 2016 ........ Petitioners STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR Through: Mr. Dushyant Chaudhary, Advocate versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate for respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.1. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioners, namely, Sh. Ramesh Chand, Smt. Sunhari Devi and Sh. Rahul for quashing of FIR No.76/2011 dated 10.03.2011, under Sections 498-A/4IPC registered at Police Station New Ashok Nagar on the basis of the Mediation Report of Delhi Mediation Centre, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi executed between petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2, namely, Smt. Meenu @ Minu on 23.04.2015. respondent-State 2. submitted that the respondent No.2, present in the Court has been identified to be the complainant/first-informant of the FIR in que...
North Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr vs.sanjeev Oberoi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2016
$~40 * + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA7902016 & CM No.37241/2016 NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR Through : Mr. Sunil Goel, Advocate ..... Appellants versus SANJEEV OBEROI Through : None. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % Counsel for the appellants states, on instructions, that during the ORDER0311.2016 pendency of the appeal, the appellants have released the payment to the respondent whereafter, the respondent has withdrawn the suit pending in the trial court. He states that in view of the said development, the appellant/NDMC does not wish to press the present appeal, which is accordingly disposed of along with the pending application.2. File be consigned to the record room. NOVEMBER03 2016 sk HIMA KOHLI, J...
Milan Kumar Dey vs.cbi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2016
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :7. h OCTOBER, 2016 DECIDED ON :3. d NOVEMBER, 2016 + CRL.M.B. 1420/2016 in CRL.A. 715/2016 + AND + RAJINDER SINGH RANA ..... Appellant C B I Through : Mr.Arvind Nigam, Sr.Advocate with versus Mr.K.K.Manan, Sr.Advocate, Mr.Harsh K. Sharma, Ms.Ragini, Ms.Vaibhavi Sharma, Ms.Mehak Nakra, Mr.Rohit Gaur & Mr.Raghav Ghei, Advocates. ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Sanjeev Bhandari, SPP. CRL.M.B. 1436/2016 in CRL.A. 726/2016 MILAN KUMAR DEY ..... Appellant CBI Through : Mr.Ramesh Gupta, Sr.Advocate with versus Mr.Aditya K.Choudhary, Mr.Ajay P.Tushir & Mr.Inderjeet Sinha, Advocates. ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Sanjeev Bhandari, SPP. CRL.M.B. 1421/2016 in CRL.A. 716/2016 RAJU DHANAPAL RAJ ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Harsh K.Sharma, Advocate with Crl.M.B.1420/2016 & connected matters. Page 1 of 6 C B I versus Ms.Ragini, Ms.Vaibhavi Sharma, Ms.Mehak Nakra, Mr.Rohit Gaur & Mr.Raghav Ghei, Advocates. ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Sanjeev Bhand...
- ‹ Prev
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- Next ›
- Last »