Delhi Court November 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Arunesh Ghosh & Ors vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2016
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 1221/2016 Date of Decision: November 3rd, 2016 ARUNESH GHOSH & ORS STATE & ANR Through: Ms. Anjana Masih, Advocate versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Through: Mr. M.P. Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with Sub- Inspector Ramesh Kumar, Police Station Rani Bagh, Delhi CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.1. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioners, namely, Sh. Arunesh Ghosh, Smt. Nirupa Ghosh, Smt. Rinku Sarkar, Sh. Pradeep Sarkar, and Sh. Pastor Ezekiel Thomas for quashing of FIR No.209/2013 dated 01.07.2013, under Sections 498- A/4IPC registered at Police Station Rani Bagh on the basis of Settlement arrived at between petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2, namely, Ms. Vandana Ghosh.2. respondent-State submitted that the respondent No.2, present in the Court has been identified to be the complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question by her counsel.3. The f...
Sajivan Rao vs.state of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2016
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: September 20, 2016 Judgment Delivered on:November 03, 2016 CRL.A. 43/2011 SAJIVAN RAO Represented by: Ms. Rakhi Dubey, Advocate. ..... Appellant versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. The present appeal is directed against the judgment dated August 20, 2010 passed by the learned Special Judge, NDPS whereby the Appellant Sajivan Rao was convicted for the offence punishable under Section 20 (b) (ii) (C) Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (in short 'NDPS Act'). Vide order on sentence dated August 25, 2010, the Appellant was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for ten years and to pay a fine of `1,00,000/- and in default of payment of fine, to further undergo simple imprisonment for two months. Rakesh Thakur and Janeshwar Thakur were also convicted under Section Section 20 (b) (ii)...
Avdhesh Ojha & Ors vs.the State & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2016
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 2271/2016 AVDHESH OJHA & ORS Date of Decision: November 3rd, 2016 .....Petitioners Through: Mr.Pradyumna Singh, Adv. versus THE STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.M.P.Singh, APP. Mr.Jitender Singh, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by 1. the petitioners, namely, Sh. Avdhesh Ojha @ Hariom, Sh. Ravi Prakash Ojha and Sh. Avinash Kumar Tiwari for quashing of FIR No.46/2009 dated 02.02.2009, under Section 323/341/392/5IPC registered at Police Station Pandav Nagar on the basis of the compromise deed executed between the petitioners and respondent no.2, namely, Sh. Birpal Singh on 21.05.2016.2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor respondent-State submitted that the respondent no.2, present in the Court has been identified to be the complainant/first-informant in the FIR in question by his counsel. The factual matrix of the present case i...
Federal Bank Limited vs.ashwani Kumar and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2016
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RSA No.132/2013 + % FEDERAL BANK LIMITED3d November, 2016 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. P.I. Jose and Mr. Nitin Kumar Singh, Advocates. versus ASHWANI KUMAR AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. M.K. Jha, proxy Advocate for Mr. Arvind Sharma, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) RSA No.132/2013 and C.M. Appl. No.10347/2013 (for stay, U/S151CPC), C.M. Appl. No.6758/2016 (for modification of Order dt. 23.3.2015) 1. This Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by Federal Bank of India/defendant against the impugned Judgment of the First Appellate Court dated 1.3.2013 RSA No.132/2013 Page 1 of 16 decreeing the suit for mandatory injunction filed by the respondents/plaintiffs. Respondent/plaintiffs filed a suit against the appellant/defendant/Bank for mandatory injunction to return the title deeds of the property b...
Rajesh Kumar and Anr. Vs.state (Govt of Nct Delhi) and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2016
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 1181/2016 RAJESH KUMAR AND ANR. Date of Decision: November 3rd, 2016 ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Advocate Versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT DELHI) AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with ASI Baljeet Singh, Police Station Bawana, Delhi Mr.Vikas Mahajan, Mr. Vishal Mahajan, Advocate for respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.1. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioners, namely, Sh. Rajesh Kumar and Sh. Jatinder Kumar for quashing of FIR No.69/2014 dated 26.01.2014 under Sections 365/3IPC registered at Police Station Bawana on the basis of Compromise Deed executed between the petitioners and respondent No.2, namely, Sh. Ashwani Bansal on 01.09.2015. respondent-State 2. submitted that the respondent No.2 present in the Court has been identified to be the complainant/first informant by his counsel.3. T...
Amma Tv vs.ministry of Information & Broadcasting & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2016
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 9032/2016 Judgment delivered on:03. 11.2016 AMMA TV ........ Petitioner versus MINISTRY OF INFORMATION & BROADCASTING & ORS. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS None. : : ....... RESPONDENTS Mr Vikas Mahajan and Mr Amit Mehta, Advocates for Union of India. Mr Abhishek Malhotra and Mr Rijul Taneja, Advocates for the applicant. Mr Yashvardhan, Mr Himanshu Kulshreshtha and Mr Devender Singh, Advocates for Intervener. Mr Kirtiman Singh, Mr Waize Ali Noor and Mr Pranav Agrawal, Advocates for TRAI. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0311.2016 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) W.P.(C) 9032/2016 1. Notice was directed to be issued to the petitioner since this matter has been received on transfer from Supreme Court. Affidavit of service has been filed indicating that the notice has been duly served on the petitioner. W.P.(C) No.9032 /2016 Page 1 of 4 2. The petition has been filed s...
Manish Kumar @ Mishri Lal vs.state (Govt of Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2016
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 2238/2016 Date of Decision: November 3rd, 2016 MANISH KUMAR @ MISHRI LAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Lalit Bhardwaj, Mr. M.K. Malhotra, Advocate Versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with Sub-Inspector Amit, Police Station Nand Nagri, Delhi Mr. A.K. Dhupar, Advocate for respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.1. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner, namely, Sh. Manish Kumar @ Mishri Lal for quashing of FIR No.257/2003 dated 14.05.2003 under Sections 468/471/420 IPC registered at Police Station Nand Nagri on the basis of Compromise Deed executed between the petitioner and respondent no.2, namely, Smt. Dallo Devi on 13.05.2016. respondent-State 2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the respondent No.2 present in the Court has been identified to be the co...
Urmila Devi vs.mcd & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2016
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :21. 10.2016 Judgment delivered on :03. 11.2016 + W.P.(C) 1170/2007 URMILA DEVI ........ Petitioner Through Ms. Aruna Mehta, Advocate versus MCD & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms. Jyoti Taneja, Advocate for GNCTD + W.P.(C) 1172/2007 MD.RAFIQUE & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through Ms. Aruna Mehta, Advocate versus MCD & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms. Jyoti Taneja, Advocate for GNCTD + W.P.(C) 1176/2007 LAXMI NARAYAN & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through Ms. Aruna Mehta, Advocate versus MCD & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms. Jyoti Taneja, Advocate for GNCTD + W.P.(C) 1177/2007 AMAR SINGH & ORS. ........ Petitioners WP(C) Nos.1170/2007, 1172/2007 1176/2007, 1177/2007 & 1178/2007 Page 1 of 19 Through Ms. Aruna Mehta, Advocate versus MCD & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms. Jyoti Taneja, Advocate for GNCTD + W.P.(C) 1178/2007 PRATAP & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through Ms. Aruna Mehta, Advocate versus MCD & O...
Raju Dhanapal Raj vs.c B I
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2016
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :7. h OCTOBER, 2016 DECIDED ON :3. d NOVEMBER, 2016 + CRL.M.B. 1420/2016 in CRL.A. 715/2016 + AND + RAJINDER SINGH RANA ..... Appellant C B I Through : Mr.Arvind Nigam, Sr.Advocate with versus Mr.K.K.Manan, Sr.Advocate, Mr.Harsh K. Sharma, Ms.Ragini, Ms.Vaibhavi Sharma, Ms.Mehak Nakra, Mr.Rohit Gaur & Mr.Raghav Ghei, Advocates. ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Sanjeev Bhandari, SPP. CRL.M.B. 1436/2016 in CRL.A. 726/2016 MILAN KUMAR DEY ..... Appellant CBI Through : Mr.Ramesh Gupta, Sr.Advocate with versus Mr.Aditya K.Choudhary, Mr.Ajay P.Tushir & Mr.Inderjeet Sinha, Advocates. ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Sanjeev Bhandari, SPP. CRL.M.B. 1421/2016 in CRL.A. 716/2016 RAJU DHANAPAL RAJ ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Harsh K.Sharma, Advocate with Crl.M.B.1420/2016 & connected matters. Page 1 of 6 C B I versus Ms.Ragini, Ms.Vaibhavi Sharma, Ms.Mehak Nakra, Mr.Rohit Gaur & Mr.Raghav Ghei, Advocates. ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Sanjeev Bhand...
M/S Constructora Sanjose s.a vs.delhi Development Authority & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2016
$~7 & 8. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % + CS(OS) 703/2013 Judgment dated 03.11.2016 M/S CONSTRUCTORA SANJOSE S.A ..... Plaintiff Through : Mr.J.P. Sengh, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Subhash Mishra, Ms.Manisha Mehta, Mr.Pulkit Jindal and Ms.Syed Maria Aijaz, Advs. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS ..... Defendants Through : Mr.Arun Birbal and Mr.Sanjay Singh, Advs. for the DDA. CS(OS) 704/2013 M/S CONSTRUCTORA SANJOSE S.A ..... Plaintiff Through : Mr.J.P. Sengh, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Subhash Mishra, Ms.Manisha Mehta, Mr.Pulkit Jindal and Ms.Syed Maria Aijaz, Advs. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR ..... Defendants Through : Mr.Arun Birbal and Mr.Sanjay Singh, Advs. for the DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) I.A. 6154/2013 (O XXXIX R1& 2 CPC) IN CS(OS) 703/2013 I.A. 6160/2013 (O XXXIX R1& 2 CPC) IN CS(OS) 704/2013 1. Registry is directed to register both these suits as commercial suits.2. Since a common question arises for consideration in both...
- ‹ Prev
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- Next ›
- Last »