Delhi Court November 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Krbl Ltd. Vs.pk Overseas Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-04-2016
$~26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO5322011 & C.Ms.22380/11, 29217/15, 290KRBL LTD Through: Mr. Chetan Sharma, Senior ..... Appellant Advocate with Mr. S.K. Bansal, Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman and Mr. Anil Kumar Sahu, Advocates versus PK OVERSEAS PVT LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Mr. Akhil Sachar, Mr. Nikhil Chawla and Mr. Raghu Vashist, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER % 04.11.2016 1. Impugned order of 27th August, 2011 rejects appellants application for interim injunction and dismisses respondent-defendants application under Order 7 Rule 10 of CPC. It is noted in the impugned order that the instant case is not of infringement of trademark of plaintiff, but of passing off appellants trademark qua the artistic work in favour of its owner and the user of appellant-plaintiff is since the year 2005 whereas the user of respondent-defendant is from the year 1995. Regarding the trade dress/colour combination, it is observed in the impugned ord...
mohd.shahid & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-04-2016
$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :4. h NOVEMBER, 2016 + CRL.M.C. 367/2016 & CRL.M.A.No.1557/2016 MOHD.SHAHID & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through : Mr.S.K.Bhalla, Advocate. VERSUS ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Ms.Manjeet Arya, APP with SI Dinesh Kumar, PS Chandni Mahal. Mr.M.Hasibuddin, Advocate for R2 along with R2 in person. STATE & ANR. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.(Oral) 1. Present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred by the petitioners to challenge the legality and correctness of an order dated 19.12.2015 by which defence of the petitioners herein was struck off. Petition is contested by the complainant / respondent No.2.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the file. On perusal of the file, it reveals that by an order dated 13.04.2009 the complainants husband was directed to pay maintenance @ `4,000/- for her and `2,000/- per month for her daughter. It appears that Crl.M.C.367/2016 Page 1...
Great Eastern Energy Corporation Ltd vs.uoi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-04-2016
$~24 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. 1095/2014 GREAT EASTERN ENERGY CORPORATION LTD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Darpan Wadhwa, Mr Aseem Chaturvedi & Mr Shlok Chandra, Advs. UOI versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr K R Sasiprabhu & Mr Somiran Sharma, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER0411.2016 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter 'the Act'), inter alia, praying that the arbitral award dated 19.03.2012 (hereafter ' the impugned award') made by an Arbitral Tribunal constituted by Mr. G.B. Patnaik, Mr. K.N. Singh and Mr V.N. Khare, three former Judges of the Supreme Court, be set aside.2. The disputes involved between the parties principally concern the interpretation of the agreement between them.3. Sometime in the year 1992, the respondent (Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas) had expressed interest in allowing private participation in exploration a...
Ravinder Kumar Mirg vs.the Union of India & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-04-2016
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 10398/2016 Date of decision:4. h November, 2016 RAVINDER KUMAR MIRG In person. versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent THE UNION OF INDIA & ANR Through Mr. Rajesh Gogna, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) We have heard the petitioner, who appears in person, in this writ petition which impugns order dated 17th May, 2016 passed by the Principal Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal in OA No.2357/2014.2. The impugned order dismisses the aforesaid OA and holds that the petitioner would not be entitled to enhanced subsistence allowance as per the revised pay scales under the Central Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 2008 as he was under suspension as on 1st June, 2006. The Tribunal has relied on the decision of the Supreme Court in Union of India Vs. Ravinder Kumar Chopra, (2010) 2 SCC763 3. The petitioner, who was an Inspector in the Income Tax Depart...
Flamagas, Sa vs.mahadev & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-04-2016
$~20. * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS (COMM) 897/2016 FLAMAGAS, SA Judgment dated 4th November, 2016 ..... Plaintiff Through : Ms.Kaustubh Sinha, Adv. versus MAHADEV & ORS ..... Defendants Through : None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. Plaintiff has filed the present suit for permanent injunction restraining infringement of trademark, copyright, passing off, rendition of accounts, etc.2. It may be noticed that the present suit was registered as a Commercial suit vide order dated 20.7.2016.3. Learned counsel for the plaintiff submits that summons in the suit and notice in the application for stay were directed to be issued vide order dated 29.6.2015, when an ex parte ad interim injunction was granted in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendants. Counsel for defendant no.1 had entered appearance on 11.8.2015. Since none appeared on behalf of defendants no.3 and 6 despite service, they were proceeded ex parte vide order dated 11.8....
Varun Gupta vs.irrigation & Flood Control Department & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-04-2016
$~39 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ARB.P. 687/2016 VARUN GUPTA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Surinder Goel & Mr Shivam Goel, Advs. versus IRRIGATION & FLOOD CONTROL DEPARTMENT & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Sanjay Dewan & Ms Palak, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % IA No.13630/2016 ORDER0411.2016 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of. ARB.P. 687/2016 3. The petitioner has filed the petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the Act), inter alia, praying that an Arbitrator be appointed.4. The respondent No.1 had invited tenders for construction of the double story Barat Ghar at village Chiraga Suman, Usmanpur, Delhi by a notice inviting tender on 26.09.2011. The petitioner participated in the aforesaid tender and his bid was accepted. It is stated that pursuant to the intimation of the acceptance on 13.12.2011, the petitioner also submitted the performance bank guarantee...
Ms Anupriya Yadav vs.state (Govt Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-04-2016
$~25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON : NOVEMBER04 2016 CRL.M.C. 4106/2016 & Crl.M.A.17146/2016 MS ANUPRIYA YADAV ........ Petitioner Through :... Petitioner present in person. versus STATE (GOVT NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG Through : Mr.Arun Kr.Sharma, APP. SI Jaibir Singh, PS Farsh Bazar. + S.P.GARG, J.(ORAL) 1. Present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred by the petitioner to challenge the legality and correctness of an order dated 18.10.2016 of learned Additional Sessions Judge whereby the petitioners prayer to issue No Objection Certificate for issuance of pass-port and visa was declined.2. I have heard the petitioner present in person and the learned APP and have examined the file. On perusal of the file, it reveals that vide order dated 22.04.2016, the petitioner was granted anticipatory bail. She was directed not to leave the area of NCR without express permission of the Court, except in emerge...
Amrik Singh vs.d.d.a. & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-04-2016
$~32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 15563/2004 AMRIK SINGH ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Girdhar Govind with Ms.Neetu Singh, Advocates. D.D.A. & ORS. versus Through Mr.M.K.Singh, Advocate for DDA. ........ RESPONDENTS % Date of Decision :4. h November, 2016 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) C.M.No.16856-16857/2013 Keeping in view the averments in the application, the delay in filing the restoration application is condoned and the matter is restored to its original status. Accordingly, the applications stand allowed and disposed of. W.P.(C) No.15563/2004 1. Present writ petition has been filed seeking implementation of the orders/directions passed by the Permanent Lok Adalat, DDA. The prayer clauses in the writ petition are reproduced hereinbelow:-"a) Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, thereby directing the respondent to implement the orders/directions of the learned Permanent Lok Adalat, DDA; W.P...
Flamagas, Sa vs.irfan Ahmed & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-04-2016
$~18 * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS (COMM) 895/2016 FLAMAGAS, SA Judgment dated 4th November, 2016 ..... Plaintiff Through : Ms.Kaustubh Sinha, Adv. versus IRFAN AHMED & ORS ..... Defendants Through : None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. Plaintiff has filed the present suit for permanent injunction restraining infringement of trademark, copyright, passing off, rendition of accounts, etc.2. It may be noticed that the present suit was registered as a Commercial suit vide order dated 20.7.2016.3. Learned counsel for the plaintiff submits that summons in the suit and notice in the application for stay were directed to be issued vide order dated 29.6.2015, when an ex parte ad interim injunction was granted in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendants. Counsel for defendant no.1 had entered appearance on 11.8.2015. Since none had appeared on behalf of defendant no.3, he was proceeded ex parte vide order dated 11.8.2015. Fresh summons...
Il & Fs Trust Company Ltd vs.c & C Constructions Ltd. & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2016
% + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:03. 11.2016 EX.P. 408/2015 & EA(OS) 471/2016 IL & FS TRUST COMPANY LTD. ..... Decree Holder Versus C & C CONSTRUCTIONS LTD. & ORS. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Decree Holder ..... Judgement Debtors For the Judgment Debtor : Mr. P.V. Kapur, Senior Advocate with : Mr Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate with Mr Moazzam Khan, Mr Alipak Banerjee and Mr Brijesh Kumar. Ms Romila Joshi and Ms Manusha Chaudhary for JD Nos.1 to 6. Mr. Anil Airi, Senior Advocate with Ms. Rashmeet Kaur and Ms Arpana Majumdar, for JD Nos. 7 to 16. CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU VIBHU BAKHRU, J EA(OS) Nos.23-30/2016 JUDGMENT1 The Decree Holder (hereafter the DH) has filed the above captioned execution petition (EX.P. 408/2015) under Section 36 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter 'the Act') for enforcement of an arbitral award (hereafter the consent award') made by the Sole Arbitrator, Mr Ciccu Mukhopadhaya, Senior...
- ‹ Prev
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- Next ›
- Last »