Delhi Court November 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Icici Bank Ltd. Vs.varinder Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-30-2016
$~50 to 66 (17 matters) * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:30. h November, 2016 (1) + (2) + + (3) + (4) (5) + + (6) + (7) (8) + (9) + (10) + (11) + (12) + (13) + (14) + (15) + (16) + (17) + FAO2702015 FAO2732015 FAO3892015 & C.Ms.26339/2015 & 14072/2016 FAO12016 & C.M.105/2016 FAO52016 & C.M.120/2016 FAO62016 & C.M.123/2016 FAO82016 & C.M.162/2016 FAO92016 & C.M.165/2016 FAO722016 & C.M.5233/2016 FAO802016 & C.Ms.5729-31/2016 FAO1682016 & C.Ms.14485/16, 144FAO1692016 & C.Ms.14497/16, 144FAO1742016 & C.Ms.15071/16, 150FAO1792016 & C.Ms.15196/16, 151FAO1942016 & C.Ms.16171, 16173-FAO1952016 & C.Ms.16178-180/2016 FAO2002016 & C.Ms.16843/16, 16845/16, 168ICICI BANK LTD versus ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Punit Bhalla, Advocate P K GOSWAMI SONU BHADHANA & ANR (1) RAJESH KUMAR (2) (3) MOHINDER KUMAR GOYAL (4) (5) RAJU ARORA (6) (7) VIRENDER SINGH (8) (9) PRABHU DAYAL SANJOY SAHA POONAM SHARMA FAOs 270/2015 & other connected matters Page 1 of 5 (10) ANIL KUMAR (11) SON...
Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. Vs.commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-30-2016
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:15. 11.2016 Pronounced on:30. 11.2016 + W.P.(C) 9509/2016, C.M. APPL.38021/2016, 41063/2016, 41235/2016 & 41236/2016 COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION-3, DELHI versus FORMULA ONE WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP LTD. & ANR. INCOME TAX INTERNATIONAL ........ Petitioner + W.P.(C) 10145/2016, C.M. APPL.40169/2016 JAIPRAKASH ASSOCIATES LTD. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX versus ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Through : Sh. S. Ganesh, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Anuradha Dutt, Ms. Fereshte Sethna, Sh. Sachit Jolly, Sh. Gautam Swarup, Sh. Siddhartha Singh and Sh. Amaya Pant, Advocates, for petitioner in W.P.(C) 10307/2016 and for Respondent No.1 in W.P.(C) 9509/2016 & W.P.(C) 10145/2016. Sh. Arvind Datar, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Kamal Deep Dayal, Sh. Ankur Saigal and Sh. Shayan, Advocates, for JAL. Sh. G.C. Shrivastava, Sr. Standing Counsel and Sh. Rahul Chaudhary, Sr. Standing Counsel, for Income Tax Department. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVI...
Icici Bank Ltd. Vs.ravi Prakash
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-30-2016
$~50 to 66 (17 matters) * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:30. h November, 2016 (1) + (2) + + (3) + (4) (5) + + (6) + (7) (8) + (9) + (10) + (11) + (12) + (13) + (14) + (15) + (16) + (17) + FAO2702015 FAO2732015 FAO3892015 & C.Ms.26339/2015 & 14072/2016 FAO12016 & C.M.105/2016 FAO52016 & C.M.120/2016 FAO62016 & C.M.123/2016 FAO82016 & C.M.162/2016 FAO92016 & C.M.165/2016 FAO722016 & C.M.5233/2016 FAO802016 & C.Ms.5729-31/2016 FAO1682016 & C.Ms.14485/16, 144FAO1692016 & C.Ms.14497/16, 144FAO1742016 & C.Ms.15071/16, 150FAO1792016 & C.Ms.15196/16, 151FAO1942016 & C.Ms.16171, 16173-FAO1952016 & C.Ms.16178-180/2016 FAO2002016 & C.Ms.16843/16, 16845/16, 168ICICI BANK LTD versus ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Punit Bhalla, Advocate P K GOSWAMI SONU BHADHANA & ANR (1) RAJESH KUMAR (2) (3) MOHINDER KUMAR GOYAL (4) (5) RAJU ARORA (6) (7) VIRENDER SINGH (8) (9) PRABHU DAYAL SANJOY SAHA POONAM SHARMA FAOs 270/2015 & other connected matters Page 1 of 5 (10) ANIL KUMAR (11) SON...
mohd.anwar vs.state Govt. Of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-30-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on : November 30, 2016 * + BAIL APPLN. 2410/2016 MOHD.ANWAR Through: Mr.Ajayinder ........ Petitioner Mr.Tarunesh Sangwan, Mr.S.N. Sharma, Kumar, Mr.Kunal Chopra, Mr.Rohan Sharma, Mr.V.P. Singh, Mr.Anirudha Kumar, Mr.Irfan and Mr.Narendra Singh, Advs. Firdous, Ms.Richa versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Ashish Dutta, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with Sub- Inspector Sachin Kumar, Police Station Amar Colony, New Delhi. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI JUDGMENT P.S.TEJI, J.The present application has been filed by the petitioner under 1. Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for the grant of anticipatory bail in FIR No.609/2016 under Section 384/3of IPC, Police Station Amar Colony, New Delhi. In a nutshell, the FIR of this case was registered at the instance 2. of Muzammil, who stated in his complaint that on 10.10.2016 at about 3.15 AM, the petitioner alongwith his three...
Handicrafts & Handlooms Export Corporation of India Ltd vs.delhi Metro ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-30-2016
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. (COMM) 379/2016 and IA Nos. 9708-9709/2016 Sahay, Advocates. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Amit Kumar and Mr Shaurya HANDICRAFTS & HANDLOOMS EXPORT CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr Shiv Khurana, Advocate. DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER3011.2016 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 Handicrafts and Handlooms Export Corporation Of India Ltd. (hereafter 'HHEC') - a public sector enterprise - has filed the present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter 'the Act') impugning an arbitral award dated 11.05.2016 as corrected on 09.06.2016 (hereafter 'the impugned award') passed by the Sole Arbitrator. By the impugned award, the Arbitrator has rejected the claims made by HHEC and has allowed the counter claims made by the respondent (hereafter 'DMRC').2. The disputes between the parties arose in respect of the Licence Agreement dated 05....
Ram Chander Sharma vs.mohd. Rafiq & Ors. (The New India Assurance Comp ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-30-2016
$~35 * % + MAC.APP. 973/2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:30. h November, 2016 RAM CHANDER SHARMA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Arvind Chaudhary, Ms. Asha Chaudhary, Advocates along with appellant in person. versus MOHD. RAFIQ & ORS. (THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD.) ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Shoumik Mazumdar, Advocate for respondent no.3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant has challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.3,02,950/- has been awarded to him. The appellant seeks enhancement of the award amount.2. On 2nd October, 2009, the appellant was driving his two wheeler scooter in front of Janak Garden, near Gurudwara Nangli Poona, G.T. Road, Delhi when he was hit by truck bearing no.JK-02-AA-1495 which resulted grievous injuries to the appellant. The appellant suffered amputation of 2nd, 3rd, 4th toes of the left foot and 5th toe of the right foot which resulted 48% permanent disa...
Yashoda vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-30-2016
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. No.329/2000 Date of Decision :30. h November, 2016 YASHODA Through Mr.M.L. Yadav, Adv. ..... PETITIONER versus STATE ..... RESPONDENT Through Mr.Mukesh Kumar, APP with ASI Dinesh, PS Narcotic Cell, Crime Branch. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J1 Aggrieved by the judgment of conviction dated 26th April, 2000 convicting the appellant finding her guilty under Sections 21/of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as NDPS Act, 1985) and order on sentence dated 26th April, 2000 vide which the sentence was passed to suffer rigorous imprisonment for a period of ten years and to pay a fine of Rs.1,00,000/- for the offence punishable under Section 21 of the NDPS Act, in default of payment of fine, convict was to suffer further simple imprisonment for two years.2. The facts in brief are that a secret information was received on the basis of which the police of Narcotic Branch, on 20th Crl...
Icici Bank Ltd. Vs.rajesh Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-30-2016
$~50 to 66 (17 matters) * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:30. h November, 2016 (1) + (2) + + (3) + (4) (5) + + (6) + (7) (8) + (9) + (10) + (11) + (12) + (13) + (14) + (15) + (16) + (17) + FAO2702015 FAO2732015 FAO3892015 & C.Ms.26339/2015 & 14072/2016 FAO12016 & C.M.105/2016 FAO52016 & C.M.120/2016 FAO62016 & C.M.123/2016 FAO82016 & C.M.162/2016 FAO92016 & C.M.165/2016 FAO722016 & C.M.5233/2016 FAO802016 & C.Ms.5729-31/2016 FAO1682016 & C.Ms.14485/16, 144FAO1692016 & C.Ms.14497/16, 144FAO1742016 & C.Ms.15071/16, 150FAO1792016 & C.Ms.15196/16, 151FAO1942016 & C.Ms.16171, 16173-FAO1952016 & C.Ms.16178-180/2016 FAO2002016 & C.Ms.16843/16, 16845/16, 168ICICI BANK LTD versus ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Punit Bhalla, Advocate P K GOSWAMI SONU BHADHANA & ANR (1) RAJESH KUMAR (2) (3) MOHINDER KUMAR GOYAL (4) (5) RAJU ARORA (6) (7) VIRENDER SINGH (8) (9) PRABHU DAYAL SANJOY SAHA POONAM SHARMA FAOs 270/2015 & other connected matters Page 1 of 5 (10) ANIL KUMAR (11) SON...
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs.sh. Kavinder Singh & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-30-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:30. h November, 2016 $~30 * % + MAC.APP. 1033/2013 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. Through: Mr. J.P.N. Shahi, Advocate ........ Petitioner Versus SH. KAVINDER SINGH & ORS. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. V K Vashistha, Advocate for R-1 Mr. Ashutosh Bhattacharjee, Advocate for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant has challenged the Award of the Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.13,69,510/- has been awarded to respondent no.1. On 29th January, 2005, respondent no.1 was driving truck No.2. HR38-7350 when it was hit by another truck bearing No.MP17 1677 near Kannauj, U.P..3. Respondent no.1 suffered fracture of both legs, fracture of radius (right hand) and head injury. Respondent No.1 remained hospitalized from 31st January, 2005 to 3rd February, 2005 and again from 5th February, 2005 to 24th February, 2005 when his left leg was amputated. The disability of respondent no.1 was assessed a...
U. Rai Arya vs.union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-30-2016
$~25. * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.11275/2016 Date of decision:30. h November, 2016 U. RAI ARYA ........ Petitioner Through Ms. S. Janani, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. Through Nemo. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): U. Rai Arya in this writ petition impugns orders dated 18th February, 2015 and 11th July, 2016, which have been passed by the Principal Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal (Tribunal, for short).2. Order dated 11th July, 2016 disposes of the Contempt Petition No.531/2015 filed by the petitioner for non-compliance of the order dated 18th February, 2015.3. The primary grievance of the petitioner is not to the order dated 11th July, 2016, but to the order dated 18th February, 2015, which had disposed of OA No.908/2014 in the following terms:-"8. In the above facts and circumstances of the case, I allow this O.A. and direct the res...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »