Delhi Court November 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
State Through C B I vs.sajjan Kumar & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-04-2016
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Reserved on :24. h October, 2016 Date of Decision:4. h November, 2016 Crl.M.A.No.15236/2016 in CRL.A. 1099/2013 STATE THROUGH C B I ..... Appellant Through: Mr. R.S. Cheema, Senior Advocate with Mr. D.P. Singh, Ms. Tarannum Cheema, Ms. Hiral Gupta, Mr. Manu Mishra, Mr. Harinder Bains, Advocates for CBI. Mr. H.S. Phoolka Senior Advocate with Ms. Kamna Vohra & Ms. Shilpa Dewan, Advocates for the Complainant. Mr.Gurbaksh Singh & Mr. Lakhmi Chand, Advocates for victim Jagsher Singh. versus SAJJAN KUMAR & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Salman Khurshid, Senior Advocate with Mr. Anil Kumar Sharma, Mr. S.A. Hashmi, Mr. Apoorav Kumar Sharma, Mr. Salman Hashmi, Mr. Anuj Sharma, Advocates for Respondent No.1. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI JUDGMENT Crl.M.A.No.15236/2016 in CRL.A. 1099/2013 For orders, see Crl.A.No.715/2013. GITA MITTAL, J NOVEMBER04 2016/aj P.S.TEJI, J...
Padam Kumar vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-04-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: September 16, 2016 Judgment delivered on: November 04, 2016 + W.P.(C) 7123/2016, CM No.29307/2016 PADAM KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Jyoti Singh, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Tinu Bajwa, Mr. Amandeep Joshi, Mr. Sameer Sharma and Mr. Dinesh Yadav, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjay Jain, ASG with Mr. Vijay Joshi, Sr. Panel Counsel, Ms. Shreya Sinha, Mr. Sumit Misra, Ms. Karnika Singh & Ms. Meenakshi Pandey, Advs. CORAM: HONBLE MS JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J1 The challenge in this writ petition is to the communication dated June 03, 2016 from Senior Administrative Officer on behalf of Director General, Border Road Organization to the Chief Engineer (HQ), Brahamank whereby, the Chief Engineer was directed to forward charge sheets along with list of W.P.(C) 7123/2016 Page 1 of 23 documents with regard to certain officers including t...
Honeywell International Inc vs.mr Harish Kantilal Bhogi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-04-2016
$~17. * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 599/2016 Judgment dated 04.11.2016 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC Through : Mr.Siddhant, Adv. ..... Plaintiff versus MR HARISH KANTILAL BHOGI & ORS ..... Defendants Through : Mr.Vikas Nagwan and Ms.Manvi Rajvanshi, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. Plaintiff has filed the present suit for permanent injunction restraining infringement of trademark passing off, unfair competition, rendition of accounts, dilution, delivery up, damages, etc.2. The plaintiff is the registered proprietor of the trademark, Honeywell, which was first adopted by the plaintiff in the year 1906. The trademark of the plaintiff, Honeywell, is an arbitrary mark, without any meaning in common parlance nor any meaning specific to the trade, except denoting the plaintiffs goods and services.3. It is the case of the plaintiff that consumers across the world associate the trademark, Honeywell, exclusively with the plaintiff. The...
Divya Jyoti Kanal & Anr vs.sanjukta S J Bahadur & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-04-2016
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:4. h November, 2016. CS(OS) 131/2016 & IAs No.3506/2016 (u/O39R-1&2 CPC) & 3507/2016 (u/O2R-2 CPC) DIVYA JYOTI KANAL & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Alok Mahajan and Mr. Abhay Mahajan, Advs. Versus SANJUKTA S J BAHADUR & ANR ..... Defendants Through: Mr. I.S. Alag, Mr. J.S. Lamba, Mr. R.S. Bisht, Mr. Rajesh Kumar and Mr. Ahmad Shahrooz, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW This suit for partition, declaration, rendition of accounts and for 1. permanent injunction is listed today for framing of issues.2. The counsel for the plaintiffs states that applications for condonation of delay in filing the replication and affidavit of admission/denial have been filed.3. 4. The same are not found to have been listed. The delay in filing the replication and affidavit of admission/denial of documents on behalf of the plaintiffs is condoned and the replication and affidavit stated to have been filed by the plaintiffs b...
Mahender Yadav vs.central Bureau of Investigation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-04-2016
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + + Reserved on :24. h October, 2016 Date of Decision:04. h November, 2016 Crl.M.A.No.15239/2016 in CRL.A. No.715/2013 MAHENDER YADAV ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Vikas Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vikas Arora, Mr. Radhika Arora, Mr. Manish Sharma, Advocates. versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ... Respondent Through: Mr. R.S. Cheema, Senior Advocate (SPP) with Mr. D.P. Singh, Ms. Tarannum Cheema, Ms. Hiral Gupta, Mr. Manu Mishra & Mr. Harinder Bains, Advocates for CBI. Mr. H.S. Phoolka Senior Advocate with Ms. Kamna Vohra, Ms. Shilpa Dewan, Advocates for the Complainant. Mr.Gurbaksh Singh & Mr. Lakhmi Chand, Advocates for victim Jagsher Singh. Crl.M.A.No.15233/2016 in CRL.A. No.753/2013 KRISHAN KHOKAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Vikas Arora, Ms. Radhika Arora & Mr. Manish Sharma, Advocates. versus C B I ..... Respondent Through: Mr. R.S. Cheema, Senior Advocate (SPP) with Mr. D.P. Singh, Ms. Tarannum Crl.A.Nos.715/2013, 753/2013 & 1099...
Icici Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd vs.krishna Devi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-04-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~31 * % + MAC.APP. 987/2013 and C.M. Appl. 17339/2013 ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD Date of Decision:04. h November, 2016 ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Suman Bagga, Advocate versus KRISHNA DEVI & ORS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sudeep Dey, Advocate for respondent No.1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) The appellant has challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal 1. whereby compensation of Rs.7,89,335/- has been awarded to respondent No.1. The accident dated 02nd January, 2010 resulted in amputation of 2. left leg below knee of respondent No.1. The permanent disability of respondent No.1 was assessed as 75%. Respondent No.1 was aged 75 years at the time of the accident. The Claims Tribunal awarded Rs.1 lakh towards pain and suffering, Rs.1 lakh towards loss of amenities of life, Rs.1 lakh towards loss of expectation of life, Rs.83,300/- towards expenditure on treatment, Rs.30,000/- towards conveyance and special...
Anuradha Chaudhary vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-04-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~18. * + % BAIL APPLN. 1608/2016 ANURADHA CHAUDHARY Date of Decision:04. 11.2016 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rattan Singh, Mr. Manish Chaudhary, Mr. Arjun Chaudhary, Ms. Abhilasha Singh, Mr. Abhishek Iyer, Ms. Aishwarya Tiwari and Mr.Nishank Tyagi, Advocates. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ashish Dutta, APP along with Inspector Sanjeev, PS Jyoti Nagar Mr. Shalabh Gupta, Advocate for respondent No.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI VIPIN SANGHI, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. The present bail application is preferred by the petitioner to seek anticipatory bail under section 438 Cr.P.C., apprehending arrest in case FIR No.672/2015 registered at Police Station Jyoti Nagar, New Delhi, under Section 420/ 406/ 467/ 468/ 471/ 477-A/ 120-B IPC, wherein the applicant is one of the four accused.2. Here itself I may observe that accused Nos. 1, 2 & 3 have been BAIL APPLN. 1608/2016 Page 1 of 12 granted anticipatory bail by the learned ASJ, Sh...
Si/Gd Ramesh Chandra Joshi vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-04-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: October 18, 2016 Judgment delivered on: November 04, 2016 + W.P.(C) 10786/2015 SI/GD RAMESH CHANDRA JOSHI Through: Mr.N.L.Bareja, Adv. ........ Petitioner Versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Amrit Pal Singh, Adv. for UOI UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J1 This Petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers: a) Issue an appropriate writ, order (s) or direction (s) in the nature of:-"(i) Writ of Certiorari, setting aside the impugned letters dated 10.11.2014 & 11.09.2015 (ii) Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner, for fixation of his seniority, at par with the batch / cadre mates, who having qualified through SCC, CPOs Exam-2009, pursuant to their allocation to the BSF, were W.P.(C)10786/2015 Page 1 of 7 appointed to the post of SI/DE, in accordance with his pos...
Delhi Transport Corporation vs.jagdish Prasad
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-04-2016
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:4. h November, 2016 + CM No.8004/2016 in W.P.(C) 6181/2013 DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Latika Choudhary, Advocate versus JAGDISH PRASAD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rupesh Tyagi, Advocate alongwith respondent for respondent in person % CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA ORDER : SUNITA GUPTA, J.CM No.8004/2016 1. Vide this application, the applicant / respondent workman seeks clarification of the order dated 23.12.2015 inter alia on the ground that the petitioner corporation filed this writ petition challenging the award dated 30.04.2013 passed in DID No.475/2009 by the Presiding Officer Labour Court, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi whereby the respondent workman was granted the relief of back- wages with effect from the date of termination of service i.e. 06.12.2006 till the date of his superannuation alongwith continuity of service and consequential benefits. The writ petition was disposed of ...
Charanjit Singh Bakshi & Anr vs.vivek Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-04-2016
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 1266/2015 CHARANJIT SINGH BAKSHI & ANR ..... Plaintiff Through : Mr.Kshitiz Ahuja and Mr.Kush Sharma, Advs. along with plaintiffs. versus VIVEK GUPTA Through : Mr.P. Bashista, Adv. along with ..... Defendant CS(OS) 4066/2015 + defendant. PANKAJ MONGIA ..... Plaintiff Through : Mr.Dhanesh Relan, Adv. versus DAVINDER PAL SINGH & ANR ..... Defendants Through : Mr.P. Bashista, Adv. along with defendant. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI ORDER0411.2016 % 1. Since the parties had expressed their desire for an amicable settlement on 02.11.2016, file of CS(OS) 4066/2014 filed by one, Sh.Pankaj Mongia, against Sh.Davinder Pal Singh, Sh.Charanjit Singh, Sh.Vivek Gupta (parties in CS(OS) 1266/2015), Sh.Manik Sethi and Sh.Anshul Sethi has been called and transferred to this Court. Resultantly, with the CS(OS).NOS.1266/2015 & 4066/2015 Page 1 of 5 consent of the parties, through counsel including the counsel of Sh.Pankaj Mongia, this Court ...
- ‹ Prev
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- Next ›
- Last »