Delhi Court November 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Neeraj Jain vs.the Registrar of Cooperative Societies Through Its Auth ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-07-2016
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI PRONOUNCED ON:07. 11.2016 RESERVED ON:01. 03.2016 W.P. (C) 5785/2012, CM APPL.5172, 17009 & 27393/2015 versus NEERAJ JAIN THE REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES THROUGH ITS AUTH OFFICER AND ORS W.P. (C) 6906/2012, CM APPL.6295/2014 ........ Petitioner ....... RESPONDENTS JAGBIR SINGH KALRA AND ORS REGISTRAR CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES AND ORS versus ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Appearance: Mr. Manoj Kumar Sharma with Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Ms. Jyoti Tyagi and Mr. Kapil, Advocates for petitioner nos.1&2 in W.P.(C) 5785/2012. Ms. Isha Khanna, proxy for Ms. Nidhi Raman, Advocate for Delhi Fire Service/Resp-13 in W.P.(C)5785/2012. Ms. Mini Pushkarna, Advocate for North DMC in W.P.(C)5785/2012. Mr. Akhilesh Arora, Advocate for petitioner nos.1, 4, 5, 7, 11, 13, 14, 15 & 18 in W.P.(C) 6906/2012. Mr. Hemant Chaudhri with Mr. Arjun Bhaskar, Advocates for petitioner no.2 in W.P.(C) 6906/2012. Mr. Fanish K. Jain, Advocate for petitioner nos.8&10...
Jaiveer Srivastava vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-07-2016
$~80 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:07. 11.2016 + W.P.(C) 10530/2016, CM APPL. 41307/2016 (stay) JAIVEER SRIVASTAVA ........ Petitioner UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through: Mr. K. Varghese, Mr. Mathew K., Mr. V. Shyamohan, Mr. Nitin Walia, Ms. Soumya Sharma, Ms. Smrithi Sunesh and Mr. Deepak Grover, Advs. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ajay Digpaul, CGSC for R-1 & R-2. Mr. P.S. Narsima, Senior Adv. with Mr. Ritin Rai and Mr. Aabhas Kshetarpal, Advs. for respondent (FACT). CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(oral) 1. Mr. Ajay Digpaul and Mr. Ritin Rai, Advocates, who appear on service of advance copy state that the matter may be heard and disposed off finally.2. 3. At joint request, the case is taken up for final hearing. The petitioner is aggrieved by order dated 02.11.2016 whereby he has been removed from the post of Chairman and Managing Director of respondent no.3 i.e. Fertilizers and Chemicals Travancore Limited (FACT) with imme...
Jagbir Singh Kalra and Others vs.registrar Co-Operative Societies and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-07-2016
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI PRONOUNCED ON:07. 11.2016 RESERVED ON:01. 03.2016 W.P. (C) 5785/2012, CM APPL.5172, 17009 & 27393/2015 versus NEERAJ JAIN THE REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES THROUGH ITS AUTH OFFICER AND ORS W.P. (C) 6906/2012, CM APPL.6295/2014 ........ Petitioner ....... RESPONDENTS JAGBIR SINGH KALRA AND ORS REGISTRAR CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES AND ORS versus ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Appearance: Mr. Manoj Kumar Sharma with Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Ms. Jyoti Tyagi and Mr. Kapil, Advocates for petitioner nos.1&2 in W.P.(C) 5785/2012. Ms. Isha Khanna, proxy for Ms. Nidhi Raman, Advocate for Delhi Fire Service/Resp-13 in W.P.(C)5785/2012. Ms. Mini Pushkarna, Advocate for North DMC in W.P.(C)5785/2012. Mr. Akhilesh Arora, Advocate for petitioner nos.1, 4, 5, 7, 11, 13, 14, 15 & 18 in W.P.(C) 6906/2012. Mr. Hemant Chaudhri with Mr. Arjun Bhaskar, Advocates for petitioner no.2 in W.P.(C) 6906/2012. Mr. Fanish K. Jain, Advocate for petitioner nos.8&10...
Hotel Leela Venture Limited vs.airports Authority of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-07-2016
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved On : November 04, 2016 Judgment Delivered On : November 07, 2016 FAO (OS) (COMM) 64/2016 HOTEL LEELA VENTURE LIMITED .....Appellant Represented by: Mr.Rajiv Nayar, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Abhimanyu Mahajan, Mr.Milan Deep Singh and Ms.Anubha Goel, Advocates versus AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA .....Respondent Represented by: Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Vaibhav Kalra and Mr.Jasbir Bidhur, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Airports Authority of India (hereinafter referred to as AAI) was the owner of 29000 square meter land near Mumbai International Airport, out of which 2 parcels ad-measuring 9000 square meters each were leased to Leela Scottish Lace Ltd. and Leela Venture Limited, (hereinafter referred to as LEELA) leaving behind 11000 square meters land, which initially was given on a license to LEELA. FAO (OS) (COMM) No.64/...
Satbir Singh vs.ghanshyam Dass & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-07-2016
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :03. 11.2016 Judgment delivered on:07. 11.2016. + W.P.(C) 3486/2013 & C.M. No.6586/2013 SATBIR SINGH ........ Petitioner Through Mr. S.S.Panwar and Ms.Nivedita Panwar, Advocate. Versus GHANSHYAM DASS & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Rajesh Yadav, Ms.Ruchira Arora and Mr.Dhananjay Mehlawat, Advocates for R-1 to R-6. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.For orders see W.P.(C) 4289/2012. NOVEMBER07 2016 A INDERMEET KAUR, J...
Burger King Corporation vs.gurpreet Singh Sekhon & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-07-2016
$~18. * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 959/2015 Judgment dated 07thNovember, 2016 BURGER KING CORPORATION ..... Plaintiff Through : Mr. Pravin Anand, Mr. Raunaq Kamath and Ms. Anjana Ahluwalia, Advocates. CORAM: versus GURPREET SINGH SEKHON & ORS. Through: None ..... Defendants HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) I.A. 13385/2016 1. This is an application filed under Order VIII Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Code, 1908 by the plaintiff for passing of a decree of permanent injunction in the default of the defendants to file written statement. None is present on behalf of the defendants despite service.2. Summons in the present matter were issued on 10.04.2015; on the same date an ex parte ad interim injunction was also granted in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendants. The defendants were duly served and the defendants had also entered appearance through counsel on the next date of hearing, i.e. 29.07.2015. Thereafter, none has appeared for...
Prabhakar Jeyapathy vs.akshaya Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-07-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~38 * + PRABHAKAR JEYAPATHY O.M.P. 973/2012 Through: Ms. Pragya Baghel, Advocate. ........ Petitioner AKSHAYA PVT LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Arjun Krishnan & Mr. Ankur Singh, versus Advocates for the Respondent. Ms. Karnika Seth & Ms. Shruti Bisht, Advocates for National Internet Exchange of India. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR % 1. The challenge in this petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and ORDER0711.2016 Conciliation Act, 1996 ('Act') is to an Award dated 4th August, 2012 passed by the sole Arbitrator in the disputes between the... Petitioner and the Respondent in relation to the use of the domain name akshaya.in.2. The background facts are that the... Petitioner is a software professional working as a Consultant to a Financial Institution in the United States of America since 1993. The Respondent Akshaya Private Limited is a builder involved in construction business. The... Petitioner claims to have approached Goodluck Domains...
Icon Build Con. Pvt. Ltd. Vs.aggarwal Developers Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-07-2016
% + *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:7. h November, 2016 CS(OS) No.2656/2008 & IA No.8760/2016 (for stay). ICON BUILD CON. PVT.LTD ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Gopal Jain, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Ankit Jain, Adv. Versus AGGARWAL DEVELOPERS PVT.LTD ..... Defendant CORAM:-"HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW Through: Mr. Sanjay Manchanda, Adv. IA No.8761/2016 (of the defendant under Order XXXVII Rule 4 CPC).1. The defendant, by this application seeks setting aside of a money decree passed in this summary suit.2. The counsel for the defendant/applicant and the senior counsel for the plaintiff/non-applicant have been heard.3. The plaintiff instituted this suit under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) for recovery of Rs.4,05,67,347/- with interest inter alia pleading that (i) the plaintiff had entered into agreements with others for purchase of some land in Tehsil Najafgarh, New Delhi and in pursuance to the said agreements had paid a sum of Rs.1,92...
Anil Kumar vs.state Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-07-2016
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.APPEAL No.587/2012 & Crl.M. (Bail) No.1385/2016 Date of Decision :7. h November, 2016 ANIL KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.B. Dandapani, Advocate (DHCLSC) versus STATE NCT OF DELHI Through: Mr. Varun Goswami, ..... Respondent Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with Sub- Inspector Sumer Chand. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.1. The present appeal has been filed by the appellant against the judgment dated 29th September, 2011 and the order on sentence dated 30th September, 2011 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge 02 (Central), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in Session Case No.15/2010 whereby the appellant was convicted in a case arising out of FIR No.155/2008 registered under Sectionsof the Indian Penal Code (IPC) at Police Station Nabi Karim and by the order on sentence dated 30th September, 2011, was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life with fine of Rs.50,000...
North Delhi Municipal Corporation vs.shakuntala and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-07-2016
$~10 & 14 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:07. 11.2016 + W.P.(C) 10424/2016 & CM Nos. 40907-08/2016 NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Biji Rajesh and Mr. G. Kanth, Advocates. GEETA AND ANR Versus Through: Mr.Rahul Sharma Bhatt, Advocates No.2. ..... Respondent and Mr. C.K. for Respondent + W.P.(C) 10465/2016 & CM Nos. 41016-17/2016 NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Biji Rajesh and Mr. G. Kanth, Advocates. Versus SHAKUNTALA AND ANR. Through: Mr.Rahul Sharma Bhatt, Advocates No.2. ........ RESPONDENTS and Mr. C.K. for Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(oral) CM Nos. 40908/2016 (in W.P.(C) No.10424/2016) & 41017/2016 (in W.P.(C) No.10465/2016) (both for exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The applications are disposed off. WP(C) No.10424 & 10465 of 2016 Page 1 of 3 W.P.(C) 10424/2016 & CM No.40907/2016 and W.P.(C) 10465/2016 & CM No.41016/2016 Thes...
- ‹ Prev
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- Next ›
- Last »