Delhi Court November 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
mohd.anas vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-08-2016
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + DECIDED ON : NOVEMBER08 2016 BAIL APPLN.1126/2016 MOHD.ANAS ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.Waseem Ahmed, Advocate. STATE versus ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG Through : Ms.Meenakshi Dahiya, APP. SI Rajiv Kumar, PS Welcome. S.P.GARG, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks interim bail in case FIR No.345/2013 under Section 302/120-B IPC registered at Police Station Welcome on medical grounds for three months. Status report is on record.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the file. The petitioner is in custody since 5.3.2014. He is facing trial under Section 302 IPC along with Danish and Nadeem for allegedly committing murder of his step mother. Upon completion of investigation, charge-sheet has since been filed. Main allegations are against accused Danish and Nadeem. Bail Appl.1126/2016 Page 1 of 2 3. During the course of arguments it was informed that earlier Danish was granted interim ba...
Harbhajan Kaur vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-08-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA1282016 HARBHAJAN KAUR Judgment Pronounced on:08. 11.2016 $~7 * + .....Appellant Through : Mr. Ravindra S. Garia, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA ....Respondent Through : Ms. Mrinalini Sen and Ms. Aastha Jain, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J.1. The appeal is preferred against the order of the learned Single Judge dated 23.12.2015 in W.P.(C) No.12271 of 2015. The unsuccessful petitioner is the appellant before us.2. The said writ petition was filed seeking a mandamus to the Government of India to take appropriate action for realisation of the sum of money deposited by the late husband of the petitioner in his accounts with General Post Office (Round Post Office), Sichin Road, Shanghai, China. On a representation being made to the Chinese authorities, the petitioner was informed vide letter dated 09.10.2003, that the claim for the monies deposited in the said account...
Pooja Gosain vs.sunil Gosain
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-07-2016
$~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 861/2015 POOJA GOSAIN ..... Plaintiff Through Mr. J.C. Mahindro, Advocate versus CORAM: SUNIL GOSAIN ..... Defendant Through Mr. Aseem Malhotra, Advocate HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI Plaintiff has filed the present suit for declaration with consequential relief ORDER0711.2016 % of perpetual injunction and rendition of accounts. The parties to the present suit are sister and brother. The plaintiff claims declaration as she is entitled to 50% share each of the deceased parents assets, which include: (i) Property bearing No.23, Road No.64, West Punjabi Bagh, New Delhi; and (ii) Tenancy rights of Shop No.6-A, East Avenue Market, East Punjabi Bagh, New Delhi. The matter was passed over once when the parties were directed to remain present in Court. The parties are present along with their counsel. The matter was passed over again to enable the parties to confer with their counsel and explore the possibility of an amicable settlement...
Prakash Kishore & Others vs.m/s Adiva Healthcare (P) Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-07-2016
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 1632/2013 PRAKASH KISHORE & OTHERS Through : Mr.Madan Gera, Adv. ..... Plaintiffs versus M/S ADIVA HEALTHCARE (P) LTD ..... Defendant Through : Mr.Raaj Malhotra and Ms.Abha Malhotra, Advs. + CS(OS) 369/2014 + ADIVA HEALTHCARE PVT LTD Through : Mr.Madan Gera, Adv. ..... Plaintiff versus PRAKASH KISHORE & ORS ..... Defendant Through : Mr.Raaj Malhotra and Ms.Abha Malhotra, Advs. EX.P. 330/2014 PRAKASH KISHORE & OTHERS Through : Mr.Madan Gera, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus M/S ADIVA HEALTHCARE (P) LTD ..... Defendant Through : Mr.Raaj Malhotra and Ms.Abha Malhotra, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI ORDER0711.2016 % CS(OS)NOS.1632/2013, 369/2014 & EX.P. 330/2014 Page 1 of 3 1. At the request of counsel for the parties file of EX.P.330/2014 has been called from the Court of R.K. Gauba, J., who is not holding Court today. The file of EX.P.330/2014 has been listed.2. CS(OS) 1632/2013 has been filed by the plaintiffs for posses...
Sh. Zinda Singh vs.sh. Sunil Kumar and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-07-2016
* + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RSA No.331/2016 7th November, 2016 SH. ZINDA SINGH Through: Mr. Alok Sharma, Advocate with Ms. ..... Appellant versus SH. SUNIL KUMAR AND ANR. Through: Swati Kumar, Advocate. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. No.41309/2016 (exemption) 1. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. +RSA No.331/2016 and C.M. No.41308/2016 (stay) 2. This Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant no.1 in the suit against the concurrent Judgments of the courts below; of the Trial Court dated 23.4.2016 and the First Appellate Court dated 22.9.2016; by which the RSA No.331/2016 Page 1 of 5 courts below have decreed the suit for possession and injunction filed by the respondent no.1/plaintiff with respect to the suit property admeasuring 55 sq. yds forming part of khasra no....
Sh. Karambir Singh and Ors vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-07-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :03. 11.2016 Judgment delivered on:07. 11.2016. $~ * % + W.P.(C) 4289/2012 & C.M. No.8900/2012 SH. KARAMBIR SINGH AND ORS Through Mr.A.K.Sen, Advocate. Versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Sanjoy Ghose, Mr.Rhishabh Jetley and Ms.Pratishtha Vij, Advocates for R-1 and R-2. Mr.Rajesh Yadav, Ms.Ruchira Arora and Mr.Dhananjay Mehlawat, Advocates for R-4 to R-9. Mr.S.S.Panwar Panwar, Advocate for R-10. and Ms.Nivedita + W.P.(C) 3486/2013 & C.M. No.6586/2013 SATBIR SINGH ........ Petitioner Through Mr. S.S.Panwar and Ms.Nivedita Panwar, Advocate. Versus GHANSHYAM DASS & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Rajesh Yadav, Ms.Ruchira Arora and Mr.Dhananjay Mehlawat, Advocates for R-1 to R-6. WP(C) Nos. 4289/2012 & 3486/2013 Page 1 of 18 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1 The petitioners before this Court are Satbir and Karambir. They are aggrieved by the th...
M/S Worldwide Machinery Solutions Pvt Ltd & Anr vs.m/s Baliyan Enterpr ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-07-2016
$~15 * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 652/2015 Judgment dated 7th November, 2016 M/S WORLDWIDE MACHINERY SOLUTIONS PVT LTD & ANR Through : Dr.Anurag Kumar Aggarwal with and ..... Plaintiffs P Mr.Umesh Mr.Dhananjay Pandey, Advocates Sharma versus M/S BALIYAN ENTERPRISES PVT LTD & ORS ..... Defendants Through : Mr. Rohit Sharma, Advocate for defendant no.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) IA No.4959/2015 IA No.7478/2015 1. Plaintiffs have filed the present suit for recovery of Rs.55,00,000/- together with pendente lite and future interest at the rate of 18%, per annum; damages to the tune of Rs.55,00,000/- and cancellation of Settlement Deed dated 13.2.2015. The plaintiffs also pray for a decree of permanent injunction.2. I.A. 4959/2015 has been filed by the plaintiffs under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure. I.A. 7478/2015 has been filed by defendant no.2 under Order XXXIX Rule 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure for s...
M/S Mohan Meakin Limited vs.m/s High Brew International Pvt Ltd & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-07-2016
$~01. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 642/2016 M/S MOHAN MEAKIN LIMITED Through : Mr.S.P. Singh, Adv. ..... Plaintiff versus M/S HIGH BREW INTERNATIONAL PVT LTD & ORS. ..... Defendants Through : Mr.Afzal. B. Khan, Adv. Mr.Prateek Srivastava, Adv. defendant no.1. Mr.Anuj Mirdha and Mr.Sushant Kumar, Advs. for defendant no.2. for for CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI ORDER0711.2016 % 1. Plaintiff has filed the present suit for permanent injunction restraining infringement of trademark, infringement of copyright, passing off, unfair competition, damages, delivery up, etc.2. Learned counsel for the parties submit that the parties have arrived at an amicable settlement before the Delhi High Court Med iation and Conciliation Centre on 2.9.2016, a copy of the Settlement Agreement dated 2.9.2016 has been placed on record, which is marked as Exhibit P-1. Counsel pray that the present suit be decreed in terms of Exhibit P-1.3. Heard counsel for the parties and also peru...
North Delhi Municipal Corporation vs.geeta and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-07-2016
$~10 & 14 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:07. 11.2016 + W.P.(C) 10424/2016 & CM Nos. 40907-08/2016 NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Biji Rajesh and Mr. G. Kanth, Advocates. GEETA AND ANR Versus Through: Mr.Rahul Sharma Bhatt, Advocates No.2. ..... Respondent and Mr. C.K. for Respondent + W.P.(C) 10465/2016 & CM Nos. 41016-17/2016 NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Biji Rajesh and Mr. G. Kanth, Advocates. Versus SHAKUNTALA AND ANR. Through: Mr.Rahul Sharma Bhatt, Advocates No.2. ........ RESPONDENTS and Mr. C.K. for Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(oral) CM Nos. 40908/2016 (in W.P.(C) No.10424/2016) & 41017/2016 (in W.P.(C) No.10465/2016) (both for exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The applications are disposed off. WP(C) No.10424 & 10465 of 2016 Page 1 of 3 W.P.(C) 10424/2016 & CM No.40907/2016 and W.P.(C) 10465/2016 & CM No.41016/2016 Thes...
Xstrata Coal Marketing Ag vs.dalmia Bharat (Cement) Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-07-2016
% + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:07. 11.2016 EX.P. 334/2014 XSTRATA COAL MARKETING AG ..... Decree Holder Versus ..... Judgement Debtor : Mr Gourab Banerji, Senior Advocate with Mr Prashant Pakiddey, Ms Shivi Sethi, Mr Sahil Tagotra and Ms Vaidehi Misra. DALMIA BHARAT (CEMENT) LTD Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Decree Holder For the Judgment Debtor : Mr A.S. Chandhiok, Senior Advocate with CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU Mr Ashish Dholakia, Mr Abhimanyu Mahajan, Mr Ankur Mahindroo, Mr D. Kishore Kumar, Mr Gautam Bajaj, Ms Smita Mohan and Ms Esha Mehta. VIBHU BAKHRU, J EA(OS) No.257/2016 JUDGMENT1 Dalmia Cement (Bharat) Limited (hereafter 'Dalmia'), the Judgment Debtor/Objector, has filed the present application under Section 48 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter 'the Act'), inter alia, praying that enforcement of the arbitral award dated 31.01.2014 (hereafter 'first award') and the final award dated 30.04.2014 (h...
- ‹ Prev
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- Next ›
- Last »