Delhi Court November 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Bhima Ridhdhi Digital Services vs.the Ministry of Information & Br ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-09-2016
Judgment delivered on:09. 11.2016 $~33 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 7195/2016 M/S BHIMA RIDHDHI DIGITAL SERVICES THE MINISTRY OF INFORMATION & BROADCASTING & ANR Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Gaurav Singh, Advocate. ........ RESPONDENTS versus ........ Petitioner : Mr. Kirtiman Singh with Mr. Waize Ali Noor, Advocates for TRAI. Mr. Rijul Taneja with Mr. Abhishek Malhotra, Advocates for the applicant/ IBF. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0911.2016 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) W.P.(C) 7195/2016 1. The petition has been filed seeking grant of time for installing the set-top boxes and till the completion of installation of set top boxes, the respondent be restrained from stopping the supply of analogue signal.2. The Ministry of Information & Broadcasting by Notification dated 11.11.2011 had, in public interest, notified that it shall be W.P.(C) No.7195/2016 Page 1 of 4 obligatory for every ca...
Director of Income Tax vs.virage Logic International
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-09-2016
$~16-17 * % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:09. 11.2016 ITA12492009 DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rahul Chaudhary and Mr. Ragvendra Singh, Advs. versus VIRAGE LOGIC INTERNATIONAL ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Balbir Singh, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Prakash Kumar and Mr. Ankit Vijaywargeja, Advs. ITA1732016 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-3 INTERNATIONAL TAXATION ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rahul Chaudhary and Mr. Ragvendra Singh, Advs. versus VIRAGE LOGIC INTERNATIONAL INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Balbir Singh, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Prakash Kumar and Mr. Ankit Vijaywargeja, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(Oral) For detailed judgment, see judgment dated 09.11.2016 passed in ITA12492009 & 173/2016 Page 1 of 2 connected matter ITA No.1108/2007 Deputy Director of Income Tax vs Virage Logic International. S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J NAJMI WAZIRI, J NOVEMBER09 2016/kk ITA12492009 ...
Preena Gadra vs.university of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-09-2016
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 7078/2016 Date of decision:9. h November, 2016 PREENA GADRA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Arunava Mukherjee, Adv. versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal and Ms. Simran Jeet, Advs. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.(ORAL) W.P.(C) 7078/2016 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking the following reliefs: Issue a Writ / Order or Direction in the nature of (i) mandamus to the... RESPONDENTS directing them to forthwith admit the petitioner to the post graduate course of M.A. (Economics) at the Delhi School of Economics, University of Delhi, for the batch commencing 2016; and (ii) Pass any order or further order (s) as this Honble Court deems fit in the facts and circumstances of the present case.2. It is the case of the petitioner in the writ petition that she is a Graduate in B.A. (Hons.) Economics, and has secured 74.23%. She...
Dr K Pugazhendi vs.ambuja Bhushan Jaiswal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-09-2016
$~A-4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:09. 11.2016 + CM(M) 1083/2016 and CM No.41807/2016 (stay) DR K PUGAZHENDI Through Ms.Ginny ........ Petitioner J.Rautray, Ms.Parul Kandoi and Ms.Harsha, Advocates. versus AMBUJA BHUSHAN JAISWAL Through ..... Respondent Respondent No.1-in-person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. By the present petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks to impugn the order dated 08.08.2016 by which an application filed by the petitioner under Order 1 Rule 9 CPC was dismissed.2. The respondent was enrolled for pre-Ph.D/Ph.D Degree programme in the School of Physical Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU), New Delhi on 29.07.2009. He was provided with hostel accommodation. A show cause notice dated 23.09.2014 was issued to the respondent. Finally an order was passed which was said to have been pasted on the respondents room on 22.10.2014 to vacate the hostel by 27....
Union of India Ministry of Railways vs.kishan Lal Meena
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-08-2016
$~39 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % . + W.P.(C) 8975/2015 & CM No.20240/2015 (for interim relief) Judgment delivered on:08. 11.2016 UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent versus KISHAN LAL MEENA Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Ms. Prerna Mehta, Advocate. None. : : JUDGMENT0811.2016 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. Notice in the petition was issued to the respondent on 18.09.2015. By order dated 24.02.2016, this Court recorded that despite service none had appeared for the respondent. The respondent was proceeded ex-parte.2. The petitioner seeks quashing of order dated 04.06.2015, passed by the Central Information Commission allowing the appeal of the respondent and directing the petitioner to provide information sought for by the respondent.3. The petitioner by his application filed under the Right to W.P.(C) No.8975/2016 Page 1 of 5 Information Act, 2...
Delhi Public School and Anr. Vs.manoj Bhandari and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-08-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.9187/2015 * + % 8th November, 2016 ........ Petitioners DELHI PUBLIC SCHOOL AND ANR. Through: Mr. Puneet Mittal, Advocate with Ms. Vasudha Bajaj, Advocate. MANOJ BHANDARI AND ANR. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S.P. Gautam, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Peeyoosh Kalra, ASC with Mr. Shiva Sharma, Advocate and Ms. Sona Babbar, Advocate for respondent No.2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. YES VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India is filed by the petitioners/Delhi Public School impugning the Order of the Delhi School Tribunal (DST) dated 21.8.2015 by which the DST accepted the appeal filed by the respondent no.1/Sh. Manoj Bhandari and ordered that the termination of services of the respondent no.1 by the petitioners was illegal and accordingly the Letter of W.P.(C) No.9187/2015 Page 1 of 13 Termination dated 27....
Manjeet Singh vs.lt. Governor-Cum-Administrator and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-08-2016
$~39 * % + W.P.(C) 4141/2014 THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:08. 11.2016 MANJEET SINGH versus LT. GOVERNOR-CUM-ADMINISTRATOR AND ORS ....... Petitioner ....... RESPONDENTS : Mr Sandeep Bajaj & Mr Soayib Qureshi. : Mr Yeeshu Jain & Ms Jyoti Tyagi. : Mr Dig Vijay Rai. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For R-1 & R-2 For R-3 CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) JUDGMENT1 The additional affidavit handed over by Mr Yeeshu Jain on behalf of the respondent nos.1 & 2 is taken on record. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the rejoinder affidavit to the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondent is already on record as also the writ W.P.(C) No.4141/2014 Page 1 of 5 petition which takes care of all the averments which are to be made in the additional affidavit and, therefore, no further response is necessary.2. The petitioner seeks the benefit of Sectio...
Dr Jai Singh vs.v S Oberoi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-08-2016
$~2 * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CONT.CAS(C) 825/2015 DR JAI SINGH V S OBEROI Through Mr.L.R.Khatana, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus Through Mr.Arindam Mukherjee, Advocate. ..... Respondent Date of Decision:08. h November, 2016 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present contempt petition has been filed alleging wilful disobedience of the order dated 19th December, 2013 passed in W.P.(C) No.6736/2010, wherein a Division Bench of this Court held that the present petitioner was entitled to the benefit of FR.49(i) w.e.f. from the date he was given the charge of the post of Technical Advisor till the date of his superannuation. It was further held that the petitioner would be entitled to pay fixation from the date he had taken over the charge of Technical Advisor.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that as the Ministry of Law had declined to give permission to the respondent to file a special leave petition to challenge the Di...
M/S Golden Tobacco Ltd. (Formerly Known as Gtc Industries Ltd.) vs.boa ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-08-2016
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Date of decision:08. 11.2016 W.P.(C) 7829/2016 M/S GOLDEN TOBACCO LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS GTC INDUSTRIES LTD.) ........ Petitioner Through: Ms.Maneesha Dhir, Ms. Varsha Banerjee & Ms.Saloni Chowdhry, Advocates. versus BOARD FOR INDUSTRIAL AND FINANCIAL RECONSTRUCTION AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Manish Mohan, CGSC for BIFR. Mr.Anil Panwar & Mr.Ram Kumar for respondent No.2. Jha, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO INDIRA BANERJEE, J (ORAL) JUDGMENT1 In this writ petition the petitioner has challenged an order dated 17th June, 2016 passed by the learned Registrar of the BIFR (Board of Industrial and Financial Reconstruction) in a Reference made by the petitioner under Section 15(1) of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act 1986, hereinafter referred to as the SICA and an order dated 23rd August, 2016 passed by the learned Secretary of the BIFR, dismissing an app...
M/S. Janta Store vs.government of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-08-2016
$~7 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:08. 11.2016 + W.P.(C) 10433/2016 & CM No.40920 /2016(stay) M/S. JANTA STORE ........ Petitioner versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr Pradeep Gupta, Mr Parinav Gupta and Ms Mansi Gupta Mr. Siddhartha Shankar Ray For the... RESPONDENTS: CORAM HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) JUDGMENT1 The petitioner seeks quashing of suspension order dated 20.10.2016 and a direction to the respondents to supply complete copy of the seized record to enable the petitioner to reply to the show cause notice dated 20.10.2016.2. The petitioner contends that the petitioner is a holder of a fair price shop licence since 1987 and, till 11.10.2016, there was never any complaint qua the functioning of the petitioner. However, on 11.10.2016, an W.P.(C) No.10433 /2016 Page 1 of 6 inspection was carried out by the officials of the r...
- ‹ Prev
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- Next ›
- Last »