Delhi Court November 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Paramjeet Singh & Anr vs.the State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-10-2016
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 1264/2016 PARAMJEET SINGH & ANR ........ Petitioners Date of Decision: November 10th, 2016 Through Mr.Ashok Anand, Adv. versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.M.P.Singh, APP. Mr.Aditya Swarup Agarwal, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by 1. the petitioners, namely, Sh. Paramjeet Singh and Sh. Amardeep Singh for quashing of FIR No.133/2013 dated 22.05.2013, under Sections 420/406/120B IPC registered at Police Station E.O.W. on the basis of settlement arrived at between the petitioner and respondent no.2 namely, Sh. Anand Prakash on 8.07.2015.2. respondent-State submitted that the respondent No.2 present in the Court has been identified to be the complainant/first informant in the FIR in question by his counsel.3. The factual matrix of the present case is that the complainant is the owner of entire building bearing ...
Rajinder Prasad Jain vs.state (Gnctd)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-10-2016
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: November 10th, 2016 CRL.M.C. 4822/2014 RAJINDER PRASAD JAIN ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Shiv Charan Garg and Mr.Imran Khan, Advocates. versus STATE (GNCTD) ..... Respondent Through Ms.Manjeet Arya, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Mr.Arun Arora, Ms.Preet, Advocates for respondent No.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.1. The present petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter shall be referred as Cr.P.C.) for setting aside the order dated 16.07.2014 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Central, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi whereby the application of the petitioner filed under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. was dismissed. Facts, in brief, are that an application under Section 156(3) 2. Cr.P.C. was filed by the petitioner before the learned Magistrate. In the application, it was alleged that the respondent no.2 Amit Jain/proposed accused was son of the bro...
Ravinder Solanki & Ors vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-10-2016
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 56/2016 Date of Decision :10. h November, 2016 RAVINDER SOLANKI & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Shanker Raju & Mr. Nilansh Gaur, Advocates. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Gautam Narayan, ASC with Mr. Shatrajit Banerji, Advocate with Mr. Manoj Kumar, LA-Zone-9 & Ms. Seema Goswami, DEO-Zone-9 for respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) With the consent of the counsel for the parties, we have taken up the writ petition for hearing and disposal. The original disciplinary records have been produced for our perusal.2. This writ petition by Ravinder Solanki, Gajendra Singh, Jai Bhagwan, Jagdish Prasad, Dinesh Kumar, Gopal Lal Meena, Hotu Ram and Than Singh, who are Trained Graduate Teachers ( TGT, for short) in different subjects, impugns the common order dated 03.12.2015 passed in eight separate Original Applications f...
Hafiz Ahmad Hussain & Ors vs.state & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-10-2016
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 2279/2016 HAFIZ AHMAD HUSSAIN & ORS Date of Decision: November 10th, 2016 ........ Petitioners Through Mr.A.K. Suri and Mr.Sumbul Nizam, Advs. versus STATE & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.M.P. Singh, APP with ASI Ved Prakash, PS Malviya Nagar. Respondent no.2 & 3 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.Learned Additional Public Prosecutor 1. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioners, namely, Sh. Hafiz Ahmad Hussain, Sh. Khalil Ahmad and Sh. Taskeenuddin for quashing of FIR No.1253/2014 dated 24.09.2014, under Sections 323/324/341/5IPC registered at Police Station Malviya Nagar on the basis of the settlement arrived at between the petitioners and respondent nos. 2 & 3, namely, Smt. Bushra Khanam and Ms. Sabina Khanam.2. respondent-State submitted that the respondent no.2, present in the Court has been identified to be the complainant/first informant and respondent no.3 ha...
Vishal Sharma &Ors vs.state of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-10-2016
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 2427/2016 Vishal Sharma &Ors Date of Decision: November 10th, 2016 ..Petitioner Through: Mr. M. Tarique Siddique, Advocate Versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, Additional Public Prosecutor Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by 1. the petitioners, namely, Sh. Vishal Sharma, Smt. Monica Sharma, Sh. Vikas Sharma, Smt. Seema Sharma for quashing of FIR No.569/2014 dated 19.12.2014 under Sections 498A/406 IPC registered at Police Station Greater Kailash on the basis of settlement arrived through Mediation Center Saket, New Delhi between the petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2, namely, Ms. Shagun Sharma on 7.7.2015.2. respondent-State submitted that the respondent No.2, present in the Court has been identified to be the complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question by her counsel. The factua...
Niraj Sharma vs.state & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-10-2016
$~ 17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % CRL.M.C. 2881/2016 & Crl.M.A. 12352/2016 Decided on:10. h November, 2016 NIRAJ SHARMA ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Sudarshan Rajan, Mr. versus Arjun Gadhoke, Mr. Archit Arora, Mr. Karanjot Singh, Advs. STATE & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Represented by: Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, APP with SI Arvind SWR Cr.Br. Mr. D.S. Kohli, Mr. T.D. Sharma, Ms. Parminder Singh, Mr. Harvinder Singh, Advs. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the respondent No.2 enters appearance and has placed on record his vakalatnama.2. On the complaint of the petitioner FIR No.253/2004 was registered at PS Chitranjan Park under Sections 506/507/387/120B IPC and investigation was going on when the respondent No.2 filed an application before the learned CMM under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. for monitoring the investigation and directing the investigating officer to conclude the investigation expeditiously. The lea...
Kumar Mayank vs.delhi Technological University & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-10-2016
* + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P(C) No.10368/2016 & conn. + W.P(C) No.10368/2016 KUMAR MAYANK10h November, 2016 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Vivek Chib, Mr. Asif Ahmed, Mr. Rishabh Kapur and Mr. Kushal Gupta, Advocates. versus DELHI TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Adv. with Ms. Latika Chaudhary, Adv. for R-1. + W.P(C) No.10370/2016 SIKANDER ALI KHAN Mr. Peeyosh Kalra, ASC, GNCTD with Ms. Sona Babbar, Advocate for R-2. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Vivek Chib, Mr. Asif Ahmed, Mr. Rishabh Kapur and Mr. Kushal Gupta, Advocates. versus DELHI TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Adv. with Ms. Latika Chaudhary, Adv. for R-1. WP(C) No.10368/2016 & conn. Page 1 of 36 Mr. Peeyosh Kalra, ASC, GNCTD with Ms. Sona Babbar, Advocate for R-2. + W.P(C) No.10372/2016 SUMAN RANI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Vivek Chib, Mr. Asif Ahmed, Mr. Rishabh Kapur and Mr. Kushal Gupta, Advocates. ver...
Amit Kumar Mutreja & Ors vs.state (Govt of Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-10-2016
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 1225/2016 Date of Decision: November 10th, 2016 AMIT KUMAR MUTREJA & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.S.N. Tripathi, Advocate versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. M.P. Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.1. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioners, namely, Sh. Amit Kumar Mutreja, Smt. Sunayana Pushkarna and Sh. Harsh Pushkarna for quashing of FIR No.469/2010 dated 12.12.2010, under Sections 498-A/406 IPC registered at Police Station Maurya Enclave on the basis of a settlement arrived at between petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2, namely, Ms. Anita Kohli in front of Sh. Ramesh Chand, Principal Counselor, Counseling Cell, Tis Hazari Courts on 24.01.2015. respondent-State 2. submitted that the respondent No.2, present in the Court has been identified to be the complainant/first-informant of th...
Anupriya Singh vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-10-2016
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:28. 09.2016 Pronounced on:10. 11.2016 REV. PET.68/2016, C.M. APPL.4290/2016 IN W.P.(C) 10412/2015 ANUPRIYA SINGH Petitioner Through: Sh. Ankur Chhibber with Sh. Manu Padalia, Advocates. Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Through: Ms. Bharathi Raju, CGSC, Respondent Nos. 1 to 4. ..Respondents for CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % Undisputed Facts:1. The petitioner is an NCC entry applicant and applied for the 38th Short Service Commission course of the Indian Army. Four vacancies were notified for Women NCC entry. She qualified for the SSB and underwent extensive medical examination in which she was declared medically fit. Her name appeared fifth on the final merit list. Miss Rajsri Ramakrishnan, fifth respondent in this case was first in the merit list but her medical status was shown as awaited. The Special Medical Board (SMB) at Bangalore had found her medical...
Subhash Kwatra vs.registrar of Co-Operative Societies & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-10-2016
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI PRONOUNCED ON:10. 11.2016 RESERVED ON:02. 05.2016 Review Petition No.182/2016, CM Nos.13218/2016, 13219/2016 & 13220/2016 & Review Petition No.212/2016, 15684/2016, 15685/2016, 15686/2016 & 15687/2016 IN W.P.(C) 7227/2013 SUBHASH KWATRA ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Rajesh Goswami with Ms. Anita Goswami, Advocates for review petitioner in Review Petition No.182/2016. Mr. V.V. Manoharan with Mr. Awanish Kumar, Advocate for review petitioner in Review Petition No.212/2016. Versus REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rahul Sharma with Mr. Ankit Roy, Advocates for R-1. Mr. Nikhil Goel with Mr. Ashutosh Ghade, Advocates for Resp-3/DDA. Review Petition No.175/2016 IN W.P.(C) 495/2007 SUBHASH KWATRA ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Anil Amrit with Mr. Ninand Laud, Mr. Jayant Mohan and Mr. Subas Acharya, Advocates for review petitioners in Review Petition No.175/2017. Versus REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIE...
- ‹ Prev
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- Next ›
- Last »