Delhi Court November 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Atul Verma vs.state of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-10-2016
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 2416/2016 ATUL VERMA Date of Decision: November 10th, 2016 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Jagat Rana, Mr. Yashwardhan Singh Ratore, Mr. Abhinav Dang, Advocate Versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. G.M. Farooqui, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with ASI Devender, Police Station Dabri, Delhi CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI Learned Additional Public Prosecutor P.S.TEJI, J.1. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioners, namely, Sh. Atul Verma for quashing of FIR No.13/2013 dated 04.01.2013 under Sections 498-A/4IPC registered at Police Station Dabri on the basis of settlement arrived at between the petitioner and respondent no.2, namely, Ms. Sneh Verma on 08.04.2016.2. respondent-State submitted that the respondent No.2, present in the Court has been identified to be the complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question by ASI Devendra.3. The factual ma...
Lmj International Ltd vs.integrated Warehousing Kandla Project Develop ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-10-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. 472/2015 LMJ INTERNATIONAL LTD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vikash Sethi, Mr. Govind Kumar and Mr. Sachin Kumar, Advocates. versus INTEGRATED WAREHOUSING KANDLA PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PVT LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rishi Aggarwala and Ms. Malavika Lal, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR ORDER1011.2016 $~ * 33. + % 1. The challenge in this petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) filed by LMJ International Ltd. is to an Award dated 26th May, 2005 passed by the sole Arbitrator in the dispute between the... Petitioner and the Respondent, Integrated Warehousing Kandla Project Development Pvt. Ltd.2. The background facts as narrated by the... Petitioner in the petition are that the Respondent floated a tender or request for proposal (RFP) in November 2010 for participation in the bidding process for the selection of the strategic partner for the developmen...
Anurag Sharma vs.manushi Sharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-10-2016
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved On : November 08, 2016 Judgment Delivered On : November 10, 2016 MAT.APP.(F.C.) 94/2014 ANURAG SHARMA .....Appellant Represented by: Mr.A.S.Chandhiok, Sr.Advocate and Ms.Geeta Luthra, Sr.Advocate instructed by Ms.Arveena Sharma, Mr.Prateek Yadav, Ms.Naina Dubey, Ms.Shweta Kakkar, Ms.Shreya Singh and Ms.Shivani Lohiya, Advocates with Appellant in person versus MANUSHI SHARMA .....Respondent Represented by: Mr.Amit Khemka, Advocate with Mr.Rishi Sehgal and Ms.Varchana Taneja, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. It all began when Anil Sharma PW-2, a friend of the family of Anurag and a junior colleague in the office of the father of Manushi introduced the two families and Manushis mother sent an e-mail to Anurags mother attaching therewith Manushis bio-data Ex.PW-3/1. It was made known that after graduating in Honours in Commerce, Manushi had obtaine...
Jai Karan vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-10-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on : November 10, 2016 * + CRL.M.C. 4330/2013 JAI KARAN Through: Mr. Vaibhav Sharma, Mr. Sidharth Singh Yadav, Mr. Aditya Singh, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.JUDGMENT By this petition filed under Articleof the Constitution 1. of India read with Section 482 of Cr. P.C. the petitioner is seeking quashing of the order passed by the Competent Officer of Police Station Sultan Puri, whereby the name of the petitioner was entered in Part II (Clause (b) of Surveillance Register maintained under Rule 23.4(3) of the Punjab Police Rules. The petitioner also seeks deletion of his name from the history sheet opened under Rule 23.9(2) of the Punjab Police Rules.2. In brief, the facts of the case are that a case under Section Crl. M.C.No.4330/2013 Page 1 of 9 308/323/506/120B/34 of IPC was registe...
Anita Bhargava vs.state & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-10-2016
+ % * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ANITA BHARGAVA Date of decision:10th November, 2016 FAO3062014 STATE & ORS Through versus Through ..... Appellant Mr P.K. Srivastava and Mr S.P. Dao, Advs. ..... Respondent Mr Pradeep Kumar Kar, Adv. for R2&3 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA : SUNITA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) CM329452016 (under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC) & FAO3062014 1. The challenge in this appeal is to the impugned judgment dated 28.02.2013 passed by learned Additional District Judge, Saket Courts, New Delhi vide which the petition under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act filed by the appellant herein for grant of probate of Will dated 25.03.2003 of the Testator was dismissed.2. The factual matrix of the case leading to filing of the present appeal broadly stated is as follows.3. The deceased Testator Smt Sushila Rani Khosla widow of late Sh. Bhagwant Rai Khosla died on 04.03.2010. Husband of Smt. Sushila Rani Khosla already pre(cid:173)deceased her in the year 1950. Smt Su...
j.p. Dubey vs.uoi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-10-2016
$~R-6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P. (C) 216/2000 J.P. DUBEY Date of decision:10. 11.2016 ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Atul Sharma, Advocate. versus UOI & ORS. Through None ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHAWLA INDIRA BANERJEE, J (ORAL) JUDGMENT No one has appeared to oppose the writ petition. This writ petition is directed against the failure and or refusal of the 1.2. respondent authorities to pay to the petitioner, an officer of the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) arrears of salary claimed to be due and payable to the petitioner for the period from 17.08.1987 to 06.07.1990 when he was on deputation in the Intelligence Bureau as an Assistant Director.3. The facts giving rise to this writ petition are stated very briefly herein below. W.P. (C) 216/2000 Page 1 of 8 4. The petitioner was directly recruited as a Deputy Superintendent of Police in the Central Reserve Police Force on 08.02.1967. In t...
Brijesh Gautam and Ors vs.the State (Nct of Delhi) and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-10-2016
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 1255/2016 BRIJESH GAUTAM AND ORS Date of Decision: November 10th, 2016 ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Kunar Aurora, Adv. with petitioner in person. versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Izhar Ahmad, APP for the State. SI M.K. Manoj, PS Anand Vihar. Respondent no.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.1. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioners, namely, Sh. Brijesh Gautam, Sh. Karunesh Gautam and Sh. Sidharth Gautam for quashing of FIR No.389/2004 dated 07.08.2004, under Sections 3IPC registered at Police Station Anand Vihar on the basis of Settlement deed executed between the petitioners and respondent no.2 namely, Sh. Bijender Gupta on 17.03.2016.2. respondent-State submitted that the respondent No.2 present in the Court has been identified to be the complainant/first informant in the FIR in question by SI M.K. Manoj.3. The factual matr...
Sandeep Sachdeva & Ors vs.state (Govt of Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-10-2016
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 1223/2016 SANDEEP SACHDEVA & ORS Date of Decision: November 10th, 2016 ........ Petitioners Through Mr.Dinesh K. Malhotra, Mr.Satish and Mr.Amardeep Singh, Verma Advs. versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms.Meenakshi Chauhan, APP with SI Manish Chaudhary, PS Shahdara. Respondent no.2 in person with Mr.Ankit Batra, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by 1. the petitioners, namely, Sh. Sandeep Sachdeva, Smt. Geeta Sachdeva, Smt. Simmy Sachdeva, Sh. Naveen Puri, Smt. Monika Puri, Sh. Vishal Bhatia, Smt. Kavita Bhatia, Sh. Abhishek Goel and Smt. Jaya Goel for quashing of FIR No.73/2011 dated 28.02.2011, under Sections 498-A/4IPC & Section 4 Dowry Prohibition Act registered at Police Station Shahdara on the basis of settlement deed, Counseling at Family Court, Shahdara, Karkadooma, Delhi executed between petitioner no.1 and re...
Amar Nath Jha vs.university of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-10-2016
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P. (C) No.965/2016 + % AMAR NATH JHA10h November, 2016 Through: Mr. A.K. Thakur, Advocate with Ms. ........ Petitioner Rajeshwari, Advocate. UNIVERSITY OF DELHI AND ANR. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. V.P. Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Advocate and Ms. Simran Jeet, Advocate for University of Delhi. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner/Sh. Amar Nath Jha seeks directions against the respondent no.1/University of Delhi to grant approval to the appointment of the petitioner as the Vice-Principal of the respondent no.2/college, namely Swamy Shraddhanand College.... Petitioner also seeks quashing of the Letters dated 13.1.2016, 19.1.2016 and 27.1.2016 of the respondent no.1/University of Delhi declining the request to grant of approval to the appointment of ...
Kanhiya Lal vs.the Ld. District and Sessions Judge (Hq)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-10-2016
* + % KANHIYA LAL IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.2391/2016 10th November, 2016 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. R.K. Saini, Advocate. versus THE LD. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE (HQ) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. Counsel for the petitioner in spite of repeated queries of the Court does not want to answer the question that if there is an order of the disciplinary authority which has imposed punishment of non-grant of pay and only grant of the suspension allowance during the period of suspension then where is the order of the disciplinary authority prayed for being quashed or set aside in this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.2. Counsel for the petitioner keeps on endeavoring to take this Court to the documents filed with the writ petition whereas documents filed with the W.P.(C) No.2391/2016 Page 1 o...
- ‹ Prev
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- Next ›
- Last »