Delhi Court November 2016 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

AI Brief & Ask
Semantic AI Search
Devil's Bench

Try free for 7 days Semantic AI Search

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Nov 30 2016

State of Tamil Nadu vs.union of India and Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-30-2016

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6117/2016 Reserved on:11. h November, 2016 Date of decision:30. h November, 2016 STATE OF TAMIL NADU ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. A.S. Chandhiok, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sandeep Khurana & Ms. Seemab Ali Fatima, Advocates. Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. .... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Jain, ASG with Mr. Dev. P. Bhardwaj, CGSC, Ms. Anubha Bhardwaj & Ms. Rakhi Sharma, Advocates for UOI-respondent No.1. Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Aditya Dewan, Advocate for respondent No.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.In this writ petition, the State of Tamil Nadu and the Union of India are on the opposite sides. The petitioner-State of Tamil Nadu impugns the order dated 11th May, 2016 passed by the principal bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal, New Delhi, whereby OA No.3682/2015 filed by Archana Ramasundaram, the second respondent before us has been allowed a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 30 2016

Salman & Anr. Vs.state Govt. Of Nct of Delhi

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-30-2016

* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on : November 30, 2016 BAIL APPLN. 2416/2016 SALMAN & ANR. Through: Mr.Ajayinder ........ Petitioners Mr.Tarunesh Sangwan, Mr.S.N. Sharma, Kumar, Mr.Kunal Chopra, Mr.Rohan Sharma, Mr.V.P. Singh, Mr.Anirudha Kumar, Mr.Irfan and Firdous, Ms.Richa Mr.Narendra Singh, Advocates. versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Ashish Dutta, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with Sub- Inspector Sachin Kumar, Police Station Amar Colony, New Delhi. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI JUDGMENT P.S.TEJI, J.The present application has been filed by the petitioner under 1. Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for the grant of bail in FIR No.609/2016 under Section 384/3of IPC, Police Station Amar Colony, New Delhi. In a nutshell, the FIR of this case was registered at the instance 2. of Muzammil, who stated in his complaint that on 10.10.2016 at about 3.15 AM, the petitioners alongwith his brother ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 30 2016

Bharat Singh vs.state

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-30-2016

* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:30. h November, 2016 WP(CRL.) 2445/2016 BHARAT SINGH ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Sumeet Verma with Mr. Abhijeet Sharma, Advs. STATE versus Represented by: Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, ASC with SI Arun Dagar, PS Kapashera. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. A detailed affidavit of Director General (Prisons) has been filed indicating the replies to the issues raised in the order dated 4th October, 2016 passed by this Court. Relevant paras of the affidavit of the Director General (Prisons) read as under- 1. That vide order dt. 04.10.2016, this Honble High Court has directed to file a detailed affidavit on the following issues: (a) Whether grant of parole to a convict is taken into consideration while granting furlough in a particular year to the convict?. (b) How many paroles and furloughs together can be granted to the petitioner as the impact of both parole and furlough is the same...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 30 2016

Icici Bank Ltd. Vs.p K Goswami

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-30-2016

$~50 to 66 (17 matters) * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:30. h November, 2016 (1) + (2) + + (3) + (4) (5) + + (6) + (7) (8) + (9) + (10) + (11) + (12) + (13) + (14) + (15) + (16) + (17) + FAO2702015 FAO2732015 FAO3892015 & C.Ms.26339/2015 & 14072/2016 FAO12016 & C.M.105/2016 FAO52016 & C.M.120/2016 FAO62016 & C.M.123/2016 FAO82016 & C.M.162/2016 FAO92016 & C.M.165/2016 FAO722016 & C.M.5233/2016 FAO802016 & C.Ms.5729-31/2016 FAO1682016 & C.Ms.14485/16, 144FAO1692016 & C.Ms.14497/16, 144FAO1742016 & C.Ms.15071/16, 150FAO1792016 & C.Ms.15196/16, 151FAO1942016 & C.Ms.16171, 16173-FAO1952016 & C.Ms.16178-180/2016 FAO2002016 & C.Ms.16843/16, 16845/16, 168ICICI BANK LTD versus ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Punit Bhalla, Advocate P K GOSWAMI SONU BHADHANA & ANR (1) RAJESH KUMAR (2) (3) MOHINDER KUMAR GOYAL (4) (5) RAJU ARORA (6) (7) VIRENDER SINGH (8) (9) PRABHU DAYAL SANJOY SAHA POONAM SHARMA FAOs 270/2015 & other connected matters Page 1 of 5 (10) ANIL KUMAR (11) SON...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 30 2016

Icici Bank Ltd. Vs.prabhu Dayal

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-30-2016

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 30 2016

Icici Bank Ltd. Vs.poonam Sharma

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-30-2016

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 30 2016

Bhagwati Prasad & Anr. Vs.union of India & Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-30-2016

$-R-10B * + W.P. (C) 6751/2003 % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:30. h November, 2016 BHAGWATI PRASAD & ANOTHER ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Kartickay Mathur, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. R.V. Sinha, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL VINOD GOEL, J.(ORAL) 1. This writ petition has been preferred by the petitioners feeling aggrieved by the order dated 29.07.2003 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (hereinafter referred to for short as the Tribunal), whereby OA No.1040/2001 filed by the petitioner No.1 and 2 and their colleague namely Mr. Jagdish Kumar Mallah, was dismissed.2. The petitioners (1) Sh. Bhagwati Prasad and (2) Sh. Kanhaya Lal were working as Senior Proof Readers in the Department of Posts in the pay scale of Rs.1320-30-1560-40-2040 and at that time Junior Proof Readers were in the pay scale of Rs.1200-30-1440-30-1800. However, 5th Central Pay Commission ma...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 30 2016

Formula One World Championship Limited vs.commissioner of Income Tax, ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-30-2016

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:15. 11.2016 Pronounced on:30. 11.2016 + W.P.(C) 10307/2016, C.M. APPL.40563/2016 & 40564/2016 FORMULA ONE WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP LIMITED versus COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION-3 & ANR. ........ Petitioner INCOME TAX, INTERNATIONAL ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 9509/2016, C.M. APPL.38021/2016, 41063/2016, 41235/2016 & 41236/2016 COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION-3, DELHI versus FORMULA ONE WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP LTD. & ANR. INCOME TAX INTERNATIONAL ........ Petitioner + W.P.(C) 10145/2016, C.M. APPL.40169/2016 JAIPRAKASH ASSOCIATES LTD. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX versus ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Through : Sh. S. Ganesh, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Anuradha Dutt, Ms. Fereshte Sethna, Sh. Sachit Jolly, Sh. Gautam Swarup, Sh. Siddhartha Singh and Sh. Amaya Pant, Advocates, for petitioner in W.P.(C) 10307/2016 and for Respondent No.1 in W.P.(C) 9509/2016 & W.P.(C) 10145/2016. Sh. Arvind Datar, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Kamal Deep Dayal, S...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 30 2016

Ashu Khan vs.ramphal Tyagi (Since Deceased) Thr His Lrs

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-30-2016

$~18. * + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA9302016 and CM APPL. 44288-91/2016 ASHU KHAN Through: Mr. Shahid Ali, Advocate with Mr. Anwar Khalil and Mr. Umar Daraz, Advocates versus ..... Appellant RAMPHAL TYAGI (SINCE DECEASED) THR HIS LRS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % The appellant/defendant is aggrieved by the judgment and decree ORDER3011.2016 dated 02.07.2014 passed in a suit for possession, damages and mesne profits instituted by the respondents/plaintiffs in respect of a shop measuring 85 sq. yards situated on the ground floor of property bearing No.349/2, Main Road, Burari, Delhi.2. Under the impugned judgment and decree, the trial court has held that the respondents/plaintiffs are entitled to the relief of possession of the suit premises and had granted the appellant/defendant a period of six months to hand over the vacant possession thereof to the respondents/plaintiffs. Further, the appellant/defendant has been directe...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 30 2016

Mrs. Archana Aggarwal vs.suresh Jindal

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-30-2016

$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :23. 11.2016 Judgment delivered on :30. 11.2016 + MAT.APP. 18/2009 MRS. ARCHANA AGGARWAL Through Appellant in person. ..... Appellant versus SURESH JINDAL ..... Respondent Through Mr. Umesh Mishra, Advocate with respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1 This appeal assails the judgment dated 24.09.2009 passed by the learned District Judge wherein the petitioner-Suresh Jindal (hereinafter referred to as the petitioner) who had sought divorce under Section 13(1)(ia) and (ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as the HMA) against his wife Smt. Archana Aggarwal (hereinafter referred to as the respondent) had been granted a decree of divorce on both the aforenoted grounds. 2 This appeal has been filed by the wife. She is aggrieved by the findings returned by the Trial Court. 3 The parties had been married according to Hindu rites and ceremonies Mat Appeal No.18/2009 Page ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

‹ Prev
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Next ›
Last »

Delhi Court November 2016 Judgments

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.