Delhi Court November 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The Bhagat Cooperative Industrial Society Ltd and Ors vs.ministry of T ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-11-2016
Judgment delivered on:11. 11.2016 $~37 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 10562/2016 & CM No.41451/2016 (interim directions) THE BHAGAT COOPERATIVE INDUSTRIAL SOCIETY LTD AND ORS ........ Petitioners versus MINISTRY OF TEXTILES THROUGH DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER FOR HANDLOOMS AND ORS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS Mr. Mr. R.K. Bharani, Advocate. Mr. Neeraj Malhotra with Mr. Rupal Luthra, Advocates for respondent Nos.1 and :... RESPONDENTS CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Bhagvan Swarup Shukla, CGSC with Mr. Mimansak Bhardwaj, Advocates for UOI. JUDGMENT1111.2016 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition seeking setting aside of the selection list dated 20.10.2016 of the participants in the forthcoming exhibition commencing from 16.11.2016 to 30.11.2016, issued by the Association of Corporations & Apex Societies of Handloom (ACASH).2. It is contended that the petitioner ha...
State vs.jagbir Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-11-2016
$~ *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + STATE JAGBIR SINGH Date of Decision:11. h November, 2016 CRL.A. 745/2000 Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for ........ Petitioner the State versus Through: Ms. Inderjeet Sidhu, Adv. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT GITA MITTAL, J(Oral) 1. The instant appeal has been filed by the State assailing the judgment dated 1st November, 1999 whereby the learned trial judge has disbelieved the prosecution case and acquitted the respondent from commission of the offence under Section 302/452/392/411 of the IPC with which he was charged in Sessions Case No.arising out of FIR No.3/96 which was registered by the Police Station Kirti Nagar.2. It was the case of the prosecution that at about 5.40 p.m. on Crl. A. 745/2000 Page 1 of 11 4th January, 1996, the wireless operator at police station Kirti Nagar received telephonic information from the L/Ct. Sushila from the police control room to the...
Jagdish vs.panchdash Nam Juna Akhara
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-11-2016
$~6 * + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA7722016 & CMs No.36310-13/2016 JAGDISH Through : Mr. Javed Ashraf Khan, Advocate with appellant in person. ..... Appellant versus PANCHDASH NAM JUNA AKHARA Through : None. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % The appellant (defendant) is aggrieved by the impugned judgment and ORDER1111.2016 decree dated 23.4.2016 passed in a suit for possession, recovery of rent, mesne profits, etc., instituted against him by the respondent (plaintiff) in respect of a shop situated in Seelampur Market, Delhi.2. Counsel for the appellant states that the respondent had filed an execution petition for seeking execution of the impugned judgment and decree and in the said proceedings, the appellant had handed over the vacant peaceful possession of the subject shop to the respondent, through the Bailiff, in the month of September, 2016.3. The limited grievance raised in the present appeal is in respect of the relief of arrears of rent,...
Life Insurance Corporation of India vs.krishna Murari Lal Asthana & Or ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-11-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :17. h October, 2016 Date of decision:11. h November, 2016 $~ * + W.P.(C) 9440/2016 LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Tushar Mehta, ASG with Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Ashok Panigrahi and Mr. Surajit Bhaduri, Advocates. versus KRISHNA MURARI LAL ASTHANA & ORS ..... Respondent Through Mr. Kumar Gaurav, Advocate. W.P.(C) 9441/2016 KRISHNA MURARI LAL ASTHANA & ORS Through Mr. Kumar Gaurav, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA & ANR ..... Respondent Through Mr. Tushar Mehta, ASG with Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Ashok Panigrahi and Mr. Surajit Bhaduri, Advocates. W.P.(C) 9442/2016 LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA & ORS..Petitioner Through Mr. Tushar Mehta, ASG with Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Ashok Panigrahi and Mr. Surajit Bhaduri, Advocates. W.P. (C) No.9440/2016 & Connected matters Page 1 of 18 KRISHNA MURARI LAL ASTHANA & ANR versus ...
Mohinder Kumar v.m. Vs.uoi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-11-2016
$~R-5 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment dated:11. h November, 2016 + W.P. (C) 6568/2001 MOHINDER KUMAR V.M. ........ Petitioner UOI & ORS Through : Mr. Ashok Mathur, Adv. versus Through : Mr. A.K. Soni, CGSC with Mr. Waize ........ RESPONDENTS Ali Noor, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Rule DB was issued on 13.02.2002.2. Challenge in this writ petition is to the order dated 18.09.2001 in O.A. No.2203/2000 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal) by which the application filed by the petitioner herein has been dismissed.3. The necessary facts to be noticed are that the petitioner at the relevant point of time, was working as a Vehicle Mechanic (HS Gde-I) in the Electrical Mechanical Engineering, Delhi Cantt (EME) and pursuant to clearing a supervisory trade test in the year 1988, he was promoted by promotion-cum-posting order, bearing EME Records Letter No...
Suresh @ Pintu vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-11-2016
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :8. h NOVEMBER, 2016 DECIDED ON :11. h NOVEMBER, 2016 + CRL.A.1488/2014 SURESH @ PINTU ..... Appellant STATE Through : Mr.R.K.Padhi, Advocate. versus ..... Respondent Through : Ms.Meenakshi Dahiya, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.The present appeal is allowed in terms of a detailed common judgment delivered today which is placed in the file of Crl.A.1166/2014 titled Hari Ram vs. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) . (S.P.GARG) JUDGE NOVEMBER11 2016 / tr...
Hari Ram vs.state (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-11-2016
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :8. h NOVEMBER, 2016 DECIDED ON :11. h NOVEMBER, 2016 + CRL.A.1166/2014 & CRL.M.B. 7704/2015 AND + HARI RAM ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Rajendra Kumar Tiwari, Advocate with Mr.O.P.Saxena & Mr.Deva Mani Mishra, Advocates. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through : Ms.Meenakshi Dahiya, APP. CRL.A.1488/2014 & CRL.M.B. 68/2016 SURESH @ PINTU ..... Appellant STATE Through : Mr.R.K.Padhi, Advocate. versus ..... Respondent Through : Ms.Meenakshi Dahiya, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG Crl.A.1166/2014 & connected matter. Page 1 of 6 S.P.GARG, J.1. Challenge in these appeals is a judgment dated 24.07.2014 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.194/2013 arising out of FIR No.2PS Aman Vihar whereby the appellants (Hari Ram & Suresh @ Pintu) were held guilty for committing offences punishable under Section 376(2)(g) IPC. By an order dated 28.07.2014, they were sentenced to undergo RI for ten years wi...
In the Matter or Mhaya Buildcon Private Limited & Ors. Vs.....
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-11-2016
$~S-1 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:11. 11.2016 CO.PET.911/2015 IN THE MATTER OR MHAYA BUILDCON PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. versus .... Advocates who appeared in this case: ....... Petitioners ..... Respondent For the... Petitioners : Dr.U.K.Chaudhary, Senior Advocate with Ms. Manisha Chaudhary, Mr Naveen Dahiya and Mr Himanshu Vij, Advocates. For the Respondent : Ms. Aparna Mudiam, AROC for Regional Director, Ms Chetana Kandpal, Company Prosecutor on b/o. Official Liquidator. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1111.2016 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J (ORAL) 1. This petition has been filed under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act,1956 by the... Petitioner Companies seeking sanction of the Scheme of Arrangement between Mhaya Buildcon Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as petitioner No.1/transferor company No.1), DLF Buildcon Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as petitioner No.2/transferor company No.2), DLF Telecom Limited (herein...
Union of India vs.om Prakash and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-11-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:11. 11.2016 CM(M) 1139/2016 & CM Nos.41958-41959/2016 UNION OF INDIA versus OM PRAKASH AND ORS ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent CM(M) 1140/2016 & CM Nos.41981-41982/2016 UNION OF INDIA versus MAHAVEER SINGH & ORS ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent CM(M) 1141/2016 & CM Nos.41983-41984/2016 UNION OF INDIA versus OM PRAKASH & ORS ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent $~A-34 to 37, 43 to 49 and 51 * % + + + + + + + CM(M) 1142/2016 & CM Nos.42041-42042/2016 UNION OF INDIA versus MAHAVEER SINGH AND ORS CM(M) 1143/2016 & CM APPL. 42066-42067/2016 UNION OF INDIA versus SHIV KUMAR AND ORS CM(M) 1144/2016 & CM APPL. 42068-42069/2016 UNION OF INDIA versus SHRI MAM CHAND & ORS CM(M) 1145/2016 & CM APPL. 42070-42071/2016 UNION OF INDIA versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner CM(M)1139/2016 & connected matters Page 1 of 12 + + + + + ..... Res...
Pawan Kumar Aggarwal vs.smt Usha Rani & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-10-2016
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on : November 10, 2016 CRL.REV.P. 842/2015 & Crl.M.A. Nos.18845-18846/2015 PAWAN KUMAR AGGARWAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.N.K. Aggarwal, Advocate. versus SMT USHA RANI & ANR Through: Nemo. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.JUDGMENT ..... Respondent By this revision petition filed under Section 397 read with 1. the petitioner seeks an order thereby Section 482 of Cr. P.C., quashing/setting aside the order dated 13.11.2014 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Dwarka, Delhi, thereby dismissing the appeal against the order dated 09.07.2014 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate Dwarka in his application under Section 340 Cr.P.C. moved in complaint case filed by respondent No.1 under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.2. In nutshell, the admitted facts of the case are that the petitioner needed to show some amount in his bank so as to obtain the loan to carry out the business o...
- ‹ Prev
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- Next ›
- Last »