Delhi Court November 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Randhir Singh & Ors vs.lt. Governor of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-15-2016
$~39 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 447/2015 Judgment delivered on:15. 11.2016 RANDHIR SINGH & ORS versus LT. GOVERNOR OF DELHI & ORS. ....... Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners For the Respondent LAC/L&B For the Respondent DDA : Mr Manoj Joshi with Mr Naresh Kaushik : Mr Yeeshu Jain with Ms Jyoti Tyagi : Mr Dhanesh Relan with Ms Isha Garg CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioners seek the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. A declaration is sought to the effect that the acquisition proceeding initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the 1894 Act) in respect of which Award No.4/2006-07 dated 20.10.2006 wa...
Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation vs.munesh & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-15-2016
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: November 15, 2016 + MAC.APP. 328/2015 & C.M. 6328/2015 MUNESH & ORS. Versus Through: Mr. Vaibhav Kumar, Advocate ..... Appellants UTTAR PARDESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION Through: Ms. Garima Prashad, Advocate ..... Respondent + MAC.APP. 635/2014 UTTAR PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION Through: Ms. Garima Prashad, Advocate ..... Appellant Versus MUNESH & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Vaibhav Kumar, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT % ORAL1 The above captioned two appeals are directed against the common impugned Award of 17th April, 2014 granting compensation of MAC.APP.635/2014 MAC.APP.328/2015 Page 1 `16,44,600/- to respondents-claimants on account of death of one Vijender Kumar on 7th March, 2011. The facts as noted in the impugned Award, in short are that on 7th March, 2011, appellants bus was plying on route from Shamli to Merrut and at about 10:00 a.m., some passengers had de-boa...
Praveen vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-15-2016
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Crl. Appeal No.661/2014 Judgment reserved on :8. h November, 2016 Date of decision :15. h November, 2016 PRAVEEN STATE Through: Mr. K. Singhal, Adv. ..... Appellant versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Aasha Tiwari, Addl.P.P. for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. This judgment shall dispose of an appeal instituted on 27.05.2014 by the appellant/convict Praveen whereby he has assailed the impugned judgment dated 25.04.2014 of the then learned ASJ-04 North District, Rohini Courts, whereby the appellant was convicted for the commission of an offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as IPC), 1860, in relation to the allegations levelled against him as averred in FIR No.114/12, Police Station (P.S.) Alipur. Vide the consequential order on sentence dated 29.04.2014, also assailed hereby, the appellant was sentenced to life impri...
s.harroop Singh Suri & Anr vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-15-2016
$~53 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:15. 11.2016 W.P.(C) 6140/2015 & CM111612015 S.HARROOP SINGH SURI & ANR versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Advocates who appeared in this case: ... Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS For the... Petitioners For the Respondent UOI For the Respondent LAC/L&B : Mr Yeeshu Jain with Ms Jyoti Tyagi For the Respondent DDA For the Respondent R-6&7 : Mr Kartik Jindal with Mr Joseph K. Antony : Mr Kumar Rajesh Singh : Mr M.P. Bhargava with Mr N.S. Vasisht : Mr Chiranjiv Kumar with Mr Mukesh Sachdeva CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR JUSTICE JAYANT NATH BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) JUDGMENT1 Mr Yeeshu Jain has handed over the counter affidavit on behalf of the respondent no.5. The same is taken on record. Mr Vasisht appearing on behalf of the petitioners does not wish to file any rejoinder affidavit inasmuch as the necessary averments are contained in the writ petition. WP(C) 6140/2015 Page 1 of 3 2. By way of this wr...
Delhi Transport Corporation vs.m/s Rose Advertising Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-15-2016
$~12 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 379/2011 & IA No.12975/2016 DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Plaintiff Through: Ms Avnish Ahlawat with Ms Latika Chaudhary, Advocates. versus Through: Mr P.S. Bindra, Advocate. M/S ROSE ADVERTISING PVT LTD CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER1511.2016 ..... Defendant VIBHU BAKHRU, J IA No.16539/2012 1. The defendant has filed the present application under Order VII Rule 11 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereafter the CPC), inter alia, praying that the plaint be rejected.2. The principal ground for seeking rejection is that the above captioned suit - which is for recovery of money - is barred by limitation.3. Mr P.S. Bindra, learned counsel appearing for applicant/defendant has drawn the attention of this Court to paragraph 10 of the plaint which reads as under:-""10. That the cause of action first arose in the year 2001 when there was a publication in the newspaper and thereafter again in 2...
The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd. Vs.b Seshagriri Rao & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-15-2016
$~15 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: November 15, 2016 MAC.APP. 328/2014 & C.M.No.6348/2014 THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD Through: Mr. JPN Shahi, Advocate ..... Appellant versus B SESHAGRIRI RAO & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Azhar Qayum and Mr. Nadeem Abbasi, Advocates for respondents No.1 and 2 Mr. Kanwal Chaudhary, Advocate for respondent No.4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT % (ORAL) This is second round of litigation. In the first round, vide Award of 9th July, 2007 the owner of vehicle in question was saddled with the liability to pay compensation and aforesaid Award was upheld qua claimant with a direction to the learned Tribunal to frame an additional issue regarding liability of the offending vehicle being insured and if so, whether the owner of the offending vehicle would be entitled to reimbursement of the awarded amount from appellant herein. The additional issue framed by the learned Tribunal is as under:-"Whether the appell...
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-06 vs.moderate Leasing and Capital Serv ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-15-2016
$~5 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:15th November, 2016 ITA7212016 & CM No.39118/2016 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-06 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rahul Choudhary, Senior Standing Counsel and Mr. Udit Jain, Advocate. Versus MODERATE LEASING AND CAPITAL SERVICES PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(Oral) 1. The question of law urged by the Revenue is whether in the circumstances of the case the direction to delete the penalty imposed was justified?. The assessee had claimed business loss for Assessment Year (AY) 2. 2004-05 in respect of a transaction i.e., sale of shares., which was disallowed by the Assessing Officer (AO), who observed that the stocks were held as investments, therefore, it should have been treated as capital loss. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT (Appeals)]. by order dated ITA No.721/2016 Page 1 of 3 The Revenue urges tha...
Munesh & Ors. Vs.uttar Pardesh State Road Transport Corporation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-15-2016
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: November 15, 2016 + MAC.APP. 328/2015 & C.M. 6328/2015 MUNESH & ORS. Versus Through: Mr. Vaibhav Kumar, Advocate ..... Appellants UTTAR PARDESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION Through: Ms. Garima Prashad, Advocate ..... Respondent + MAC.APP. 635/2014 UTTAR PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION Through: Ms. Garima Prashad, Advocate ..... Appellant Versus MUNESH & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Vaibhav Kumar, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT % ORAL1 The above captioned two appeals are directed against the common impugned Award of 17th April, 2014 granting compensation of MAC.APP.635/2014 MAC.APP.328/2015 Page 1 `16,44,600/- to respondents-claimants on account of death of one Vijender Kumar on 7th March, 2011. The facts as noted in the impugned Award, in short are that on 7th March, 2011, appellants bus was plying on route from Shamli to Merrut and at about 10:00 a.m., some passengers had de-boa...
Anil Kumar Jain vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-15-2016
$~41 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:15. 11.2016 W.P.(C) 858/2015 & CM15052015 ANIL KUMAR JAIN versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. Advocates who appeared in this case: ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS For the... Petitioner For the Respondent LAC/L&B For the Respondent DDA : Mr Akhil Sachar : Mr Siddharth Panda : Mr Arjun Pant CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR JUSTICE JAYANT NATH BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) JUDGMENT1 By way of this writ petition the petitioner is seeking the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. The petitioner, consequently, seeks a declaration that the acquisition proceeding initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the 1894 WP(C) 858/2015 Page 1 of 4 Act) and in respect of which Award No.4B/2004-05...
Samir Ahluwalia vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-15-2016
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:15. h November , 2016 CRL.M.C. 4249/2016 SAMIR AHLUWALIA ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Vijay Kumar Aggarwal, Mr. Neeraj Kumar Jha and Mr. Mudit Jain, Advs. versus STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Represented by: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP with Insp. Vivek Pathak, STF/Crime and Ins. Ramavtar, SHO Seelampur. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A. 17705/2016 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Crl.M.C. 4249/2016 & Crl.M.A. 17704/2016 1. FIR No.12/2013 was registered at PS Crime Branch on 15th January, 2013 pursuant to a written complaint dated 10th January, 2013 made by respondent No.2 through its Director Rajiv Bhadauria. On completion of investigation, the investigating officer filed a final report under Section 173(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure on 29th July, 2015 opining that there was no evidence to proceed against Samir Ahluwalia, the petitioner herein as an accused. On a p...
- ‹ Prev
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- Next ›
- Last »