Delhi Court November 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mohd. Nafees Khan & Anr vs.national Investigation Agency
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-16-2016
$~ *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:16. h November, 2016 CRL.A. 602/2016 ABU ANAS & ORS Through: Mr. M.S. Khan, Adv. ..... Appellant versus NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Jain, ASG with Mr. Abhishek Bagaria, SPP, Ms. Rajul Jain and Mr. Vignaraj Pasayat, Advs. + CRL.A. 607/2016 MOHD. NAFEES KHAN & ANR Through: Mr. M.S. Khan, Adv. ..... Appellant versus NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Jain, ASG with Mr. Abhishek Bagaria, SPP, Ms. Rajul Jain and Mr. Vignaraj Pasayat, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT (ORAL) Crl. App.No.642/2016 Page 1 of 9 GITA MITTAL, J Crl.M.A.Nos.10425/2016 & 10504/2016 Heard. For the reasons stated in the applications, we are satisfied that the appellants were prevented from sufficient cause from filing the appeals belatedly. Therefore, delay in filing the appeals is hereby condoned and the applications are allowed. C...
Veena Rawat vs.devki Devi Rawat & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-16-2016
$~9. * + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA5342015 VEENA RAWAT ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Kavita Rani, Advocate versus DEVKI DEVI RAWAT & ANR Through:... RESPONDENTS No.1 and 2 in person. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % Counsel for the appellant and the respondents No.1 and 2, who appear ORDER1611.2016 in person and have handed over proofs of their identity, which are taken on record, jointly state that the appellant and her husband, respondent No.2 herein have been able to arrive at a negotiated settlement before the Principal Judge, Family Court Vishwas Nagar, North East District, Delhi and pursuant thereto, they have filed a joint application for dissolution of their marriage and for obtaining a decree of divorce by mutual consent.2. A copy of the order dated 02.09.2016 passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court is handed over by the respondent No.2, who states that the appellant has undertaken to vacate the suit premises, which is the mat...
Delhi Transport Corporation vs.balbir Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-16-2016
$~33. * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WRIT PETITION(CIVIL) No.10812/2016 Date of decision:16. h November, 2016 DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION ........ Petitioner Through Ms. Manisha Tyagi, Advocate. versus BALBIR SINGH ..... Respondent Through Nemo. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR CM No.42312/2016 SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): Exemption application is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. WRIT PETITION(CIVIL) No.10812/2016 We have heard counsel for the petitioner and also perused the additional documents filed with the application CM No.42311/2016.2. The writ petition filed by the Delhi Transport Corporation has to be dismissed for the reason that the Tribunal has taken a reasonable view. The factual matrix also reveals that the petitioner Corporation has failed to maintain sanctity and purity of service records as is required and mandated by law. The petitioner has to, therefore, suffer the consequences of their lapses and faults. W....
Shailendra Garg vs.k-7 Impex Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-16-2016
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: November 10, 2016 Judgment Delivered on: November 16, 2016 RFA(OS) 31/2016 SHAILENDRA GARG ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Amit Agrawal, Advocate with K-7 IMPEX PVT LTD Ms.Tejaswita, Advocate versus ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.Ravi Sikri, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Deepak Yadav, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. IA No.14316/2014 filed by the appellant under Order XXXVII Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 seeking leave to defend the suit filed by the respondent has been dismissed vide impugned order dated February 16, 2016. The result is the suit being decreed in sum of `1,75,79,000/- (Rupees One Crore Seventy Five Lakh and Seventy Nine Thousand only) together with interest @ 36% per annum from August 13, 2013 (when the notice of demand was sent) till date of filing the suit and pendente lite interest @ 9% per annum on th...
Archna Dev vs.raj
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-16-2016
$~3 * + 1.2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA4282016 & CM APPL.36263/2016 & CM No.38428/2016(by the appellant u/S48r/w S151CPC for extension of time to make compliance of the order dated 10.8.2016) ARCHNA DEV ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Rakesh Rao, Proxy counsel for Mr.Rajeev Ranjan Pandey, Advocate with appellant in person. RAJ versus Through: Mr. Arun Vohra, Advocate with respondent in person. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % This order is in continuation of the order dated 18.10.2016. ORDER1611.2016 On the last date of hearing, the appellant and the respondent were directed to remain present to explore the possibility of their arriving at a negotiated settlement. After some interaction between the parties, it has been agreed by the respondent that the appellant may be granted time upto 30.4.2017 to vacate the suit premises on the condition that the she shall hand over the vacant peaceful possession thereof to the respondent on or before the said da...
Adnan Hassan & Anr vs.national Investigation Agency
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-16-2016
$~ *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:16. h November, 2016 CRL.A. 600/2016 ADNAN HASSAN & ANR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. M.S. Khan, Adv. versus NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Jain, ASG with Mr. Abhishek Bagaria, SPP, Ms. Rajul Jain and Mr. Vignaraj Pasayat, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT(ORAL) GITA MITTAL, J1 The instant appeal has been filed by the appellants under Section 21(4) of the National Investigating Agency Act, 2008 (NIA Act hereafter) assailing an order dated 10th June, 2016 passed by the learned District & Sessions Judge, Special Court (NIA), New Delhi whereby the application for grant of statutory bail under Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the appellant was dismissed.2. The matter relates to a case registered by the National Crl. A.600/2016 Page 1 of 11 Investigation Agency being FIR RC No.04/2016/NIA/DLI under Section 120B of the IPC...
Bank of India vs.ajit Pal Singh Bindra
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-16-2016
$~23. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA8512016 and CM APPL. 40426/2016 1. BANK OF INDIA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Vipin Jain, Advocate with Mr. Rahul Khanna, Dy. Zonal Manager of the appellant in person. versus AJIT PAL SINGH BINDRA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Abhinav Dhingra, Advocate with respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % This order is in continuation of the order dated 27.10.2016 on which ORDER1611.2016 date, it had been enquired from the counsels for the parties if the parties were ready and willing to negotiate on the use and occupation charges in respect of the suit premises w.e.f. 01.08.2015, till the same is vacated.2. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, Mr. Rahul Khanna, Dy. Zonal Manager of the appellant/Bank and the respondent are present. Having interacted with the parties, it does not appear that they are in a position to arrive at a settlement with regard to the rate of the use and occupation charges in respect of the suit premi...
Commissioner of Income Tax Delhi vs.m/s Nav Sansar Agro Products
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-16-2016
$~17 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:16. 11.2016 ITA1282004 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. P. Roychaudhry and Ms. Vibhooti Malhotra, Advs. versus M/S NAV SANSAR AGRO PRODUCTS ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Kavita Jha and Ms. Mehak Gupta, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J ( Oral) 1. The questions of law framed in this case are as under: interest 1. Whether learned ITAT is correct in holding that the assessee is entitled to set off finance and professional and other charges of Rs.75,35,047/- paid in the assessment years 1991-92 and 1992-93 respectively from the interest income of the assessee for the assessment year 1993-94?.2. Whether the order of the learned ITAT dated 16.12.2002 dismissing the appeal of the Revenue is perverse and as it is a non speaking and non reasoned order and does not deal with the reasoning and facts mentioned by the Assessing Of...
Jaspal Singh & Anr vs.the State ( Govt of Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-16-2016
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON : OCTOBER06 2016 DECIDED ON : NOVEMBER16 2016 CRL.REV.P. 162/2016 & CRL.M.B. 18JASPAL SINGH & ANR Through : Mr.Sajan K.Singh, Advocate. ........ Petitioners Versus THE STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ....... RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG Through : Mr.Kamal K.Ghei, APP. Mr.Dinesh Priani, Advocate with Mr.Bishan Dass, Advocate for R2. + S.P.GARG, J.1. The present petition is disposed of in terms of a detailed common judgment delivered today which is placed in the file of Crl.Rev.P.No.160/2016 titled Jaspal Singh vs.The State (Govt.of NCT of Delhi) & Anr. NOVEMBER16 2016/sa (S.P.GARG) JUDGE...
Tata Aig General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.anita & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-16-2016
I-17 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI MAC.APP. 937/2014 & C.M.No.17297/2014 Date of decision: November 16, 2016 TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD. Through: Ms. Shanta Devi Raman & Mr. Arihant Jain, Advocates ..... Appellant Versus ANITA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Nishant Anand & Ms. Shilpa Dewan, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % ORAL1 JUDGMENT Impugned Award of 24th July, 2014 grants compensation of `55,19,926/- with interest to respondents-claimants on account of death of one-Anil Kumar, who was driving motor cycle on 29th October, 2010 at Dhaula Kuan under pass towards AIIMS side and was hit by a car at noon time. Due to the injuries sustained, the injured had died on the spot although he was removed to the Army Hospital near Dhaula Kuan. While relying upon the evidence of the eye witness- Pawan Kumar, who happens to be the brother of the deceased, and other evidence, learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal has granted compensation, which is u...
- ‹ Prev
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- Next ›
- Last »