Delhi Court November 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sudhir @ Vicky vs.state ( Nct of Delhi )
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2016
$~7 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON : NOVEMBER24 2016 CRL.M.C. 1088/2016 & Crl.M.A.4658/2016 SUDHIR @ VICKY ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.Shivam Chowdhary with Mr.Dron, Advocates. Versus STATE ( NCT OF DELHI ) Through : Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, APP. SI Jitender, PS Anand Vihar. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.(ORAL) 1. Present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner to challenge the legality and correctness of an order dated 29.10.2015 whereby the application to recall PW-5 (Master Gaurav Pal) was dismissed.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the file. The petitioner along with others is facing trial in case FIR No.1133/2014 under Sections 364A/120B IPC registered at Police Station Aman Vihar. On 14.10.2015 PW-5 (Master Gaurav Pal) was present Crl.M.C.1088/2016 Page 1 of 3 to record his statement. Mr.Shashank Chowdhary, Advocate, had filed a fresh power of attorney on be...
Sadhu Ram Gupta and Ors vs.golden Forests India Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2016
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON:24. 11.2016 % + W.P. (C) 219/2016, CM APPL.884/2016 SADHU RAM GUPTA AND ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Ms. Anjana Gosain with Mr. Pradeep Desodaya and Mr. Rahul Singhal, Advocates. versus GOLDEN FORESTS INDIA LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Suruchi Aggarwal, Advocate for Committee-GFIL. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(ORAL) 1. The writ petitioner seeks a direction for the quashing of the order/decision of the Committee for Golden Forests (India) Ltd. group of companies which had been constituted by the Supreme Court in terms of its orders. These proceedings emanate from the writ petition preferred in the Supreme Court which was ultimately transferred to the file of this Court for further proceedings.2. The petitioner claims ownership of House No.570, Sector-12, Panchkula, Haryana which he purchased through a sale deed dated 09.02.2010. Briefly, the propert...
Nathu vs.the State Govt. Of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2016
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: November 24th, 2016 BAIL APPLN. 2284/2016 NATHU ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Khalil A. Ansari, Mr.Mohammad Akhtar, Mohd. Sulaiman Khan and Mr.Arif Shakeel, Advs. versus THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through Mr.Ashish Dutta, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI JUDGMENT % P.S. TEJI, J.By this petition filed under Section 439 of Code of Criminal 1. Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the Cr. P.C.) the petitioner seeks Section 302/201/411/120B/34 of IPC, Police Station Sangam Vihar, New Delhi. FIR No.554/2013 regular bail in under 2. The facts, in brief, are that on 23.12.2013 on receipt of DD no.10A, SI Birender Singh along with Ct. Rajender reached J-Block hills, behind the forest of Govt. School where a charred dead body of a male person was found. The dead body was having injury marks on Bail Appl. No.2284/2016 Page 1 of 6 his head. One plastic bottle half burnt and one empty quarter bottle ...
Ram Bachan Soni vs.m/s Maheshwari Gas Service
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA1622016 & CM Nos. 9025-27/2016 LPA3232016 & CM Nos. 19428-31/2016 LPA3242016 & CM Nos. 19440-43/2016 $~9 to 11 * + + + VED PRAKSH DUBEY JAI PRAKASH DUBEY RAM BACHAN SONI ..... Appellant(s) Through: Mr. Syed Sajjad Ali, Adv. versus M/S MAHESHWARI GAS SERVICE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Praduman Gautam, Adv. CORAM:-"HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO ORDER2411.2016 % CM No.9026/2016 in LPA1622016 (for exemption) CM No.19429/2016 in LPA3232016(for exemption) CM No.19441/2016 in LPA3242016(for exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Applications stand disposed of. CM No.9027/2016 in LPA1622016 (seeking condonation of 91 days delay in filing the appeal) CM No.19430/2016 in LPA3232016(seeking condonation of 61 days delay in filing the appeal) CM No.19442/2016 in LPA3242016(seeking condonation of 61 days delay in filing the appeal) LPA No.162/2016 and connected matter Page 1 of 11 For the reasons stated ...
Door Deco Industries vs.customs, Central Excise & Service Tax
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-23-2016
$~4 to 6 & 8 to 10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:23. 11.2016 + (5) + (6) + (8) + (9) + W.P.(C) 8712/2016, CM APPL. 35749/2016 DOOR DECO INDUSTRIES ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Priyanka Goel, Adv. Versus CUSTOMS, CENTRAL EXCISE & SERVICE TAX..... Respondent Through: Mr. Pramod Kumar Rai, Adv. W.P.(C) 10121/2016, CM APPL. 40111/2016 JAURASIA HINGES & SCREWS ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Priyanka Goel, Adv. Versus COMMISSIONER, CENTRAL EXCISE & SERVICE TAX SETTLEMENT COMMISSION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Pramod Kumar Rai, Adv. W.P.(C) 8998/2016, CM APPL. 36506/2016 AGGARWAL INDUSTRIES ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Priyanka Goel, Adv. Versus COMMISSIONER, CENTRAL EXCISE & SERVICE TAX SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Pramod Kumar Rai, Adv. W.P.(C) 9476/2016, CM APPL. 37887/2016 OM INDUSTRIES ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Priyanka Goel, Adv. Versus COMMISSIONER, CENTRAL EXCISE & SERVICE TAX SETILEMENT COMMISSIONER ..... R...
Soni vs.shri Ram General Insurance Co Ltd & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-23-2016
$~28 to 31 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: November 23, 2016 (i) + MAC.APP. 260/2016 SONI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. O.P. Mannie, Advocate versus SHRI RAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. P. Acharya, Advocate for respondent No.1-insurance company (ii) + MAC.APP. 357/2016 PINKU @ SAMRUIT RANJAN DASH versus Through: Mr. O.P. Mannie, Advocate ..... Appellant SHRI RAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD &ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. P. Acharya, Advocate for respondent No.1-insurance company (iii) + MAC.APP. 495/2015 & C.M.11356/2015 SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD Through: Mr. P. Acharya, Advocate ..... Appellant versus MAC APPs.260/16, 357/16, 4& 4Page 1 of 10 SONI & ORS Through: Mr. O.P. Mannie, Advocate for .....Respondents (vi) + MAC.APP. 497/2015 & C.M.11364/2015 respondent-claimant SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD Through: Mr. P. Acharya, Advocate ..... Appellant versus PINKU @ SAMRUTI DASH & ORS .....Respondents Through: M...
Joint Commissioner of Police vs.asi Sube Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-23-2016
$~R-1A * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Dated:23. d November, 2016 + W.P.(C) 2417/2007 JOINT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Naushad Ahmed Khan, ASC with Ms. Haney Wadhwa, Advocate versus ASI SUBE SINGH ..... Respondent Through Mr. Arun Bhardwaj with Mr. A.Sriram, Mr. Mimansah Bhardwaj and Mr. Nikhil Bhardwaj, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. Challenge in this writ petition is to the order dated 03.08.2006 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal(hereinafter referred to for short as the Tribunal), by which the OA filed by the respondent was allowed.2. The respondent was working as ASI with Delhi Police. A complaint was received from many residents of Nangla Machi through Shri Raghubir Singh Kapoor, resident of 1178, Dev Ram Park, Tri Nagar, Delhi. In the complaint, it was stated that he had received a written complaint against the police officer ASI Sube Singh, who was ...
M/S Amardeep Prakashan vs.m/s Siddharth Tradex (P) Ltd. & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-23-2016
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:23. 11.2016 FAO5272016 & CM419422016 (stay) ..... Appellant Through Mr. Rajat Sharma, Advocate + M/S AMARDEEP PRAKASHAN M/S SIDDHARTH TRADEX (P) LTD. & ANR. % CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA Through None versus ..... Respondent : SUNITA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. The challenge in this appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) is to the order dated 13th July, 2016 passed by the Additional District Judge-17, Central/THC, Delhi in Arbitration No.84190/2016 whereby the application u/s 5 of the Limitation Act arising out of objections/application u/s 34 of the Act for setting aside the award dated 25th August, 2014 passed by the Sole Arbitrator Sh. Satya Narain Gupta, Paper Merchants Association (Regd.) in Arbitration proceedings No.23/2011-2012 titled as M/s. Sidharth Tradex Pvt. Ltd. vs. M/s. Amardeep Prakashan was dismissed.2. Counsel for the appellant submits that ...
Central Board of Secondary Education vs.ashwani Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-23-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~45 * % + W.P.(C) 11119/2016 & CM APPL. 43466/2016 CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION ........ Petitioner Judgment delivered on:23. 11.2016 versus ..... Respondent ASHWANI KUMAR Advocates who appeared in the case: For the... Petitioner : Mr Amit Bansal with Ms. Seema Dolo and Ms. Surbhi Mehta, Advocates. None. For the Respondent: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner impugns the order dated 02.12.2015, whereby the Central Information Commission had directed the CPIO of CBSE to show cause as to why the penalty be not imposed for not responding to the RTI application and for not refunding the amount of Rs. 250/- which was deposited by the respondent on the advice of the CPIO and for not providing any information, and the order dated 29.03.2016 subsequently directing the petitioner to pay a compensation of Rs. 5000/- to the respondent. W.P.(C) Nos. 11119 /2016 Page 1 of 3 2. It is contend...
Om Prakash vs.the Commissioner South Delhi Municipal Coporation and Or ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-23-2016
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI OM PRAKASH W.P.(C) 1245/2016 Date of decision:23. d November, 2016 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. K.K. Rai, Senior Advocate with Mr. Randhir Kumar & Mr. Anshul Rai, Advocates. versus THE COMMISSIONER SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL COPORATION AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr. Mimansak Bhardwaj, Mr. Nikhil Bhardwaj, Mr. Sriram & Mr. Bishan Dass, Advocates for R-1 & 3/SDMC. Mr. M.S. Saini, Advocate for R-4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) With the consent of the parties, we have taken up the writ petition for hearing and disposal.2. The petitioner, Dr. Om Prakash, in this writ petition impugns the order dated 22nd January, 2016 passed by the Principal Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal whereby Original Application No 4145/2015 filed by him has been dismissed.3. The petitioner is aggrieved that his junior Dr. Ravinder Sharma, W.P. (C) N...
- ‹ Prev
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- Next ›
- Last »