Delhi Court November 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Society for Alternative Fuel and Environment Safe) & Anr vs.nct of Del ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~5 * + W.P.(C) 8797/2016 SOCIETY FOR ALTERNATIVE FUEL AND ENVIRONMENT SAFE) & ANR ........ Petitioners Through Mr.Kapil Sankhla with Mr.Shyam D.Nanda, Mr.R.C.Vats and Mr.Shashank Mishra, Advocates. Mr.Kirti Uppal, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Praveen Kumar Jain and Ms.Sahiba, Advocates for proposed P-3. versus NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Sanjoy Ghose, ASC with Ms.Pratistha Vij, Advocate for GNCTD. Mr.Ruchir Mishra with Ms.Namisha Gupta and Mr.Mukesh Kumar Tiwari, Advocates for UOI. Date of Decision :24. h November, 2016 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) C.M.No.43583/2016 After some arguments, learned senior counsel for proposed petitioner no.3 wishes to withdraw the present application with liberty to file Page 1 of 5 W.P.(C) 8797/2016 appropriate legal proceedings in accordance with law. Consequently, the application is dismissed as withdrawn. W.P.(C) No.8797/2016 & C.M.No.36007/2016 1. On 17th Oct...
Ved Praksh Dubey vs.m/s Maheshwari Gas Service
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA1622016 & CM Nos. 9025-27/2016 LPA3232016 & CM Nos. 19428-31/2016 LPA3242016 & CM Nos. 19440-43/2016 $~9 to 11 * + + + VED PRAKSH DUBEY JAI PRAKASH DUBEY RAM BACHAN SONI ..... Appellant(s) Through: Mr. Syed Sajjad Ali, Adv. versus M/S MAHESHWARI GAS SERVICE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Praduman Gautam, Adv. CORAM:-"HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO ORDER2411.2016 % CM No.9026/2016 in LPA1622016 (for exemption) CM No.19429/2016 in LPA3232016(for exemption) CM No.19441/2016 in LPA3242016(for exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Applications stand disposed of. CM No.9027/2016 in LPA1622016 (seeking condonation of 91 days delay in filing the appeal) CM No.19430/2016 in LPA3232016(seeking condonation of 61 days delay in filing the appeal) CM No.19442/2016 in LPA3242016(seeking condonation of 61 days delay in filing the appeal) LPA No.162/2016 and connected matter Page 1 of 11 For the reasons stated ...
Sambhav Kapur vs.british Indo German Industrial Organics Private Ltd a ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2016
$~19. * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) No.1532/2016 & IA No.14411/2016 (under Order XXXIX Rules 1&2 CPC). SAMBHAV KAPUR ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Dhanesh Ralhan and Mr. Aashita Manocha, Advs. Versus BRITISH INDO GERMAN INDUSTRIAL ORGANICS PRIVATE LTD AND ORS Through: None. ..... Defendants CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW % ORDER2411.2016 1. The plaintiff has instituted this suit against the defendants no.1 to 9 namely (i) British Indo German Industrial Organics Private Ltd.; (ii) BIG Industrial Organics Private Limited; (iii) Mr. Nitin Khullar; (iv) Mr. Rakesh Rathour; (v) Mr. Mangat Rai; (vi) Mr. Raj Kumar Rathour; (vii) Mr. Raman Kumar; (viii) Mr. Vikram Rathour and (ix) Akash Rathour for (i) permanent injunction restraining the defendants from manufacturing, selling the goods under the mark PUREPASTE SAFETY SKIN PASTE or any other mark as may be identical or deceptively similar to the plaintiffs mark REINOL SAFETY SKIN PASTE amounting to passing ...
Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd vs.suman Jee Jha & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~6 * % + MAC.APP. 833/2012 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD Date of Decision:24. h October, 2016 Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Adv. Versus ........ Petitioner SUMAN JEE JHA & ORS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. L.B. Rai and Mr. Mohit Kumar Sharma, Advs. for R1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant has challenged the award of Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.15,61,164/- has been awarded to respondent No.1. The accident dated 05th November, 2008 resulted in the amputation of right arm below elbow of the respondent No.1. The permanent disability suffered by the appellant has been assessed to be 70%. The Claims Tribunal awarded Rs.8,521/- towards medical expenses, Rs.9,98,001/- towards loss of future income, Rs.24,642/- towards loss of income, Rs.15,000/- towards his special diet, Rs. 15,000/- towards future treatment medical expenses, Rs. 1,00,000/- towards pain and suffering and Rs.2,00,000/- towards loss of a...
Madhu Bala vs.viqar Ahmed
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2016
$~13 * + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA5622016 & CM No.28673/2016 MADHU BALA Through : Ms. Shalini Kapoor, Advocate ..... Appellant versus VIQAR AHMED Through : None. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % Counsel for the appellant states that the parties have been able to ORDER2411.2016 negotiate an out of court settlement during the pendency of the present proceedings and as a result, she has instructions not to press the present appeal.2. Accordingly, the appeal is disposed of as not pressed, along with the pending application. NOVEMBER24 2016 sk/ap HIMA KOHLI, J...
Saurabh Agrotech Private Limited vs.radhey Shyam Agencies & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2016
$~27 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:24. 11.2016 CS(COMM) 1153/2016 SAURABH AGROTECH PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr Harshit Tolia, Mr Rajendra H. Bhansali and Mr Sitesh Narayan Singh, Mr Shiv Mangal Sharma and Ms Abhinandni Sharma, Advs. versus RADHEY SHYAM AGENCIES & ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mr Narender Mohan Sharma and Ms Sakshi and Mr Ankul Singh, Advs for D-1 and 2 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA IA No.25496/2015 (by defendant No.2 and 3 under Order VI Rule 15A, Order XI Rule 1, Order 7 Rule 11 CPC) 1. Vide the present application, the defendant Nos.2 and 3 has sought rejection of the plaint and the documents. The plea of the applicant/defendant Nos. 2 and 3 is that after the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Court CS(COMM) 1153/2016 Page 1 Ordinance, 2015, (hereinafter referred to as the Ordinance, 2015) came into force with effect from 23.10.2015, all the civ...
B L Kapur Memorial Hospital vs.kothari Associates Pvt Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2016
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: November 9, 2016. Decision on : November 24, 2016. O.M.P. 1126/2013 B L KAPUR MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Amit Dubey and Mr.Chandan Gupta, Advocates. versus KOTHARI ASSOCIATES PVT LTD. Through: Ms. Anusuya Salwan, Advocate. ..... Respondent CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR % 1. The challenge in this petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and JUDGMENT2411.2016 Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) is to an Award dated 10th July 2013 passed by the sole Arbitrator in the disputes between the parties arising out of Consultancy Agreement dated 8th December 2004.2. The... Petitioner, which is stated to be a unit of Lahore Hospital Society, provides tertiary healthcare service. The Respondent company is engaged in the business of providing architectural and structural design consultancy services for turnkey projects. In terms of the above Consultancy Agreement, Respondent was to provide consultancy for architectural u...
Sunil Bansal vs.a v Rao & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2016
$~8 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CONT.CAS(C) 839/2014 SUNIL BANSAL ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Manish Kumar with Mr.Anil Goel, Advocates. versus A V RAO & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Anil K.Batra, Advocate for R- 1 % to 3. Date of Decision :24. h November, 2016 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present contempt petition has been filed alleging wilful disobedience of the order dated 8th August, 2007 passed by a Division Bench of this Court in W.P.(C) No.17451/2005 in respect of E-Tender floated by the respondent- BPCL in August, 2014.2. In the petition, the only allegation is that the respondent-BPCL had awarded E-Tender in favour of forty-six tank trucks without the said vehicles possessing any valid/existing fitness certificates.3. In the reply-affidavit, the respondent-BPCL has stated that the fitness certificates of forty tank trucks have been received and the said certificates have been confirmed by the respective RTOs. Th...
Yash Pal vs.director General, Council of Scientific & Industrial Resea ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2016
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI YASH PAL W.P.(C) 11175/2016 Date of decision:24. h November, 2016. In person. ........ Petitioner versus DIRECTOR GENERAL, COUNCIL OF SCIENTIFIC & INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH & ANR Through ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitoiner, Yash Pal has appeared in person and we have examined the merits of the impugned order dated 9th September 2016, whereby OA No.4190/2013 has been dismissed as not maintainable on the ground of res judicata and constructive res judicata.2. We are in agreement with the reasoning given by the tribunal.3. The petitioner is a retired employee from the National Physical Laboratory, a constituent unit of the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research. He had earlier field an OA Nos.2990/1991 claiming that he had been wrongly denied promotion under the New WP. (C) No.11175/2016 Page 1 of 5 Recruitment and Assessment Scheme. He had f...
Globe Ground India Employees Union vs.lufthansa German Airlines and Ot ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2016
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA No.107/2016 Reserved on:5. h September, 2016 Date of Decision:24. h November, 2016 GLOBE GROUND INDIA EMPLOYEES UNION ..... Appellant Through Ms. Tanya Aggarwal, Advocate. LUFTHANSA GERMAN AIRLINES AND OTHERS ..... Respondent versus % Through Mr. Ciccu Mukhopadhyay, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Alok Bhasin and Ms. Poonam Das, Advocates for respondent No.1 Mr. Virender Mehta, Advocate for respondent No.2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA SANJIV KHANNA, J.This intra-Court appeal under Clause X of the Letters Patent by Globe Ground India Employees Union impugns the order and final judgment dated 21st April, 2014 passed by the single Judge allowing W.P. (C) No.1255/2014 filed by Lufthansa German Airlines. The appellant workers union also impugns the order dated 24th October, 2015 passed by the single Judge dismissing Review Petition No.447/2015 and C.M.No.20959/2015.2. The issue involved is rather short and li...
- ‹ Prev
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- Next ›
- Last »