Delhi Court November 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Gurvinder Singh Saini vs.director of Education and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2016
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.9060/2016 + % GURVINDER SINGH SAINI25h November, 2016 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Saurabh Chadda, Advocate. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathy, ASC DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION AND ORS. with Mr. Rizwan, Advocate for GNCTD. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition under article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner impugns the judgment of the Delhi School Tribunal (DST) dated 21.7.2016 by which the DST has upheld the impugned order dated 25.11.1997 passed by the respondent nos.2 and 3/Sri Guru Nanak Public School terminating the services of the petitioner who was a probationer.2. The facts of the case are that the petitioner was appointed by the respondent nos.2 and 3/school on probation as a TGT (PET) on W.P.(C) No.9060/2016 Page 1 of 15 1.1.1995. The appointment was pursuant to the letter of the r...
Atul Kanti Tripathi vs.m/s Kuber Media Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2016
$~1 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:25. 11.2016 W.P.(C) 6008/2014 ATUL KANTI TRIPATHI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Pankaj Vivek and Mr. Atul Tripathi, Advocates. Versus M/S KUBER MEDIA LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Asim Naeem, Asad Siddiqui, and Mohd. Haris, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI % ORDER2511.2016 The petitioner (workman) impugns the order dated 07.06.2014 passed 1. in Ex. Petition No.50/2013 and a subsequent order filed on an application for implementation of the Award passed in LIR No.346/2008 dated 10.03.2010. The Award dated 10.03.2010 directed the respondent (management) to (i) grant reinstatement to the workman in service along with back wages; (ii) continuity of service and consequential benefits within 30 days from the date of publication of the Award, (iii) failing which, the management will have to pay interest at the rate of 12% per annum till the date of actual payment. The Award was published on 17.08...
Sachin & Anr vs.jhabbu Lal & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2016
$~7 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:24. h November,2016 RSA1362016 & CM No.19123/2016 SACHIN & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Appellant No.1 in person versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Rakesh Kumar, Advocate with respondents in person JHABBU LAL & ANR PRATIBHA RANI, J.(Oral) 1. The appellant No.1, who is present in person, requests for an adjournment on the ground that he wants to change his counsel. The appellants are enjoying an ex-parte interim stay granted in their favour on 20th May, 2016 against their dispossession from the suit property.2. On 29th August, 2016 the appellants requested for a date on the ground that the counsel was suffering from fever. This Court passed the following order:-"1. Only for the reason that counsel for the appellants is said to be down with fever, therefore, this case is adjourned, otherwise prima facie I find no merits in the appeal where appellants/defendants who are son and daughter-in-law of the respondents/plai...
Jai Prakash Dubey vs.m/s Maheshwari Gas Service
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA1622016 & CM Nos. 9025-27/2016 LPA3232016 & CM Nos. 19428-31/2016 LPA3242016 & CM Nos. 19440-43/2016 $~9 to 11 * + + + VED PRAKSH DUBEY JAI PRAKASH DUBEY RAM BACHAN SONI ..... Appellant(s) Through: Mr. Syed Sajjad Ali, Adv. versus M/S MAHESHWARI GAS SERVICE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Praduman Gautam, Adv. CORAM:-"HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO ORDER2411.2016 % CM No.9026/2016 in LPA1622016 (for exemption) CM No.19429/2016 in LPA3232016(for exemption) CM No.19441/2016 in LPA3242016(for exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Applications stand disposed of. CM No.9027/2016 in LPA1622016 (seeking condonation of 91 days delay in filing the appeal) CM No.19430/2016 in LPA3232016(seeking condonation of 61 days delay in filing the appeal) CM No.19442/2016 in LPA3242016(seeking condonation of 61 days delay in filing the appeal) LPA No.162/2016 and connected matter Page 1 of 11 For the reasons stated ...
Union of India & Anr. Vs.d.c. Murmu
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * + W.P. (C) 7837/2002 % UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Date of Judgment:24. h November, 2016 ........ Petitioners D.C. MURMU Through: Mr. Jaswinder Singh, Advocate. Versus Through: Mr. S.C. Soren, Advocate. .... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1.2. Rule DB was issued in this matter on 20.07.2004. The challenge in this writ petition is to the orders dated 08.02.2002 and 11.09.2002 passed by Central Administrative Tribunal (briefly the Tribunal). Before we notice the facts of the case and the rival submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties; we may notice that the respondent has since retired from the service. It may further be noted that the quantum involved in the present writ petition is Rs. 23,800/-, which stands paid to the respondent on 18.10.2002.3. In this case, the respondent had approached the Tribunal primarily seeking two reliefs: (i) Promotion; and (ii) Non-pay...
Murti Devi vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2016
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:05. 10.2016 Decided on :24. 11.2016 + WP(C) No.9201/2015 MURTI DEVI .....Petitioner Through: Mr.V.P.S.Tyagi, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Advocate % CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT :SUNITA GUPTA J.1. The impugned order dated 21st November, 2014 passed by the Principal Bench, Central Administrative Tribunal (Tribunal for short) in OA No.3870/2013 and order dated 3rd February, 2015 passed in review application being RA152015 rejecting the claim for grant of arrears of paid weekly off to the petitioner during the period she worked as casual labourer with temporary status are under challenge in this writ petition.2. The petitioner was initially engaged as a casual labourer on daily wage basis on 1st October, 1988 by respondent No.4. She was conferred with temporary status with effect from 15th September, 1994 in accordance with th...
Rampiari Ahuja & Ors vs.jasdeep Singh & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ..... Appellants Through: Mr.Vimal Wadhwan, Advocate $~Regular-21 * + MAC.APP. 370/2009 RAMPIARI AHUJA & ORS versus JASDEEP SINGH & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Rajat Brar, Advocate for respondent No.3/Insurer CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % Impugned Award of 23rd April, 2009 grants compensation of ORDER2411.2016 `3,79,691/- to appellants on account of death of Birinder Kumar Ahuja in a road accident on 07th February, 2007 in Punjabi Bagh area near Britannia Flyover, Delhi at 4.00PM. The deceased was aged 76 years at the time of accident. He had retired as Chief Manager from Punjab National Bank and was getting monthly pension of `9,226/-. According to the appellants, he was also earning `45,000/- pm from share investments and as, LIC agent. After recording the evidence, learned Tribunal vide impugned Award has granted the compensation as noted above. In this appeal, enhancement of compensation is sought on the ground that compens...
Lok Nayak Jai Prakash Narain Hospital. Vs.attar Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2016
$~43 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:24. h November, 2016 + W.P.(C) 1905/2011 LOK NAYAK JAI PRAKASH NARAIN HOSPITAL....Petitioner Through: Mr. Naushad Ahmed Khan, ASC (Civil), GNCTD. ATTAR SINGH versus Through: Mr. K. B. Mina, Adv. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The petitioner has challenged the award of the Labour Court whereby the petitioner has been directed to reinstate the respondent and pay the compensation of Rs.25,000/-.2. The respondent joined the petitioner in 1999 as an Ex- serviceman. He remained absent from duty with effect from 20th January, 2003 on account of illness whereupon the petitioner initiated disciplinary proceedings against the respondent and thereafter, imposed a penalty of dismissal/removal from service vide order dated 16th October, 2008.3. The respondent raised an industrial dispute to challenge the order of dismissal. The respondent did not contest the petition before the Labour Court ...
Sachin Balhara vs.gnct Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2016
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on 4th October, 2016 Decided on 24th November, 2016 + W.P.(C) 6995/2016 SACHIN BALHARA Through ........ Petitioner Mr Ajay Raj Singh and Mr Shabbir Ali, Advs. GNCT DELHI & ANR. Through Versus Mr Anupam Srivastava, ASC for GNCTD with Ms Shanmistha Ghose, Advs. for R1 & 2 ..... Respondent % CORAM: HONBLE MR.JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA : SUNITA GUPTA, J.JUDGMENT1 The writ petitioner impugns the order dated 29.04.2016 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi whereby the OA No.2951/2014 filed by the petitioner was dismissed.2. The petitioner joined the services as constable on 04.04.2002 in Delhi Police on compassionate ground on account of death of his father, late Shri Hari Krishan Balhara, who was also working in Delhi Police. On 14.05.2013, he tendered his resignation which was duly accepted by the competent authority on 09.07.2013 w.e.f. 16.07.2013. He was granted no due certif...
State Bank of India vs.harish Kumar Chawla
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2016
$~19. * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA3712016 and CM APPL. 20943-20944/2016 STATE BANK OF INDIA ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Jaya Tomar, Advocate with Mr. Mukul Shanker Saxena, Chief Manager (Administration) in person. versus HARISH KUMAR CHAWLA ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Shreya Singh, Advocate with respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % ORDER2411.2016 CM APPL. 42424/2016 (joint application u/O XXIII R3CPC) 1. The present compromise application has been filed by the parties stating inter alia that they have been able to arrive at a negotiated settlement, the terms and conditions whereof have been mentioned in paras 2 to 7.2. It has been agreed by the parties that the appellant/Bank shall hand over the vacant peaceful possession of the suit premises to the respondent on or before 30.04.2017 and the arrears of the use and occupation charges of the suit premises shall be paid to the respondent at the rate mentioned in RFA3712016 Page 1 of 3 para 2 ...
- ‹ Prev
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- Next ›
- Last »