Delhi Court October 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sweety Gupta vs.neety Gupta & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-25-2016
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:04. 10.2016 Judgment delivered on:25. 10.2016 FAO (OS) 108/2016 SWEETY GUPTA versus NEETY GUPTA & ORS ..... Appellant ..... RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant : Mr Abhijat with Mr Rishab Bansal and Mr Anuj Chaturvedi. For Respondent No.1 : Mr Praveen Kumar. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J JUDGMENT1 Sweety Gupta, appellant/defendant No.4 has put up a challenge to the order dated 28.01.2016 passed in IA No.19352/2011 in CS(OS) No.2209/2008 whereby the application preferred by her for setting aside the ex-parte preliminary decree dated 27.09.2011 passed by a learned single Judge of this Court directing that the plaintiff/respondent No.1 and defendant Nos.1 to 4, all of whom are own sisters, would be entitled to 1/5th share in the suit property FAO(OS) 108/2016 Page 1 of 20 bearing Nos.B-7, 80/2, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi-110...
Ajay Singhal vs.state ( Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-25-2016
$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON : OCTOBER25 2016 + CRL.REV.P. 560/2016 & Crl.M.B.1557/16, Crl.M.A.13217/16, 14279/16, 161AJAY SINGHAL Through : Mr.Jayant K.Sud with Mr.Honey Khanna, Ms.Vaishali Soni and Mr.Uman Singh, Advocates. ........ Petitioner versus STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG Through : Mr.Kamal Kr.Ghei, APP. Mr.A.S.Anand, Advocate, for R-2 along with R-2 present in person. S.P.GARG, J.(ORAL) 1. Present revision petition has been preferred by the petitioner- Ajay Singhal to challenge the legality and correctness of a judgment dated 28.10.2015 of learned Additional Sessions Judge in Crl.A.No.25/2015 whereby the judgment dated 19.05.2015 of learned ACMM, Shahdara, in Complaint Case (CC) No.405/2014 under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act was upheld. The Trial court had sentenced the petitioner vide order dated 7.7.2015 to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for two years Crl.Rev.P.560/2016 Page 1 of 3...
Ms. Richa Aggarwal vs.m/s Deepika Sarees Pvt Ltd & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-25-2016
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:25. h October, 2016 + CRL.M.C. 4919/2015 and Crl.M.A.No.17611/2015 MOHINI AGGARWAL & ANR Through: Ms. Meenakshi Jyoti, Advocate. versus ........ Petitioners DEEPIKA SAREES PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS Through: Mr. Mehul Gupta, Advocate for R-2. ........ RESPONDENTS AND + CRL.M.C. 4028/2015 and Crl.M.A.No.14341/2015 MS RICHA AGGARWAL Through: Ms. Meenakshi Jyoti, Advocate. versus ........ Petitioner M/S DEEPIKA SAREES PVT LTD & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Mehul Gupta, Advocate for R-2. CRL.M.C. 4919/2015 & CRL.M.C. 4028/2015 Page 1 of 15 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA I.S. MEHTA, J.1. The present petitions are arising out of the impugned summoning order passed by MM(C-02) Delhi in CC No.2011/1/14 dated 28.01.2015. The present petitioners aggrieved from the impugned summoning order passed in CC No.2011/1/14 dated 28.01.2015 preferred to file two separate petitions mentioned herein above, i.e., CRL.M.C. 4919/2015 and CR...
Akhil Kumar Saini vs.university of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-25-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:25. 10.2016 $~86, 87,88,89 & 90 * % + W.P.(C) 7722/2016 & CM No.31887/2016 AKHIL KUMAR SAINI versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS. Advocates who appeared in the case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: + W.P.(C) 7723/2016 & CM No.31892/2016 PARAG PARASHAR Mr. Ashish Mohan, Adv. Mr. M.J.S. Rupal & Ms. Simranjeet, Adv. ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner Versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS. Advocates who appeared in the case: For the... Petitioner: For the... RESPONDENTS: Mr Tushar Rudra, Advocate. Mr M.J.S.Rupal & Ms.Simranjeet, Advocate ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 7866/2016 & CM No.32568/2016 SAGAR BATRA & ORS. ........ Petitioner Versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS. Advocates who appeared in the case: For the... Petitioner: For the... RESPONDENTS: Mr Bhaskar Subramanian, Advocate. Mr M.J.S.Rupal & Ms.Simranjeet, Advocate ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) Nos. 7722/2016 & connected matters Page 1 of 5 +...
Iyogi Technical Services Pvt. Ltd Vs.-
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-25-2016
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CO.APPL. (M) 135/2016 IN THE MATTER OF: iYOGI Technical Services Pvt. Ltd Applicant Company Through: Mr P.Nagesh, Mr Manish Kumar and Mr Nakul Jain, Advocates for Applicant. Mr Jai Sahai Endlaw, Advocate for Non- Applicant. Mr Hemant Phalpher , Mr Vanshdeep Dalmia and Mr Parth Goswami, Advocates for Non-Applicant. CORAM: HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL ORDER2510.2016 C.A. No.3676 of 2016 (Exemption) All exemptions granted, subject to just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. CO.APPL. (M) 135/2016 1. The present is a first motion application filed under Sections 391-394 of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred as as Act), read with Rules 6 & 9 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 by iYOGI Technical Services Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as applicant company), in connection with the proposed Scheme of Arrangement (hereinafter referred to as Scheme) between the Applicant Company and its creditors. CO.APPL.(M) 135/...
Mohini Aggarwal & Anr. Vs.deepika Sarees Private Limited & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-25-2016
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:25. h October, 2016 + CRL.M.C. 4919/2015 and Crl.M.A.No.17611/2015 MOHINI AGGARWAL & ANR Through: Ms. Meenakshi Jyoti, Advocate. versus ........ Petitioners DEEPIKA SAREES PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS Through: Mr. Mehul Gupta, Advocate for R-2. ........ RESPONDENTS AND + CRL.M.C. 4028/2015 and Crl.M.A.No.14341/2015 MS RICHA AGGARWAL Through: Ms. Meenakshi Jyoti, Advocate. versus ........ Petitioner M/S DEEPIKA SAREES PVT LTD & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Mehul Gupta, Advocate for R-2. CRL.M.C. 4919/2015 & CRL.M.C. 4028/2015 Page 1 of 15 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA I.S. MEHTA, J.1. The present petitions are arising out of the impugned summoning order passed by MM(C-02) Delhi in CC No.2011/1/14 dated 28.01.2015. The present petitioners aggrieved from the impugned summoning order passed in CC No.2011/1/14 dated 28.01.2015 preferred to file two separate petitions mentioned herein above, i.e., CRL.M.C. 4919/2015 and CR...
Patna Water Supply Distribution Networks Private Limited vs.bihar Urba ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-25-2016
$~30 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ARB.P. 157/2016 PATNA WATER SUPPLY DISTRIBUTION NETWORKS PRIVATE LIMITED Through: Mr Rajiv Bansal, Mr Prashant, Ms versus Charu Ambwani, Mr Anurag Tripathi and Ms Tanya Jolly, Advocates. ........ Petitioner BIHAR URBAN INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Shivam Singh and Mr A. Awasthi, Advocates for R-1. Mr Rudreshwar Singh, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER2510.2016 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter 'the Act'), inter alia, praying that an arbitral tribunal be appointed for adjudicating the disputes that have arisen between the... Petitioner and Respondent no.1 (hereafter 'BUIDCo') in relation to a tripartite agreement dated 24.09.2012.2. BUIDCo issued a notice inviting tender for the work of Design, Construction, Installation, Commissioning of Water Trea...
Pawan Kumar vs.m/s the New India Assurance Co Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-25-2016
$~1 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:25. h October, 2016 + MAC.APP. 833/2015 PAWAN KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. I.C. Mishra and Mr. P.K. Jha, Advocates versus M/S THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD..... Respondent Through: Ms. Shubhada Khosla, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) The appellant has challenged the order dated 28th May, 2015 1. whereby the Claims Tribunal dismissed the claim petition for non- prosecution. The Claims Tribunal framed the issues on 11th April, 2014 and 2. listed the matter for the appellants evidence on 11th July, 2014. On 11th July, 2014, the appellant filed an application for examination of the appellant by a Medical Board to determine his disability whereupon the Claims Tribunal vide order dated 11th July, 2014 directed the appellant to appear before the Medical Board of Lal Bahadur Shashtri Hospital on 17th September, 2014. The report of the Medical Board of Lal Bahadur Shashtri Hospital dated 09th ...
Sarabjeet Singh vs.university of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-25-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:25. 10.2016 $~86, 87,88,89 & 90 * % + W.P.(C) 7722/2016 & CM No.31887/2016 AKHIL KUMAR SAINI versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS. Advocates who appeared in the case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: + W.P.(C) 7723/2016 & CM No.31892/2016 PARAG PARASHAR Mr. Ashish Mohan, Adv. Mr. M.J.S. Rupal & Ms. Simranjeet, Adv. ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner Versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS. Advocates who appeared in the case: For the... Petitioner: For the... RESPONDENTS: Mr Tushar Rudra, Advocate. Mr M.J.S.Rupal & Ms.Simranjeet, Advocate ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 7866/2016 & CM No.32568/2016 SAGAR BATRA & ORS. ........ Petitioner Versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS. Advocates who appeared in the case: For the... Petitioner: For the... RESPONDENTS: Mr Bhaskar Subramanian, Advocate. Mr M.J.S.Rupal & Ms.Simranjeet, Advocate ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) Nos. 7722/2016 & connected matters Page 1 of 5 +...
Abdul Rashid @ Pappu vs.mohd. Rizwan
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-25-2016
* + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.REV.P. 452/2015 & CRL.M.A. Nos. 10388/2015 & 10390/2015 Date of Decision:25. h October, 2016 ABDUL RASHID @ PAPPU ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Nikhil Majithia, Advocate. versus MOHD. RIZWAN ..... Respondent Through: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA I.S. MEHTA, J.1. The present revision petition is arising out of the order passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge dated 17.01.2015 qua against the present petitioner, i.e., Mr. Abdul Rashid, who prefers to challenge the same on the ground that the order so passed is an ex parte order and his opportunity of being heard has been taken away by the Court below.2. The brief facts stated are that the respondent herein- Mr. Mohd. Rizwan, S/o Mr. Mohd. Suleman had filed a criminal complaint under Section 200 Cr.P.C. qua against the present petitioner- Mr. Abdul Rashid @ Pappu arraigned as accused no.5, Mr. Rahisuddin as accused no.1, Ms. Sugra as accused no.2, ...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »