Delhi Court October 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Anand Singh vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-25-2016
$~ *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % ANAND SINGH STATE CRL.A. No.839/2016 Date of decision :25. h October, 2016 Through: Mr. M.L. Yadav and ..... Appellant Mr. Lokesh Chandra, Advs. versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State with Insp. Satyavir Singh from PS Bindapur CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, J.1. The appellant assails the judgment dated 24th May, 2016 passed in Sessions Case No.by the learned Additional Sessions Judge convicting him for commission of offence under Section 302 of the IPC as well as the consequential order of sentence dated 26th May, 2016 awarding life imprisonment as well as fine of `20,000/-, in default simple imprisonment for six months.2. On 19th September, 2013 at 04.45 hours, information was received by Police Station Bindapur from Ct. Mukesh, who was Crl. App.No.839/2016 Page 1 of 30 posted at DDU Hospital that one Soni, wife of Anand Singh (appellant) had...
Sarvesh Kumar vs.sh. Dalel Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-25-2016
* + % SARVESH KUMAR IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RSA No.319/2016 25th October, 2016 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ashok Gurnani, Advocate. versus SH. DALEL SINGH ..... Respondent Through: CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. Appl. No.39866/2016 (for exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. RSA No.319/2016 and C.M. Appl. No.39865/2016 (for stay of operation of the Judgment and Decree dt. 12.8.2016 under Section 151 CPC) 1. This Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the appellant/defendant/son impugning the concurrent Judgments of the courts below; of the Trial Court dated 24.11.2015 and the First Appellate Court dated 12.8.2016; by which the courts RSA No.319/2016 Page 1 of 15 below have decreed the suit of the respondent/plaintiff/father for possession and damages. The suit property is a p...
Shri Megh Shyam Sharma & Ors vs.vinod Kumar Sharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-25-2016
$~39. * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI TR.P.(C) 14/2016 Judgment dated 25th October, 2016 SHRI MEGH SHYAM SHARMA & ORS ........ Petitioners Through : Ms.Sonal Jain and Ms.Heena Sharma, Advs. versus CORAM: VINOD KUMAR SHARMA ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Siddharth Aggarwal, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. By the present petition filed under Section 24(1)(b)(i) of Code of Civil Procedure, the petitioner seeks transfer of CS(OS) 709/2014 tit led as Vinod Kumar Sharma v. Megh Shyam Sharma & Ors., filed by the defendant herein for possession and mesne profits, from the court of District and Sessions Judge, Saket District Courts, New Delhi, to the High Court of Delhi.2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners herein have filed a suit, being CS(OS) 1822/2015, for declaration, partition and permanent injunction in the High Court of Delhi with the following prayers: i. Pass a decree of declaration in favour of the Plaintiffs an...
Mantec Consultants Pvt Ltd vs.ajay Narayan Jha & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-25-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:25. 10.2016 $~1 * % + Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the... RESPONDENTS : : CONT.CAS(C) 1085/2016 MANTEC CONSULTANTS PVT LTD AJAY NARAYAN JHA & ORS versus ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Suneet Bhardwaj, Advocate. Mr. Manish Mohan, CGSC with Mr. Shivam Chanana and Ms. Manisha Saroha, Advocates for UOI. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2510.2016 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CM No.35530/2016 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CONT.CAS(C) 1085/2016 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition seeking initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondents for wilful disobedience of order dated 05.09.2016.2. By order dated 05.09.2016, this Court had stayed the operation of order dated 23.08.2016, whereby, the petitioner had been debarred. This CONT.CAS(C) 1085/2016 Page 1 of 3 Court had further directed removal of the order dated ...
Insecticides (India) Limited vs.raja Pathak & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-25-2016
$~14. * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 1639/2015 Judgment dated 25th October, 2016 INSECTICIDES (INDIA) LIMITED Through Mr. Shobhit Agarwal, Advocate ..... Plaintiff CORAM: versus RAJA PATHAK & ANR Through None .... Defendants HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S. SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. None for the defendants. None was present on the last date of hearing. Defendants are accordingly proceeded ex parte.2. The plaintiff has instituted the present suit praying inter alia for permanent injunction against the defendants restraining them from infringing its trademark, copyright, passing off, rendition of accounts, delivery up, damages etc.3. Counsel for the plaintiff states that the plaintiff is a public limited company, founded in the year 1996 and as on date, it is one of the premier names in the crop protection industry. With more than 120 formulation products and 15 technical products, the plaintiff manufactures all types of weedicides, fungicides and plant growth regula...
Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing (Tianjin) Co Ltd & Ors. Vs.anchor Healt ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-25-2016
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:03. 10.2016 Judgment delivered on:25. 10.2016 FAO (OS) 257/2016 PROCTOR & GAMBLE MANUFACTURING (TIANJIN) CO LTD & ORS. ..... Appellants versus ANCHOR HEALTH AND BEAUTY CARE PVT LTD .. Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant For the Respondent : Mr Sudhir Chandra Agarwala and Mr Sanjeev Sindhwani, Sr. Advs. with Mr Prashant Gupta, Ms Arzu Chimmi and Mr Siddharth Sharma. : Mr Sandeep Sethi and Ms Pratibha M.Singh, Sr. Advs. with Mr Sudeep Chatterjee, Ms Jaya Mandelia and Mr Nikhil Lal. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR JUDGMENT ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J1 The appellants, Proctor and Gamble Manufacturing (Tianjin) Co. Ltd. & Ors., have challenged the order dated 26.08.2016 passed in CCP(O) No.47/2015 in CS (OS) No.1431/2013 whereby, while dealing with the application seeking initiation of contempt by the plaintiff/respondent as against the appellant/defendant for...
Rajesh Khanna & Ors vs.state & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-25-2016
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 1872/2016 RAJESH KHANNA & ORS Date of Decision: October 25th, 2016 ........ Petitioners STATE & ORS Through Mr.Avdhesh K. Singh, Adv. Versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms.Meenakshi Chauhan, APP for the State with SI Santosh Kumar, PS Tilak Nagar. Mr.Rajendra Kumar Singh, Adv. with Respondent nos.2 to 8 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.1. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioners, namely, Sh. Rajesh Khanna, Deepak Khanna and Anurag Khanna for quashing of FIR No.434/2014 dated 30.09.2014, under SectionsIPC registered at Police Station Mayapuri on the basis of Compromise Deed executed between the petitioners and respondent nos.2 to 8 namely, Smt. Poonam Misra, Sh. Anshu Misra, Sh. Akhilesh Misra, Sh. Mohan Lal, Sh. Vidya Ram Goyal, Sh. Mahesh Singh and Sh. Anil Kumar on 11.12.2015.2. respondent-State submitted that the respondent nos.2 to 8 present in the Court have been...
Union of India and Ors. Vs.baruna Madan
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-25-2016
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3111/2013 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ Petitioner Date of decision:25. h October,2016 Through Mr. R.V. Sinha and Mr. A.S. Singh, Advocates versus BARUNA MADAN ..... Respondent Through Mr. Shekhar Kumar, Advocate for with respondent along the respondent in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA SANJIV KHANNA,J.(ORAL) 1. The Union of India and others have filed the present writ petition challenging the correctness of the order dated 20th December, 2012 passed by the Principal Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal in OA43572011. The impugned order partly allows the original application filed by Baruna Madan, the respondent herein.2. The respondent was appointed under the Women Special Entry Scheme as a Short Service Commission Officer of the Indian Army in the Corp of Electronic and Mechanical Engineer (EME, for short). She had worked in the EME Corp. from 11.3.1995 to 31.3.2007. W...
Sagar Batra & Ors. Vs.university of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-25-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:25. 10.2016 $~86, 87,88,89 & 90 * % + W.P.(C) 7722/2016 & CM No.31887/2016 AKHIL KUMAR SAINI versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS. Advocates who appeared in the case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: + W.P.(C) 7723/2016 & CM No.31892/2016 PARAG PARASHAR Mr. Ashish Mohan, Adv. Mr. M.J.S. Rupal & Ms. Simranjeet, Adv. ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner Versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS. Advocates who appeared in the case: For the... Petitioner: For the... RESPONDENTS: Mr Tushar Rudra, Advocate. Mr M.J.S.Rupal & Ms.Simranjeet, Advocate ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 7866/2016 & CM No.32568/2016 SAGAR BATRA & ORS. ........ Petitioner Versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS. Advocates who appeared in the case: For the... Petitioner: For the... RESPONDENTS: Mr Bhaskar Subramanian, Advocate. Mr M.J.S.Rupal & Ms.Simranjeet, Advocate ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) Nos. 7722/2016 & connected matters Page 1 of 5 +...
Icici Lombard General Insurance Co Ltd. Vs.nirmala & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-25-2016
$~31 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:25. h October, 2016 + MAC.APP. 378/2015 and C.M. Appl. 7496/2015 ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Pankaj Gupta proxy for Ms. Suman Gupta, Advocate Versus NIRMALA & ORS. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate for respondents No.1 and 2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant has challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.13,85,964/- has been awarded to claimants/respondents No.1 and 2.2. The accident dated 12th April, 2013 resulted in the death of Sunil. The deceased was aged 22 years at the time of the accident and was self-employed as a motor mechanic. The deceased was survived by his parents, who filed the claim petition before the Claims Tribunal.3. The Claims Tribunal took the minimum wages of Rs.7,722/- per month, added 50% towards future prospects, deducted one-half towards personal expenses and applied ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »