Delhi Court October 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rakesh Thakur & Anr. Vs.sandeep Jain & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-26-2016
$~ * 28. + 34. + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Ex. P. 25/2016 RAKESH THAKUR & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajeev Saxena and Ms.Nameeta Chauhan, Advocates. versus SANDEEP JAIN & ANR. Through: Mr. L. C. Rajput, Advocate... RESPONDENTS 3 and 4. ........ RESPONDENTS for AND O.M.P. 53/2014 RAKESH THAKUR & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajeev Saxena and Ms.Nameeta Chauhan, Advocates. versus SANDEEP JAIN& ANR. Through: Mr. L. C. Rajput, Advocate... RESPONDENTS 3 and 4. ........ RESPONDENTS for CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR ORDER2610.2016 % Ex. P. 25/2016 & IA224592015 in O.M.P. 53/2014 1. The applicant Mr. Mohd. Rafiq seeks more or less the same relief in Ex. P. 25 of 2016 & IA224592015 in O.M.P. 53 of 2014 Page 1 of 5 Execution Petition No.25 of 2016 as well as IA No.22459/2015 in O.M.P. 53/2014.2. What the Applicant wants is enforcement of the order in his favour passed by this Court on 18th February, 2014 in O.M.P. 53/2014. At this juncture, it should be noted ...
Ranchem Private Limited vs.rhc Holding Private Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-26-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CO.APPL. (M) 153/2016 IN THE MATTER OF: RANCHEM PRIVATE LIMITED . Transferor/ Applicant Company No.1 AND RWL HEALTHWORLD LIMITED . Demerged/ Applicant Company No.2 AND RHC HOLDING PRIVATE LIMITED . Transferee/ Resulting/ Applicant Company No.3 Through: Mr. Pawan Sharma, Mr. Sumit Garg and Mr. Saaransh Sadhoo, Advocates CORAM: HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL ORDER2610.2016 1. The present is a first motion application, filed jointly, under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) in connection with the Scheme of Arrangement (hereinafter referred to as Scheme) of Ranchem Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as CO.APPL.(M) 153/2016 Page 1 of 11 Transferor/Applicant Company No.1), RWL Healthworld Limited (hereinafter referred to as Demerged/ Applicant Company No.2) and RHC Holding Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as Transferee/ Resulting/Applicant Company No.3) and their respective shareholders...
Namdhari Food International Private Ltd vs.bush Food Overseas Private ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-26-2016
$~04. * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 419/2016 Judgment dated 26th October, 2016 NAMDHARI FOOD INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LTD Through : Mr.Naveen Sharma and Ms.Divyaa ..... Plaintiff Garg, Advs. versus CORAM: BUSH FOOD OVERSEAS PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Defendant Through HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. Plaintiff has filed the present suit under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure for recovery of Rs.2,02,00,000/-.2. Summons were issued to the defendant in the prescribed form. The defendants had entered appearance, which is evident upon reading of the order sheets. Thereafter the plaintiff filed an application seeking summons for judgment. Defendant has failed to file an application seeking leave to defend. On 19.9.2016, when the matter was listed before the Joint Registrar, counsel for the defendant had made a statement that he is not getting any instruction from the defendant.3. Learned counsel for the plaintiffs prays for a decree in term...
Master Harshil Anand vs.uoi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-26-2016
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA5362016 & C.M.Nos. 36135/2016 & 36136/2016 Date of Decision: October 26, 2016 MASTER HARSHIL ANAND ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Atul Nanda, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Rameeza Hakim, and Mr. Ashim Shridhar, Advs. Versus UOI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mrs.Bharathi Raju, CGSC with Ms.C. Rubavathi, Adv. for R-1 & R-6. Mr.K. K. Sharma, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Sonia Sharma, Mr.Rajiv Bakshi, Ms.Bhanita Patowary, Mr.Ayush Chourasia and Ms. Bhawana Gera, Advs. for R-3, R-4 & R-5. Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Simran Jeet, Adv. for Mr.Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Adv. for Delhi University. Mr.T. Singhdev, Ms. Biakthansangi and Mr. Tarun Verma, Advs. for R-7/MCI. + LPA5392016 & C.M. Nos. 36159/2016 & 36163/2016 AMRIT SAMRA & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Himanshu Sharma, Advocate Versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr.Adv. with Ms.Simran Jeet, Adv. for Mr.Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Adv. for Delhi University ...
Dinesh Kumar Gupta vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-26-2016
$~41. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WRIT PETITION(C) No.10052/2016 DINESH KUMAR GUPTA ........ Petitioner Date of decision:26. h October, 2016 Through Mr. Shanker Raju, Mr. Nilansh Gaur & Ms. Himantika Saini Gaur, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Sanjeev Narula, CGSC & Mr. Abhishek Ghai, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, we are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order dated 19th September, 2016 passed by the Principal Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal (Tribunal, for short) dismissing OA No.4414/2012.2. The petitioner, who was working as Superintendent in Service Tax Commissionerate at New Delhi, vide letter dated 29th August, 2012 had submitted a request for voluntary retirement under Rule 48A of the Central W.P. (C) No.10052/2016 Page 1 of 4 Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 stating that...
Super Cassettes Industries Pvt Ltd vs.sbn Network
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-26-2016
$~27. * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 3290/2015 Judgment dated 26th October, 2016 Super Cassettes Industries Pvt Ltd ..... Plaintiff Through : Ms. Prachi Agarwal, Adv. versus CORAM: SBN Network Through: None ..... Defendant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. The plaintiff has filed the present suit for permanent injunction restraining infringement of copyright, damages, rendition of accounts etc.2. Learned counsel for the plaintiff submits that summons in the suit were issued vide order dated 22.01.2016, when an ex parte ad interim injunction was passed in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant. Counsel further submits that summons was duly served on the defendant, however, none was present on behalf of the defendant on 23.05.2016; accordingly the defendant was proceeded ex parte. The plaintiff has also filed the ex parte evidence of Mr. S.K. Dutta, PW-1 and Mr. Vikas Bari, PW-2.3. As per the plaint, the plaintiff company was initia...
Pushkar Gupta vs.narender Kumar Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-25-2016
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: October 20, 2016 Judgment Delivered on: October 25, 2016 MAT.APP.(F.C.) 123/2014 PUSHKAR GUPTA ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Shailender Dahiya, Adv. with appellant in person versus NARENDER KUMAR GUPTA ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.Naveen Kumar Raheja, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRATIBHA RANI, J.1. The joy of success of counter claim filed by the appellant/wife in HMA Petition No.was short lived. Her grievance is that on the basis of decree of restitution of conjugal rights passed in her favour, it is the respondent/husband who despite being at fault, ultimately secured a decree of divorce under Section 13(1A)(ii) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 in HMA Petition No.1228/2011.2. We shall hereinafter refer the parties as the wife and the husband.3. Undisputed facts of this case are that the parties got married on July 01, 1994 as per Hindu rites and custo...
Nand Ram & Ors vs.suraj Bhan
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-25-2016
* + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RSA No.320/2016 and RSA No.321/2016 25th October, 2016 + RSA No.320/2016 NAND RAM & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Sunil Mittal, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Maldeep Sidhu and Mr. Dhruv Grover, Advocates. ..... Respondent versus SURAJ BHAN Through: + RSA No.321/2016 NAND RAM & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Sunil Mittal, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Maldeep Sidhu and Mr. Dhruv Grover, Advocates. KANWAL SINGH & ANR Through: versus ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. YES VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) RSA Nos. 320/2016 and 321/2016 Page 1 of 15 1. These Regular Second Appeals under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) are filed by the appellants/defendants in the suit impugning the Judgment of the First Appellate Court dated 25.4.2016 by which the first appellate court has allowed the first appeal by setting aside the Judgment of the Trial Court dated 29.1.2014 as regards...
Sonu vs.shakuntala
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-25-2016
$~4 * + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA4862016 SONU SHAKUNTALA Through : Mr. Jitender Kr. Dhingra, Advocate with appellant in person. ..... Appellant versus Through : Mr. R.K. Jain with Mr. Subhash Chander, Advocates with respondent in person. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % ORDER2510.2016 The appellant is aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 20.5.2016 passed in the suit for recovery of possession, damages, mesne profits and permanent injunction instituted against him by his mother in respect of the second floor of property No.20-B/78B, Tilak Nagar, New Delhi, measuring 33 sq. yards. Under the impugned and decree, the trial court has decreed the suit for possession against the appellant and further, directed him to pay the respondent, damages @ Rs.10,000/- p.m. w.e.f. 25.12.2014 till the date of handing over possession of the suit premises to her.2. Appearance is entered by learned counsel for the respondent, who states on instructions, tha...
Parag Parashar vs.university of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-25-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:25. 10.2016 $~86, 87,88,89 & 90 * % + W.P.(C) 7722/2016 & CM No.31887/2016 AKHIL KUMAR SAINI versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS. Advocates who appeared in the case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: + W.P.(C) 7723/2016 & CM No.31892/2016 PARAG PARASHAR Mr. Ashish Mohan, Adv. Mr. M.J.S. Rupal & Ms. Simranjeet, Adv. ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner Versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS. Advocates who appeared in the case: For the... Petitioner: For the... RESPONDENTS: Mr Tushar Rudra, Advocate. Mr M.J.S.Rupal & Ms.Simranjeet, Advocate ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 7866/2016 & CM No.32568/2016 SAGAR BATRA & ORS. ........ Petitioner Versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS. Advocates who appeared in the case: For the... Petitioner: For the... RESPONDENTS: Mr Bhaskar Subramanian, Advocate. Mr M.J.S.Rupal & Ms.Simranjeet, Advocate ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) Nos. 7722/2016 & connected matters Page 1 of 5 +...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »