Delhi Court October 2016 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2016 Page 3 of about 298 results (0.023 seconds)Fdc Limited vs.mr Anuj Pareek & Ors
Court: Delhi
$~42. * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 971/2016 Judgment dated27th October, 2016 FDC LIMITED Through : Ms. Shwetasree Majumdar with Mr. ..... Plaintiff Prithvi Singh, Advs. versus CORAM: MR ANUJ PAREEK & ORS Through: None ..... Defendants HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. The plaintiff has filed the present suit for permanent injunction restraining infringement of trademark, copyright in packaging, passing off, rendition of accounts, delivery up, damages, etc.2. Summons in the suit were issued on 09.09.2015, on which date an ad interim ex parte injunction was also granted in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendants. On the same date, two local commissioners were also appointed. The reports of the local commissioners are on record. Thereafter on 19.11.2015 and 15.02.2016, this court observed that all the defendants had been duly served and none appeared on their behalf, the defendants were proceeded ex parte. The plaintiff has also ...
Tag this Judgment!Gaurav Dhiman vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
$~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON : OCTOBER27 2016 CRL.M.C.4052/2016 & Crl.M.A.16939/2016 GAURAV DHIMAN Through : Mr.Rajiv Garg with Mr.Rajiv Kapoor, ........ Petitioner Advocates. versus STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG Through : Mr.M.S.Oberoi, APP. SI Vishvendra, PS Seemapuri. Mr.Saurabh Kr.Pandey, Advocate, for R-2. + S.P.GARG, J.(ORAL) 1. Present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred by the petitioner for quashing of FIR No.167/2015 under Section 376 IPC registered at Police Station Seemapuri.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the file.... Petitioners counsel urged that the matter has since been settled with the victim and Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) dated 23.02.2016 has been executed between them. It is further urged that earlier the petitioner had agreed to marry the victim. Subsequently, she changed Crl.M.C.4052/2016 Page 1 of 3 her mind and did not agree to the ...
Tag this Judgment!Ajay Gupta vs.commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Delhi
* + + + + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:02. 09.2016 Pronounced on:27. 10.2016 ITA3582015 ITA3592015 ITA5652015 ITA5662015 SMT. DAYAWANTI THROUGH SMT. SUNITA GUPTA (LEGAL HEIR) Appellant Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..Respondent ITA3602015 ITA3612015 AJAY GUPTA Versus Appellant COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..Respondent Through: Sh. Salil Kapoor, Ms. Ananya Kapoor, Sh. Sumit Lal Chandani and Sh. Sanat Kapoor, Advocates, for the appellants Sh. Dileep Shivpuri, Sr. Standing Counsel with Sh. Sanjay Kumar, Jr. Standing Counsel, for revenue, in ITA3572015, 358/2015, 359/2015, 565/2015 & 566/2015. Sh. Anup Kumar Kesari, for Sh. Rahul Chaudhary, Sr. Standing Counsel, for revenue in ITA3602015 & 361/2015. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA ITA3582015 & connected matters Page 1 MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % The appeals lack merit and are accordingly dismissed. For detailed decision, the judgment dated 27.10.2016 in ITA3572015...
Tag this Judgment!M/S. P E C Limited vs.m/s. Kandla Energy and Chemicals Ltd. & Anr.
Court: Delhi
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27th October, 2016 FAO(OS) No.95/2016 M/S. P E C LIMITED ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Dhruv Mehta, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Ms. Anupama Dhruve and Mr. Anubhav Ray, adocates. versus M/S. KANDLA ENERGY AND CHEMICALS LTD. & ANR. ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Akhil Sibal, Ms. Manmeet Kaur, Mr. Yashvardhan & Ms. Riya, Advocates for respondent No.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR JUDGMENT INDIRA BANERJEE , J (ORAL) 1. This appeal is against a judgment and order dated 5.10.2016 of the learned Single Bench disposing of an application filed by the appellant under Section 9 of the Arbitration and FAO(OS) No.95/2016 1 Conciliation Act, 1996, hereinafter referred to as the 1996 Act after vacating the earlier interim orders passed in the said application.2. The appellant, M/s.P.E.C. Limited, a Government of India enterprise filed an application under Section 9 of the 1996 Act seeking...
Tag this Judgment!Shahzad @ Imran vs.state (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :27. h OCTOBER, 2016 CRL.REV.P.697/2016 $~11 * + SHAHZAD @ IMRAN ........ Petitioner Through : Ms.Prabha Mishra, Proxy counsel for Mr.Biswajit Patra, Advocate. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Kamal K.Ghei, APP with SI R.S.Pandit, PS Preet Vihar. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.(Oral) CRL.M.A.No.16874/2016 (Exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CRL.REV.P.697/2016 & CRL.M.B. 1946/2016 1. Present revision petition has been preferred by the petitioner Shahzad @ Imran to impugn the judgment dated 17.08.2016 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Crl.A. 223/2016 whereby the judgment dated 02.05.2016 on conviction and order on sentence dated 06.05.2016 of learned ACMM were upheld. The petitioner was convicted by the Trial Court for Crl.Rev.P.697/2016 Page 1 of 3 committing offences punishable under Section 382 IPC and under Section 25 Ar...
Tag this Judgment!Smt. Daya Wanti Through Smt. Sunita Gupta (Legal Heir) vs.commissioner ...
Court: Delhi
* + + + + + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:02. 09.2016 Pronounced on:27. 10.2016 ITA3572015 ITA3582015 ITA3592015 ITA5652015 ITA5662015 SMT. DAYAWANTI THROUGH SMT. SUNITA GUPTA (LEGAL HEIR) Appellant Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..Respondent ITA3602015 ITA3612015 AJAY GUPTA Versus Appellant COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..Respondent Through: Sh. Salil Kapoor, Ms. Ananya Kapoor, Sh. Sumit Lal Chandani and Sh. Sanat Kapoor, Advocates, for the appellants Sh. Dileep Shivpuri, Sr. Standing Counsel with Sh. Sanjay Kumar, Jr. Standing Counsel, for revenue, in ITA3572015, 358/2015, 359/2015, 565/2015 & 566/2015. Sh. Anup Kumar Kesari, for Sh. Rahul Chaudhary, Sr. Standing Counsel, for revenue in ITA3602015 & 361/2015. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT ITA3572015 & connected matters Page 1 HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. These seven appeals by the assessee urge common questions, viz:1. Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribu...
Tag this Judgment!Imran Khan & Ors. Vs.oriental Insurance Company Ltd.
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:27th October, 2016 $~23 & 30 * % + MAC.APP. 945/2013 & CM306842016 ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. IMRAN KHAN & ORS. 30 + MAC.APP. 1055/2014 IMRAN KHAN & ORS. ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Tarkeshwar Nath, Mr.Onkar Nath, Mr. Saurabh Kumar Tuteja, Advocates Versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Kavita Agrawal, Mr. Ashok for Kumar Garg, Advocates respondent no.1. ..... Appellants Through: Ms.Kavita Agrawal, Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, Advocates versus Through: Mr.Tarkeshwar Nath, Mr.Onkar Nath, Mr. Saurabh Kumar Tuteja, Advocates ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Both the parties have challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.6,45,349/- has been awarded to Imran Khan. The accident dated 18th June, 2010 resulted in permanent 2. disability of 16% in respect of right lower limb to Imran Khan. The MAC. APP. Nos.945/2013 & 1055/2014 Page 1 of ...
Tag this Judgment!Bses Rajdhani Power Limited vs.sh. Chand Singh
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * + % RSA No.140/2013 BSES RAJDHANI POWER LIMITED26h October, 2016 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rajeev Mehra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Anupam Verma, Advocate, Mr. Nikhil Sharma, Advocate, Ms. Niti Arora, Advocate and Ms. Shruti Aggarwal, Advocate. versus ..... Respondent SH. CHAND SINGH CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA Through: None. To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the appellant/defendant no.1/Delhi Vidyut Board (now known as BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd.) impugning the concurrent Judgments of the courts below; of the Trial Court dated 3.2.2011 and the First Appellate Court dated 16.4.2013; by which the suit for mandatory injunction and permanent injunction as also for damages of Rs.2.50 lacs was decreed to the extent that the appellant/defendant no.1 was directed to remove the electricity transformer instal...
Tag this Judgment!Col M L Kaktikar (Retd.) and Anr vs.new Delhi Municipal Council and Or ...
Court: Delhi
$~33. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 10173/2016 and CM APPL.40211-40212/2016 COL M L KAKTIKAR (RETD.) AND ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Prosenjeet Banerjee, Advocate with Ms. Nidhi Parashar and Ms. Amrita Chandra, Adv. versus NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ORS........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anil Grover, Standing Counsel with Ms. Kanika Singh, ASC and Ms. Noopur Singhal, Advocate for R-1/NDMC. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % ORDER2610.2016 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners praying inter alia for issuing directions to the respondent No.1/NDMC to take appropriate action in respect of the alleged illegal construction/unauthorised structure raised by the respondents No.2 and 3 on the terrace above the second floor of premises No.25, Aradhana Enclave, R.K.Puram, New Delhi.2. Mr. Banerjee, learned counsel for the petitioners states that this is not the first time that the respondents No.2 and 3 have undertaken unauthorised constr...
Tag this Judgment!Union of India & Ors vs.ex-constable Dilip Kumar Jha
Court: Delhi
* + % UNION OF INDIA & ORS IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RSA No.6/2012 & C.M. Appl. 37924/2016 (for stay under Section 151 CPC) 26th October, 2016 ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC for UOI. versus EX-CONSTABLE DILIP KUMAR JHA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Khagesh B. Jha, Advocate for R-1. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. Appl. No.37925/2016 (for exemption) 1.2. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. C.M. Appl. No.37923/2016 and Review Petition No.466/2016 3. The Supreme Court in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.36219/2013 filed by the appellants against the Order of a learned Single Judge of this Court dated 19.3.2013 dismissing the Regular Second Appeal only records that appellants wanted to withdraw the SLP before the Supreme Court RSA No.6/2012 Page 1 of 5 because a review petition was sought to be filed before this Court again...
Tag this Judgment!