Delhi Court October 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Govt. of NCT of Delhi Vs. Rosmerta HSRP Ventures Private Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-07-2016
1. This is an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ( Act ) filed by the Appellant, Government of NCT of Delhi ( GNCTD ) against an interim order dated 21st May, 2016 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal ( AT ) in an application under Section 17 of the Act filed by the Respondent, Rosmerta HSRP Ventures Private Limited ( RHVPL ). 2. The background to the present appeal is that pursuant to the notification dated 28th March, 2001 issued by the GNCTD under Section 41 (6) of the Motor Vehicles Act 1988 ( MV Act ) read with Rule 50 of the Motor Vehicles Rules 1989, the Petitioner entered into a Concession Agreement ( CA ) with the Respondent for a term of 15 years on 25th April, 2012 for execution of the High Security Registration Plates ( HSRP ) project. According to the Appellant, several complaints were received by it regarding violations and irregularities committed by the Respondent in the execution of the HSRP project. On 10th March, 2014 a show cause notice...
The Financial Times Ltd. Vs.times Publishing House Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-07-2016
% + *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:7. h October, 2016 W.P.(C) No.2737/2012 THE FINANCIAL TIMES LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. P.S. Raman, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Aparajitha Vishwanath, Mr. Gaurav Mukherjee, Mr. J.V. Abhay, Mr. Raghav Pant, Mr. Avijit Deb, Ms. Ashima Obhan, Advs. Versus TIMES PUBLISHING HOUSE LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Hemant Singh, Mr. K. Datta, Mr. Shashi P. Ojha and Mr. Rahul Malhotra, Advs. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 For judgment see WP(C) No.2735/2012 titled The Financial Times Ltd. Vs. The Times Publishing House Ltd. OCTOBER7h, 2016 pp/bs/m.. RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J W.P.(C) No.27Page 1 of 1...
Sanjay Gupta & Anr vs.ratan Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-07-2016
$~7 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment dated 7th October, 2016 CS(OS) 1230/2013 SANJAY GUPTA & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through Ms. Ashu Arora, Advocate versus RATAN SINGH ..... Defendant Through Mr. Abhishek, Advocate for the defendant along with defendant Ratan Singh. Mr. TVSR Krishna Sastry, Advocate for appellant in OA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) I.A.12677/2016(refund of excess court fee) 1. This is an application filed by the plaintiff seeking refund of the excess court fee deposited. Prayer made in this application is not opposed. The application is accordingly allowed. Registry to process this application and in case excess court fee has been paid, the same shall be refunded to the plaintiff.2. The application stands disposed of. CS(OS) 1230/2013 3. Plaintiff has filed the present suit for specific performance of Agreement to Sell dated 08.02.1013 against the defendant with respect to land measuring 8 bigha 4 biswa comprising in ...
Healthfore Technologies Limited vs.oscar Investments Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-07-2016
$~71 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CO.APPL. (M) 147/2016 IN THE MATTER OF: HealthFore Technologies Limited ... Applicant Company no.1/Amalgamating Company WITH Oscar Investments Limited ... Applicant Company No.2/Amalgamated Company Through: Mr. Mahesh Agarwal and Mr. Rajeev Kumar, Advocates CORAM: HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL ORDER0710.2016 1. The present is an application for first motion, filed jointly, under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) in connection with the Scheme of Amalgamation (hereinafter referred to as Scheme) between HealthFore Technologies Limited (hereinafter referred to as Amalgamating Company/Applicant Company No.1) with Oscar Investments CO.APPL.(M) 147/2016 Page 1 of 7 Limited (hereinafter referred to as Amalgamated Company/Applicant Company No.2) and their respective Shareholders and Creditors.2. The Amalgamating Company and Amalgamated Company are hereinafter jointly referred to as Applicant ...
Gmu Infosoft Private Limited vs.gm Solutions Private Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-07-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI COMPANY APPLICATION (M) No.143 OF2016In the matter of The Companies Act, 1956 and The Companies Act, 2013 (to the extent applicable): AND Application under Rule 6 & 9 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 read with Section 391 to 394 and Section 100 to 103 of the Companies Act, 1956 Scheme of Amalgamation between: GMU Infosoft Private Limited AND U Infosoft Private Limited AND GM Solutions Private Limited CO.(M) 143/2016 ...Applicant Company No.1/ Amalgamating Company No.1 Applicant Company No.2/ Amalgamating Company No.2 Applicant Company No.3/ Amalgamated Company Page 1 of 7 Through: Mr.Kunal Tandon, Advocate with Ms. Snigdha Sharma and Mr. Shashank Shekhar Advocate the Applicant Companies. for CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL1 ORDER0710.2016 The present first motion application under Sections 391 to 394 and Section 100 to 103 of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) read with Rules 6 & 9 of the Companies (Court...
Hakikat Rai vs.d.d.A.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-07-2016
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 952/2015 & CM Appl. 1681/2015 HAKIKAT RAI Through: Ms. Tasneem Ahmadi with Ms. Shubhi Khare, Advs. ........ Petitioner D.D.A. % versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Dhanesh Relan with Mr. Harshit, Advs. Date of Decision:07. h October, 2016 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. The present writ petition has been filed with the following prayers:-"It is therefore most humbly prayed that this Honble Court may be pleased to:-"(a)Grant a Writ of Mandamus or any other Writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the... RESPONDENTS, their servants, agents and assigns not the boundary walls of the... Petitioner on Khasra Nos. 215 min & 216 min of Village Hauz Rani New Delhi. (b)Issue of Writ of Mandamus or any other Writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the... RESPONDENTS not to dispossess the Petitioenr from Khasra Nos. 215 min and 216 min of Village Hauz Rani New Delhi. to demolish W.P.(C) No.952/2015 Page 1...
Bygging India Ltd. Vs.lanco Infratech Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-07-2016
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ARB.P. 479/2016 BYGGING INDIA LTD. ........ Petitioner Through : Mr S.K. Maniktala and Mr Swetab Kumar, Advocates. Versus ..... Respondent Through : Mr Deepak Khurana and Ms Aditi Sharma, Advocates. LANCO INFRATECH LTD. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER0710.2016 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter 'the Act') praying that an arbitrator be appointed for adjudicating the disputes that have arisen between the parties in relation to the Settlement Agreement (hereafter 'the Agreement') dated 19.02.2014 entered into between the parties.2. Clause 6 and 7 of the Agreement are relevant and are set out below:-""6. Any dispute or claim arising out of this Agreement shall be referred to a sole arbitrator and the arbitration will be conducted under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The venue of Arbitration shall be Delhi and the ...
Munniappa vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-07-2016
$~ *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. No.747/2016 and Crl.M.(Bail)No.1472/2016 % Reserved on :3. d October, 2016 Date of decision :7. h October, 2016 MUNNIAPPA STATE Through: Mr. Gurvinder Singh, Adv. ..... Appellant versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Varun Goswami, APP for the State with SI Mukesh Kumar from PS Bindapur. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S. TEJI JUDGMENT GITA MITTAL, J.1. The instant appeal assails the judgment dated 30th of May 2016 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge in SC No.80/2015 arising out of FIR No.3registered by P.S. Bindapur under Sections 3IPC holding the appellant guilty of commission of offences punishable under Sections 3IPC with which he was charged. The appellant also assails the order on sentence dated 31st of May 2016 whereby he was sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and fine of `15,000/-, in default of which he was directed to undergo simple imprisonment for four Crl.A.No.747/2016 Page...
Shri Chandeep Singh Bhatia vs.shri Dinesh Sehgal & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-07-2016
$~36. * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 2745/2015 Judgment Dated 7th October, 2016 SHRI CHANDEEP SINGH BHATIA ..... Plaintiff Through : Mr.Sandeep P. Agarwal and Mr.Rajesh Pathak, Advs. versus SHRI DINESH SEHGAL & ORS ..... Defendants Through : Mr.Kumar Dushyant Singh and Mr.Siddharth Dutta, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) I.A. 7904/2016 1. This is an application filed by the defendants under Order XXXVII Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking unconditional leave to defend.2. Plaintiff has filed the present suit under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure for recovery of Rs.2,42,58,812/- together with pendente lite and future interest at the rate of 1.5%, per annum. As per the plaintiff, present suit is based on a written Purchase Agreement dated 16.7.2014.3. Facts of this case, as stated in the plaint, are that the plaintiff and defendants are known to each other for many years and in fact defendant no.1 remained as a ...
Times Publishing House Ltd. Vs.the Financial Times Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-07-2016
% + *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:7. h October, 2016 W.P.(C) No.2745/2012 TIMES PUBLISHING HOUSE LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Hemant Singh, Mr. K. Datta, Mr. Shashi P. Ojha and Mr. Rahul Malhotra, Advs. Versus THE FINANCIAL TIMES LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. P.S. Raman, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Aparajitha Vishwanath, Mr. Gaurav Mukherjee, Mr. J.V. Abhay, Mr. Raghav Pant, Mr. Avijit Deb, Ms. Ashima Obhan, Advs. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 For judgment see WP(C) No.2735/2012 titled The Financial Times Ltd. Vs. The Times Publishing House Ltd. OCTOBER7h, 2016 pp/bs/m.. RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J W.P.(C) No 27Page 1 of 1...
- ‹ Prev
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 28
- 29
- 30
- Next ›
- Last »