Delhi Court October 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Amit Yadav vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-18-2016
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: August 22, 2016 Judgment Delivered on: October18, 2016 + CRL.A.128/2016 & Crl. M.A. No.2039/2016 MOHIT PAUL STATE Represented by: Mr. Subodh Kumar Pathak, Mr. ..... Appellant Sanjay Kumar and Mr. Rohit Agarwal, Advocates. versus Represented by: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP with ..... Respondent Insp. Asha Sinha CAW Cell Nanakpura. + CRL.A.1179/2015 SHARAD KUMAR @ MONTY ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. V.K. Khurana, Advocate. versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP with Insp. Asha Sinha CAW Cell Nanakpura. + CRL.A.64/2016 AMIT YADAV STATE Represented by: Mr. Krishan Kumar, Ms. Sunita ..... Appellant Arora, Advocates versus Represented by: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP with ..... Respondent Insp. Asha Sinha CAW Cell Nanakpura. Crl.A.Nos. 128/2016, 1179/2015 & 64/2016 Page 1 of 8 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. Vide the impugned judgment dated September 11, ...
United India Insurance Company Limited vs.subhadra@deepa & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-18-2016
$~17 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:18th October, 2016 MAC.APP. 640/2016 & CM No.29816/2016 (Stay) UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED Through: Mr. Amit Kumar Advocate .... Appellant Singh, Versus SUBHADRA@DEEPA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. R.P.S. Bhatti and Mr. S.S. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA Rathi, Advocates JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant has challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.23,15,600/- has been awarded to claimants/respondents No.1 to 4. The accident dated 3rd February 2013 resulted in the death of 2. Pappu Kumar. The deceased was aged 41 years at the time of the accident and was working as a driver on contract basis earning Rs.12,000/- per month. The deceased was survived by his wife and three minor children, who filed the claims petition before the Claims Tribunal. The Claims Tribunal added 30% towards future prospects of the deceased, deducted 1/4th towards personal expenses and appli...
Agarwal Refrigeration Private Limited (In Vol. Liqn.) Vs.-
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-18-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:18. 10.2016 CO.PET. 549/2016 AGARWAL REFRIGERATION PRIVATE LIMITED (IN VOL. LIQN.) Through: Mr. Mayank Goel, Advocate on behalf of the Official Liquidator. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.1. The present is a petition under section 497(6) of the Companies Act, 1956, by the Official Liquidator, seeking voluntary winding up of Agarwal Refrigeration Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as petitioner company).2. The petitioner company has passed a special resolution in its Extraordinary General Meeting held on 12.03.2015, for voluntary winding up of the petitioner company, whereby, Ms. Rakhi Bhattacharya was appointed as the Voluntary Liquidator of the petitioner company.3. The Registrar of Companies was informed regarding the voluntary winding up and the appointment of the Voluntary Liquidator. Notices under CO.PET. 549/2016 Page 1 of 3 Rule 315 of the Company (Court) Rules, 1959 were...
Sunil Dahiya vs.state (Govt of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-18-2016
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:05. 08.2016 Judgment delivered on:18. 10.2016 BAIL APPLNS. 1212/2016, 1221/2016 and 1222/2016 SUNIL DAHIYA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Arvind Nigam, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Raghu Tandon, Advocate. versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel with Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for State. Mr. A.K Singla, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Bharat Gupta & Varun Tyagi, Advs. complainants/ in Crl. M.A. Nos. applicants 10388/2016, and 10392/2016. 10390/2016 for the CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI VIPIN SANGHI, J.JUDGMENT1 The Applicant herein, Mr. Sunil Dahiya has filed three applications for regular bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter "CrPC") pertaining to the respective FIRS, wherein he is one of BAIL APPLNS. 1212/2016, 1221/2016 and 1222/2016 Page 1 of 31 the accused. The allegations in all three FIRS are of the same nature and all three applications hav...
Kanwar Bhan vs.state & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-18-2016
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on : October 18, 2016 CRL.M.C. 3105/2016 KANWAR BHAN Through: Mr.Kunal Manav, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus STATE & ORS. Through: Mr.G.M. Farooqui, Additional Public ..... Respondent Prosecutor for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI JUDGMENT P.S.TEJI, J.By this petition filed under Section 482 of Cr. P.C.1. the petitioner is seeking quashing of order dated 07.05.2016 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge vide which the Criminal Revision No.09 of 2016 preferred by the petitioner was dismissed. The said revision petition was filed by the petitioner for setting aside the order dated 05.02.2016 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate whereby the learned Metropolitan Magistrate had rejected the application under Section 156(3) of Cr. P.C. and declined to take cognizance of the offence of forgery against the respondent Nos.2 to 5 herein. Crl. M.C.No.3105/2016 Page 1 of 9 2. The gist of the facts ...
Mohit Paul vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-18-2016
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: August 22, 2016 Judgment Delivered on: October18, 2016 + CRL.A.128/2016 & Crl. M.A. No.2039/2016 MOHIT PAUL STATE Represented by: Mr. Subodh Kumar Pathak, Mr. ..... Appellant Sanjay Kumar and Mr. Rohit Agarwal, Advocates. versus Represented by: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP with ..... Respondent Insp. Asha Sinha CAW Cell Nanakpura. + CRL.A.1179/2015 SHARAD KUMAR @ MONTY ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. V.K. Khurana, Advocate. versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP with Insp. Asha Sinha CAW Cell Nanakpura. + CRL.A.64/2016 AMIT YADAV STATE Represented by: Mr. Krishan Kumar, Ms. Sunita ..... Appellant Arora, Advocates versus Represented by: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP with ..... Respondent Insp. Asha Sinha CAW Cell Nanakpura. Crl.A.Nos. 128/2016, 1179/2015 & 64/2016 Page 1 of 8 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. Vide the impugned judgment dated September 11, ...
All India Kabadi Mazdoor Mahasangh vs.new Delhi Municipal Council and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-18-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~21 * + W.P.(C) 7210/2016 & CMs No.29691/2016 and CM No.35854/2016 ALL INDIA KABADI MAZDOOR MAHASANGH........ Petitioner Through : Ms. Amisy Shukla with Mr. Shakti Vardhan, Advocate versus NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ORS........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Sanjay Jain, ASC with Ms. Rhia Verma and Ms. Bani Dixit, Advocates for R-1/NDMC Mr. Shatrajit Banerji, proxy counsel for Mr. Gautam Narayan, ASC for R-2. Ms. Monika Arora, CGSC with Mr. Kushal Kumar, Advocate for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % ORDER1810.2016 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner/Trust praying inter alia for directions to the respondent No.1/New Delhi Municipal Council, the respondent No.2/Govt. of NCT of Delhi and respondent No.3/UOI for proposing a Scheme in terms of the Solid Waste Management Rules, 2016 (in short the Rules) (Annexure P-3). Further, directions have been prayed for to the respondents restraining them from demolishing the gar...
Manoj Khurana vs.gurudwara Sri Guru Singh Sabha
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-18-2016
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: October 18, 2016 CM(M) 1121/2015 and CM Nos. 26887/2015 & 158/2016 MANOJ KHURANA ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Rajiv Bakshi and Mr. Ayush Chaurasia, Advocates. versus GURUDWARA SRI GURU SINGH SABHA ..... Respondent Through Mr. J.K.Chawla, Mr.Vinay Chadda and Mr.T.P.Ravi, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. This petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to impugn the order of eviction confirmed by the Rent Control Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as RCT) dated 12.10.2015 under section 22 of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as The DRC Act).2. The brief facts which led to filing of the eviction petition under section 22 of the Act are that the respondent is said to be running a Homeopathic dispensary for the general public without any distinction on the basis of any caste, creed or religion. It is averred in the Eviction Petit...
smt.gurmeet Kaur Lr. Of Late Shri Sarwan Singh vs.shri Harbhajan Singh ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-18-2016
* + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RSA No.155/2016 18th October, 2016 SMT.GURMEET KAUR LR. OF LATE SHRI SARWAN SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rakesh Dahiya and Brig. M.C. Khatter, Advocates. versus SHRI HARBHAJAN SINGH & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. D.D. Joshi, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. YES VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. On the last date of hearing, i.e on 6.9.2016, it was argued on behalf of the appellant that the First Appellate Court has passed the impugned Judgment on 29.1.2016 on merits but in the absence of appearance on behalf of the appellant. Reliance was placed on Order XLI Rule 17(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) which states that if an appeal is called on a date fixed for hearing, when the appellant does not appear, then the appeal cannot be decided on merits, and the appeal can only be dismissed in default. RSA No.155/2016 Page 1 of 5 2. By the last Order passed on ...
Jasdeep Kaur Chadha vs.state & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-18-2016
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on : October 18, 2016 CRL.M.C. 3102/2016 & Crl.M.A. 13324/2016 (Stay) JASDEEP KAUR CHADHA ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Sanjay Abbot and Mr.Tanmaya Mehta, Advs. versus STATE & ORS. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Chadha, Additional Public the State with Inspector Prosecutor Satyawan, Crime Branch. for CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.JUDGMENT1 By this petition filed under Section 482 and 483 of Cr. P.C. the petitioner seeks to challenge the order dated 04.08.2016 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge (South) Saket, Delhi in SC No.44/2016. In brief, a case registered under Section 147/148/302/307/325/ 2. 365/368/395/397449/450/452/342/201/412/120-B/34 IPC and Sections 25/27/of the Arms Act was registered vide FIR No.the instance of the 497/2012 Police Station Mehrauli, Delhi, at of Crl. M.C.No.3102/2016 Page 1 of 9 complainant Nand Lal, who was the driver of the deceased Hardeep Singh Chadha.... Pet...
- ‹ Prev
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- Next ›
- Last »